Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2022 / Article
Special Issue

The Role and Mechanism of Electroacupuncture for Neurological Diseases 2021

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 |Article ID 7710374 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7710374

Yan Zhao, Beibei Liu, Chunxiu Wang, Shaochen Guan, Chunxiao Liu, Yanlei Zhang, Chengbei Hou, Xiaowei Song, Zhongying Zhang, Xiaoguang Wu, Huihui Li, Xiang Gu, Shimin Hu, Jian Wu, Xianghua Fang, "Prevalence and Risk Factors Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Intracranial Arterial Stenosis", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2022, Article ID 7710374, 8 pages, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7710374

Prevalence and Risk Factors Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Intracranial Arterial Stenosis

Academic Editor: Feng Zhang
Received31 Jul 2021
Accepted02 Dec 2021
Published10 Jan 2022

Abstract

The prevalence and risk factors of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) located in the anterior circulation (AC) and posterior circulation (PC) has been scarcely noted in the general population. We aimed to determine ICAS prevalence and risk factor profile of AC and PC in a representative population. Data were from the China Hypertension Survey of Beijing. In total, 4800 people aged 35 years or older were enrolled in this subsurvey for ICAS, and 3954 participants were eligible for analysis. ICAS was assessed by transcranial Doppler. The prevalence of ICAS in AC was much greater than that in PC (11.9% vs. 4.2%), and subjects with ICAS in PC were 3.9 years older than those with ICAS in AC. Multivariable logistics regression showed that the odds of hypertension and diabetes increased by 79% (OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.40–2.27) and 35% (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.04–1.75) in those with AC vascular lesions and by 3.35 times (OR: 3.35, 95% CI: 2.49–4.50) and 71% (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.19–2.46) in those with PC vascular lesions compared with those without vascular lesions. Most modifiable vascular risk factors for ICAS appeared to exert similar magnitudes of risk for PC to AC lesions.

1. Introduction

The incidence of stroke in China has increased over the last decades [1], and the rise has mainly been attributed to ischemic stroke, with an annual growth rate of 8.7% [2]. Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a predominant cause for ischemic stroke, particularly for the Asian population. The percentage of ICAS ranged from 37% to 46.6% in ischemic stroke patients from China [37] and 30% in patients from Korea [37], which is higher than that of western countries of ICAS (8%–27%) [810]. Previous studies confirmed the disparity in ICAS prevalence by race/region [1115], but the epidemiological characteristics of ICAS located in anterior circulation (AC) and posterior circulation (PC) has been scarcely noted. In addition, the ICAS of AC and PC shared risk factors; for example, hypertension and diabetes are both the risk factors of ICAS [16, 17]. Different magnitudes of atherosclerotic lesion’s risk for AC compared with PC were less reported in general population. These emerging risk factors associated with the presence of ICAS according to the anatomic location of intracranial artery (i.e., AC and PC as well as per-vessel) are not yet clarified.

Expanding our understanding of ICAS prevalence by the anatomic location of intracranial artery and the association between risk factors and ICAS by location will afford insight in the pathogenesis of ICAS. This would provide potential implications for precise ICAS prevention. We therefore aimed to fill this knowledge gap by conducting a study to determine ICAS prevalence of AC and PC in a representative population. We were also interested in determining if the profiles of risk factor differed by atherosclerotic location.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Survey Participants

Data was used from the Beijing subgroup of the China Hypertension Survey (CHS), a nation-wide survey performed during the period of 2012–2015. The study design and major findings of the survey had been published elsewhere [18, 19]. Briefly, a stratified multistage multicentered national cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate the prevalence of hypertension in subjects over 15 years old from 31 metropolises/provinces in China. For this substudy, all selected urban and rural areas of 31 metropolises/provinces were stratified into eastern, middle and western regions again according to both geographical locations and economic level. Sixty cities and seventy counties were selected by using the simple random sampling (SRS) method. Beijing was one of the selected cities, and three districts and one county were randomly selected for the survey. Next, three communities or villages were further randomly selected. Only residents with certificated documents from the Administration of Households of the local government were enrolled to exclude immigration effects. According to the protocol of CHS, 4000 residents aged more than 35 years were the designed sample size. Taking nonresponse into account, an additional 20% sample was added, and thus, the final sample size was 4800 participants. All participants were invited to complete a standard questionnaire, blood biochemical testing, and cerebral vascular evaluation by carotid ultrasound and transcranial Doppler (TCD) as a secondary analysis for atherosclerosis. A total of 3954 participants completed the questionnaire and underwent the TCD vascular evaluation with a response rate of 82.4%; thus, they were included in this analysis. The participant screening flowchart was presented in Figure S1. The characteristics between participants included and not included in the analyses are listed in Table S1.

The protocol of this study’s design was approved by the ethics committee of the Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University ([2014]-016) and Fuwai Hospital (2012-402). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment.

2.2. Training and Data Collection

A standardized questionnaire developed by Fuwai Hospital, the coordination center of this nation-wide survey, was administrated by a trained staff to collect information about demographic characteristics, lifestyle, risk factors, and history of coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia [19]. The histories of coronary heart disease and stroke were self-reported and verified by cardiologists or neurologists, respectively. Blood pressure and body weight and height were measured with a standard procedure, and details were described elsewhere [1820]. After the interview, participants were invited to take laboratory measurements. Blood samples were taken and sent to the National Center for Cardiovascular Disease of Fuwai Hospital for analysis according to predefined protocols to ensure the accuracy and controllability of the results [20].To ensure the quality of survey, all of the investigators received standard training before participation, including the TCD operators. All physical examinations and laboratory testing were conducted strictly as the protocol required.

2.3. Assessment of Intracranial Artery Stenosis

TCD was performed by two independent vascular ultrasound practitioners with more than five years of experience using portable machines. All procedures were carried out as the standard protocol required, and each vessel in the intracranial artery was detected, including the bilateral anterior cerebral artery (ACA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), posterior cerebral artery (PCA), terminal of internal carotid artery (ICA), vertebral artery (VA), and basilar artery (BA). The diagnoses of ICAS referred to Wong’s criteria based on peak systolic flow velocity (Vp) [21]. The cutoff value of Vp for ICAS diagnosis was 140 cm/s in the MCA, 120 cm/s in the ACA and internal carotid siphon, and 100 cm/s in the PCA and vertebra-basilar artery. Additional criteria of stenosis in the MCA were as follows: Vp ranged from 140 to 160 cm/s, together with disturbance in echo frequency and turbulence, or Vp reduction by ≥30% compared with the contralateral depth-corresponding homologous segment. Intracranial artery occlusion is considered when low velocity and low resistance discontinuous flow signals are detected along the main intracranial artery. The primary TCD criteria at each site of occlusion was defined as one of four types, such as dampened signal, blunted signal, minimal signal, and absent signal [22]. Apart from the velocity criteria, the subjects’ age was also considered. In the absence of good temporal windows, intracranial blood flow signals were detected via orbital window [21]. Any cerebral arteries that could not be detected via both temporal and orbital window were considered nonstenosis due to the failed detection of blood follow by both the temporal and orbital windows. The operators and reviewers of the TCD studies were blind to the clinical information.

2.4. Definition of Vascular Risk Factors

Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg or having antihypertension therapy. Diabetes was defined as having a previous history of diabetes or on insulin or oral hypoglycemic medication, or having a fast blood glucose over 7 mmol/L. Hyperlipidemia was defined as total cholesterol ≥6.1 mmol/L or triglyceride ≥2.26 mmol/L or high density lipoprotein cholesterol, <0.9 mmol/L in males and <1.0 mmol/L in female, or under lipid-lowering medication. Smoking was defined as those who were either ex-smokers or current smokers. Body mass index (BMI) was classified as underweight (<18.5), normal (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2), and obese (>30.0 kg/m2) [18]. Hyperuricaemia was defined as a serum uric acid level ≥416 μmol/L for male and ≥357 μmol/L for female. Hyperhomocysteinemia was defined as serum homocysteine ≥15 umol/L, and urine microalbuminuria (UMA) was defined as urine microalbumin ≥20 mg/L.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The CHS was designed to provide accurate estimates for the prevalence of cardiovascular disease and risk factors in the general Chinese population as well as for each selected metropolis/province by sampling weights calculated based on different population census data and sampling scheme and including oversampling for old age and nonresponses. In the current study, we estimated prevalence by age and gender based on the 2010 Beijing municipal population census. Therefore, we could provide prevalent estimates referable to the overall Beijing population. The age- and gender-specific weight-adjusted sample was acquired to estimate the prevalence of ICAS. The association of risk factors with the presence of ICAS was analyzed by ANOVA, student’s t-test, and chi-squared test. To identify the potential risk factors independently associated with the presence of ICAS, multivariate logistic regression models were allied. Odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were also estimated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

3. Results

The results of Table 1 showed that the overall weighted prevalence of ICAS was 14.6% (95%CI: 13.5–15.8). The prevalence of ICAS was much lower in population free of stroke than that with a history of stroke (13.8% vs. 32.9%). The prevalence of males was similar to females (14.9% vs. 14.4%), but the increased magnitude across age groups was different by gender (Figure 1(a)), and the increased patterns were similar for population with and without history of stroke (Figures 1(b) and 1(c)).


AgePrevalence and 95% CI of anterior circulationPrevalence and 95% CI of posterior circulation
TotalSubtotalACAMCASubtotalPCAVABA

Population free of stroke
35∼8.6 (6.9∼10.3)6.9 (5.3∼8.4)5.4 (4.0∼6.9)3.3 (2.2∼4.4)2.4 (1.4∼3.4)0.2 (0.0∼0.5)2.2 (1.3∼3.1)
45∼10.9 (8.9∼12.9)10.0 (8.1∼11.9)7.2 (5.5∼8.9)5.7 (4.2∼7.2)1.6 (0.8∼2.5)0.2 (0.0∼0.6)0.9 (0.3∼1.6)0.6 (0.1∼1.1)
55∼16.8 (14.3∼19.3)15.5 (13.1∼17.9)10.2 (8.1∼12.3)10.7 (8.5∼12.8)4.9 (3.4∼6.4)1.9 (0.9∼2.8)2.9 (1.7∼4.1)0.7 (0.1∼1.3)
65∼22.8 (18.7∼27.0)19.1 (15.2∼23.1)12.4 (8.9∼15.9)13.1 (9.6∼16.7)10.1 (6.9∼13.3)2.3 (0.6∼3.9)7.9 (5.0∼10.8)2.9 (1.0∼4.7)
75∼23.1 (17.3∼29.0)18.2 (12.7∼23.7)10.5 (5.9∼15.1)13.6 (8.5∼18.6)12.1 (7.2∼16.9)2.5 (0.1∼5.0)9.5 (5.1∼13.9)3.2 (0.4∼5.9)
Total13.8 (12.6∼14.9)11.9 (10.8∼13.0)8.2 (7.2∼9.1)7.5 (6.6∼8.4)4.2 (3.5∼4.9)1.0 (0.6∼1.3)3.0 (2.4∼3.6)0.8 (0.5∼1.1)
for trend<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001

Population with history of stroke
35∼
45∼
55∼32.7 (19.5∼45.8)31.3 (18.1∼44.4)25.0 (12.2∼37.8)19.5 (7.4∼31.6)21.4 (9.0∼33.8)13.2 (2.4∼23.9)17.5 (5.7∼29.3)5.7 (0.0∼13.4)
65∼32.3 (20.9∼43.7)25.4 (14.3∼36.5)17.0 (6.9∼27.1)18.5 (8.2∼28.9)22.8 (11.9∼33.7)10.2 (1.7∼18.7)17.0 (6.9∼27.1)8.3 (0.5∼16.2)
75∼38.1 (23.4∼52.8)27.8 (13.1∼42.4)21.2 (7.3∼35.2)21.2 (7.3∼35.2)29.7 (15.0∼44.5)7.1 (0.0∼16.7)25.7 (11.2∼40.2)10.3 (0.0∼21.4)
Total32.9 (25.7∼40.2)27.0 (19.9∼34.2)20.0 (13.3∼26.7)18.8 (12.2∼25.4)23.4 (16.4∼30.4)10.0 (4.6∼15.4)18.8 (12.2∼25.4)7.7 (2.9∼12.5)
for trend<0.00010.1980.9590.7290.1890.7150.2030.137

Overall population
35∼8.6 (6.9∼10.3)6.9 (5.3∼8.4)5.4 (4.0∼6.9)3.3 (2.2∼4.4)2.4 (1.4∼3.4)0.2 (−0.1∼0.5)2.2 (1.3∼3.1)
45∼10.9 (8.9∼12.8)9.9 (8.0∼11.8)7.2 (5.5∼8.9)5.6 (4.1∼7.1)1.6 (0.8∼2.5)0.2 (−0.1∼0.6)0.9 (0.3∼1.6)0.6 (0.1∼1.1)
55∼17.6 (15.2∼20.1)16.2 (13.8∼18.6)10.9 (8.8∼13.0)11.1 (9.0∼13.2)5.7 (4.2∼7.3)2.4 (1.3∼3.5)3.6 (2.3∼4.9)0.9 (0.2∼1.6)
65∼24.2 (20.3∼28.1)20.0 (16.2∼23.7)12.8 (9.5∼16.0)13.6 (10.3∼16.9)11.9 (8.7∼15.1)3.3 (1.5∼5.1)8.7 (5.9∼11.5)3.5 (1.6∼5.4)
75∼25.7 (20.2∼31.2)19.7 (14.5∼25.0)12.0 (7.6∼16.4)14.1 (9.4∼18.8)15.2 (10.3∼20.0)3.2 (0.7∼5.7)11.6 (7.2∼16.0)4.2 (1.3∼7.0)
Total14.6 (13.5∼15.8)12.5 (11.5∼13.6)8.6 (7.7∼9.5)7.9 (7.0∼8.8)5.0 (4.3∼5.8)1.3 (0.9∼1.7)3.6 (3.0∼4.2)1.1 (0.7∼1.4)
for trend<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001

Table 1 also demonstrates that the ICAS prevalence in AC was much higher than that in PC (11.9% vs. 4.2%). The vascular lesions in PC increased faster than in AC with advanced age, and this rapid increase was attributed mainly to VA lesions.

A total of 987 arteries were detected to have atherosclerotic lesions (892 stenosis and 45 occlusions) among 752 individuals with vascular lesions. The individuals with 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 or more artery lesions were 302, 122, 46, 44, and 14, respectively.

Risk factors related to ICAS were the highest in the subjects with both ICAS and history of stroke (Table S2). The average age for individuals without ICAS was 61.4 ± 12.8 years old, followed by those with ICAS of AC (66.0 ± 11.2), and those with ICAS in PC had the highest age (69.8 ± 8.8). The frequency and multivariable analyses in the population free of stroke were showed in Tables S3 and 2. The odds of hypertension and diabetes increased by 79% (OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.40–2.27) and by 30% (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.04–1.75) in those with AC lesions and by 3.35 times (OR: 3.35, 95% CI: 2.49–4.50) and 71% (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.19–2.46) in those with PC lesions compared with that without ICAS. The odds of overweight or obese were reduced in those with either AC or PC lesions. In addition, the population with PC lesions was more likely to have diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hi-CRP). Most OR values in PC lesions were greater than those in AC lesion, but all of 95% CIs were overlapped, except age.


Risk factorsAnterior circulationPosterior circulation
Crude OR and 95% CIFully adjusted OR and 95% CICrude OR and 95% CIFully adjusted OR and 95% CI

Age (<65 vs. ≥65 years old)1.79 (1.48∼2.17)1.18 (0.93∼1.47)3.37 (2.46∼4.61)2.16 (1.48∼3.15)
Gender (male vs. female)0.89 (0.73∼1.07)0.88 (0.66∼1.17)1.07 (0.80∼1.43)1.04 (0.68∼1.61)
Hypertension (no vs. yes)1.99 (1.65∼2.41)1.79 (1.40∼2.27)3.35 (2.49∼4.50)2.54 (1.76∼3.69)
Diabetes (no vs. yes)1.76 (1.42∼2.17)1.35 (1.04∼1.75)2.42 (1.80∼3.25)1.71 (1.19∼2.46)
Hyperlipidemia (no vs. yes)1.12 (0.93∼1.36)1.05 (0.83∼1.32)1.52 (1.13∼2.04)1.49 (1.04∼2.16)
History of CAD (no vs. yes)2.00 (1.32∼3.01)1.23 (0.71∼2.12)3.72 (2.30∼6.00)1.86 (0.97∼3.56)
Smoking status
NeverReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
Current smoker1.06 (0.84∼1.34)1.00 (0.71∼1.39)0.97 (0.68∼1.39)1.25 (0.75∼2.08)
Ex-smoker1.38 (1.02∼1.88)1.22 (0.81∼1.83)1.19 (0.74∼1.91)1.02 (0.54∼1.92)
Normal weightReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
Underweight0.83 (0.35∼1.97)1.19 (0.45∼3.13)0.61 (0.15∼2.57)0.96 (0.22∼4.20)
Overweight1.01 (0.83∼1.23)0.93 (0.73∼1.18)0.82 (0.61∼1.11)0.61 (0.42∼0.88)
Obese0.87 (0.63∼1.20)0.61 (0.40∼0.92)0.69 (0.42∼1.15)0.33 (0.17∼0.65)
Hyperuricaemia (no vs. yes)1.31 (1.02∼1.68)1.17 (0.87∼1.58)1.65 (1.17∼2.33)1.07 (0.69∼1.67)
Hyperhomocysteinemia (no vs. yes)0.99 (0.80∼1.22)0.94 (0.74∼1.18)1.04 (0.76∼1.44)0.94 (0.66∼1.34)
hi-CRP(mg/dl)
1st tertile (≤0.70)ReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
2nd tertile (0.71–1.80)0.77 (0.61∼0.98)1.02 (0.77∼1.35)0.84 (0.58∼1.20)1.07 (0.68∼1.67)
3rd tertile (>1.80)0.98 (0.78∼1.22)1.27 (0.97∼1.67)1.37 (1.00∼1.89)1.69 (1.12∼2.56)
UMA (no vs. yes)1.21 (0.99∼1.47)1.27 (0.97∼1.67)1.59 (1.19∼2.12)1.23 (0.87∼1.75)

Population with neither ICAS nor stroke was the reference group, and the frequencies of risk factors are listed in Supplementary Table S3.

The frequency and multivariable analyses in subjects with a history of stroke showed that males were more likely to have lesions in AC, and diabetes was significantly associated with lesions of PC (Tables S4 and S5).

Per-vessel risk factor analysis for subjects without and with a history of stroke is listed in Table S6. The associations of most of the previously mentioned risk factors with each intracranial artery lesion were similar to those with AC and PC lesions. However, in the subpopulation with stroke history, the odds of UMA in those with ICAS of VA were significantly higher compared to those with non-ICAS.

4. Discussion

In this representative general population study of Beijing, China, using TCD to detect the vascular lesions of the intracranial artery, we found that ICAS of AC was the predominant location. Our evidence suggested that most risk factors may differ, but there were no different magnitudes of risk for ICAS of AC compared with PC, except for age. On multivariable analyses, hypertension and diabetes were independent risk factors for ICAS of both AC and PC, while hyperlipidemia and elevated hi-CRP were independently associated with PC lesions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first population-based study to estimate the prevalence of ICAS by the anatomical location of intracranial atherosclerosis. The large sample and randomly selected population of the current study allowed us to analyse the characteristics by age-gender subgroup. The method for detecting vascular lesions and the criteria for defining atherosclerosis were consistent with most of the previous studies in China [11, 21]. Our ICAS prevalence of 13.8% in the population free of stroke is similar to that in the APCA study [11]. The APAC study was performed on 5353 employees aged 40 years or older and retirees of a large coal mine industry in Kailuan, located 150 km southeast of our study site.

Arteries located in AC were more likely to experience atherosclerosis than those in PC. The finding corresponded with the previous clinical observation studies [7, 11, 23, 24]. About 70–80% of the patients who experienced ischemic stroke had AC lesions, and MCA was the most common affected artery. In the current study, we also found that the atherosclerotic lesion was high in MCA. We also analyzed PC lesions and found that VA was much more likely to have atherosclerotic lesions. Several population-based studies of China [11], Japan [25], Korea [13], and Spain [15] demonstrated that MCA was much more likely to have atherosclerotic lesions. Similar findings were also noted in hospitalized ischemic stroke patients in China [3] and European countries such as Italy [26] and Germany [9]. However, the prevalence of each intracranial artery was not reported in these studies. In an autopsy study in France, Mazighi et al. reported that MCA and BA appeared to be the most common location for stenosis >30%. Similarly, Kimura et al. reported that MCA and BA had the highest percentage of severe atherosclerosis from 7260 autopsies in Japan, but the lesions in ACA was the lowest. On the contrary, Suri et al. reported that intracranial artery lesions in PCA were highest in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Community Study of US [27]. Whether the diversity in the location or artery of atherosclerotic lesions among these previous studies was due to the differences in study design, method for detecting vascular lesion, definition of ICAS, or selection of the study population was not clear, and thus, the results should be explained with caution.

We found that the association of demographic characteristics to vascular lesions by location was interesting. The mean age of the subjects with AC lesions was 3.9 years younger than those with PC lesions. The findings are in accordance with hospital-based studies in China [23, 28, 29]. Compared with patients with PC stroke, the patients with AC stroke were 0.9–5.6 years younger. On the contrary, studies from Western countries such as Switzerland, Germany, Austria, and Czech showed that patients with posterior circulation infarction were 3–5 years younger than those with anterior circulation infarction [3033]. The earlier occurrence of ICAS in AC in the current study can well explain why the age at the first stroke onset in China was about 10 years younger than that in the Western population [34]. However, we did not find that ICAS had sex differences in our population despite the fact that stroke incidence is generally higher in males than females [1]. The average age of females with ICAS was younger than males, which suggested that vascular lesions occur earlier in females. But age-specific prevalence suggested that the vascular lesion might develop faster in males than females, which consequently led to the higher ICAS prevalence in males than females after the age of 55 years. This gender–age change pattern was similar to the Asymptomatic Polyvascular Abnormalities Community (APCA) Study [11]. We could not explain the earlier onset and the slower progression of vascular lesions in females compared with males. It is known that the risk of stroke and majority of risk factors in women are closer to those in men after menopause [35]. Female sex hormones may be implicated in vascular outcomes [35].One possible explanation might be that unhealthy lifestyles (i.e., smoking and physical inactivity) are more prevalent in men than women across the life span.

The modifiable risk factors associated with ICAS in current study were much similar to a previous Chinese population-based study [11]. Hypertension, diabetes, and elevated hi-CRP were independent risk factors for ICAS [36], while overweight and obesity appeared to have a protective effect against vascular damage [11]. We failed to find any unique potential risk factor that can explain the high prevalence of ICAS in our population. It is known that the prevalence of smoking [37] and hyperhomocysteinemia [38] are generally higher in Chinese population than the Western population. However, we did not find the significant differences of these two risk factors between individuals with and without ICAS. Perhaps, some unmeasured characteristics associated with the development of ICAS may explain the high incidence of ICAS in the Asian population and need to be elucidated in the future.

Our analysis showed that the modifiable risk factors in lesions between AC and PC were similar, except for age, which is not in line with the previous studies [2, 1115]. To date, there has been no study attempting to discern the comparative role of these risk factors by the anatomic location of intracranial artery lesions in general population. Several hospital-based studies showed the disparity of risk factor profile in ischemic stroke patients located in AC and PC existed. Compared with patients with AC ischemic stroke, patients with PC ischemic stroke had 50% higher prevalence of diabetes and 16% higher prevalence of hypertension, and TG was high, while HDL-C was lower in Chinese ischemic stroke patients [28]. Subramanian et al. found that diabetes was independently associated with an increase in the odds of PC to AC ischemic stroke in 849 Canadian patients with acute ischemic stroke [39]. The authors presumed a neurovascular origin of anterior and posterior circulation differed and the arteries of PC might be more susceptible to metabolic disorders. We did not find the difference in these modifiable risk factors in the population with history of stroke. The values of ORs were greater than these of AC, but all of 95% CIs were overlapped. Our findings implied that an intensive administration of those modifiable vascular risk factors in the population free of stroke and that with a history of stroke could reduce of the risk of ICAS; hence, risk of the first-ever and recurrence of stroke would decrease. Controlling diabetes at population level might decrease the risk of ICAS in PC, which may reduce the risk of PC strokes and generally have worse outcomes compared with AC strokes [28].

Limitations of the current study have to be mentioned. First, the ICAS assessment was by TCD and was not further validated by vessel imaging (CTA or MRA). The application of the golden standard measurements, that is, DSA, CTA, or MRA, is not feasible in large population studies. TCD was applied to detect intracranial artery lesions in most population-based surveys in China [11, 21, 40], and the sensitivity was validated by a previous study [41, 42]. With an identical criterion to define vascular lesions, our results were comparable with those of previous studies [11, 21, 40]. Second, subjects had an acoustic window failure, and they were defined as non-ICAS, which would lead to misclassification of ICAS and underestimation of ICAS burdens. We failed to detect blood flow using the temporal or orbital windows in only 34 subjects. Therefore, the impact on the prevalence of CAS was not big enough to change the overall prevalence. Third, the cross-sectional design of this study limits the ability to draw definitive associations of risk factors with the development of ICAS. We will follow this population for several years, so the causal relationship between the development of ICAS and risk factors can be explored.

In conclusion, our results showed that the prevalence of ICAS in AC was predominate to that in PC. The vascular lesion in PC developed faster than that in AC with aging. Advanced age in patients with ICAS appeared to exert different magnitudes of risk for PC to AC lesions. The ICAS of AC and PC shared the most modifiable risk factors.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

X. H. F. and J. W. were responsible for the conceptualization. X. H. F. was responsible for the methodology. C. B. H. and X. G. W. were responsible for software. Y. Z., B. B. L., and C. X. W. were responsible for the validation. Y. Z. and X. W. S. were responsible for the formal analysis. Y. Z., S. C. G., C. X. L., H. H. L., X. G., and Y. L. Z. were responsible for the investigation. X. H. F. was responsible for the resources. X. G. W. and S. S. H. were responsible for the data curation. Y. L. Z. prepared the original draft. X. H. F. and J. W. reviewed and edited the manuscript. Y. Z. was responsible for the visualization. X. H. F. was responsible for the supervision. X. H. F. and J. W. were responsible for the project administration. X. H. F. was responsible for the funding acquisition.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Key Program in the Twelfth Five-year Plan (grant no. 2011BAI 11 B01) from the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology; Commission of Science and Technology of Beijing (grant no. D121100004912002), Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z171100001017019), and Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals’ Ascent Plan (DFL20152201).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1: the screening flowchart of participants. Supplementary Table 1: characteristics (i.e., age, sex, smoking and alcohol consumption, and chronic diseases). Supplementary Tables 2–4: frequency of risk factors (i.e., old age, male, hypertension and history of coronary heart disease, smoking, obesity, and laboratory testing results) in the population with or without history of stroke by anatomic location of ICAS. Supplementary Tables 5–6: ORs and 95% CIs of ICAS in the intracranial anterior and posterior circulation and branches for individuals with or without history of stroke. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. W. Wang, B. Jiang, H. Sun et al., “Prevalence, incidence, and mortality of stroke in China: results from a nationwide population-based survey of 480 687 adults,” Circulation, vol. 135, no. 8, pp. 759–771, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. Zhao, J. Liu, W. Wang et al., “Epidemiological transition of stroke in China: twenty-one-year observational study from the Sino-MONICA-Beijing project,” Stroke, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1668–1674, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Y. Wang, X. Zhao, L. Liu et al., “Prevalence and outcomes of symptomatic intracranial large artery stenoses and occlusions in China: the Chinese Intracranial Atherosclerosis (CICAS) Study,” Stroke, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 663–669, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. S. Wong and H. Li, “Long-term mortality and recurrent stroke risk among Chinese stroke patients with predominant intracranial atherosclerosis,” Stroke, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2361–2366, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. D. Kim, H. Y. Choi, H. J. Cho et al., “Increasing frequency and burden of cerebral artery atherosclerosis in Korean stroke patients,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 318–325, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. T. Kim, S. H. Yoo, J.-H. Kwon, S. U. Kwon, and J. S. Kim, “Subtyping of ischemic stroke based on vascular imaging: analysis of 1,167 acute, consecutive patients,” Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 225–230, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. S. Wong, H. Li, Y. L. Chan et al., “Use of transcranial Doppler ultrasound to predict outcome in patients with intracranial large-artery occlusive disease,” Stroke, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2641–2647, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. L. Sacco, D. E. Kargman, Q. Gu, and M. C. Zamanillo, “Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study,” Stroke, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Weimar, M. Goertler, L. Harms, and H.-C. Diener, “Distribution and outcome of symptomatic stenoses and occlusions in patients with acute cerebral ischemia,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 1287–1291, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. G. Tsivgoulis, K. Vadikolias, I. Heliopoulos et al., “Prevalence of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis in Caucasians: a prospective, multicenter, transcranial Doppler study,” Journal of Neuroimaging: Official Journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Y. Zhang et al., “Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis in a community-based population of Chinese adults,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1479–1485, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Q. Sun, Q. Wang, X. Wang et al., “Prevalence and cardiovascular risk factors of asymptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: the Kongcun town study in Shandong, China,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 729–735, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. K.-Y. Park, C.-S. Chung, K. H. Lee, G.-M. Kim, Y.-B. Kim, and K. Oh, “Prevalence and risk factors of intracranial atherosclerosis in an asymptomatic Korean population,” Journal of Clinical Neurology (Seoul, Korea), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–33, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. Qiao, F. K. Suri, Y. Zhang et al., “Racial differences in prevalence and risk for intracranial atherosclerosis in a US community-based population,” JAMA Cardiology, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 1341–1348, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. E. López-Cancio, L. Dorado, M. Millán et al., “The barcelona-asymptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis (AsIA) study: prevalence and risk factors,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 221, no. 1, pp. 221–225, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. Chaturvedi, A. Singh, V. Tiwari, and A. Thacker, “Brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in acute stroke and its clinical implications,” Brain circulation, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 185–190, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. G. Eaton, V. S. Shah, D. Dornbos et al., “Demographic age-related variation in Circle of Willis completeness assessed by digital subtraction angiography,” Brain circulation, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Z. Wang, X. Wang, G. Hao et al., “A national study of the prevalence and risk factors associated with peripheral arterial disease from China: the China hypertension survey, 2012–2015,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 275, pp. 165–170, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Z. Wang, L. Zhang, Z. Chen et al., “Survey on prevalence of hypertension in China: background, aim, method and design,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 174, no. 3, pp. 721–723, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. X. Song, J. Li, Y. Hua et al., “Chronic kidney disease is associated with intracranial artery stenosis distribution in the middle-aged and elderly population,” Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 245–254, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. S. Wong, Y. N. Huang, H. B. Yang et al., “A door-to-door survey of intracranial atherosclerosis in Liangbei county, China,” Neurology, vol. 68, no. 23, pp. 2031–2034, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. M. Demchuk, I. Christou, T. H. Wein et al., “Accuracy and criteria for localizing arterial occlusion with transcranial Doppler,” Journal of Neuroimaging: Official Journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1–12, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y. Hua, L. Jia, Y. Xing et al., “Distribution pattern of atherosclerotic stenosis in Chinese patients with stroke: a multicenter registry study,” Aging and disease, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 62–70, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. T. Uehara, M. Tabuchi, and E. Mori, “Risk factors for occlusive lesions of intracranial arteries in stroke-free Japanese,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 218–222, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. W. Duan, Y. Pu, H. Liu et al., “Association between leukoaraiosis and symptomatic intracranial large artery stenoses and occlusions: the Chinese intracranial atherosclerosis (CICAS) study,” Aging and disease, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1074–1083, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Baracchini, G. P. Anzola, S. Cenciarelli et al., “Italian symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis study (ISIDE): a multicenter transcranial ultrasound evaluation,” Neurological Sciences, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1645–1651, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. F. K. Suri, Y. Qiao, X. Ma et al., “Prevalence of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis using high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography in the general population: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study,” Stroke, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1187–1193, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Y. Luo, Z. Li, J. Zhang, J. Li, and Z. Lu, “Dyslipidaemia was correlated to the posterior circulation infarction in non-diabetic populations,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 150, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Q. Zeng, W. Tao, C. Lei, W. Dong, and M. Liu, “Etiology and risk factors of posterior circulation infarction compared with anterior circulation infarction,” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1614–1620, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. P. Sommer, A. Posekany, W. Serles et al., “Is functional outcome different in posterior and anterior circulation stroke?” Stroke, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 2728–2732, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. E. Zürcher, B. Richoz, M. Faouzi, and P. Michel, “Differences in ischemic anterior and posterior circulation strokes: a clinico-radiological and outcome analysis,” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases: The Official Journal of National Stroke Association, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 710–718, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Dorňák, M. Král, M. Hazlinger et al., “Posterior vs. anterior circulation infarction: demography, outcomes, and frequency of hemorrhage after thrombolysis,” International Journal of Stroke: Official Journal of the International Stroke Society, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1224–1228, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. B. von Sarnowski, U. Schminke, U. Grittner et al., “Posterior versus anterior circulation stroke in young adults: a comparative study of stroke aetiologies and risk factors in stroke among young fabry patients (sifap1),” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 43, no. 3-4, pp. 152–160, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. V. L. Feigin, C. M. Lawes, D. A. Bennett, S. L. Barker-Collo, and V. Parag, “Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 355–369, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. Lisabeth and C. Bushnell, “Stroke risk in women: the role of menopause and hormone therapy,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 82–91, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. O. Almobarak, S. Badi, W. M. Elmadhoun, H. Tahir, and M. H. Ahmed, “The prevalence and risk factors of stroke among Sudanese individuals with diabetes: cross-sectional survey,” Brain Circulation, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 26–30, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. Liu, M. Zhang, L. Yang et al., “Prevalence and patterns of tobacco smoking among Chinese adult men and women: findings of the 2010 national smoking survey,” Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 154–161, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y. Huo, J. Li, X. Qin et al., “Efficacy of folic acid therapy in primary prevention of stroke among adults with hypertension in China: the CSPPT randomized clinical trial,” JAMA, vol. 313, no. 13, pp. 1325–1335, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. G. Subramanian, J. Silva, F. L. Silver et al., “Risk factors for posterior compared to anterior ischemic stroke: an observational study of the registry of the Canadian stroke network,” Neuroepidemiology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 12–16, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. K. S. Wong, P. W. Ng, A. Tang, R. Liu, V. Yeung, and B. Tomlinson, “Prevalence of asymptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis in high-risk patients,” Neurology, vol. 68, no. 23, pp. 2035–2038, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. Röther, A. Schwartz, K. U. Wentz, W. Rautenberg, and M. Hennerici, “Middle cerebral artery stenoses: assessment by magnetic resonance angiography and transcranial Doppler ultrasound,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 273–279, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. Mowla, B. Shakibajahromi, R. Kabir, Z. Garami, and J. Volpi, “Transcranial Doppler and magnetic resonance angiography assessment of intracranial stenosis: an analysis of screening modalities,” Brain Circulation, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 181–184, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2022 Yan Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views139
Downloads156
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.