Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Emergency Medicine International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 362624, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/362624
Research Article

A Comparison between Emergency Medicine Residency Training Programs in the United States and Saudi Arabia from the Residents’ Perception

Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Saginaw, MI, USA

Received 31 May 2013; Accepted 22 October 2013; Published 19 January 2014

Academic Editor: Harold K. Simon

Copyright © 2014 Khaled Alghamdi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Alagappan and C. J. Holliman, “History of the development of international emergency medicine,” Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. Qureshi, “International perspective from Saudi Arabia on, ‘procedural skills training during emergency medicine residency: are we teaching the right things?’,” Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 157–158, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. S. Ilgen, J. Sherbino, and D. A. Cook, “Technology-enhanced simulation in emergency medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 117–127, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  4. D. A. Cook, R. Hatala, R. Brydges et al., “Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 306, no. 9, pp. 978–988, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. C. McGaghie, S. B. Issenberg, E. R. Cohen, J. H. Barsuk, and D. B. Wayne, “Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence,” Academic Medicine, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 706–711, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus