Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Education Research International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 1768690, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1768690
Research Article

Complex Problems in Entrepreneurship Education: Examining Complex Problem-Solving in the Application of Opportunity Identification

1Department of Education, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
2Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS), University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg
3Hector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
4Education and Competence Studies, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands

Correspondence should be addressed to Yvette Baggen

Received 29 March 2017; Accepted 27 August 2017; Published 15 October 2017

Academic Editor: Jose C. Nunez

Copyright © 2017 Yvette Baggen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Gibb, “Creating conducive environments for learning and entrepreneurship. living with, dealing with, creating and enjoying uncertainty and complexity,” Industry and Higher Education, vol. 16, pp. 135–148, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. K. Moberg, H. Barslund Fosse, A. Hoffman, and M. Junge, Impact of entrepreneurship education in Denmark, 2014, http://eng.ffe-ye.dk/media/637847/effektmacc8alingen20201520eng-online.pdf.
  3. M. Lackéus, “Entrepreneurship in education: What why, when how. Entrepreneurship360 background paper,” http://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/BGP_Entrepreneurship-in-Education.pdf.
  4. E. C. Rideout and D. O. Gray, “Does entrepreneurship education really work? A review and methodological critique of the empirical literature on the effects of university-based entrepreneurship education,” Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 51, pp. 329–351, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. A. Shane and S. Venkataraman, “The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 217–226, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. M. Gielnik, M. Frese, J. M. Graf, and A. Kampschulte, “Creativity in the opportunity identification process and the moderating effect of diversity of information,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 27, pp. 559–576, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  7. Y. L. Wang, A. D. Ellinger, and Y. C. J. Wu, “Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: An empirical study of RD personnel,” Management Decision, vol. 51, pp. 248–266, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. R. Suddaby, G. D. Bruton, and S. X. Si, “Entrepreneurship through a qualitative lens: Insights on the construction and/or discovery of entrepreneurial learning,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 30, pp. 10–10, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  9. P. Vogel, “From Venture Idea to Venture Opportunity,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Hsieh, J. A. Nickerson, and T. R. Zenger, “Opportunity discovery, problem solving and a theory of the entrepreneurial firm,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 7, pp. 1255–1277, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  11. Y. Baggen, J. Mainert, T. Lans, H. J. A. Biemans, S. Greiff, and M. Mulder, “Linking complex problem solving to opportunity identification competence within the context of entrepreneurship,” in Proceedings of the International Journal of Lifelong Education, vol. 34, pp. 412–429, 2015.
  12. D. A. Shepherd, T. A. Williams, and H. Patzelt, “Thinking About Entrepreneurial Decision Making: Review and Research Agenda,” Journal of Management, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 11–46, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  13. A. Fischer, S. Greiff, and J. Funke, “The process of solving complex problems,” The Journal of Problem Solving, vol. 4, pp. 10–7771, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  14. K. S. McGrew, “CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research,” Intelligence, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Raven, J. C. Raven, and J. H. Court, Manual for Ravens Progressive Matrices and vocabulary scales: Section 4. The standard progressive matrices, Oxford Psychologists Press, 1998.
  16. J. Funke, “Complex problem solving: A case for complex cognition?” Cognitive Processing, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 133–142, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. “Assessing problem-solving skills in PISA 2012,” in PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving (Volume V), PISA, pp. 25–46, OECD Publishing, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. OECD Skills Outlook 2013, OECD Publishing, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Kretzschmar, J. C. Neubert, and S. Greiff, “Komplexes Problemlösen, schulfachliche Kompetenzen und ihre Relation zu Schulnoten [Complex problem solving, school competencies and their relation to school grades,” Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, vol. 28, no. 4, Article ID a000137, pp. 205–215, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Stadler, N. Becker, S. Greiff, and F. M. Spinath, “The complex route to success: complex problem-solving skills in the prediction of university success,” Higher Education Research Development, vol. 115, pp. 10–1080, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  21. S. Greiff, S. Wüstenberg, G. Molnár, A. Fischer, J. Funke, and B. Csapó, “Complex problem solving in educational contexts-something beyond g: Concept, assessment, measurement invariance, and construct validity,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 364–379, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Danner, D. Hagemann, D. V. Holt et al., “Measuring Performance in Dynamic Decision Making: Reliability and Validity of the Tailorshop Simulation,” Journal of Individual Differences, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 225–233, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. Ederer, L. Nedelkoska, A. Patt, and S. Castellazzi, “What do employers pay for employees’ complex problem solving skills?” International Journal of Lifelong Education, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 430–447, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Kersting, “Zur Konstrukt- und Kriteriumsvalidität von Problemlöseszenarien anhand der Vorhersage von Vorgesetztenurteilen über die berufliche Bewährung,” Diagnostica, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 67–76, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J. C. Neubert, J. Mainert, A. Kretzschmar, and S. Greiff, “The assessment of 21st century skills in industrial and organizational psychology: Complex and collaborative problem solving,” in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, vol. 8, pp. 31–10, 1-31, 8, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. J. R. Sampson, Adaptive Information Processing, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. J. Funke, “Human Problem Solving in 2012,” The Journal of Problem Solving, vol. 6, no. 1, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. P. A. Frensch and J. Funke, Complex problem solving: The European perspective, L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J, 1995.
