Emergency Medicine International

Emergency Medicine International / 2021 / Article
Special Issue

Resuscitation for Cardiac Arrest and Postcardiac Arrest Care 2021

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 9954669 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9954669

Chin-Teng Lin, Chen-Yu Wang, Kuan-Chih Huang, Shi-Jinn Horng, Lun-De Liao, "Wearable, Multimodal, Biosignal Acquisition System for Potential Critical and Emergency Applications", Emergency Medicine International, vol. 2021, Article ID 9954669, 10 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9954669

Wearable, Multimodal, Biosignal Acquisition System for Potential Critical and Emergency Applications

Academic Editor: Yan-Ren Lin
Received09 Apr 2021
Accepted25 May 2021
Published11 Jun 2021


For emergency or intensive-care units (ICUs), patients with unclear consciousness or unstable hemodynamics often require aggressive monitoring by multiple monitors. Complicated pipelines or lines increase the burden on patients and inconvenience for medical personnel. Currently, many commercial devices provide related functionalities. However, most devices measure only one biological signal, which can increase the budget for users and cause difficulty in remote integration. In this study, we develop a wearable device that integrates electrocardiography (ECG), electroencephalography (EEG), and blood oxygen machines for medical applications with the hope that it can be applied in the future. We develop an integrated multiple-biosignal recording system based on a modular design. The developed system monitors and records EEG, ECG, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) signals for health purposes simultaneously in a single setting. We use a logic level converter to connect the developed EEG module (BR8), ECG module, and SpO2 module to a microcontroller (Arduino). The modular data are then smoothly encoded and decoded through consistent overhead byte stuffing (COBS). This developed system has passed simulation tests and exhibited proper functioning of all modules and subsystems. In the future, the functionalities of the proposed system can be expanded with additional modules to support various emergency or ICU applications.

1. Introduction

The monitoring of biosignals is becoming increasingly important in modern healthcare and health management, especially for emergency or intensive-care units (ICUs) [13]. Patients with unclear consciousness or unstable hemodynamics often require aggressive monitoring by using multiple monitors. This type of monitoring is not only used to understand current physiological changes in the body but also provides a potential way to predict the occurrence of specific malfunctions (e.g., stroke or heart attack) [4]. Biosignals record a biological event (such as a beating heart or a contracting muscle) in both space and time. The electrical, chemical, and mechanical activities that occur during this biological event often produce signals that can be measured and analyzed [5]. Biosignals, therefore, contain useful information that can be used to understand the underlying physiological mechanisms of a specific biological event or system and may be useful for medical diagnosis [6, 7]. These signals can be acquired in a variety of ways [5, 6, 8]. Many developed products have combined different peripheral measurements (heart rate (HR), skin conductance level, etc.) into one actigraphy for healthcare [9, 10]. However, very few studies or products have combined these peripheral activities with central biological changes, such as brain activities (electroencephalography (EEG), hemodynamics, etc.) [1113].

Moreover, recent developments have shown that multiple biological signals can provide higher accuracy in terms of determining human performance [14, 15] or diagnosing various diseases [16]. Biological signals in living beings are any signal (either electrical or nonelectrical) that can be continually measured and monitored to provide information about several different systems in the body [17]. For example, EEG can be used to assess brain function diseases, degenerative diseases, inflammation, epilepsy, and abnormal sleep [1822].

In addition, electrocardiography (ECG) can be used to observe cardiac behavior and to detect arrhythmia, ventricular atrial hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia and other diseases [23]. It can reflect the degree of myocardial damage and the structure of the atria and ventricles [24, 25]. Recently, oxygen saturation (SpO2) combined with ECG was used to detect stenosis or occlusion of an arteriovenous fistula/graft, the progression of arteriosclerosis, and arrhythmia [25]. SpO2 is a measure of the amount of oxygen-carrying hemoglobin in the blood relative to the amount of hemoglobin not carrying oxygen [2629]. The body requires a certain level of oxygen in the blood to function efficiently [26, 28, 30]. In fact, very low levels of SpO2 can result in severe symptoms [26]. An ECG conditioning circuit is employed to examine the measured ECG signal. A pulse oximeter with a finger-type probe is connected to indirectly measure the SpO2 level, and then, the HR and SpO2 level are obtained at the same time [31, 32].

Therefore, an urgent need exists to develop an integrated system that can record multiple biosignals simultaneously for medical applications. In this study, we develop a multibiological integrated monitoring system that can acquire and process multiple biosignals (such as EEG, ECG, SpO2, and HR signals) simultaneously. Additionally, the developed system can transmit integrated biological data wirelessly to a smartphone or PC and monitor EEG, ECG, SpO2, and HR information in real time. Most conventional systems take data points separately and from different locations on the body. Additionally, complicated pipelines or lines increase the burden on patients and inconvenience for medical personnel. In contrast, we develop an intelligent sensor system that facilitates sensor fusion by sealing the electronics into a single mold. This design is less affected by motion artifacts. In the future, this option will provide flexibility to patients and give clinicians access to physiological data in real time. Moreover, the modular design concept (functional partitioning into discrete and scalable modules) will soon be applied to this system to expand the number of possible measurements and establish industry standards.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. System Architecture

The purpose of this study is to develop a biosignal recording system that can measure multiple biosignals synchronously (the system architecture is shown in Figure 1(a)). The system consists of three parts: a recording module, a microcontroller, and an online interface. The core system is the Arduino Mega 2560, which has the following characteristics: (1) an open-source single-chip microcontroller that uses an Atmel AVR single chip; (2) open-source software; (3) a hardware platform built into a simple output/input interface panel; and (4) the use of C language to develop the environment. The biosignals are acquired by separate related modules: (1) EEG module: BR8; (2) ECG module: AD8232; and (3) SpO2 module: MAX30100.

2.2. EEG Signal Acquisition System

The architecture of the EEG signal acquisition system is shown in Figure 1(b). The EEG signals are first amplified by two analog amplifier circuits and then sent to the analog-to-digital converter (ADC) (ADS1298) for sampling. The digital signals converted by the ADC are transmitted to the microcontroller unit (MSP430) via a serial peripheral interface (SPI). After the signals are encoded by MSP430, the EEG raw data are sent to other receiver devices through RS-232 for further analysis or application.

2.2.1. Front-End Active Circuit

In the first stage, INA333 has a high input impedance (100 GΩ) and a high common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) (100 dB). These factors make INA333 suitable for the modular design of the integrated system.

The transfer function of this design is as follows:

In this circuit, is set as the gain of the amplifier. The preamplifier amplitude is set to 7.8 V/V, and the cutoff frequency is designed to be 0.103 Hz. Thus, the circuit achieves high performance in the first stage, as shown in Figure 2(a) (schematic of the instrument amplifier). In the second stage, OPA2333 has a low offset voltage (10 µV), a low quiescent current (17 μA), an excellent CMRR (130 dB), and a low power op amplifier. In this stage, OPA2333 is used as a bandpass filter. The second-order high-pass filter circuit is shown in Figure 2(b).

The EEG signal is filtered by a second-order high-pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 0.108 Hz in the second stage. The gain of the high-pass filter is set to 174 V/V. The transfer function of this designed high-pass filter circuit is as follows:

2.2.2. Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC)

In the ADC unit, ADS1298 integrates 8 channels of a high-resolution (24 bits) delta-sigma ADC and provides a high data rate (32 k samples per second). ADS1298 is usually used for ECG and EEG monitoring, as shown in Table 1.

ADS1298:8-channel ADC
Resolution24 bit/16 bit high resolution
Input channels8 channels
Power/channel consumption0.75 mW
Control interfaceSPI

Specification of active circuit
Input signal range10 µV–100 µV
Sampling rate (Hz)512

Overall, the total gain of the active circuit is approximately 1,357 V/V, and the noise below 0.108 Hz is filtered out. The amplified and filtered EEG signals are digitized by the ADC unit (ADS1298). A total of 8 channel active circuits are operated at approximately 2.8 mA with a 3 V DC power supply. The details of the active circuits are shown in Table 1.

2.2.3. Microcontroller: MSP430

After digitization is completed, the microcontroller unit (MSP430F5522, Texas Instruments, USA) receives the digital signals. MSP430 incorporates a 16-bit RISC CPU, peripherals, 10 KB SRAM, and 128 KB Flash. Dedicated embedded emulation logic resides on the device itself and is accessed via the Joint Test Action Group (JTAG) using no additional system resources. A sampling rate of 500 samples per second is set for the ADC.

MSP430 processes EEG signals and transmits them via a universal asynchronous receiver/transmitter (UART) interface to the Arduino board. Finally, the EEG data and other biosignals are displayed simultaneously on the screen and saved to the computer [8, 33].

2.3. ECG Module

AD8232 is a signal module for ECG measurement applications. It is designed to extract, amplify, and filter small biosignals under noisy conditions [34]. AD8232 is chosen because it has the best output impedance and gains. For the high-pass filter, a two-pole high-pass filter is used, and for the low-pass filter, a two-pole Sallen–Key low-pass filter is used [34]. AD8232 is available in a 4 mm × 4 mm, 20-lead LFCSP package. All the specifications make AD8232 suitable for use in the integrated system.

2.4. SpO2 Module

The SpO2 module used, MAX30100, is an integrated pulse oximetry and HR monitoring sensor. It combines two LEDs, a photodetector, optimized optics, and low-noise analog signal processing to detect pulse oximetry and HR signals. MAX30100 operates from 1.8 V to 3.3 V power supplies [35] and can simplify the circuit design, reduce the system footprint, and reduce the design time and system power consumption; hence, it is suitable for the system [35].

2.5. Microcontroller Unit

Arduino uses an open-source software and hardware platform and provides a simple I/O interface. It also supports development environments such as Java and C. In the experiment, we connected different modules to the Arduino Mega 2560. The Arduino board can accept input voltages from 7 to 12 V. In addition, it can output 3.3 V and 5 V to provide different physiological modules and has a sufficient number of I/O pins, making the integration of many physiological signal modules straightforward.

The Arduino Mega 2560 is an ATmega2560-based microcontroller board. It has 54 digital I/O pins (15 of which can be used as PWM outputs), 16 analog inputs, 4 UARTs (hardware serial ports), a 16 MHz crystal oscillator, a USB connection, and a power jack. It contains everything necessary to support the microcontroller and simply requires connection to a computer with a USB cable or boot-up with an AC-DC adapter or battery.

2.6. BR8 Connection to Arduino: Logic-Level Converter

The Arduino board generally functions at 5 V, but the MSP430 used in our EEG system is a microcontroller operating at 3.3–3.7 V. If the TX/RX is connected, it will easily wear out or even overheat the MSP430 system (Figure 2(c)). Between the two systems, a logic-level converter is used for voltage conversion (Figure 2(d)).

The principle of this system is straightforward. When the current terminal (from the Arduino board) has a VL input of 5 V, the transistor does not conduct, and the back-end (to MSP430) VH output is 3.3 V. Conversely, when the front-end VL input is 0 V, the transistor is turned on, and the back-end VH output is also 0 V; thus, the voltage can be converted to a level suitable for different systems. Combined with the logic-level converter, the transmitting peak-to-peak voltage of MSP430 (Figure 3(a)) changes from 3.28 V to 4.8 V as it becomes the receiving peak-to-peak voltage of the Arduino board (Figure 3(b)). Additionally, the transmitting peak-to-peak voltage of the Arduino board changes from 4.8 V to 3.28 V as it becomes the receiving peak-to-peak voltage of MSP430.

Consistent overhead byte stuffing (COBS) is an algorithm for encoding digital packets to achieve efficient and reliable packet framing. It uses zero as a specific byte, which is inserted into a packet as a delimiter. When a zero data byte occurs, the operation replaces the zero bytes with a nonzero value. Therefore, zero data are not present in the packet and are misinterpreted as a packet boundary (shown in Table 2). This method enables the data packet receiver to quickly and efficiently restore the data packet to its original data form for efficient and error-free transmission.

Unencoded data (hex)Encoded with COBS (hex)

0001 01 00
00 0001 01 01 00
11 22 00 3303 11 22 02 33 00
11 22 33 4405 11 22 33 44 00
11 00 00 0002 11 01 01 01 00

The data transmitted from MSP430 to the Arduino board are encoded by using COBS. To integrate different signals from each module, the packets need to be decoded into the original data. After the packets are decoded, the overhead byte and the delimiter byte are eliminated, and the zero value is reduced, as shown in Figure 3(c).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. EEG Test Result

The experiments reported in this paper were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of National Chiao Tung University (NCTU-REC-106-057) and followed the rules of the Declaration of Helsinki. In the EEG signal test, we use the formal EEG test signal generator to simulate the fixed frequency signal (500 μV, 2 Hz sine wave) for testing. The basic signals are framed as a packet through the BR8 module and transmitted to the Arduino board. Then, the Arduino board restores the packet to the original waveform via a UART. The design of the proposed system successfully passes the EEG simulation test and obtains the same quality EEG signal as that obtained through the connection with the EEG module (BR8).

3.2. ECG Test Result

In the ECG independent test, we use a UART to connect the AD8232 to the Arduino board through the TX/RX signal lines to receive the measured data from the experiments. The Arduino board then organizes the results into data for transmission to the computer as follows. The electrodes are grouped together to observe the activity of the heart from different angles. The typical ECG waveform can clearly be observed in Figure 4(a). PQRS and less obvious T waves can also be seen.

3.3. SpO2 Test Result

Unlike AD8232, MAX30100 uses I2C and the Arduino board to transfer data. Through the two signal lines SCL and SDA connected to the Arduino board, after the process starts, the red LED on MAX30100 is activated, indicating normal operation. The red LED plays an important role in measuring blood oxygen data.

When measuring, we press the index finger over the red LED, allowing light to pass through the finger, with the reflected rays being monitored by the receiver. The signal received by the receiver is analyzed with respect to both the AC signal and the DC signal. In addition to measuring the blood oxygen concentration, MAX30100 can calculate the rhythm. Figure 4(b) shows the results of SpO2 transmission to the computer.

The data in the figure are updated approximately every second. We carry out a simple test: the subject is first measured in a calm state, and then, the subject climbs the stairs to the eighth floor and is measured again. A simple comparison reveals that the heart rhythm is significantly improved after climbing the stairs. The normal blood oxygen readings of an adult range from approximately 94% to 100%.

3.4. Graphical User Interface Test

To monitor a variety of biomedical signals, we must develop an integrated interface that can simultaneously display EEG, ECG, and SpO2 monitoring results. In this study, we use MATLAB to achieve our goal. MATLAB's powerful features provide us with a waveform interface and a collection of data packets from the COM port. The collected data are easy to store and use in subsequent calculations. In the experiment, we use the interface to display the EEG and ECG real-time waveforms, the blood oxygen level, and the HR. With MATLAB itself, we observe the individual waveform amplifications and store them at the end of measurement. The data for each experiment are available for later review.

3.5. Online Demo of the Integrating System

In the integration interface test, the subject wears all the sensors of each module, including four EEG channels from BR8, three electrodes from AD8232, and one SpO2 channel from MAX30100 (Figure 5). Four EEG electrodes are placed on the forehead (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)), three ECG electrodes are placed on the chest (Figure 5(c)), and the subject's finger is placed on MAX30100 for the SpO2 measurement (Figure 5(c)). When the preparation procedure is finished, the subject begins to undergo measurement of the EEG, ECG, and SpO2 signals simultaneously. The results we obtained are presented in the integrated interface shown in Figure 5(d). The first to fourth channels are the signals received from the four electrodes of the EEG measurement. The fifth channel is the ECG signal, measured by the aforementioned three electrodes. The sixth and seventh channels are the HR and SpO2 signals. In the experiment, we ask the subject to close their eyes for approximately 10 seconds and then quickly blink for approximately 10 seconds. As shown, for approximately 67–75 seconds, the EEG signal has a gentle waveform, which represents the brain wave of the closed eye. Between 75 seconds and 85 seconds, each peak represents an eye blink (Figure 6(a)). Then, after enlarging the ECG signal, we observe that every complete cycle of the heart rhythm is a PQRST wave (Figure 6(b)). Finally, the HR and SpO2 values fall within the normal range (Figure 6(c)).

4. Conclusions

This study developed a multiple-biosignal recording system based on a modular design that integrates EEG, ECG, and SpO2 modules for medical applications. The data from these three modules are transmitted to the microcontroller unit, an Arduino board, through a designed logic level converter. The Arduino board uses COBS to simultaneously decode the data and send them together to a customized graphical user interface for near-real-time presentation in a MATLAB environment, which is capable of receiving and visualizing data in real time and providing data for offline analysis. This system passed all simulation signal tests and functioned as intended when applied to a real human being. The modular design can endow the integrated system with high flexibility and enable our EEG module to be successfully combined with other commercial measurement devices on a common Arduino platform. In the future, we will replace our microcontroller with a more advanced microcontroller (e.g., the Arduino Zero) to increase the speed of data transmission. This improvement can help to enable the measurement of different biosignals (e.g., electromyography) or channels of the EEG module in this system for complete monitoring of human health status. Moreover, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth will support mobile platforms to increase the convenience of usage and application. We anticipate this multiple-biosignal acquisition system to be used for various real-life medical applications, such as in emergency or ICU settings, and to improve human quality of life.

Data Availability

Data will be provided on request through the corresponding author of this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


This work was supported in part by the Australian Research Council (ARC) under discovery grants DP180100670 and DP180100656. The research was also sponsored in part by the Army Research Laboratory and accomplished under Cooperative Agreement nos. W911NF-10-2-0022 and W911NF-10-D-0002/TO 0023. This research was supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan through financial support under grant nos. 107-2221-E-400-002-MY3, 107-3111-Y-043-012, 108-2221-E-400-003-MY3, 108-2221-E-009-120-MY2, 109-2221-E-009-050-MY2, and 109-2314-B-400-037; by the National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan under grant nos. NHRI-EX108-10829EI, NHRI-EX109-10829EI, and NHRI-EX110-10829EI; and by S & T grants from the Central Government of Taiwan under grant nos. 106-0324-01-10-05, 107-0324-01-19-02, 108-0324-01-19-06, 109-EC-17-A-22-1650, and 110-EC-17-A-22-1650.


  1. E. Kyriacou, S. Pavlopoulos, A. Berler et al., “Multi-purpose HealthCare Telemedicine Systems with mobile communication link support,” Biomedical Engineering Online, vol. 2, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Tachakra, K. A. Banitsas, and F. Tachakra, “Performance of a wireless telemedicine system in a hospital accident and emergency department,” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 298–302, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Rezayi, A. A. Safaei, and N. Mohammadzadeh, “Design and evaluation of a wearable smart blanket system for monitoring vital signs of patients in an ambulance,” Journal of Sensors, vol. 2021, Article ID 8820740, 11 pages, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. Catarinucci, D. de Donno, L. Mainetti et al., “An IoT-aware architecture for smart healthcare systems,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 515–526, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Liu, M. Liu, Y. Bai, J. Zhang, H. Liu, and W. Zhu, “Recent progress in flexible wearable sensors for vital sign monitoring,” Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 20, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. V. Thakor and S. Tong, “Advances in quantitative electroencephalogram analysis methods,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 453–495, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L.-D. Liao, S.-L. Wu, C.-H. Liou et al., “A novel 16-channel wireless system for electroencephalography measurements with dry spring-loaded sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1545–1555, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. T. Lin, Y. H. Yu, J. T. King, C. H. Liu, and L. D. Liao, “Augmented wire-embedded silicon-based dry-contact sensors for electroencephalography signal measurements,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 20, pp. 3831–3837, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  9. H. Kim, S. Kim, N. Van Helleputte et al., “A configurable and low-power mixed signal SoC for portable ECG monitoring applications,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 257–267, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. L. Wu, L. D. Liao, S. W. Lu, W. L. Jiang, S. A. Chen, and C. T. Lin, “Controlling a human-computer interface system with a novel classification method that uses electrooculography signals,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 2133–2141, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. M. Chi, P. Ng, and G. Cauwenberghs, “Wireless noncontact ECG and EEG biopotential sensors,” Acm Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, vol. 12, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. D. Lou, X. Chen, Z. Zhao et al., “A wireless health monitoring system based on android operating system,” IERI Procedia, vol. 4, pp. 208–215, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. D. Liao, C. T. Lin, K. McDowell et al., “Biosensor technologies for augmented brain-computer interfaces in the next decades,” Proceedings of the IEEE Special Centennial Issue, vol. 100, pp. 1553–1566, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. H. Nam, J. Y. Lee, and J. Y. Kim, “Biological-signal-based user-interface system for virtual-reality applications for healthcare,” Journal of Sensors, vol. 2018, Article ID 9054758, 10 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. H. Yu, S. W. Lu, L. D. Liao, and C. T. Lin, “Design, fabrication, and experimental validation of novel flexible silicon-based dry sensors for electroencephalography signal measurements,” IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, vol. 2, Article ID 2700307, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. T. Lin, M. Nascimben, J. T. King, and Y. K. Wang, “Task-related EEG and HRV entropy factors under different real-world fatigue scenarios,” Neurocomputing, vol. 311, pp. 24–31, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  17. S. J. Hussain, M. Irfan, N. Z. Jhanjhi, K. Hussain, and M. Humayun, “Performance enhancement in wireless body area networks with secure communication,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. Baumgartner, J. P. Koren, and M. Rothmayer, “Automatic computer-based detection of epileptic seizures,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 9, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  19. C. A. Teixeira, B. Direito, H. Feldwisch-Drentrup et al., “EPILAB: a software package for studies on the prediction of epileptic seizures,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 200, pp. 257–271, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  20. N. Ahammad, T. Fathima, and P. Joseph, “Detection of epileptic seizure event and onset using EEG,” Biomed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 450573, 7 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Jacob, M. Alagirisamy, V. G. Menon et al., “An adaptive and flexible brain energized full body exoskeleton with IoT edge for assisting the paralyzed patients,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 100721–100731, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. J. Casson, “Wearable EEG and beyond,” Biomedical Engineering Letters, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 53–71, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. S. Addison, “Wavelet transforms and the ECG: a review,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. R155–R199, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H. L. Zhu, C. Cheng, H. Yin et al., “Automatic multilabel electrocardiogram diagnosis of heart rhythm or conduction abnormalities with deep learning: a cohort study,” Lancet Digital Health, vol. 2, pp. E348–E357, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. K. Tseng, S. H. Chao, Y. S. Hwang et al., “Application of A Minimized wearable device combined with SpO2 and ECG sensors to detect stenosis or occlusion of arteriovenous fistula/graft, progression of arteriosclerosis and arrhythmia,” in Proceedings of 2018 7th IEEE International Symposium on Next-Generation Electronics (Isne), pp. 198–201, Taipei, Taiwan, May 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  26. A. M. Modi, R. D. Kiourkas, J. Li, and J. B. Scott, “Reliability of smartphone pulse oximetry in subjects at risk for hypoxemia,” Respiratory Care, vol. 66, pp. 384–390, 2021. View at: Google Scholar
  27. A. Hasanin, N. Karam, A. M. Mukhtar, and S. F. Habib, “The ability of pulse oximetry-derived peripheral perfusion index to detect fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock,” Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 254–261, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Navarro-Martinez, M. Carrasco-Llatas, S. Matarredona-Quiles, J. A. D. Ares, N. P. Tomas, and R. T. Juan, “Feasibility of at-home continuous overnight pulse oximetry for obstructive sleep apnea screening in bariatric surgery candidates,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. T. Dunnwald, R. Kienast, D. Niederseer, and M. Burtscher, “The use of pulse oximetry in the assessment of acclimatization to high altitude,” Sensors, vol. 21, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Menahem, A. Sehgal, and S. Meagher, “Early detection of significant congenital heart disease: the contribution of fetal cardiac ultrasound and newborn pulse oximetry screening,” Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 323–327, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. S. Mostafa, F. Mendonca, F. Morgado-Dias, and A. Ravelo-Garcia, “SpO2 based sleep apnea detection using deep learning,” in Proceedings of 2017 IEEE 21st International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (Ines), pp. 91–96, Larnaca, Cyprus, October 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  32. R. Yousefi, M. Nourani, S. Ostadabbas, and I. Panahi, “A motion-tolerant adaptive algorithm for wearable photoplethysmographic biosensors,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 670–681, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. C. T. Lin, C. H. Liu, P. S. Wang, J. T. King, and L. D. Liao, “Design and verification of a dry sensor-based multi-channel digital active circuit for human brain electroencephalography signal acquisition systems,” Micromachines, vol. 10, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. W. Gifari, H. Zakaria, and R. Mengko, “Design of ECG homecare: 12-lead ECG acquisition using single channel ECG device developed on AD8232 analog front end,” in Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics 2015, pp. 371–376, Bali, Indonesia, August 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  35. J. X. Wan, Y. H. Zou, Y. Li, and J. Wang, “Reflective type blood oxygen saturation detection system based on MAX30100,” in Proceedings of 2017 International Conference on Security, Pattern Analysis, and Cybernetics (Spac), pp. 615–619, Shenzhen, China, December 2017. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Chin-Teng Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.