Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Education Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 731720, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/731720
Research Article

Estimating Students’ Satisfaction with Web Based Learning System in Blended Learning Environment

1University of Montenegro, Sanja Bauk, Dobrota 36, 85330 Kotor, Montenegro
2“Mediterranean” University, Snežana Šćepanović, Vaka Đurovića bb, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro
3University of Graz, Michael Kopp, Liebiggasse 9/II, 8010 Graz, Austria

Received 4 December 2013; Accepted 15 March 2014; Published 22 April 2014

Academic Editor: Yi-Shun Wang

Copyright © 2014 Sanja Bauk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. R. Garrison and H. Kanuka, “Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education,” Internet and Higher Education, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 95–105, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Owston, D. York, and S. Murtha, “Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative,” The International and Higher Education, vol. 18, pp. 38–46, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation (2012-2013), “Blended Learning Model Definitions,” http://www.christenseninstitute.org/blended-learning-model-definitions/.
  4. J. J. Summers, A. Waigandt, and T. A. Whittaker, “A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class,” Innovative Higher Education, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 233–250, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C.-M. Chiu, M.-H. Hsu, S.-Y. Sun, T.-C. Lin, and P.-C. Sun, “Usability, quality, value and e-learning continuance decisions,” Computers and Education, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 399–416, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. B. Seddon, “A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success,” Information Systems Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 240–253, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. V. McKinney, K. Yoon, and F. Zahedi, “The measurement of Web-customer satisfaction: an expectation and disconfirmation approach,” Information Systems Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 296–315, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. Ives, M. H. Olson, and J. J. Baroudi, “The measurement of user information satisfaction,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 785–793, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Muylle, R. Moenaert, and M. Despontin, “The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction,” Information and Management, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 543–560, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. A. Tessier, W. W. Crouch, and P. Atherton, “New measures of user satisfaction with computer-based literature searches,” Special Libraries, vol. 68, pp. 383–389, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  11. R. Beeler, “The relationship of user fees and user satisfaction,” in Proceedings of the 3th National Online Meeting, pp. 24–26, University of Technology Science, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  12. G. Momenee, “Asking the right question: why not Info Track?” Research Strategies, vol. 5, pp. 186–190, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Khalifa and L. Vanessa, “State of research on information system satisfaction,” 2004, http://www.questia.com/library/1P3-666972001/the-state-of-research-on-information-system-satisfaction.
  14. R. Applegate, “Models of user satisfaction: understanding false positives,” RQ, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 525–539, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Paechter, B. Maier, and D. Macher, “Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction,” Computers and Education, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 222–229, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. J. Doll and G. Torkzadeh, “The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 259–273, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. W. J. Doll, X. Deng, T. S. Raghunathan, G. Torkzadeh, and W. Xia, “The meaning and measurement of user satisfaction: a multigroup invariance analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 227–262, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9–30, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Ozkan and R. Koseler, “Multi-dimensional students' evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: an empirical investigation,” Computers and Education, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1285–1296, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B.-C. Lee, J.-O. Yoon, and I. Lee, “Learners' acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: theories and results,” Computers and Education, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1320–1329, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. Matsatsinis, E. Grigoroudis, and P. Delias, “Customer satisfaction and e-learning systems: towards a multi-criteria evaluation methodology,” Operational Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 249–259, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  22. A. Lee-Post, “E-learning success model: an information systems perspective,” Electronic Journal of E-Learning, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 61–70, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  23. Y.-S. Wang, “Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems,” Information and Management, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 75–86, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Y. Shee and Y.-S. Wang, “Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: a methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications,” Computers and Education, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 894–905, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. H. Chen and H. C. Lin, “Integrating Kano's model into E-learning satisfaction,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM '07), pp. 297–301, Singapore IEEE Engineering Management Society Singapore Center & IEEE Singapore Section, Singapore, December 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. Dominici and F. Palumbo, “How to build an e-learning product: factors for student/customer satisfaction,” Business Horizons—Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, vol. 56, pp. 87–96, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  27. K. Matzler and H. H. Hinterhuber, “How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment,” Technovation, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 25–38, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. J. Schvaneveldt, T. Enkawa, and M. Miyakawa, “Consumer evaluation perspectives of service quality: evaluation factors and two-way model of quality,” Total Qualaity Management, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 149–161, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. N. Kano, “Attractive quality and must be quality,” Hinshitsu (Quality), vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 147–156, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  30. B. L. Bayus, S. Jain, and A. G. Rao, “Too little, too early: introduction timing and new product performance in the personal digital assistant industry,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 34, pp. 50–63, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. D. Walden, “A special issue on: Kano’s methods for understanding customer defined quality,” Center For Quality of Management Journal, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1–37, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  32. D. Bertsekas and J. Tsitsiklis, Introduction To Probability, Athena Scientific, Nashua, NH, USA, 2nd edition, 2008.
  33. K. Weltner, W. J. Weber, J. Grosjean, and P. Schuster, Mathematics for Physicists and Engineers (Fundamentals and Interactive Study Guide), Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2009.
  34. R. Taylor, “Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review,” Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 35–39, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus