Maternal Cardiac Arrest: A Practical and Comprehensive Review
Cardiac arrest during pregnancy is a dedicated chapter in the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care; however, a robust maternal cardiac arrest knowledge translation strategy and emergency response plan is not usually the focus of institutional emergency preparedness programs. Although maternal cardiac arrest is rare, the emergency department is a high-risk area for receiving pregnant women in either prearrest or full cardiac arrest. It is imperative that institutions review and update emergency response plans for a maternal arrest. This review highlights the most recent science, guidelines, and recommended implementation strategies related to a maternal arrest. The aim of this paper is to increase the understanding of the important physiological differences of, and management strategies for, a maternal cardiac arrest, as well as provide institutions with the most up-to-date literature on which they can build emergency preparedness programs for a maternal arrest.
Managing a maternal cardiac arrest is an extremely challenging and trying task for emergency department (ED) staff as there are two patients, the mother and the fetus. Since out-of-hospital maternal cardiac arrests carry the worst outcomes, emergency medical services (EMS) also play an integral part in the management process . The optimal management of a maternal cardiac arrest requires the participation of several different nonemergency teams, as well as the use of specialized equipment [2, 3], neither of which are part of the usual emergency department code protocols. This would include the obstetrical team, the anesthesia team, and the neonatal team, as well as equipment for a perimortem cesarean section and neonatal resuscitation. Ensuring that the right staff and equipment arrive at the code scene in a timely manner is imperative but often practically difficult.
Education and training are essential to managing a maternal cardiac arrest; however, the current skill, knowledge, and implementation of existing guidelines among staff are poor [4–6]. Current ACLS training courses do not routinely include a comprehensive review of maternal resuscitation, and while specialized courses are being developed, they are not yet widely available .
Cardiac disease is the number one cause of maternal mortality based on a United Kingdom database that holds the largest population-based data on this specific group . Women are deferring pregnancy to older ages, and more women with complex health problems are choosing to go through pregnancy [8, 9]. Moreover, even if these patients are being followed in high-risk centres, their residence may be located closer to smaller hospital centres. Thus, care for these patients when they are critically ill may occur in any emergency department. Critical events can occur at any time in the obstetric population and emergency medical services could be the first point of contact during such events. This means that patients could potentially arrive at any emergency department and makes excellent communication between EMS providers and the receiving emergency department crucial.
Pregnant women are usually directed to the labour and delivery floor when they become ill during the later stages of pregnancy. Implementation papers directly affecting obstetrical staff and in-hospital cardiac arrest teams have been published to encourage awareness and adaptation of existing protocols to be more in line with the science and current evidence guidelines . Having a proactive approach to emergency preparedness for the pregnant patient in cardiopulmonary arrest is essential for all emergency departments. Understanding the physiological changes of pregnancy, the direct and indirect evidence on maternal cardiac arrest resuscitation approaches and how both have contributed to our current resuscitation guidelines are important first steps to adapting local resuscitation protocols for maternal cardiac arrests.
2. Current Science and Guidelines
2.1. Systematic Review on Maternal Resuscitation
Recently, the first systematic review on the management of cardiac arrest during pregnancy was published and highlighted the lack of science in the area of maternal resuscitation . The five studies in the area of maternal cardiac arrest reported several important findings. The first finding was that the transthoracic impedance does not change with pregnancy, and, therefore, current defibrillation energy recommendations are the same in both the pregnant and nonpregnant patient [10, 11]. Second, although chest compressions are feasible in the tilted position (nonphysiological data) , the maximum possible resuscitative force with chest compressions declines as the angle of inclination increases [10, 13]. The remaining two studies looked at perimortem cesarean sections (PMCSs). One retrospective cohort from The Netherlands reported that PMCS was mainly considered for fetal viability; however, after the completion of a training course on the importance of PMCS for maternal benefit, the frequency of performed PMCS significantly increased [10, 14]. While this retrospective cohort study found poor outcomes with PMCS, it was noted that PMCSs were not performed within the recommended 4-5 minute timeframe and many unnecessary, time-consuming delays were made [10, 14]. Finally, the last study was a case series on PMCS [10, 15] which reported that very few PMCS (8/38) were performed within the recommended 4-5-minute timeframe after onset of maternal cardiac arrest. Yet, despite these time delays for PMCS, positive neonatal and maternal outcomes were still possible . Several women had a sudden and dramatic improvement in their hemodynamics, with a return of pulse and blood pressure immediately after PMCS. The neonates that had higher survival outcomes tended to be older in their gestational age at birth .
2.2. American Heart Association 2010 Guidelines
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) published the most recent science on maternal resuscitation in 2010 [16–18]. This consensus on science and treatment recommendations, combined with expert opinions and agreement, led to the development of the most recent American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care with a chapter specifically dedicated to maternal resuscitation . These guidelines published the first evidence-based algorithm for the management of cardiac arrest during pregnancy (Figure 1) . This algorithm should be the basis for emergency responses during a maternal cardiac arrest for all providers. Highlights of these guidelines include the following.(1)Coordinate multiple teams during and after the cardiac arrest.(2)Do not delay usual measures such as defibrillation and the administration of medications.(3)Perform aortocaval decompression maneuvers, preferably manual left uterine displacement (LUD) (Figures 2 and 3) .(4)Consider the airway difficult, and the most experienced provider should manage the airway.(5)Intravenous access is important but should be placed above the diaphragm.(6)There should be a dedicated timer to document when 4 minutes after the onset of a maternal cardiac arrest have elapsed, in order to make a decision on the need for a PMCS. PMCS should be performed by 5 minutes after the onset of a maternal cardiac arrest if there is no return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) by 4 minutes with the usual resuscitation measures.(7)Consider an expanded etiology list for the cause of the cardiac arrest; BEAU-CHOPS can be used as a usual mnemonic.However, in order to understand and properly implement these guidelines, caregivers must have a comprehensive understanding of the unique aspects of maternal resuscitation. Given the lack of science in this area, it is vital that caregivers are educated on the physiological differences during pregnancy and, therefore, the basis for the recent guidelines, algorithm, and previous recommendations.
3. The ABCs of Maternal Physiology during Cardiac Arrest
The optimal management of a cardiac arrest in pregnancy must take into account the physiological changes of pregnancy as they relate to resuscitation. There are significant changes in the airway (A), breathing (B), and circulation (C) during pregnancy, and therefore important resuscitation modifications must be made to maximize the chance of a successful resuscitation [3, 16].
Pregnant patients should be viewed as having a difficult airway by all staff involved in maternal resuscitation [3, 19]. Failed intubations even occur in nonarrested pregnant patients undergoing general anesthesia, with an incidence of approximately 1 : 300 [20, 21]. There is ongoing concern related to the incidence of airway-related maternal morbidity and mortality , and this has led to the development of specialized maternal airway management strategies and recommendations . During pregnancy, physiological changes in the upper airway include hyperemia, hypersecretion, and edema . These changes increase the friability of the mucosa and may result in impaired visualization and increased bleeding, especially with repeat airway manipulations . In addition, the airway during pregnancy is smaller , and, therefore, it is recommended that a smaller endotracheal tube is used during intubation . The topic of optimal airway management as well as protocols for failed intubation and difficult airway management is beyond the scope of this review; however, resources on these specific areas are available [19, 23].
The three important points for emergency staff to understand about airway modifications include the following.(1)Good basic life support can optimize ventilations, chest excursion, and oxygenation and defer the need for an advanced airway.(2)Advanced airway placement is difficult in a maternal cardiac arrest. Thus, it is important to be thoroughly prepared.(3)The most experienced person should secure and manage the advanced airway during a maternal cardiac arrest.
During pregnancy there is an increased risk of rapid desaturation . Reduced oxygen reserve is the main physiological reason for the rapid desaturation observed during pregnancy. The reduced oxygen reserve seen during pregnancy is the result of an increase in oxygen consumption [26, 27] coupled with a reduced functional residual capacity . There is also increased intrapulmonary shunting during pregnancy, and, therefore, ventilation-perfusion mismatch will be poorly tolerated in the pregnant patient . Thus, during a cardiac arrest, and especially prior to intubation attempts, oxygenation should be optimized in the pregnant patient [3, 19]; however, resuscitation staff should also be aware of the risk of uterine vasoconstriction and fetal hypoxemia that can occur with maternal respiratory alkalosis as a result of overventilation .
