Emergency Medicine International

Emergency Medicine International / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 9358426 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9358426

Xiaofan Li, Yaqun Hong, Xianling Chen, Ping Chen, Nainong Li, "Emergency Combination of Four Drugs for Bloodstream Infection Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Severe Agranulocytosis Patients with Hematologic Malignancies after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation", Emergency Medicine International, vol. 2020, Article ID 9358426, 8 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9358426

Emergency Combination of Four Drugs for Bloodstream Infection Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Severe Agranulocytosis Patients with Hematologic Malignancies after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Academic Editor: Chak W. Kam
Received27 Feb 2020
Revised24 May 2020
Accepted06 Jun 2020
Published04 Aug 2020

Abstract

Bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria is a global threat. However, an effective treatment regimen is still controversial and inadequate due to the rapid deterioration caused by the bacteria. In immunocompromised and neutropenic patients, MDR-BSI is an emergency, which causes treatment-related mortality. In this study, four agranulocytosis patients with hematologic malignancies after HSCT receiving treatment for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae- (CRE-) BSI were included. Conventional treatment using two to three combined antibiotics was administered in the first and second patients. Combination treatment using four drugs, polymyxin B, high-dose tigecycline, fosfomycin, and double-dose carbapenem, was administered in the third and fourth patients. None of the patients receiving conventional treatment survived. Both patients receiving combination treatment using four drugs survived. Therefore, four-drug combination therapy may be needed in CRE-BSI patients who experienced severe agranulocytosis after HSCT. The efficacy of the four-drug combination treatment for CRE-BSI patients as well as the adverse effects need to be further studied.

1. Introduction

Bacterial infection is an important cause for mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Granulocytopenia due to the chemotherapy or radiotherapy in conditioning regimen leads to increased susceptibility for bacterial infections. Some can manifest as fatal bloodstream infections (BSI): high frequency of the multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, even progressing to the extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria and pandrug-resistant (PDR) bacteria. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacteriaceae, including extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) bacteria and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), is a great threat to recipients in HSCT [1]. BSI caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) after transplantation, mostly including Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae [2], has shown a negative impact on long-term survival in transplantation [3]. Herein, we present four cases in which CRE was detected in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies and focus on the treatment of MDR bacteria.

2. Methods

2.1. Patients’ Characteristics

From January 2019 to December 2019, a total of four consecutive severe agranulocytosis patients with hematologic malignancies after HSCT received antibiotic treatment for CRE-BSI. Two patients were male and two were female (see Table 1). The eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of CRE-BSI after HSCT, as well as absence of other active malignancies. No exclusions were made because of age, performance status, cardiac, hepatic, or renal function. This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.


Case 1Case 2Case 3Case 4

NameYeZhangChenLi

Age (year)625250

GenderMaleFemaleMaleFemale

Weight (kg)21411265.9

DiagnosisRelapsed and refractory ALL (CR)Hemophagocytic syndrome (NR)Acute monocytic leukemia (CR)Multiple myeloma

Underlying diseaseNoneNoneNoneNone

Treatment before HSCTMultiple chemotherapy; CAR-TMultiple chemotherapyMultiple chemotherapyMultiple chemotherapy

EBMT score342

Type of HSCTAllo-HSCTAllo-HSCTUCBTAuto-HSCT

Source of stem cells and donorPeripheral blood of HLA-haploidentical related donor (5/10); single cord blood of unrelated donor (7/10)Peripheral blood of HLA-haploidentical related donor (5/10); single cord blood of unrelated donor (5/10)Single cord blood of unrelated donor (7/10)Peripheral blood

Intensity of conditioningIntensified myeloablative conditioningIntensified myeloablative conditioningIntensified myeloablative conditioningMyeloablative conditioning (CBV)

Had PICC deviceYesYesYesYes

Pre-HSCT rectal swabMDRGNB repeatedly (CRE). Day –5: CRENegativeDay –11: Enterococcus faecalis (sensitive)Negative

Post-HSCT rectal swabDay +4: CRE
Day +42: CRE
Day +46: CRE
Day +10: CREDay +7: CREDay +1: CRKp
Day +9: CRKp

Duration of neutropeniaFrom day –2 to day +14 (died before engraftment)From day –4 to day +15From day –1 to day +10

Development of GVHDGrade IVNoneNoneNone

MDR bacteriaCRE (Escherichia coli)CRKP (Klebsiella pneumoniae)CRE (Escherichia coli)CRKP (Klebsiella pneumoniae)

TreatmentCombination therapy with two drugsCombination therapy with three drugsCombination therapy with four drugsCombination therapy with four drugs

OutcomeDied from acute GVHD and infectionDied from infection at day +14ImprovedImproved

Reduction in the number of transplanted T cells in haplo-HSCTYesYesYesYes

Perianal mucosal damage before BSINoneNonePerianal mucosal damagePerianal mucosal damage

ALL: acute lymphocytic leukemia; UCBT: umbilical cord blood stem cell transplantation; haplo-HSCT: haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; allo-HSCT: allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; auto-HSCT: autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; CRE: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; GVHD: graft versus host disease.
2.2. Supportive Care

Packed red blood cells and platelet transfusions were administered when patient hemoglobin level and platelet counts dropped below 60 g/L and 20 × 109 cells/L, respectively. Five days after HSCT, 200 μg/m2/day G-CSF was given subcutaneously until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was higher than 1.5 × 109 cells/L. Prophylactic antifungal therapy using posaconazole was included, while systemic antifungal therapy was empirically given for unexplained persistent fevers.

2.3. Laboratory Testing

MIC values of in vitro susceptibility tests with different drugs against CRE were determined in a multifunction laboratory study by the approved Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards of Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, which included the evaluation of microdilution testing. Reference MIC values for the tested isolates were determined by agar dilution method with Mueller-Hinton agar according to CLSI guidelines. E. coli ATCC25922 was used as quality control strain. The results are shown in Table 2.


AntibioticsCase 1:YeCase 2: ZhangCase 3: ChenCase 4: Li

Amikacin≥64≥32≤2≥64
Aztreonam≥64≥64≥64≥64
Ciprofloxacin≥4≥4≥4≥4
Doxycycline≥16≥16≥16
Cefepime≥32≥32≥32
Imipenem≥64≥168≥16
Levofloxacin≥8≥8≥8≥8
Meropenem≥168≥16
Minocycline≥164≥16
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole≥320≥320≥320≥320
Ceftazidime≥64≥64≥64
Tobramycin≥16≥16≥16≥16
Piperacillin-tazobactam≥128≥128≥128≥128
Cefoperazone/sulbactam≥64≥64≥64
Colistin≤0.5≤0.5≤0.5
Tigecycline≤0.54≤0.52

3. Results

Figure 1 shows the blood cell counts, clinical cases, time of antibiotic explore, and treatment courses of four cases. The first case is a six-year-old boy who was diagnosed with high-risk B-cell acute lymphocyte leukemia with detection of high triploid when he was 15 months old. Due to little response to chemotherapy, CAR-T was performed after the 20th chemotherapy session. Subsequently, halpo-HSCT was utilized to treat the relapsed and refractory ALL. Acute gut GVHD manifesting recurrent diarrhea was diagnosed at day +20 after engraftment. Methylprednisolone, ciclosporin, and lucitanib were administered to treat acute gut GVHD. At day +35 posttransplantation, tazocin, 2.25 g, q8h, was used due to a probable intestinal infection manifesting with fever and diarrhoea accompanied with acute gut GVHD. Given the history of CRE in perianal swabs culture repeatedly, tigecycline was added subsequently according to antibiotic susceptibility. However, the fever was not controlled and increased inflammatory markers were detected in blood. Thus, tazocin was changed into tienam, and the dose of tigecycline was doubled. Three days after treating with this strategy, clinical symptoms did not disappear and more severe diarrhoea developed. Thus, an adjustment using sulperazone, 1.5 g, q8h, and vancomycin, 0.4 g, q12h, was carried out. Recurrent fever and diarrhea continued, while the latest result of perianal swab culture indicated CRE detected, and tigecycline was sensitive solely. Tigecycline and maxipime were given at day +45 posttransplantation. The patient died from acute gut GVHD with persisting blood stools 51 days after transplantation.

The second case is a 25-year-old female diagnosed with hemophagocytic syndrome with recurrent fever. Salvage haploidentical transplantation was performed. After a high-dose chemotherapy treatment, the patient suffered from granulocytopenia. At day +3 posttransplantation, due to recurrent fever accompanied with chills and an increase of inflammatory markers, including IL-6 and procalcitonin, levofloxacin, 0.5 g, qd, sulperazone, 3 g, q12h, and indometacin were used. However, the patient continued to be feverous recurrently and subsequently developed intestinal infection manifesting diarrhea at day +7. Thereby, tienam, 1 g, q6h, and vancomycin, 1 g, q12h, were administrated to replace levofloxacin and sulperazone. Further lab test, including urinary tract, perianal swab, and blood bacterial culture, indicated a progression to systematic XDR bacterial infection, with drug susceptibility showing that almost all the antibiotics are resistant, except colistin and tigecycline. Consequently, combination therapy using polymyxin B, tigecycline, and fosfomycin were administrated. However, the patient died from CRE-BSI at day +14 posttransplantation.

The third case is a 29-month-old boy diagnosed with acute monocytic leukemia with abnormal karyotype. During hospitalization, antibiotic was first used at day +4 due to febrile neutropenia, which might be caused by the administration of ATG or infection. Six days after HSCT, the patient showed an increase of inflammatory markers. Thus, tazocin was escalated to tienam, 0.34 g, q6h, and vancomycin. At the same time, anal fissure was considered because of another chief complaint of perianal pain, which might be the origin of CRE-BSI detected at day +11. An emergency combination therapy with four drugs, including polymyxin B, tigecycline, fosfomycin, and double-dose carbapenem, was administrated immediately. Finally, the following results of blood culture showed no bacteria detected. The patient is still alive and has regular followups.

The fourth case is a 50-year-old woman with multiple myeloma who underwent an autologous HSCT. Four days before HSCT, several pustules were found in her crissum. Considering her history of perianal abscess and septic shock, perianal infection was considered, and mupirocin topical ointment was applied. Due to the aggressive presentation of perianal infection at day +1 posttransplantation accompanying granulocytopenia, linezolid, 0.6 g, q12h, and tienam, 1.0 g, q6h, were added. There was no improvement by day +5 posttransplantation with a fever presenting, so tazocin and vancomycin were administered. Lab results of blood and perianal swabs cultures indicated BSI and perianal infection with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP). An emergency combination therapy with four drugs, including polymyxin B, tigecycline, fosfomycin, and double-dose carbapenem, was administered immediately, after which CRE was cleared. The patient is still alive and has regular followups.

4. Discussion

Immunosuppression patients with BSI are considered an emergency event in clinical practice. Classification of bacteria is broadly based on bacterial properties, such as staining, oxygen tolerance, or morphology. Using Gram stain, bacteria can be categorized into Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [4]. Based on the characteristics of Gram-negative bacteria, the antibacterial action of drugs is determined. For example, the interaction between colistin and LPS can enhance the permeability of the cell envelope and lead to an antimicrobial action [5]. Also, the binding of β-lactams with penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) deactivates enzymes, which play an important role in the assembly or morphogenesis of the bacterial cell wall [6, 7]. However, CRE resist most antibiotics used in clinical practice which make it more difficult to deal with [8].

Immunosuppression and prolonged neutropenia are the most common conditions in patients undergoing HSCT, which are risk factors for infection. The mortality related to BSI caused by CRE is 51% in adult neutropenic patients [9]. We presented four cases of BSI caused by CRE. Only two patients using combination therapy with four drugs survived. The first case could not receive an effective treatment before the final result of blood test was reported, and using tigecycline and maxipime seemed to have a little effect on treating infection of CRE though a MIC <0.5 was detected. It is critical that the median day from the onset of bacteremia until death was about four days [9]. Therefore, for such high-risk patients, an emergency combination therapy should be considered early. The second patient was treated with combination therapy too, which included polymyxin, tigecycline, and fosfomycin. However, the patient died. We highly suspect that carbapenem might be required when treating CRE-BSI in immunosuppression patients. Thus, we used an emergency combination therapy with four drugs to treat patients subsequently, and clinical successes were achieved.

In the “Turin bundle,” the combination therapy using colistin 9 MU, then 4.5 MU, q12h + tigecycline, 100 mg, q12h + meropenem, 2 g, q8h. was recommended for severe sepsis/septic shock caused by CPKP carriers [10]. Though meropenem was not advised when MIC was higher than 8–16 mg/L in a study by Bassetti et al. [11], an enhanced efficacy of double-dose carbapenem therapy compared with carbapenem alone was observed in both in vitro chemostat and in vivo murine model [12]. Also, the double-dose carbapenem regimen demonstrated a synergistic effect in a neutropenic patient suffering from BSI caused by XDR-CPKP after allo-HSCT whose blood test indicated MIC >32 of carbapenem and clinical successes were achieved in 3/7 (43%) patients with BSI caused by CRKP [13, 14]. Eventually, double-dose tienam was administrated in our combination therapy. Due to no new or alternative antibacterial drugs available and drawbacks such as the risk of emergent resistance and suboptimal efficacy, combination therapy with some agents that remain active in vitro, including colistin/polymyxin B and tigecycline, should also be considered [15]. Colistin is effective against XDR carbapenemase-producing microorganisms both in vitro and in vivo, and a combination therapy is necessary to treat bacteremia in the critically ill patients [16]. Another “old” drug, fosfomycin, was suggested in combination therapy. A synergy was observed when fosfomycin was combined with meropenem or colistin [17]. A synergistic effect could also be found in the combination of colistin with meropenem and tigecycline [18]. It is also important to note that the 100 mg tigecycline twice daily showed a higher efficacy in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia compared with lower doses of tigecycline [19]. Considering these drug interactive findings, our empirical therapy combining polymyxin B, high-dose tigecycline, fosfomycin, and double-dose carbapenem was administered, and immunocompromised and neutropenic patients in cases four and three survived BSI caused by CRE.

5. Risk Factors for CRE, BSI, and Mortality

Apart from the treatment regimen for BSI, many risk factors for HSCT mortality should also be considered. All patients reported here had PICC before transplantation and no underlying disease, yet many characteristics of patients are heterogeneous. The retrospective case report includes two children and two adults who were diagnosed as ALL, HLH, AML, and MM, respectively, and showed different clinical histories. Source of stem cells varied that were collected from mobilized peripheral blood of HLA-haploidentical related donor and single cord blood of unrelated donor or single cord blood of unrelated donor or autologous mobilized peripheral blood. All patients undergoing allo-HSCT received intensified myeloablative conditioning. The patient undergoing auto-HSCT received myeloablative conditioning using CBV regimen. Perianal mucosal damage was observed in two of them. The previously mentioned factors might be related to the course and severity of infection. Considering the patients’ clinical infection condition, combination therapy could be considered as an emergency treatment.

It is worth noting that colonization was significantly related to MDR bacterial infections in HSCT, which commonly results in bacteremia eventually, and what is also noteworthy is the high rate of patients colonized by at least one MDR organism [2023]. For pre-HSCT rectal swab screening in the four cases, CRE was detected repeatedly in the first case and sensitive Enterococcus faecalis was observed in the third case, while the results of cases three and four were negative. Rectal swabs are positivity correlated with the subsequent BSI caused by MDRGNB. CRKP is a predictive indicator of subsequent infection in immunocompromised patients [24]. Though a study by Forcina et al. showed no significance between a pretransplant MDR-GNB colonization and the overall survival, transplant-related mortality, or infection-related mortality in HSCT [25], most studies indicated that colonization with MDR organisms is an important risk factor for nonrelapse mortality of HSCT [20, 22, 26]. Preengraftment Gram-negative bacteremia is associated with the rise of mortality rate at four months after auto-HSCT and allo-HSCT [26]. Therefore, an evaluation protocol and timing for the execution of the rectal swab is necessary. A well-defined monitoring strategy has not been standardized. We executed rectal swab before transplantation, and the rectal swab results of these four cases are shown in Table 1. Regular detection was performed every two weeks unless related symptoms and signs, such as perianal mucosal damage or abnormal stool, were found. Additionally, it is still controversial whether there is a significant difference between colonization and outcome of HSCT and whether therapies should be given when perianal or rectal swabs culture result indicates a MDR infection without any other evidence of infection before transplantation. Moreover, the therapy strategies for colonization after transplantation are inconclusive. A significant survival difference was described between patients who cleared the MDR organisms and those with persistent MDR organisms, but interestingly, it is the length of antibiotic therapy that is a potential risk factor for MDR organism persistence after HSCT [27]. It is worth noting that the first case also developed GVHD. Acute gastrointestinal GVHD is associated with the rise of enteric bacterial BSI in pediatric allo-HSCT recipients [28]. The further multicenter study of BSI showed that enteric bacterial BSI after the onset of acute gastrointestinal GVHD caused a nearly fivefold increase in transplantation-related mortality [29]. Acute GVHD grades II–IV are an independent predictive indicator of subsequent first BSI, and both acute GVHD grades II–IV and BSI predict death within 100 days after HSCT [30].

Another possible factor for causing MDR is other previous antibiotic therapies, such as fluoroquinolone, which is administrated in the second case, and the third-generation cephalosporins [3133]. However, some studies described that prophylactic treatment with levofloxacin showed a lower rate of bacteremia by contrast [34, 35]. The use of fluoroquinolones in patients with cancer and neutropenia is still controversial. It is also important to note that the pediatric patient in the first case developed acute gut GVHD after HSCT, which is maybe associated with MDR. There is a new and diversified pattern of accumulation of antimicrobial resistance genes in pediatric patients who develop acute GVHD after HSCT, including multidrug resistance [36]. It is noteworthy that, due to a prolonged bacterial culture, the results of the blood bacterial culture of the first case came out after death, which increased the difficulty of treatment and was a risk factor for mortality. A study by Satlin et al. also described a critical data that the 30-day mortality of patients who were infected with CRE in blood stream but treated with antimicrobial agents before receiving final antimicrobial susceptibility testing were 9/9 [9]. Another risk factor for mortality may be the antimicrobial susceptibility. Multiple factors impact on the incidence and outcome of BSI, and both early prevention and combination therapy are important.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional Points

BSI caused by MDR or XDR bacteria in immunocompromised and neutropenic patients after HSCT is a global threat. In a study by Satlin et al., the 30-day mortalities are 4/10, 6/16, or 4/8 in single, two, or three Gram-negative agent(s), respectively [9]. However, effective treatment regimen is still controversial and inadequate. Our emergency therapy combining polymyxin B, high-dose tigecycline, fosfomycin, and double-dose carbapenem saved two patients in our center, but verification using in vitro, in vivo, and well-designed clinical studies may be needed in the future. Moreover, the adverse effect is unknown and a long-term followup is needed. It is noteworthy that the use of colistin extensively or inadequately may cause resistance of colistin among K. pneumoniae isolates [37]. However, strong combination therapy should be considered in immunocompromised and neutropenic patients because of the rapid deterioration and high mortality. New drugs, such as zavicefta, may provide a better strategy to deal with the dilemma [38]. Given the heterogeneity, more data and analysis of related cases are needed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Xiaofan Li and Yaqun Hong contributed equally to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Youth Project of National Natural Science Foundation (Grant no. 81200400); Top-Notch Innovative Talents Project and Fujian Project (Grant 2016Y9025 and 2016J06018); Fujian Medical University Teaching Reform Project (Y17005) and Department of Science and Technology of Fujian Province Project (2017I0004 and 2017Y9057).

References

  1. M. J. Satlin and T. J. Walsh, “Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus: three major threats to hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients,” Transplant Infectious Disease, vol. 19, no. 6, Article ID e12762, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. Moghnieh, N. Estaitieh, A. Mugharbil et al., “Third generation cephalosporin resistant Enterobacteriaceae and multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria causing bacteremia in febrile neutropenia adult cancer patients in Lebanon, broad spectrum antibiotics use as a major risk factor, and correlation with poor prognosis,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 5, p. 11, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Ge, T. Yang, L. Zhang et al., “The incidence, risk factors and outcomes of early bloodstream infection in patients with malignant hematologic disease after unrelated cord blood transplantation: a retrospective study,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 654, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. I. Zgurskaya and V. V. Rybenkov, “Permeability barriers of gram-negative pathogens,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1459, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. Giamarellou and G. Poulakou, “Multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections,” Drugs, vol. 69, no. 14, pp. 1879–1901, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. Cho, T. Uehara, and T. G. Bernhardt, “Beta-lactam antibiotics induce a lethal malfunctioning of the bacterial cell wall synthesis machinery,” Cell, vol. 159, no. 6, pp. 1300–1311, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Toth, N. T. Antunes, N. K. Stewart et al., “Class D β-lactamases do exist in gram-positive bacteria,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. L. Tooke, P. Hinchliffe, E. C. Bragginton et al., “β-lactamases and β-lactamase inhibitors in the 21st century,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 431, no. 18, pp. 3472–3500, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. J. Satlin, N. Cohen, K. C. Ma et al., “Bacteremia due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies,” Journal of Infection, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 336–345, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. F. G. De Rosa, S. Corcione, S. Raviolo, B. Bruno, and A. Busca, “Management of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae in allogenic stem cell transplant recipients: the Turin bundle,” The New Microbiologica, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 143–145, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. Bassetti, M. Peghin, and D. Pecori, “The management of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 583–594, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. C. Bulik and D. P. Nicolau, “Double-carbapenem therapy for carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 3002–3004, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. N. Piedra-Carrasco, L. Miguel, A. Fàbrega et al., “Effectiveness of a double-carbapenem regimen in a KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in an immunocompromised patient,” Microbial Drug Resistance, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 199–202, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. B. Cprek and J. C. Gallagher, “Ertapenem-containing double-carbapenem therapy for treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 669–673, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. Averbuch, C. Cordonnier, D. M. Livermore et al., “Targeted therapy against multi-resistant bacteria in leukemic and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: guidelines of the 4th European conference on infections in leukemia (ECIL-4, 2011),” Haematologica, vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 1836–1847, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. I. Karaiskos and H. Giamarellou, “Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens: current and emerging therapeutic approaches,” Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1351–1370, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Souli, I. Galani, S. Boukovalas et al., “In vitro interactions of antimicrobial combinations with fosfomycin against KPC-2-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and protection of resistance development,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 2395–2397, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. Geladari, M. Simitsopoulou, C. Antachopoulos, and E. Roilides, “Dose-dependent synergistic interactions of colistin with rifampin, meropenem, and tigecycline against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilms,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 63, no. 3, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Ramirez, N. Dartois, H. Gandjini, J. L. Yan, J. Korth-Bradley, and P. C. McGovern, “Randomized phase 2 trial to evaluate the clinical efficacy of two high-dosage tigecycline regimens versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1756–1762, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. Sadowska-Klasa, A. Piekarska, W. Prejzner, M. Bieniaszewska, and A. Hellmann, “Colonization with multidrug-resistant bacteria increases the risk of complications and a fatal outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 509–517, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. M. Ferreira, F. Moreira, T. Guimaraes et al., “Epidemiology, risk factors and outcomes of multi-drug-resistant bloodstream infections in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: importance of previous gut colonization,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 83–91, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. Scheich, S. Lindner, R. Koenig et al., “Clinical impact of colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms on outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia,” Cancer, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 286–296, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. V. Rolston, L. Nesher, V. Mulanovich, and R. Chemaly, “Intestinal colonisation and blood stream infections due to vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae (ESBLE) in patients with haematological and oncological malignancies,” Infection, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1039-1040, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. Girmenia, C. Viscoli, A. Piciocchi et al., “Management of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in stem cell transplant recipients: an Italian multidisciplinary consensus statement,” Haematologica, vol. 100, no. 9, pp. e373–e376, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Forcina, F. Lorentino, V. Marasco et al., “Clinical impact of pretransplant multidrug-resistant gram-negative colonization in autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1476–1482, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Girmenia, A. Bertaina, A. Piciocchi et al., “Incidence, risk factors and outcome of pre-engraftment gram-negative bacteremia after allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an Italian prospective multicenter survey,” Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 1884–1896, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. D. Heidenreich, S. Kreil, M. Jawhar et al., “Course of colonization by multidrug-resistant organisms after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 2501–2508, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. Levinson, K. Pinkney, Z. Jin et al., “Acute gastrointestinal graft-vs-host disease is associated with increased enteric bacterial bloodstream infection density in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 350–357, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. Satwani, J. L. Freedman, S. Chaudhury et al., “A multicenter study of bacterial blood stream infections in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients: the role of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease,” Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 642–647, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. D. Poutsiaka, D. Munson, L. L. Price, G. W. Chan, and D. R. Snydman, “Blood stream infection (BSI) and acute GVHD after hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) are associated,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 300–307, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. Averbuch, G. Tridello, J. Hoek et al., “Antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative rods causing bacteremia in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: intercontinental prospective study of the infectious diseases working party of the European bone marrow transplantation group,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 1819–1828, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. O. Zajac-Spychala, J. Wachowiak, A. Pieczonka et al., “Bacterial infections in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: incidence, epidemiology, and spectrum of pathogens: report of the Polish Pediatric Group for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation,” Transplant Infectious Disease: An Official Journal of the Transplantation Society, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 690–698, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. L. Oliveira, M. de Souza, V. M. H. Carvalho-Dias et al., “Epidemiology of bacteremia and factors associated with multi-drug-resistant gram-negative bacteremia in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 775–781, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G. Bucaneve, A. Micozzi, F. Menichetti et al., “Levofloxacin to prevent bacterial infection in patients with cancer and neutropenia,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 10, pp. 977–987, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Wolf, L. Tang, P. M. Flynn et al., “Levofloxacin prophylaxis during induction therapy for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 1790–1798, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. F. D’Amico, M. Soverini, D. Zama et al., “Gut resistome plasticity in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 5649, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Antoniadou, F. Kontopidou, G. Poulakou et al., “Colistin-resistant isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae emerging in intensive care unit patients: first report of a multiclonal cluster,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 786–790, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. Shirley, “Ceftazidime-avibactam: a review in the treatment of serious gram-negative bacterial infections,” Drugs, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 675–692, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Xiaofan Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views502
Downloads342
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.