Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Education Research International
Volume 2011, Article ID 735643, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/735643
Research Article

Uncovering Relationships between Task Understanding and Monitoring Proficiencies in Postsecondary Learners: Comparing Work Task and Learner as Statistical Units of Analyses

Department of Education, Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance & Learning for Life Centre, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1M8

Received 26 August 2010; Accepted 20 December 2010

Academic Editor: Susan O'Neill

Copyright © 2011 Vivek Venkatesh and Kamran Shaikh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Bereiter and M. Scardamalia, The Psychology of Written Composition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1987.
  2. R. Bruning and C. Horn, “Developing motivation to write,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 25–37, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Graham and K. R. Harris, “Self-regulation and writing: where do we go from here?” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 22, pp. 102–114, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  4. K. R. Harris and S. Graham, Making the Writing Process Work: Strategies for Composition and Self-Regulation, Brookline, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1996.
  5. J. A. Langer, “Beating the odds: teaching middle and high school students to read and write well,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 837–880, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. J. Zimmerman and R. Risemberg, “Caveats and recommendations about self-regulation of writing: a social cognitive rejoinder,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 115–122, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. V. Venkatesh and K. Shaikh, “Investigating task understanding in online repositories equipped with Topic Map indexes: implications for improving self-regulatory processes in graduate learners,” International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 22–35, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. Andrews, “The end of the essay?” Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 117–128, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  9. Canadian Council on Learning [CCL], “Post-secondary education in Canada: strategies for success,” 2009, http://www.ccl-cca.ca/pdfs/PSE/2009/PSE2008_English.pdf.
  10. A. Simard, J. Broome, M. Drury, B. Haddon, B. O’Neil and , and D. Pasho, “Understanding knowledge services at Natural Resources Canada,” 2007, http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/collection_2007/nrcan-rncan/M4-45-2006E.pdf.
  11. S. Lindblom-Ylänne and H. Pihlajamäki, “Can a collaborative network environment enhance essay-writing processes?” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 17–30, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Tynjälä, “Writing, learning and the development of expertise in higher education,” in Writing as a Learning Tool: Integrating Theory and Practice, P. Tynjälä, Ed., pp. 37–56, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  13. P. R. Pintrich, “The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation, M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, Eds., pp. 451–502, Kluwer Academic Publishers, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  14. P. H. Winne and A. F. Hadwin, “The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning,” in Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications, D. H. Schunk and B. J. Zimmerman, Eds., pp. 297–314, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  15. B. J. Zimmerman, “Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation, M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, Eds., pp. 13–39, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  16. B. J. Zimmerman, “Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 166–183, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Dunlosky and R. A. Bjork, Handbook of Metamemory and Memory, Psychology Press, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
  18. J. Dunlosky and J. Metcalfe, Metacognition, SAGE, Beverly Hills, Calif, USA, 2009.
  19. J. L. Nietfeld, C. K. Enders, and G. Schraw, “A Monte Carlo comparison of measures of relative and absolute monitoring accuracy,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 258–271, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. Schraw, M. E. Dunkle, L. D. Bendixen, and T. D. Roedel, “Does a general monitoring skill exist?” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 433–444, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. L. Nietfeld, L. Cao, and J. W. Osborne, “The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy,” Metacognition and Learning, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 159–179, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. Schraw, “A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring,” Metacognition and Learning, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33–45, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. Schraw and J. Nietfeld, “A further test of the general monitoring skill hypothesis,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 236–248, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. L. Nietfeld, L. Cao , and J. W. Osborne, “Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom,” The Journal of Experimental Education, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 7–28, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  25. J. L. Nietfeld and G. Schraw, “The effect of knowledge and strategy training on monitoring accuracy,” Journal of Educational Research, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 131–142, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. H. Winne, “Students' calibration of knowledge and learning processes: implications for designing powerful software learning environments,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 466–488, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. H. Winne and A. F. Hadwin, “Studying as self-regulated learning,” in Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, Eds., pp. 277–304, Erlbaum, Malwah, Calif, USA, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  28. V. Venkatesh, K. Shaikh, and A. Zuberi, “Topic Maps as indexing tools in the educational sphere: theoretical foundations, review of empirical research and future challenges,” in Cognitive Maps, K. Perusich, Ed., pp. 1–12, In-Tech, Vienna, Austria, 2010, http://www.intechopen.com/articles/show/title/topic-maps-as-indexing-tools-in-the-educational-sphere-theoretical-foundations-review-of-empirical-r. View at Google Scholar
  29. N. E. Perry, K. O. VandeKamp, L. K. Mercer, and C. J. Nordby, “Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 5–15, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Pressley and W. Schneider, Introduction to Memory Development During Childhood and Adolescence, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1997.
  31. I. M. Begg, L. A. Martin, and D. R. Needham, “Memory monitoring: how useful is self-knowledge about memory?” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, vol. 4, pp. 195–218, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  32. J. Dunlosky and L. T. Connor, “Age differences in the allocation of study time account for age differences in memory performance,” Memory and Cognition, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 691–700, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. H. Maki, “Predicting performance on text: delayed versus immediate predictions and tests,” Memory and Cognition, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 959–964, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. K. W. Thiede, M. C. M. Anderson, and D. Therriault, “Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 66–73, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. W. Thiede and M. C. M. Anderson, “Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 129–160, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. K. W. Thiede, J. Dunlpsky, T. D. Griffin, and J. Wiley, “Understanding the delayed-keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1267–1280, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. W. Shaffer and R. C. Serlin, “What good are statistics that don’t generalize?” Educational Researcher, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 14–25, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  38. J. B. Biggs, “Student learning in the context of school,” in Teaching for Learning: The View from Cognitive Psychology, J. B. Biggs, Ed., pp. 7–29, The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd., Hawthorn, Australia, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  39. J. B. Biggs, “Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment,” Higher Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 347–364, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. W. Reitman, Cognition and Thought, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1965.
  41. R. H. Maki, “Accuracy of metacomprehension judgments for questions of varying importance levels,” American Journal of Psychology, vol. 108, pp. 327–344, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  42. R. Glaser and M. T. Chi, The Nature of Expertise, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1998.
  43. J. Borkowski and N. Muthukrishna, “Moving metacognition into the classroom: ‘working models’ and effective strategy instruction,” in Promoting Academic Competence and Literacy in School, M. Pressley, K. Harris, and J. Guthrie, Eds., pp. 477–501, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  44. A. L. Brown, “Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms,” in Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding, F. Weinert and R. Kluwe, Eds., pp. 65–115, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  45. G. Schraw and J. C. Impara, Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition, Buros Institute of Mental Measurement, Lincoln, Neb, USA, 2000.