  29. S. Greiff, D. V. Holt, and J. Funke, “Perspectives on problem solving in educational assessment: Analytical, interactive, and collaborative problem solving,” Journal of Problem Solving, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 71–91, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Karavidas, N. K. Lim, and S. L. Katsikas, “The effects of computers on older adult users,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 697–711, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Osman, “Controlling Uncertainty: A Review of Human Behavior in Complex Dynamic Environments,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 65–86, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. Funke, “Dynamic systems as tools for analysing human judgement,” Thinking & Reasoning, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 69–89, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. Klahr and K. Dunbar, “Dual space search during scientific reasoning,” Cognitive Science, vol. 12, 148, pp. 10–1016, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  34. P. A. Argenti, “Book Reviews : Organizational Public Relations: A Political Perspective. By Christopher Spicer. Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997 324 pages,” Journal of Business Communication, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 305-306, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. D. F. Kuratko, “The emergence of entrepreneurship education: development, trends, and challenges,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 577–597, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. D. Sarasvathy, N. Dew, S. R. Velamuri, and S. Venkataraman, “Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. In,” in Handbook of entrepreneurship research, Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch, Eds., Springer, Boston, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  37. Y. E. Companys and J. S. McMullen, “Strategic entrepreneurs at work: The nature, discovery, and exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities,” Small Business Economics, vol. 28, pp. 301–322, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. D. R. DeTienne, “Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: theoretical development,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 203–215, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Costanzo, A. Baryshnikova, J. Bellay et al., “The genetic landscape of a cell,” Science, vol. 327, no. 5964, pp. 425–431, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. D. A. Grégoire, D. A. Shepherd, and D. A. Grégoire, “Technology-market combinations and the identification of entrepreneurial opportunities: An investigation of the opportunity-individual nexus,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 55, pp. 753–785, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. S. Shane, “Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities,” Organization Science, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 448–469, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. D. Dimov, “Beyond the single-person, single-insight attribution in understanding entrepreneurial opportunities,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 713–731, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. L. W. Busenitz, “Research on entrepreneurial alertness: sampling, measurement, and theoretical issues,” Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 35–44, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. M. Gaglio and J. A. Katz, “The psychological basis of opportunity identification: entrepreneurial alertness,” Small Business Economics, vol. 16, no. 2, Article ID 1011132102464, pp. 95–111, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. J. Rank, V. L. Pace, and M. Frese, “Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative,” Applied Psychology: An International Review, vol. 53, pp. 518–528. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. J. S. McMullen and D. A. Shepherd, “Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 31, pp. 132–152, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. Z. Chen and D. Klahr, “All other things being equal: acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy,” Child Development, vol. 70, pp. 1098–1120, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. S. T. Levy and U. Wilensky, “Mining students’ inquiry actions for understanding of complex systems,” Computers and Education, vol. 56, pp. 556–573, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. J. C. Neubert, A. Kretzschmar, S. Wüstenberg, and S. Greiff, “Extending the assessment of complex problem solving to finite state automata - Embracing heterogeneity,” European Journal of Psychological Assessment, vol. 31, Article ID a000224, pp. 181–194, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. A. Kretzschmar, L. Hacatrjana, and M. Rascevska, “Re-evaluating the psychometric properties of MicroFIN: A multidimensional measurement of complex problem solving or a unidimensional reasoning test?” Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 157–182, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  51. Y. Baggen, J. K. Kampen, A. Naia, H. J. A. Biemans, T. Lans, and M. Mulder, “Development and application of the opportunity identification competence assessment test (OICAT) in higher education,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. D. R. DeTienne and G. N. Chandler, “Opportunity identification and its role in the entrepreneurial classroom: a pedagogical approach and empirical test,” Academy of Management Learning and Education, vol. 3, pp. 242–257, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. J. P. Guilford, The Nature of Human Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1967.
  54. K. A. Hallgren, “Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial,” Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 23–34, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. A. Buchner and J. Funke, “Finite-state automata: Dynamic task environments in problem-solving research,” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 46, Article ID 14640749308401068, pp. 83–118, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. S. Greiff, S. Wüstenberg, J. Funke, and S. Wüstenberg, “Dynamic problem solving a new assessment perspective,” Applied Psychological Measurement, vol. 36, Article ID 0146621612439620, pp. 189–213, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. J. C. Müller, A. Kretzschmar, S. Greiff, and J. C. Müller, “Exploring exploration: inquiries into exploration behavior in Complex Problem Solving assessment,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, S. K. DMello, R. A. Calvo, and A. Olney, Eds., pp. 336-337, Memphis, Tenn, USA, 2013.
  58. A. Kretzschmar, J. C. Neubert, S. Wüstenberg, and S. Greiff, “Construct validity of complex problem solving: A comprehensive view on different facets of intelligence and school grades,” Intelligence, vol. 54, pp. 55–69, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. C. Rodriguez and Y. Maeda, “Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha,” Psychological Methods, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 306–322, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. S. Greiff, A. Fischer, M. Stadler, S. Wüstenberg, and S. Wüstenberg, “Assessing complex problem-solving skills with multiple complex systems,” Thinking and Reasoning, vol. 21, pp. 356–382, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  61. H. W. Marsh and R. O'Neill, “Self-description questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents,” Journal of Educational Measurement, vol. 21, pp. 153–174, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  62. A. Ardichvili, R. Cardozo, and S. Ray, “A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 105–123, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2016.
  64. S. van Buuren and K. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, “Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R,” Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 1–67, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. A. Robitzsch, S. Grund, and T. Henke, Miceadds, Some Additional Multiple Imputation Functions, Especially for mice, 2017, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=miceadds.
  66. J. W. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for The Behavioral Sciences, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988.
  67. G. E. Gignac and E. T. Szodorai, “Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 102, pp. 74–78, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. M. M. Gielnik, A.-C. Krämer, B. Kappel, M. Frese, and A.-C. Krämer, “Antecedents of business opportunity identification and innovation: Investigating the interplay of information processing and information acquisition: Business opportunity identification,” Applied Psychology: An International Review, vol. 63, pp. 344–381. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. A. Rauch and M. Frese, “Let's put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners' personality traits, business creation, and success,” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 353–385, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 879–903, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. J. C. Short, D. J. Ketchen, J. G. Combs, and R. D. Ireland, “Research methods in entrepreneurship: opportunities and challenges,” Organizational Research Methods, vol. 13, Article ID 1094428109342448, pp. 15–10, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  72. R. A. Baron and M. D. Ensley, “Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs,” Management Science, vol. 52, pp. 1331–1344, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  73. S. A. Shane, A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus, Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2007.
  74. T. B. Ward, “Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 173–188, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. J. Funke, “Complex Problem Solving,” in Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, M. Seel, Ed., pp. 682–685, Springer, Boston, MA, USA, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  76. K. Kraiger, J. K. Ford, and E. Salas, “Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 311–328, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. P. Warr and D. Bunce, “Trainee characteristics and the outcomes of open learning,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 48, pp. 347–375, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. H. M. Neck and P. G. Greene, “Entrepreneurship Education: Known Worlds and New Frontiers,” Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 49, pp. 55–70, 2011 (Chinese). View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. F. E. Weinert, “Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification,” in Defining and Selecting Key Competencies, D. S. Rychen and L. H. Salganik, Eds., pp. 45–65, Hogrefe, Seattle, WA, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  80. B. E. Bakken, Learning and transfer of understanding in dynamic decision environments, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1993.
  81. L. S. Fuchs, D. Fuchs, K. Prentice et al., “Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 293–305, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. E. Jensen, “Learning and transfer from a simple dynamic system,” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 119–131, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. A. Kretzschmar and H.-M. Süß, “A Study on the Training of Complex Problem Solving Competence,” Journal of Dynamic Decision Making, vol. 1, pp. 16–10, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  84. W. Putz-Osterloh and M. Lemme, “Knowledge and its intelligent application to problem solving,” German Journal of Psychology, vol. 11, pp. 286–303, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  85. W. Tomic, “Training in inductive reasoning and problem solving,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 483–490, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. S. Greiff, S. Wüstenberg, B. Csapó et al., “Domain-general problem solving skills and education in the 21st century,” Educational Research Review, vol. 13, pp. 74–83, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus