Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Emergency Medicine International
Volume 2012, Article ID 636045, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/636045
Research Article

A Method for Reviewing the Accuracy and Reliability of a Five-Level Triage Process (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale) in a Community Emergency Department Setting: Building the Crowding Measurement Infrastructure

1Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 3A7
2Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, NB, Canada E2L 4L2

Received 30 September 2011; Revised 21 November 2011; Accepted 22 November 2011

Academic Editor: Adrian Boyle

Copyright © 2012 Michael K. Howlett and Paul R. T. Atkinson. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Beveridge, B. Clarke, L. Janes et al., “Implementation guidelines for the Canadian ED Triage & Acuity Scale (CTAS),” Endorsed by Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP); National Emergency Nurses Affiliation of Canada (NENA); L’association des medecins d’urgence du Quebec (AMUQ), 2007, http://caep.ca/resources/ctas/cedis#presentingcomplaintlist.
  2. M. Murray, M. Bullard, and E. Grafstein, “Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale implementation guidelines,” Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 421–427, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  3. G. Innes, M. Murray, and E. Grafstein, “A consensus-based process to define standard national data elements for a Canadian emergency department information system,” Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 277–284, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  4. D. Manos, D. A. Petrie, R. C. Beveridge, S. Walter, and J. Ducharme, “Inter-observer agreement using the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale,” Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 16–22, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. Grafstein, “Close only counts in horseshoes and triage?” Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 288–289, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Beveridge, J. Ducharme, L. Janes, S. Beaulieu, and S. Walter, “Reliability of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: interrater agreement,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 155–159, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. A. Maningas, “The Soterion Rapid Triage Systemml: evaluation of inter-rater reliability and validity,” Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 461–469, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. Grafstein, M. J. Bullard, D. Warren, and B. Unger, “Revision of the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) presenting complaint list version 1,” Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 151–161, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  9. K. Göransson, “Accuracy and concordance of nurses in emergency department triage,” Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 432–438, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Considine, “Do knowledge and experience have specific roles in triage decision-making?” Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 722–726, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. E. Göransson, “Emergency department triage: is there a link between nurses' personal characteristics and accuracy in triage decisions?” Accident and Emergency Nursing, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 83–88, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Edwards, “Walking in—Initial visualisation and assessment at triage,” Accident and Emergency Nursing, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 73–78, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. J. Bullard, B. Unger, J. Spence, and E. Grafstein, “Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines,” Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 136–142, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  14. D. W. Warren, A. Jarvis, L. LeBlanc, and J. Gravel, “Revisions to the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale Pediatric Guidelines (PaedCTAS),” Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 224–232, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  15. M. K. Howlett, H. Wolfe, C. Bartlett, and D. Burris, “a method for review of accuracy and reliability of Canadian Emergency Department Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) based triage process in a community emergency department setting: starting the quality improvement processs,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 492–493, 2008. View at Google Scholar