Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Education Research International
Volume 2017, Article ID 1614262, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1614262
Research Article

Teacher Learning within a Multinational Project in an Upper Secondary School

1Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
2Centre for University Teaching and Learning, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
3Faculty of Education, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

Correspondence should be addressed to Liisa Ilomäki; if.iknisleh@ikamoli.asiil

Received 10 March 2017; Revised 14 May 2017; Accepted 11 June 2017; Published 18 July 2017

Academic Editor: Eduardo Montero

Copyright © 2017 Liisa Ilomäki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. OECD, Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris, France, 2009, http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_39263231_42980662_1_1_1_1,00.html.
  2. L. Darling-Hammond and N. Richardson, “Teacher learning: what matters?” Educational Leadership, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 46–53, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Opfer and D. Pedder, “The lost promise of teacher professional development in England,” European Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 24–10, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  4. S. M. Owen, “Teacher professional learning communities in innovative contexts: "ah hah moments", "passion" and "making a difference" for student learning,” Professional Development in Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 57–74, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Korthagen, “Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: towards professional development 3.0,” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 387–405, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. OECD, “The organisation for economic co-operation and development,” in Are the New Millenium Learners Making the Grade? Technology Use and Educational Performance in PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  7. C. Kiili, “Online reading as an individual and social practice,” Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research 441, Jyväskylä University Printing House, Jyväskylä, Finland.
  8. L. Lundahl, I. Erixon Arreman, U. Lundström, and L. Rönnberg, “Setting things right? Swedish upper secondary school reform in a 40-year perspective,” European Journal of Education. Special Issue: Knowledge, Globalisation and Curriculum, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 46–59, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. R. Tierney, E. Bond, and J. Bresler, “Examining literate lives as students engage with multiple literacies,” Theory Into Practice, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 359–367, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. P. Goodyear and M. Zenios, “Discussion, collaboration and epistemic fluency,” British Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 55, pp. 351–3368, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. D. Opfer and D. Pedder, “Conceptualizing teacher professional learning,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 81, pp. 376–407, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. W. Admiraal, J. Kruiter, D. Lockhorst et al., “Affordances of teacher professional learning in secondary schools,” Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 281–298, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. M. Kennedy, “How does professional development improve teaching?” Review of Educational Research, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 945–980, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Tynjälä, “Perspectives into learning at the workplace,” Educational Research Review, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 130–154, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Lam, R. W. Cheng, and H. C. Choy, “School support and teacher motivation to implement project-based learning,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 20, pp. 487–497, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Imants and K. Van Veen, “Teacher learning as workplace learning,” in International Encyclopedia of Education, E. Peterson, E. Baker, and B. McGaw, Eds., pp. 569–574, Elsevier, 3rd edition, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. L. M. Desimone, “Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures,” Educational Researcher, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 181–199, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. I. Bakkenes, J. Vermunt, and T. Wubbels, “Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 20, pp. 533–548, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. R. Fogarty and B. Pete, “Professional learning 101: a syllabus of seven protocols,” Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 32–34, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. Lehtonen, A. Toom, and J. Husu, “Teacher learning within co-teaching – moral aspects of practical knowledge in inclusive teaching,” in International Perspectives on Inclusive Education. Volume 9: Ethics and Equity for Inclusive Education, A. Gajewski, Ed., Emerald Publishing, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  21. A. Jones and J. Vincent, “Collegial mentoring for effective whole school professional development in the use of IWB technologies,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 477–493, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  22. M. Lakkala and L. Ilomäki, “A case study of developing ICT-supported pedagogy through a collegial practice transfer process,” Computers & Education, vol. 90, pp. 1–12, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. KNORK, “Promoting knowledge work practices in education,” http://knork.info/website/.
  24. FNBE, The basics of the curriculum for upper secondary school, Opetushallitus, Helsinki, Finland, 2015.
  25. S. Paavola and K. Hakkarainen, “Trialogical approach for knowledge creation,” in Knowledge Creation in Education, S. Tan, H. So, and J. Yeo, Eds., pp. 53–73, Springer, Singapore, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  26. S. Paavola, M. Lakkala, H. Muukkonen, K. Kosonen, and K. Karlgren, “The roles and uses of design principles for developing the trialogical approach on learning,” Research in Learning Technology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 233–246, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. Yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods, Sage Publications, 5th edition, 2014.
  28. P. Atkinson and P. Hammersley, “Ethnography and participant observation,” in Handbook of Qualitative Research, K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Eds., pp. 248–260, Sage Publication, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  29. C. Pole and M. Morrison, Ethnography for Education, Open University Press.
  30. H. Muukkonen, M. Lakkala, A. Toom, and L. Ilomäki, “Assessment of competences in knowledge work and object-bound collaboration during higher education courses,” in Higher Education Transitions: Theory and Research, E. Kyndt, V. Donche, K. Trigwell, and S. Lindblom-Ylänne, Eds., EARLI book series New Perspectives on Learning and Instruction, pp. 288–305, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  31. C. Teddle and A. Tashakkori, “Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral studies,” in Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, A. Tashakkori and C. Teddle, Eds., pp. 3–50, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  32. I. Newman, C. S. Ridenouer, C. Newman, and G. DeMarco M Jr., “A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods,” in Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, A. Tashakkori and C. Teddle, Eds., pp. 167–188, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  33. T. Francis, G. Østergaard, and S. Morse, “Phenomenon-based learning in agroecology: a prerequisite for transdisciplinarity and responsible action,” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 60–75, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. W. Schenke, J. van Driel, F. Geijsel, H. Slighte, and M. Volman, “Characterizing cross-professional collaboration in research and development projects in secondary education,” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 553–569, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  35. S. Timmermans and I. Tavory, “Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis,” Sociological Theory, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 167–186, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. E. Coburn, “Collective sensemaking about reading: how teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities,” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 145–170, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. M. Lakkala, A. Toom, L. Ilomäki, and H. Muukkonen, “Re-designing university courses to support collaborative knowledge creation practices,” Australian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 31, pp. 521–536, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. M. Morris, J. Chrispeels, and P. Burke, “The power of two: linking external with internal teachers’ professional development,” Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 764–767, 2003. View at Google Scholar