Research Article
Comparing Four Video Laryngoscopes and One Optical Laryngoscope with a Standard Macintosh Blade in a Simulated Trapped Car Accident Victim
Table 4
Evaluation of preferred devices after examination.
| | Experience | Placement | Device | n | Percent |
| | Overall | 1 | C-MAC® | 20 | 48 | | 2 | C-MAC® PM | 8 | 19 | | 3 | Macintosh blade | 6 | 14 | | 4 | D-Blade | 6 | 14 | | 5 | Airtraq® SP | 2 | 5 | | 6 | Truview PCD™-R | 0 | 0 |
| | Board-certified physicians | 1 | C-MAC® | 8 | 42 | | 2 | Macintosh blade | 5 | 26 | | 3 | D-Blade | 4 | 21 | | 4 | C-MAC® PM | 2 | 11 | | 5 | Airtraq® SP | 0 | 0 | | 6 | Truview PCD™-R | 0 | 0 |
| | Interns | 1 | C-MAC® | 12 | 55 | | 2 | C-MAC® PM | 5 | 23 | | 3 | D-Blade | 2 | 9 | | 4 | Airtraq® SP | 2 | 9 | | 5 | Macintosh blade | 1 | 5 | | 6 | Truview PCD™-R | 0 | 0 |
|
|