During pregnancy, the elevated diaphragm may result in the need for lower ventilation volumes. There is concern about the risk of aspiration during maternal cardiac arrest due to the reduced lower esophageal sphincter competency [31–33]. Yet, the routine use of cricoid pressure is no longer recommended in the American Heart Association (AHA) resuscitation guidelines as it may impede laryngoscopy and ventilation and may not prevent aspiration [34, 35].
The four main points for emergency staff to understand about breathing modifications include the following.(1)Oxygenate well, monitor, and avoid desaturation.(2)Avoid respiratory alkalosis.(3)Consider adjusting ventilation volumes down.(4)Be aware of the risk of aspiration.
The major circulation concern during a maternal cardiac arrest is the possibility of aortocaval compression caused by the gravid uterus. The gravid uterus can compress the inferior vena cava resulting in a reduced preload and stroke volume [36–38]. We know that by at least 20 weeks gestational age, aortocaval compression is likely to occur ; however, even at 12 weeks gestational age, mechanical venous effects of the gravid uterus can be observed . The hemodynamic and cardiovascular effects of uterine compression during cardiac arrest have not been studied. Still, achieving the maximum possible maternal hemodynamic advantage during cardiac arrest and chest compressions is important. Hemodynamic optimization during maternal cardiac arrest in the obviously pregnant patient requires effective aortocaval decompression. The most ideal manner to perform aortocaval decompression is with a manual LUD (see Figures 2, 3, and 4) [3, 10]. Manual LUD allows the patient to remain supine which improves airway access, ease of defibrillation and IV access and enables simultaneous high quality chest compressions. This is important since high quality and effective chest compressions are essential to maximizing the chance of a successful resuscitation in all patients [39–41]. Previously, left lateral tilt had been recommended for aortocaval decompression; however, science has shown that tilt will reduce the forcefulness of the chest compression , affecting chest compression quality and potentially negatively impacting survival.
4. Perimortem Cesarean Section
Anoxic brain injury occurs within the 4 minutes after a cardiac arrest is identified. Therefore, if team members are unable to achieve ROSC by 4 minutes in a patient that is obviously gravid, and especially if the patient is >20 weeks gestational age, a decision to perform a PMCS should be made. A PMCS is useful as it allows for complete aortocaval decompression once the uterus is evacuated. There are reports of sudden and dramatic improvements in maternal hemodynamics only after a PMCS [14, 42–45], suggesting that manual maneuvers may not be sufficient for relieving aortocaval compression with the purpose of resuscitation.
A PMCS should be initiated 4 minutes after the onset of the maternal cardiac arrest, with the aim of delivery by 5 minutes after-onset, if ROSC is not achieved with optimization of the usual resuscitative measures . In order to achieve this goal of delivery within 5 minutes after-onset, the team should prepare for a PMCS as soon as the arrest is documented so that the PMCS incision can be made at the correct time when clinically indicated . The PMCS should be performed at the location where the arrest occurs as transporting the mother to an operating room results in significant delays in delivery time [14, 46]. Furthermore, it is critical that the neonatal team and neonatal resuscitation equipment are on standby to receive the infant once delivered.
5. Etiology and Treatment Considerations
Similar to any cardiac arrest, it is important to consider the etiology of the arrest. There are important differences to highlight in the etiology of maternal deaths and cardiac arrests that emergency department staff should be educated on and aware of when managing a maternal cardiac arrest. Additional etiologies relevant to pregnancy should be considered. BEAU-CHOPS as described in the AHA guideline algorithm on maternal cardiac arrest (Figure 1) can be a useful mnemonic for these additional etiologic considerations which include (1)bleeding/DIC;(2)embolism: coronary/pulmonary/amniotic fluid embolism;(3)anesthetic complications;(4)uterine atony;(5)cardiac disease (MI/ischemia/aortic dissection/cardiomyopathy);(6)hypertension/pre-eclampsia/eclampsia;(7)other: differential diagnosis of standard ACLS;(8)sepsis.The leading causes of death during pregnancy based on the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom, taken from the Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE), include cardiac disease, sepsis, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, thrombosis/thromboembolism, and amniotic fluid embolism . When a pregnant patient presents in cardiac arrest, these etiologies should be assessed and treated as appropriate. Full recommendations of treatment algorithms for each of these etiologies are outside of the scope of this paper as the topic is immense; however, some important points should be remembered by emergency department staff as follows.(1)Cardiac disease is the most common cause of maternal mortality . The incidence of myocardial infarction  and complicated cardiac disease during pregnancy is on the rise based on data from the United States . Fibrinolysis is relatively contraindicated in pregnancy, and, therefore, primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the reperfusion strategy of choice to treat ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in the pregnant woman . Careful consideration as well as discussion between the emergency physician, obstetrician, and cardiologist regarding the pros and cons of different diagnostic and therapeutic strategies is important during acute ischemic events [48, 49]. Nonetheless, postpartum arrest patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction should be treated urgently with PCI in exactly the same manner as the non-pregnant, postarrest patient.(2)Pregnant women who develop eclampsia may develop a cardiac arrest . Initial management of eclampsia may occur in the emergency department  and may include treatment with magnesium sulfate. It should be recognized that magnesium sulfate can cause toxicity and result in cardiac arrest . If a pregnant woman is receiving magnesium sulfate and has a cardiac arrest, empiric treatment with calcium and discontinuing magnesium treatment is advised (Figure 1) . (3)Life-threatening amniotic fluid embolisms have been reported and are one of the leading causes of maternal mortality [8, 52]. Treatments with emergency perimortem cesarean section  and emergency coronary bypass  have been successful.
6. Emergency Preparedness
Maternal cardiac arrest is the most complicated arrest scenario. There are two patients, the mother and the fetus, and multiple teams who normally do not work together are required to have exceptional teamwork skills in order to achieve the best possible outcome. Yet, since maternal arrest is such a rare event, preparations for maternal cardiac arrests are minimal and receive the least attention. This means that when faced with a maternal cardiac arrest, it can be very stressful for all providers as they are dealing with an extremely complex situation that places a high degree of psychological stress on all team members. Therefore, careful and proactive emergency planning should be undertaken at all institutions and across all teams that should be involved in the comprehensive care of a maternal cardiac arrest patient. A multidisciplinary approach to emergency preparedness that can be used by institutions as a guide for emergency preparedness has been previously published in the obstetrical literature . Highlights of this paper include a 10-step approach to the important aspects of emergency preparedness for a maternal cardiac arrest .
6.1. The Team
The maternal cardiac arrest team should be comprised of the adult resuscitation team, obstetrical team (obstetrician and obstetrical nurse), anesthesia team (anesthesiologist and anesthesiology assistant), and the neonatology team (neonatologist and neonatal nurse and neonatal respiratory therapist) .
6.2. The Equipment
The suggested equipment includes anything necessary for a perimortem cesarean section and neonatal resuscitation. Suggested components are listed in Table 1 .
An important point to consider when implementing the 2010 AHA guidelines for maternal resuscitation is ensuring that there is a specific method of gathering all team members and necessary equipment to the maternal arrest in a timely manner . Training as well as coordination between the involved team members is essential. The worst outcomes for maternal arrest are for out-of-hospital arrest , so institutional preparedness should involve coordination with local emergency medical services (EMS). The EMS staff should alert ED staff of any unstable pregnant patient or maternal cardiac arrest patient before their arrival to allow sufficient time to call the maternal code team and ensure they are in the ED upon arrival.
7. Postarrest Care
The post-arrest (and prearrest/unstable) pregnant patient should be placed at 90° left lateral tilt to relieve possible aortocaval compression. The use of therapeutic hypothermia when appropriate for the non-pregnant patient should be considered in pregnancy . The use of therapeutic hypothermia during pregnancy is a relative contraindication . There have been reports of its successful use in pregnancy; however, one case reported fetal demise, but the patient also had other reasons for a poor outcome, including a prolonged arrest time [55–57]. The use of therapeutic hypothermia should be considered on a case by case basis as maternal cardiac arrest patients were excluded from all prior trials [58, 59]. If therapeutic hypothermia is not applied, all maternal cardiac arrest patients should be well monitored post arrest to ensure normothermia and avoid any hyperthermia. The overarching concern with the use of therapeutic hypothermia in the bleeding or post-PMCS patient relates to the theoretical increased risk of impairing coagulation. Patients receiving therapeutic hypothermia should be monitored for fetal bradycardia.
The management of maternal cardiac arrest is very complicated. This review has included the most up-to-date science and guidelines published in the field of maternal resuscitation based on unique and important physiological differences, etiology, and implementation factors that need to be considered in the advance planning and delivery of an optimal emergency response to a maternal cardiac arrest.
Permission has been provided for use of all figures and tables included in this manuscript. Permission to reprint Table 1 has been provided courtesy of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Permission to reprint Figure 4 has been provided courtesy of Elsevier.
Conflict of Interests
There is no conflicts of interest to disclose.
S. Einav, N. Kaufman, and H. Y. Sela, “Maternal cardiac arrest and perimortem caesarean delivery: evidence or expert-based?” Resuscitation, vol. 83, no. 10, pp. 1191–1200, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Hui, L. J. Morrison, R. Windrim et al., “The American Heart Association 2010 guidelines for the management of cardiac arrest in pregnancy: consensus recommendations on implementation strategies,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 858–863, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
T. L. Vanden Hoek, L. J. Morrison, M. Shuster et al., “Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care,” Circulation, vol. 122, no. 18, supplement 3, pp. S829–S861, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Lipman, K. I. Daniels, B. Carvalho et al., “Deficits in the provision of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during simulated obstetric crises,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 203, no. 2, pp. 179.e1–179.e5, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. E. Cohen, L. C. Andes, and B. Carvalho, “Assessment of knowledge regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation of pregnant women,” International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Einav, I. Matot, H. Berkenstadt, R. Bromiker, and C. F. Weiniger, “A survey of labour ward clinicians' knowledge of maternal cardiac arrest and resuscitation,” International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 238–242, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Schimmelpfennig and T. J. Stanfill, “Advanced cardiovascular life support for the obstetric population: bridging the gap,” Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 136–146, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
R. Cantwell, T. Clutton-Brock, G. Cooper et al., “Saving Mothers' Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 118, supplement 1, pp. 1–203, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
E. V. Kuklina and W. M. Callaghan, “Chronic heart disease and severe obstetric morbidity among hospitalisations for pregnancy in the USA: 1995–2006,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 345–352, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. M. Jeejeebhoy, C. M. Zelop, R. Windrim, J. C. A. Carvalho, P. Dorian, and L. J. Morrison, “Management of cardiac arrest in pregnancy: a systematic review,” Resuscitation, vol. 82, no. 7, pp. 801–809, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Nanson, D. Elcock, M. Williams, and C. D. Deakin, “Do physiological changes in pregnancy change defibrillation energy requirements?” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 237–239, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. L. Goodwin and A. J. Pearce, “The human wedge. A manoeuvre to relieve aortocaval compression during resuscitation in late pregnancy,” Anaesthesia, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 433–434, 1992.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. A. D. Rees and B. A. Willis, “Resuscitation in late pregnancy,” Anaesthesia, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 347–349, 1988.View at: Google Scholar
