|
| | Authors and year | Education level | Country | Type | Methods | Peer-reviewed |
|
| 1 | Bruce et al., (2011) [9] | Primary | Canada | III | Classroom observation, students’ and teachers’ survey, teachers’ interviews | Yes |
| 2 | Essig (2011) [41] | Primary | USA | III | Classroom observation, teachers’ interviews | No |
| 3 | Glover et al., (2003) [27] | Secondary | UK | III | Classroom observation, students’ and teachers’ survey, teachers’ interviews | No |
| 4 | Glover et al., (2007) [6] | Secondary | UK | III | Classroom observation, students’ and teachers’ survey, teachers’ interviews | Yes |
| 5 | Glover and Miller (2009) [35] | Secondary | UK | IV | Development of IWB use in classrooms | Yes |
| 6 | Higgins et al., (2005) [18] | Primary | UK | I | Teachers’ survey, teachers’ and students’ interviews, classroom observation, test achievements | No |
| 7 | Holmes (2009) [37] | Pre-service teachers | Australia | IV | Development of mathematical lesson activities | Yes |
| 8 | Jewitt et al., (2007) [30] | Secondary | UK | III | Classroom observation, students’ interviews | Yes |
| 9 | Jones and Tanner (2002) [26] | Secondary | UK | III | Classroom observation, students’ and teachers’ survey, teachers’ interviews | Yes |
| 10 | Kennewell et al., (2008) [13] | Primary | UK | III | Classroom observation, students’ and teachers’ survey, teachers’ interviews | Yes |
| 11 | Lavicza and Papp-Varga (2010) [39] | Secondary | Hungary | IV | Development of mathematical lesson activities using geometrical dynamic software | Yes |
| 12 | Miller et al., (2005) [28] | Secondary | UK | III | Classroom observation, students’ and teachers’ survey, teachers’ interviews | No |
| 13 | Miller et al., (2005) [29] | Secondary | UK | III | Classroom observation, students’ and teachers’ survey, teachers’ interviews | No |
| 14 | Miller and Glover (2007) [16] | Secondary | UK | III | Classroom observation, students’ and teachers’ survey, teachers’ interviews | Yes |
| 15 | Miller et al., (2008) [36] | Secondary | UK | IV | Development of IWB use in classrooms | No |
| 16 |
Miller and Glover (2010) [10] | Secondary | UK | IV | Development of IWB use in classrooms | Yes |
| 17 |
Miller and Glover (2010) [38] | Secondary | UK | IV | Development of IWB use in classrooms | No |
| 18 | Moss et al., (2007) [17] | Secondary | UK | I | Classroom observation, teachers’ survey, teachers’ and students’ interviews, test achievements | No |
| 19 | Serow and Callingham (2011) [32] | Primary | Australia | III | Classroom observations, field notes, students’ work samples | Yes |
| 20 | Smith et al., (2006) [24] | Primary | UK | I | Teachers’ survey, teachers’ and students’ interviews, classroom observation, test achievements | Yes |
| 21 | Somekh et al., (2007) [7] | Primary | UK | I | Teachers’ survey, teachers’ and students’ interviews, classroom observation, test achievements | No |
| 22 | Swan et al., (2010) [11] | Primary and secondary | USA | II | Students’ attainments | No |
| 23 | Tataroglu and Erduran (2010) [25] | Secondary | Turkey | II | Students’ attitude survey and interviews | Yes |
| 24 | Torff and Tirotta (2010) [8] | Primary | USA | II | Students’ attainments, teachers’ and students’ interviews | Yes |
| 25 | Wood and Ashfield (2008) [33] | Primary | UK | III | Classroom observation, students’ and teachers’ survey, teachers’ interviews | Yes |
| 26 | Zevenbergen and Lerman (2008) [12] | Primary | Australia | III | Classroom observation, students’ and teachers’ survey, teachers’ interviews | Yes |
|
