Review Article

Benefits of Equine-Assisted Therapies in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

Table 3

Effects of equine-assisted therapy intervention on the assessed instrument.

StudyToolGroupsBefore interventionAfter interventionEffect size [CI 95%]Differences ( value)Between-group
Mean (SD)Mean (SD)Within-group

HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE
Moraes (2021)FAMS (total)EATG133.4 (35.2)151.4 (38.3)0.11 [−0.57, 0.80]SMD
ICG143.2 (27.2)138.7 (27.2)
Muñoz-Lasa (2019)KHQEATG34.83 (16.15)17.7 (6.95)1.38 [ 0.1, 2.6]dNSD
ICG32.36 (19.99)34 (21.73)−0.08 [−1.5, 1.3]dNR
MSQOL-54 (2,3)EATG2.85 (0.9)3.55 (0.61)−0.85 [−2.0, 0.3]dNSD
ICG2.63 (1.3)2.61 (1.05)0.02 [−1.4, 1.4]dNR
Vermöhlen (2017)MSQOL-54 (physical health)EATG46.0 (14.2)57.0 (15.1)0.36 [−0.12, 0.85]SMDNR
ICG53.7 (14.6)51.3 (15.9)NR
MSQOL-54 (mental health)EATG62.6 (18.0)75.7 (15)0.64 [0.14, 1.13]SMDNR
ICG67.1 (17.2)64.2 (19.9)NR
Frevel (2015)HAQUAMS totalEATG13.6 (2.3)14.5 (2.1)0.38 [−0.62, 1.37]SMDNSDNSD
ACG11.5 (4.1)13.0 (4.9)NSD
Hammer (2005)SF-36 (general health)EATG54.5 (25.82)53.8 (19.26)NANANA
SF-36 (mental health)EATG70 (19.74)69.6 (30.53)NANANA
SF-36 (physical functioning)EATG40 (24.30)37 (20.38)NANANA

FATIGUE
Moraes (2021)FSSEATG5.0 (1.6)4.0 (1.7)−0.17 [−0.86, 0.51]SMD
ICG4.5 (1.7)4.3 (1.7)
MFIS TotalEATG44.2 (19.0)32.3 (18.5)−0.86 [−1.57, −0.14]SMD
ICG48.1 (10.3)45.9 (11.5)
Muñoz-Lasa (2019)FISEATG5.52 (0.67)1.93 (0.83)4.76 [2.5, 7.0]dNSD
ICG2.85 (0.48)2.87 (0.74)−0.03 [−1.4, 1.4]dNR
Vermöhlen (2017)FSS (sum score of FSS)EATG51.80 (10.5)42.6 (11.4)−0.38 [−0.86, 0.11]SMDNR
ICG47.8 (11.9)46.8 (10.6)NR
Frevel (2015)FSSEATG5.40 (0.80)4.4 (1)0.24 [−0.75, 1.22]SMDNSD
ACG4.50 (1.90)4.00 (2.00)NSD
MFISEATG44.7 (18.3)22.9 (11.8)−0.31 [−1.30, 0.67]SMDNSD
ACG34.6 (22.6)28.5 (20.8)NSD

BALANCE
Vermöhlen (2017)BBSEATG40.60 (11.50)47.0 (8.7)0.19 [−0.29, 0.67]SMDNR
ICG42.10 (10.90)45.10 (10.90)NR
Frevel (2015)BBSEATG40.30 (9.80)45.8 (8.3)−0.08 [−1.06, 0.90]SMDNSD
ACG43.50 (9.90)46.50 (9.00)
DGIEATG12.8 (6.4)15.8 (6.6)0.07 [−0.91, 1.05]SMDNSD
ACG13.3 (6.6)15.3 (6.5)
Silkwood-Sherer (2007)BBSEATG39.38 (16.87)56 (15.11)1.31 [0.04, 2.58]NR
ICG41.00 (9.19)40.20 (7.91)NR
Lindroth (2015)BBSEATG42 (1.73)46 (0)NANANA
Hammer (2005)BBSEATG40.5 (24.57)31 (26.06)NANANA

MOBILITY
Moraes (2021)Timed up and go testEATG9.9 (3.1)7.5 (2.2)−0.27 [−0.95, 0.42]SMD
ICG8.7 (2.5)8.09 (2.13)
Muñoz-Lasa (2011)POMAEATG16 (6.1)19.3 (3.6)1.23 [0.38, 2.08]NSD
ACG17.3 (6.8)17.1 (6.7)NSD
Silkwood-Sherer (2007)POMAEATG18.44 (6.45)22.11 (4.82)−2.05 [−3.51, −0.59]NR
ICG19.33 (3.9)18.83 (3.98)NR
Hammer (2005)Timed up and go testEATG14.85 (7.52)14.82 (7.75)NANANA

SPASTICITY
Muñoz-Lasa (2019)Modified Ashworth ScaleEATG1.25 (0.25)0.5 (0.55)3.40 [1.11, 5.69]
ICG1.12 (0.58)0.82 (0.48)NSD
Vermöhlen (2017)NRSEATG4.6 (2.1)3.2 (2.4)−0.25 [−0.74, 0.23]SMDNR
ICG4.4 (2.2)3.8 (2.3)NR

WALKING PERFORMANCE
Moraes (2020)Walking endurance (6-minute WT (m))EATG459.06 (118.34)503.59 (126.38)0.06 [−0.63, 0.74]SMD
ICG513.00 (101.97)497.13 (88.88)
Frevel (2015)2-minute WTEATG130.3 (22.5)141.3 (28.8)0.24 [−0.75, 1.22]SMDNSDNSD
ACG128.6 (50.7)130.0 (57.1)NSD

GAIT SPEED
Moraes (2020)Speed (cm/s)EATG97.84 (25.94)114.93 (31.20)0.29 [−0.39, 0.98]SMD
ICG110.95 (33.35)105.95 (28.61)
Muñoz-Lasa (2011)Speed (m/s)EATG0.44 (0.11)0.48 (0.10)−0.38 [−1.2, 0.4]dNSD
Lindroth (2015)FGAEATG14 (4.36)18 (6.24)NANANA

DISABILITY
Muñoz-Lasa (2011)EDSSEATG5.2 (1.2)5.2 (1.1)0 [−0.8 , 0.8]dNSDNSD
ACG4.9 (1.3)5 (1.3)−0.08 [−0.8, 0.6]dNSD

PAIN
Vermöhlen (2017)VASEATG32.2 (29.9)24.9 (27.6)0.05 [−0.43, 0.54]SMDNSD
ICG24.7 (29.3)23.4 (27.0)

PHYSICAL FUNCTIONING INDEPENDENCE LEVEL
Muñoz-Lasa (2011)Barthel IndexEATG89.6 (10.5)90.4 (8.9)−0.08 [−0.9, 0.7]dNSD
ACG90.3 (10.9)90.7 (11.3)−0.02 [−0.8, 0.7]dNSD

POSTURAL CONTROL
Moraes (2021)CoP Speed (cm/s), stable surface, and eyes openEATG1.2 (0.4)0.7 (0.4)−1.21 [−1.96, −0.46]SMD
ICG1.4 (0.7)1.4 (0.7)
CoP Speed (cm/s), stable surface, and eyes closedEATG1.6 (0.6)1.1 (0.6)−0.98 [−1.70, −0.25]SMD
ICG2.0 (1.1)1.7 (0.6)
CoP Speed (cm/s), foam surface, and eyes openEATG2.7 (0.9)1.6 (0.9)−0.80 [−1.51, −0.09]SMD
ICG2.8 (1.1)2.3 (0.8)
CoP Speed (cm/s), foam surface, and eyes closedEATG5.9 (2.2)2.6 (1.6)−1.14 [−1.88, −0.40]SMD
ICG6.4 (2.7)5.10 (2.6)

Menezes (2013)AMPap (cm), eyes openEATG2.85 (0.93)2.28 (0.68)0.70 [−0.4, 1.8]d
ICG1.58 (0.35)1.89 (0.99)−0.42 [−1.8 , 1.0]d
AMPap (cm), eyes closedEATG3.91 (1.70)3.02 (0.84)0.66 [−0.4, 1.7]d
ICG2.39 (1.71)2.61 (1.37)−0.14 [−1, 5, 1.2]d
AMPml (cm), eyes openEATG2.2 (1.19)1.66 (0.76)0.54 [−0.5, 1.6]dNSD
ICG0.96 (0.43)0.96 (0.63)0 [−1.4, 1.4]d
AMPml (cm), eyes closedEATG3.28 (2.21)2.17 (0.99)0.65 [−0.4, 1.7]dNSD
ICG1.41 (0.67)1.08 (0.67)0.49 [−0.9, 1.9]d
Msap (cm/s), eyes openEATG1.44 (0.56)1.48 (0.46)−0.08 [−1.1, 1.0]dNSD
ICG0.83 (0.19)0.97 (0.28)−0.59 [−2.0, 0.8] d
Msap (cm/s), eyes closedEATG1.91 (0.79)1.85 (0.70)0.08 [−1.0, 1.1]dNSD
ICG0.99 (0.27)1.33 (0.35)−1.09 [−2.6, 0.4]d
MSml (cm/s), eyes openEATG1.30 (0.75)1.19 (0.59)0.16 [−0.9, 1.2]d
ICG0.62 (0.30)0.72 (0.28)−0.34 [−1.7, 1.1]d
MSml (cm/s), eyes closedEATG1.70 (0.99)1.19 (0.41)0.67 [−0.4, 1.8]d
ICG0.69 (0.26)0.84 (0.15)−0.71 [−2.1, 0.7]d

Lindroth (2015)SOTEATG67.33 (9.29)73 (12.49)NANANA

SD: standard deviation; EATG: equine-assisted therapy group; ICG: inactive control group; NR: not reported; ACG: active control group; NSD: not significant differences; dwithin group Cohen’s d value with an interval confidence of 95%; SMDStandardized Mean Difference results of randomized trials (calculated with after intervention data); Standardized Mean Difference results of nonrandomized trials (calculated with change from baseline data); NA: not applied; MSQOL-54: Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54; HAQUAMS: Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis; FAMS: Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life; SF-36: Short Form 36; KHQ: general health perception of King’s Health Questionnaire; FSS: Fatigue Severity Scale; MFIS: Modified Fatigue Impact Scale; VAS: Visual Analogue Scale; BBS: Berg Balance Scale; POMA: Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment; NRS: Numeric Rating Scale; WT: walking test; FGA: Functional Gait Assessment; EDSS: Extended Disability Status Scale; CoP: center of pressure; AMPap: amplitude of center of pressure displacement in the antero-posterior directions; AMPml: amplitude of center of pressure displacement in the medial-lateral directions; Msap: mean speed of the center of pressure displacement in the antero-posterior directions; MSml: mean speed of the center of pressure displacement in the medial-lateral directions; SOT: Sensory Organization Test.