A Comparative Histomorphometric Analysis of Two Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical, Crossover, and Split-Mouth Study

<div>40x magnification of the histopathological graft 1 biomaterial on the left and graft 2 on the right. <i>Note.</i> The greater amount of neoformed bone tissue (arrow) with the use of graft 1 when compared to graft 2 (hematoxylin-eosin staining). Legend: percentage of vital mineralized tissue (VMT) and nonvital mineralized tissues (NVMTs), medullary spaces (MS), and connective tissue in graft 1 (left) and graft 2 (right) biomaterials.</div>

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: A Comparative Histomorphometric Analysis of Two Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical, Crossover, and Split-Mouth Study 

Figure 3 | A Comparative Histomorphometric Analysis of Two Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical, Crossover, and Split-Mouth Study 