A. Dijkman, C. M. A. Huisman, M. Smit et al., “Cardiac arrest in pregnancy: increasing use of perimortem caesarean section due to emergency skills training?” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 282–287, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Katz, K. Balderston, M. Defreest, M. Nageotte, and J. Parer, “Perimortem cesarean delivery: were our assumptions correct?” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 192, no. 6, pp. 1916–1921, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Jeejeebhoy and C. Zelop, “In pregnant patients with cardiac arrest (prehospital or in-hospital) (P), do any specific interventions (I) as opposed to standard care (according to treatment algorithm) (C), improve outcome (O) (eg. ROSC, survival)?” 2010, http://circ.ahajournals.org/site/C2010/ALS-SC-065.pdf.View at: Google Scholar
L. J. Morrison, C. D. Deakin, P. T. Morley et al., “Part 8: advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations,” Circulation, vol. 122, no. 16, supplement 2, pp. S345–S421, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
“Appendix: Evidence-Based Worksheets: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations and 2010 American Heart Association and American Red Cross International Consensus on First Aid Sceince with Treatment Recommendations,” Circulation, vol. 122, pp. S606–S638, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Mhyre and D. Healy, “The unanticipated difficult intubation in obstetrics,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 648–652, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. J. McDonnell, M. J. Paech, O. M. Clavisi, and K. L. Scott, “Difficult and failed intubation in obstetric anaesthesia: an observational study of airway management and complications associated with general anaesthesia for caesarean section,” International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 292–297, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. Djabatey and P. M. Barclay, “Difficult and failed intubation in 3430 obstetric general anaesthetics,” Anaesthesia, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 1168–1171, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Elkus and J. Popovich Jr., “Respiratory physiology in pregnancy,” Clinics in Chest Medicine, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 555–565, 1992.View at: Google Scholar
G. M. Vasdev, B. A. Harrison, M. T. Keegan, and C. M. Burkle, “Management of the difficult and failed airway in obstetric anesthesia,” Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 38–48, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Izci, M. Vennelle, W. A. Liston, K. C. Dundas, A. A. Calder, and N. J. Douglas, “Sleep-disordered breathing and upper airway size in pregnancy and post-partum,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 321–327, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. K. Cheun and K. T. Choi, “Arterial oxygen desaturation rate following obstructive apnea in parturients,” Journal of Korean medical science, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 6–10, 1992.View at: Google Scholar
G. J. Andersen, G. B. James, N. P. Mathers, E. L. Smith, and J. Walker, “The maternal oxygen tension and acid-base status during pregnancy,” The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 16–19, 1969.View at: Google Scholar
M. L. Pernoll, J. Metcalfe, T. L. Schlenker, J. E. Welch, and J. A. Matsumoto, “Oxygen consumption at rest and during exercise in pregnancy,” Respiration Physiology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 285–293, 1975.View at: Google Scholar
G. R. Baldwin, D. S. Moorthi, J. A. Whelton, and K. F. MacDonnell, “New lung functions and pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 235–239, 1977.View at: Google Scholar
G. D. V. Hankins, C. J. Harvey, S. L. Clark, E. M. Uckan, and J. W. Van Hook, “The effects of maternal position and cardiac output on intrapulmonary shunt in normal third-trimester pregnancy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 327–330, 1996.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Levinson, S. M. Shnider, A. A. DeLorimier, and J. L. Steffenson, “Effects of maternal hyperventilation on uterine blood flow and fetal oxygenation and acid base status,” Anesthesiology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 340–347, 1974.View at: Google Scholar
U. Ulmsten and G. Sundstrom, “Esophageal manometry in pregnant and nonpregnant women,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 260–264, 1978.View at: Google Scholar
R. S. Fisher, G. S. Roberts, C. J. Grabowski, and S. Cohen, “Altered lower esophageal sphincter function during early pregnancy,” Gastroenterology, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1233–1237, 1978.View at: Google Scholar
W. J. Dodds, J. Dent, and W. J. Hogan, “Pregnancy and the lower esophageal sphincter,” Gastroenterology, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1334–1336, 1978.View at: Google Scholar
R. W. Neumar, C. W. Otto, M. S. Link et al., “Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care,” Circulation, vol. 122, no. 18, supplement 3, pp. S729–S767, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
S. Boet, K. Duttchen, J. Chan et al., “Cricoid pressure provides incomplete esophageal occlusion associated with lateral deviation: a magnetic resonance imaging study,” Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 606–611, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ueland, M. J. Novy, E. N. Peterson, and J. Metcalfe, “Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. IV. The influence of gestational age on the maternal cardiovascular response to posture and exercise,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 856–864, 1969.View at: Google Scholar
