Research Article
Comparison of Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Four-Level and Three-District Triage Standard and the Australasian Triage Scale
Table 1
Interrater reliability for the CHT and ATS.
| Triage system | k scores | 95% CI |
| CHT by instructor group with CHT by assistant group (n = 254) | 0.686 | 0.608–0.757 | ATS by instructor group with ATS by assistant group (n = 254) | 0.731 | 0.663–0.790 | CHT with ATS (n = 1552) | 0.654 | 0.622–0.689 | CHT with ATS (combination of level 3 and level 4, n = 1552) | 0.630 | 0.594–0.669 |
|
|
Note. CHT, three-district and four-level triage standards of the Chinese Ministry of Health; ATS, Australasian Triage Scale.
|