Research Article

[Retracted] The Clinical Efficacy of Cedilanid and Isosorbide Dinitrate plus Pericardial Dissection for Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis in the Elderly and Its Influence on Plasma Endothelin, Atrial Natriuretic Peptide, and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index

Figure 5

Comparison of HAD scores among the three groups ( ¯x ± s) Note: the abscissa denotes before and after the intervention, and the ordinate denotes the HAD score, in points. The HAD scores of patients in control group A before and after intervention were (35.88 ± 3.22) and (13.29 ± 2.53), respectively. The HAD scores of patients in control group B before and after intervention were (35.81 ± 3.25) and (7.56 ± 1.49) points, respectively. The HAD scores of patients in the combination group before and after the intervention were (35.79 ± 3.34) and (4.67 ± 1.01), respectively. A significant difference in HAD scores between control group A and control group B after the intervention (t = 58.901, ). A significant difference in HAD scores between the control B group and the combination group after the intervention (t = 37.005, ); A significant difference in HAD scores between the control A group and the combination group after the intervention (t = 18.968, ).