The Study of Teacher Efficacy in Hong Kong Sub-Degree Sector

Table 2

Hierarchal regression analysis on predicting variables of teacher efficacies.

	TSE		TSES							ToSES
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h	i	j	k	l
	β	β	β	β	β	β	β	β	β	β	β	β
Gender	.17	.35	−.12	.08	.18	.08	.26	.20	.19	.21	.04	.11
Experience	.05	.12	.30*	.03	.12	.16	.27	.20	.07	.15	.10	.18
Education level	−.13	−.13	.22	1.9	.26	.15	−.01	−.12	.06	−.05	.02	−.09
Education training	.17	−.15	−.01	−.14	.10	.07	−.13	−.15	.04	.13	−.07	.04
Δ𝑅^2	.07	.13	.18	.07	.16	.07	.12	.07	.05	.08	.01	.04
F value	0.88	1.87	2.77*	1.03	2.38	1.00	1.82	1.02	0.67	1.13	0.18	0.54
Gender	.18	.31*	−.12	.10	.24*	.10	,26	.21	.19	.19	.04	.09
Experience	.05	.08	.31*	.03	.16	.18	.27	.16	.05	.12	.07	.16
Education level	−.13	−.10	.23	.19	.15	.13	−.01	−.10	.06	−.04	.06	−.07
Education training	.17	−.13	−.01	−.14	.11	.04	−.13	−.08	.04	.12	−.06	.05
Level of concerns	.05	.17	.12	−.20	.46***	.24	.02	2.8*	.13	.22	.52***	.10
Δ𝑅^2	.00	.03	.01	.04	.20	.06	.00	.07	.01	.05	.27	.01
F value	0.72	1.83	2.39	1.30	5.57***	1.50	1.44	1.76	0.70	1.48	3.95**	0.52

a: GTE, b: PTE, c: decision making, d: school resource, e: parental involvement, f: community involvement, g: instructional efficacy h: student discipline management, i: create a positive climate, j: student management, k: instruction strategies, and l: classroom management.
* P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001.