C. E. McLennan, “Antecubital and femoral venous pressure in normal and toxemic pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 568–591, 1943.View at: Google Scholar
M. G. Kerr, “The mechanical effects of the Gravid Uterus in late pregnancy,” The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, vol. 72, pp. 513–529, 1965.View at: Google Scholar
C. Vaillancourt, S. Everson-Stewart, J. Christenson et al., “The impact of increased chest compression fraction on return of spontaneous circulation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients not in ventricular fibrillation,” Resuscitation, vol. 82, no. 12, pp. 1501–1507, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Christenson, D. Andrusiek, S. Everson-Stewart et al., “Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation,” Circulation, vol. 120, no. 13, pp. 1241–1247, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. B. Kern, R. W. Hilwig, R. A. Berg, A. B. Sanders, and G. A. Ewy, “Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 645–649, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Cardosi and K. B. Porter, “Cesarean delivery of twins during maternal cardiopulmonary arrest,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 695–697, 1998.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Finegold, A. Darwich, R. Romeo, M. Vallejo, and S. Ramanathan, “Successful resuscitation after maternal cardiac arrest by immediate cesarean section in the labor room,” Anesthesiology, vol. 96, no. 5, p. 1278, 2002.View at: Google Scholar
S. Oates, G. L. Williams, and G. A. D. Rees, “Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in late pregnancy,” British Medical Journal, vol. 297, no. 6645, pp. 404–405, 1988.View at: Google Scholar
J. Parker, N. Balis, S. Chester, and D. Adey, “Cardiopulmonary arrest in pregnancy: successful resuscitation of mother and infant following immediate Caesarean section in labour ward,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 207–210, 1996.View at: Google Scholar
S. Lipman, K. Daniels, S. E. Cohen, and B. Carvalho, “Labor room setting compared with the operating room for simulated perimortem cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 1090–1094, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. E. Ladner, B. Danielsen, and W. M. Gilbert, “Acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy and the puerperium: a population-based study,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 480–484, 2005.View at: Google Scholar
C.-L. Poh and C.-H. Lee, “Acute myocardial infarction in pregnant women,” Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 247–253, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
A. H. James, M. G. Jamison, M. S. Biswas, L. R. Brancazio, G. K. Swamy, and E. R. Myers, “Acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy: a United States population-based study,” Circulation, vol. 113, no. 12, pp. 1564–1571, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. T. Munro, “Management of eclampsia in the accident and emergency department,” Journal of Accident and Emergency Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7–11, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
N. J. McDonnell, “Cardiopulmonary arrest in pregnancy: two case reports of successful outcomes in association with perimortem Caesarean delivery,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 406–409, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. N. Stehr, I. Liebich, G. Kamin, T. Koch, and R. J. Litz, “Closing the gap between decision and delivery-Amniotic fluid embolism with severe cardiopulmonary and haemostatic complications with a good outcome,” Resuscitation, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 377–381, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. D. Stanten, L. I. G. Iverson, T. M. Daugharty, S. M. Lovett, C. Terry, and E. Blumenstock, “Amniotic fluid embolism causing catastrophic pulmonary vasoconstriction: diagnosis by transesophageal echocardiogram and treatment by cardiopulmonary bypass,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 496–498, 2003.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Howes, R. Green, S. Gray et al., “Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Hypothermia Post cardiac Arrest Position Statement Subcommittee,” 2005.View at: Google Scholar
A. Chauhan, H. Musunuru, M. Donnino, M. T. McCurdy, V. Chauhan, and M. Walsh, “The use of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest in a pregnant patient,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 786–789, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Rittenberger, E. Kelly, D. Jang, K. Greer, and A. Heffner, “Successful outcome utilizing hypothermia after cardiac arrest in pregnancy: a case report,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1354–1356, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. F. Wible, J. S. Kass, and G. A. Lopez, “A report of fetal demise during therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest,” Neurocritical Care, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 239–242, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
“Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 346, no. 8, pp. 549–556, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Bernard, T. W. Gray, M. D. Buist et al., “Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 346, no. 8, pp. 557–563, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar