Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Education Research International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 1504701, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1504701
Research Article

Psychometric Properties and Validation of the Arabic Academic Performance Rating Scale

1Dental Public Health, Department of Quality Assurance, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
2Department of Dental Public Health, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang, Malaysia
3National Accreditation Authority for Translators and Interpreters, Sydney, NSW, Australia
4Department of Quality Assurance, College of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
5Department of Quality Assurance, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
6Department of Health promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands

Correspondence should be addressed to M. F. A. Q. Quadri; moc.liamg@irdauq.qeaf.rd

Received 15 February 2017; Revised 14 May 2017; Accepted 4 July 2017; Published 31 July 2017

Academic Editor: Jose C. Nunez

Copyright © 2017 M. F. A. Q. Quadri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. Alromi, Vocational Education in Saudi Arabia, Penn State University, State College, PA, USA, 2000.
  2. D. Wiliam, “Assessment: the bridge between teaching and learning,” National Council of Teachers of English, Voices from the Middle, vol. 21, no. 2, article 15, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  3. I. A. Al-Sadan, “Educational assessment in Saudi Arabian schools,” Assessment in Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 143–155, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Alsadaawi, “Saudi national assessment of educational progress (SNAEP),” International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1–14.
  5. W. Popham, “Why standardized tests don't measure educational quality?” ASCD Educational Leadership Using Standards and Assessment, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 8–15, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Kohn, “Standardized testing and its victims,” Education Week, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Verman, P. Aschbacher, and L. Winters, “A practical guide to alternative assessment,” ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED352389, 2008.
  8. N. C. o. E. i. Education, A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform (1999). Retrieved February 2, 2007, http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html.
  9. M. Taras, “Assessment: summative and formative-some theoretical reflections,” British Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 466–478, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Kohn, “Standardized testing: separating wheat children from chaff children,” in What Happened to Recess and Why Are Our Children Struggling in Kindergarten, S. Ohanian, Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  11. P. Seedhouse, “Classroom interaction: possibilities and impossibilities,” ELT Journal, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. B. Bronson, B. D. Goodson, J. I. Layzer, and J. M. Love, Child behavior rating scale, Abt Associates, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990.
  13. R. Barkley, “Child behavior rating scale and check lists,” in Assessment and Diagnosis in Child Psycholopathology, pp. 113–155, Guildford, Newyork, NY, USA, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. W. Hightower, W. C. Work, E. L. Cowen, and C. A. Rohrbeck, “The teacher–child rating scale: a brief objective measure of elementary children's school problem behaviors and competencies,” School Psychology Review, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 393–409, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  15. F. E. Greisham, “Social skills rating system,” Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, vol. 17, pp. 392–397, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. H. Epstein, G. Ryser, and N. Pearson, “Standardization of the behavioral and emotional rating scale: factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity,” The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 208–216, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. G. a. R. Du Paul, “Academic performance rating scale,” School Psychology Review, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 284–300, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  18. B. J. Zimmerman and A. Kitsantas, “Comparing students' self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 145–155, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Rice, L. Wakefield, K. Patterson et al., “Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure serious and common quality of life issues for patients experiencing small bowel obstructions,” Healthcare, vol. 2, pp. 139–149, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. B. Nunnally and I. R. Bernstein, Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1994.
  21. J. J. Bartko, “The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability.,” Psychological Reports, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. E. Green and C. G. Frantom, “Survey development and validation with the Rasch model,” in Proceedings of theInternational Conference on Questionnaire Development, Evaluation, and Testing, Charleston, SC, USA, 2002.
  23. A. B. Costello and J. W. Osborne, “Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis,” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1–9, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. M. Linacre, “Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness,” in Introduction to Rasch measurement, E. V. Smith Jr. and R. M. Smith, Eds., pp. 258–278, JAM, Maple Grove, MN, USA, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  25. J. D. Evans, Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, Brooks-Cole Publishing, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 1996.