Geofluids / 2017 / Article
Special Issue

Geofluids in Deep Sedimentary Basins and their Significance for Petroleum Accumulation

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 1020648 |

Wang Furong, He Sheng, Hou Yuguang, Dong Tian, He Zhiliang, "The Distribution and Origin of Carbonate Cements in Deep-Buried Sandstones in the Central Junggar Basin, Northwest China", Geofluids, vol. 2017, Article ID 1020648, 13 pages, 2017.

The Distribution and Origin of Carbonate Cements in Deep-Buried Sandstones in the Central Junggar Basin, Northwest China

Academic Editor: Xiaorong Luo
Received04 Mar 2017
Revised19 May 2017
Accepted04 Jun 2017
Published14 Sep 2017


Extremely high porosities and permeabilities are commonly discovered in the sandstones of the Xishanyao Formation in the central Junggar Basin with the burial depth greater than 5500 m, from which hydrocarbons are currently being produced. High content of carbonate cements (up to 20%) is also observed in a similar depth range. Our study aimed to improve our understanding on the origin of carbonate cements in the Xishanyao Formation, in order to provide insights into the existence of high porosity sandstones at greater depths. Integrated analyses including petrographic analysis, isotopic analysis, fluid-inclusion, and core analysis were applied to investigate the distribution and origin of carbonate cements and the influence of high fluid pressure on reservoir quality. Textural evidences demonstrate that there are two generations of carbonate cements, precipitated at the temperature of 90°C and 120°C, respectively. The carbonate cements with low ranging from −19.07 to dominantly occurred near the overpressure surface and especially accumulated at approximately 100 m below the surface. Our interpretation is that high content of carbonate cements is significantly influenced by early carbonate cements dissolution and migration under overpressure. Dissolution of plagioclase resulted in the development of internal pores and porosities of as much as 10% at 6500 m depth presumably.

1. Introduction

Carbonate cements in sandstones have variable mineralogy, texture, and chemical compositions and therefore exhibit significant effects on reservoir properties because it is commonly concentrated rather than being uniformly distributed. It is challenging to quantify the influence of concretionary carbonate cements on fluid flow in reservoirs because it is difficult to determine the distribution of diagenetic heterogeneity based on subsurface data. If the carbonate cements formed during early diagenetic stage, it could provide a framework that resists burial compaction and retains primary porosity until decarbonatization at greater burial depth [13]. Microlitic carbonate cements formed at early diagenetic stage can undertake partial overburden load that can slow compaction and can be dissolved into secondary pores under favorable geologic conditions. Extensive studies have been performed on carbonate cementation-dissolution reactions from the viewpoints of fluid-rock, organic-inorganic, and sandstone-mudstone interactions in the past 40 years by traditional geochemical methods, such as stable isotope and major and trace elements analysis [417] (Tan Jianxiong et al., 1999; dos Anjos et al., 2000; Hendry et al., 2000; Taylor et al., 2000; Fayek et al., 2001; Geoffrey Thyne, 2001; Ni Shijun et al., 2002; Wang Zhizhang et al., 2003; Xie Xinong et al., 2006; Wilkinson et al., 2006; Machent et al., 2007; Cao Jian et al., 2007).

It is observed that the favorable sandstone reservoirs are developed at the depth of 4500~6000 m in the central Junggar Basin. The average porosity is approximately 10% and the average permeability is 1 × 10−3μm2. Although many studies have been carried out in this area, including petrographic analysis, formation-water geochemistry, fluid inclusions analysis, and overpressure characterization [13, 1823], there is still a lot of debate on the origins and types of porosity in this area. Some studies assumed that the primary residual pores are the dominant pore type and other studies assumed that secondary pores resulting from the dissolution of carbonate cements make more contributions to forming favorable reservoirs [2426]. The negative correlation between porosity and the carbonate cements content indicates that the formation of secondary pores and carbonate cement dissolution probably have genetic relationships. It is unexpected that in sandstones high secondary porosity and high content of carbonate cements superimpose at the same depth. In this study, we attempt to investigate the origin of carbonate cements in deep-buried sandstones in the central Junggar Basin by applying a multidisciplinary approach, including petrographic, microthermometric, fluid-inclusion, and geochemical analysis. The main objectives of the study are as follows: (1) to quantify the chemical composition, size, and spatial distribution of carbonate cements and (2) to provide further insights into the effect of carbonates cements on petrophysical properties of deep-buried reservoirs.

2. Geological Setting

The Junggar Basin is one of the most prolific oil basin in China (Jiang and Fowler, 1986), covering an area of 136,000 km2. It is an intramontane basin bounded by multiple orogenic belts, including the Qinggelidi Mountains, the Kelameili Mountains, the Yilinheibiergen Mountains, the Bodega Mountains, and the Zhayier Mountains (Figure 1). The Junggar Basin is Late Palaeozoic-Cenozoic in age which is developed on the Junggar terrane, consisting of both Precambrian crystalline basement formed at 800 Ma ago and slightly metamorphic Palaeozoic basement [2833]. Our study area in this paper belongs to SINOPEC, located in the central depression of the hinterland of the basin which mainly consists of the west segment of the Changji Sag in the south (Figure 1).

The central depression area is one of the important areas for petroleum exploration. The characteristics of source rocks and reservoirs in the central Junggar Basin have been extensively studied. There were two sets of source rocks, including the Permian shales dominated by lacustrine-facies and the Jurassic mudstones dominated by swamp coal-bearing. The deeply buried Jurassic sandstones dominated by fluvial-delta facies were main reservoirs with low porosity and permeability generally. However, relatively high porosity and permeability in sandstones display at some depth. At the same time, extensive development of overpressure is displayed over much of the central Junggar Basin. Much more hydrocarbon generated from Permian and Jurassic source rocks accumulated in the overpressured system (Wu Hengzhi et al., 2006; Li Pingping et al., 2006; Yang Zhi et al., 2007) (Figure 2).

Figure 3 shows the modelling burial history of Y1 well (Yongjin area) in Block 3 (see Figure 1 for its location). The erosion event generated an unconformity between Later Jurassic and Early Cretaceous. Therefore, the heat flow is the only variable that needs to be adjusted to match the present-day vitrinite reflectance data. Our modelling results indicated that the paleotemperature decreased gradually from the Permian to the present. This result is consistent with previous studies [3437]. Drilling data demonstrated that the vitrinite reflectance () ranges within 0.65~0.82% in the Middle Jurassic Xishanyao Formation. To match the measured and the predicated vitrinite reflectance data, BasinMod simulation software aims to rebuild the geothermal history. At present, the temperature of Jurassic strata was approximately between 120°C and 150°C, giving a gradient of 2.2°C/100 m. With the results of homogenization temperature, the main oil pools in the third central block formed from the end of the early Cretaceous to the early stage of Paleogene (from 75 Ma to 60 Ma) [38]. At the same time, the crude oil was detected in high levels of 25-norhopane from Y1 well, which explained that an early stage of hydrocarbon charging occurred in the late Jurassic [38].

3. Samples and Methods

125 core samples were obtained from six wells (Y1, Y2, Y3, Y6, Y7, and Y8) at a depth range of 5500–6200 m from Jurassic Xishanyao Formation (Figure 1). The strategy of sample collection is based on the characteristics of lithology. Generally, an interval of one meter is between the two samples, if the cores have homogeneous qualities. The ternary plot indicates that the Xishanyao Formation sandstones are dominantly litharenite and feldspathic litharenite as they have an average framework composition of Q28F13L59 (Figure 4).

Carbonate cements were investigated by using epoxy-impregnated thin sections, cathodoluminescence, and SEM/EDX images. Conventional core samples and epoxy-impregnated thin sections analysis was conducted on the MIAS 2000 microscopes by the Experimental Research Center of Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology of SINOPEC and Research Center of Shengli Oilfield Institute of Geology of SINOPEC. Analysis was performed at the room temperature of 25°C and the relative humidity of 60%.

Cathodoluminescence analysis was conducted on the CL8200 MK5 cathodoluminescence microscopy by the Experimental Research Center of Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology of SINOPEC. Analysis was performed at the room temperature of 27°C and the relative humidity of 40%.

SEM/EDX analysis was performed on the sem-xl30 and EDX-INCA scanner by the Experimental Research Center of Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology of SINOPEC. Analysis was performed at the room temperature of 22°C and the relative humidity of 60%.

Carbon and oxygen isotope analysis was carried out on the MAT253 Gas isotope mass spectrometer made in Germany Firmigan company. Analysis was performed at the sample tray temperature of 72°C, chromatography temperature of 40°C, and helium gas pressure of 100 KPa.

Electron microprobe analysis was conducted on the JXA-8100 electron probe microanalyser at the State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resource. Analysis was performed at the room temperature of 23°C and the relative humidity of 65%.

4. Results

4.1. Thin Section Analysis

Thin section images demonstrate that the dominant cements are carbonates, which consists of a high volume of ferroan calcite and ankerite. At the same time, a small amount of dolomite developed in some wells. Thin section images show that both ferroan and nonferroan calcites commonly occurred as extensive, single-crystal poikilotopes that filled with the intergranular pores (Figure 5(a)). In contrast, ankerite cements are regular to rhombic, replacing calcites with an undulating extinction characteristic (Figures 5(b) and 5(c)). Dolomite cements were also observed in the form of replacing calcites (Figure 5(d)). Some calcite crystal filled in intergranular pores and postdated quartz overgrowth (Figures 5(e) and 5(f)). Some thin section images show that carbonate cements replaced detrital quartz, feldspar, or rock fragments. The abundance of carbonate can be up to 20% and generally in the range of 1–10% within the six studied wells (Figure 6). At the same time, particle contact modes were different because of maldistributed distribution. Some particles were in point contact where carbonate cements develop, while others were in straight of concavoconvex contact. Moreover, carbonates with different mineral compositions distributed in different wells, such as ankerite cements, generally distributed in wells Y2, Y6, and Y8 with an average concentration of 4.5% and calcite cements generally distributed in wells Y1, Y3, and Y7 with an average content of 4.1%.

4.2. Cathodoluminescence

Under the cathodoluminescent (CL) images, the relative content of manganese (Mn) and iron (Fe) in carbonate cements can be used to provide insights into the redox conditions when the pore fluid formed. Mn in calcites is an activator in CL, while Fe acts as a quencher. Carbonate cements with Mn > Fe show bright luminescence, whereas calcite cements with Fe > Mn exhibit dull- luminesce. In Block 3, the carbonate cements partially show bright luminesce (Figure 5(g)) and others show shade of bright luminesce (Figure 5(h)). Cathodoluminescence of these calcite cements can be interpreted by their origin in sandstones.

4.3. EDX Analysis

The trace element data of 14 core samples, determined by EDX analysis, are presented in Table 1. Carbonate cements are generally rich in Fe with low concent of Mn and Mg, and the concentration of Ca increases with increasing burial depth.








4.4. Stable Isotopes

δ13C and δ18O of the carbonate cements, together with burial and thermal histories, can be used to reveal the origin of the cements. Stable isotopes data in Yongjin area are presented in Table 2. Carbon isotope values range from −19.07 to (PDB) with average value of (PDB). The oxygen isotope values range from −21.08 to (PDB) with average value of (PDB). The δ13C and δ18O values increase with increasing burial depth and there is a positive correlation between the δ13C and δ18O values.

WellDepth/mIsotopic temperature/°C







Isotopic temperature , according to Epstein et al. [27].

5. Discussion

5.1. Origins of Carbonate Cements and Source of Fluid

Petrographic observations revealed at least two generations of carbonate cements. The first-generation carbonate occurred as blocky crystalline calcite, which filled within the intergranular pores reduced considerably by mechanical and chemical compaction. This kind of cements occurred in the form of coating quartz grains, preventing authigenic quartz from overgrowing (Alaa et al., 2007). And they dominated in the deeply buried sandstones and filled with iron (Fe) content, which belonged to late diagenesis cements. The second-generation carbonate cement was ankerite, which replaced calcite (Figure 5(c)).

δ13C and δ18O in the carbonate cements can be used to unravel the origins of the cements. The main mechanisms of generation of δ13C-depleted CO2 in large amounts during burial are discussed by Irwin et al. [39], including diagenetic carbonate in area I, carbonate relating to biogas in area II, and carbonate relating to organic acid in area III (Jansa et al., 1990; Wang Darui, 2000; Wilkinson et al., 2006) (Figure 7). 29 samples from Xishanyao Formation (J2x) and 11 samples from Toutunhe formation (J2t) were collected between 5500 m and 6200 m for the carbon and oxygen stable isotopic analysis. The results were shown in Figure 7 as a plot of δ18O (PDB) versus δ13C (PDB) that more negative δ13C values are generally accompanied by more negative δ18O values indicating that the carbonate cements were significantly influenced by organic matter alteration during burial (Figure 7) in area III. Rare input of δ12C with increasing burial and temperature from thermal alteration of organic matter is indicated by the strong correlation between δ13C and δ18O [3941].

With limited fluid-inclusion data of carbonate cements and quartz overgrowth, the precipitation was formed at about 100°C and 80–130°C, respectively (Table 3). From Figures 5(e) and 5(f), the phenomena that carbonate crystal postdates quartz overgrowth revealed that at least part of carbonate cement deposited at 120°C (inclusion homogenization temperature of overgrowth concentrating in 120°C). From Figure 3, the carbonate formation mainly resulted from the later hydrocarbon charging.

WellDepth, mNumbers of inclusionCarbonate homogenization temperature, °CQuartz overgrowth homogenization temperature, °C

5876.384115, 120, 125, 127
6116.87292, 98

Y25953.6669685, 88, 116, 120, 132
5970.533102, 117, 127
6002.15298, 102

Y66027.44296, 102
6028.6280, 134

5.2. Effect on Reservoir Properties

Reservoir physical properties data indicate that porosity near the overpressure surface is relatively high, mainly concentrating in the depth range +50 m~−250 m of the overpressure top surface, and the carbonate cements are concentrated in these high porosity zone (Figure 8). Thin section images and microscope analysis were used to investigate the origin that why do the high porosity and carbonate cements superimpose in depth, when the formation water flowed and broke through the overpressure surface, causing the precipitation and concentration of calcite near the overpressure surface because of the unstable temperature and pressure [42, 43] (Yang Zhi, 2011).

Observation from thin section images indicate that secondary intergranular pores are the dominant pore type (Figure 9). In contrast to the characteristics of minerals by plane-polarized and cross-polarized light, the remnant of calcite can be found after dissolution developing in the surrounding pores. Data from electron microprobe analysis indicate that the secondary intergranular pores resulted from dissolving intergranular carbonate cements and feldspar (Figure 10, Table 4), mainly generated by calcite dissolution. Megapores were mostly formed by the dissolution of albite and less by K-feldspar and kaolinite in situ deposit which shows that pore configuration has good connection. These evidences demonstrate that the large-scale dissolution of intergranular carbonate cements can generate more intergranular pores and make the pore more connected.






Although sandstones experienced extensive mechanical compaction and chemical compaction, the point or straight grain contact and the pervasive development of intergranular pores suggest that the formation of carbonate cements predated intensive physical compaction. Firstly, early carbonate cements occupied the intergranular pore space which increased rock mechanical strength and resisting ability to compaction. Therefore, the sandstone reservoir can develop high primary porosity even in deeply buried conditions. Secondly, early carbonate cements provided materials for dissolution which can form a large amount of secondary intergranular porosity and feldspar dissolution further improved the porosity. In these two ways, the high porosity and high content of carbonate cements developed in the same burial depth [44].

Carbonate cements commonly occurred as irregularly distributed concretions even at the same depth, so it is challenging to predict porosity and permeability in the subsurface from spaced wells. Thin sections can provide a continuous image of heterogeneity produced by concretionary calcite cements. Our thin section images indicate a negative correlation between the carbonate cements and porosity development. Perhaps this phenomenon elaborates that intergranular pores, developing in deeply buried sandstones, result from early carbonate cements dissolving and migration. Therefore, early carbonate cements develop widely and secondary porosity is higher at later diagenetic phase.

The late generation of poikilotopic calcite is interpreted as a result of plagioclase and early calcite dissolution, which releases cations into pore water and may also be responsible for the precipitation of clay minerals and the silica cements [45]. From Figure 3, Ro were in 0.7–1.0%. Thin section observations show that calcite formation is strongly associated with alteration of plagioclase. Among the common rock-forming minerals, plagioclase (especially calcium-rich plagioclase) is dissolved more rapidly than the other silicate phases [46], indicating that porosity generation may primarily result from plagioclase dissolution in deeply burial location. With the increasing of depth, temperature, and thermal maturity, calcite dissolution will be gradually weakened [5]. According to thin sections, primary porosity developed before the depth 3500 m, secondary porosity mainly developed between 3500–6200 m, and cracks begin to develop from 6200 m [47, 48]. Therefore, during the deep-burial water-rock interaction processes, a lower secondary porosity zone resulting from plagioclase dissolution at depth greater than 6500 m would develop (Figure 11).

6. Conclusions

In Block 3 of the central Junggar Basin, carbonate cements are the predominant cements. Conventional core samples, epoxy-impregnated thin section analysis, and cathodoluminescence analysis indicate that the growth of carbonate cements has two stages and mostly formed at the late diagenetic stage, generating ferroan calcite and ankerite cements.

Data from the six wells demonstrate that carbonate cements of most of the samples are less than 20% and generally in the range of 1–10%. The concentration of carbonate cements increases with increasing burial depth. Carbonate cements mainly concentrate in the depth range +50 m~−200 m to the top overpressure surface.

Stable isotopic data shows that ranges from −19.07 to and ranges from −21.08 to . This suggests that the carbonate cements in these sandstones were significantly influenced by organic matter during burial history.

Electron microprobe analysis documents that the secondary intergranular pores primarily resulted from dissolving intergranular carbonate cements and feldspar. The chemical compaction and large-scale cementation restricted the dissolving capability of organic acid on late carbonate cements.

Textural data suggest that the late poikilotopic calcite, near the top overpressure surface, is rich in Fe and high porosity is developed in the same depth interval. This can be interpreted as a result of the dissolution of plagioclase. Therefore, another secondary porosity zone is supposed to develop, resulting from plagioclase dissolution at depth greater than 6500 m. However, because of the chemical compaction and quartz overgrowth, the porosity scale will be smaller than the porosity developed at the depth of 5500 m.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. R. Hesse and L. A. Abid, “Carbonate cementation-the key to reservoir properties of four sandstone levels (cretaceous) in the hibernia oil field, jeanne d'arc basin, newfoundland, Canada,” in Carbonate Cementation in Sandstones: Distribution Patterns and Geochemical Evolution, International Association of Sedimentologists Special Publication, vol. 26, pp. 363–393, Wiley Online Library, Oxford, UK, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Liu, S. Huang, Z. Shen, Z. Lü, and R. Song, “Diagenetic fluid evolution and water-rock interaction model of carbonate cements in sandstone: An example from the reservoir sandstone of the Fourth Member of the Xujiahe Formation of the Xiaoquan-Fenggu area, Sichuan Province, China,” Science China Earth Sciences, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1077–1092, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. Xiong, K. Azmy, and N. J. F. Blamey, “Diagenesis and origin of calcite cement in the Flemish Pass Basin sandstone reservoir (Upper Jurassic): Implications for porosity development,” Marine and Petroleum Geology, vol. 70, pp. 93–118, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. D. Curtis, “Possible links between sandstone diagenesis and depth-related geochemical reactions occurring in enclosing mudstones,” Journal of the Geological Society, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 107–117, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. C. Surdam, L. J. Crossey, E. S. Hagen, and H. P. Heasler, “Organic-inorganic interactions and sandstone diagenesis,” AAPG Bulletin, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. D. Weedman, S. L. Brantley, R. Shiraki, and S. R. Poulson, “Diagenesis, Compaction, and Fluid Chemistry Modeling of a Sandstone Near a Pressure Seal: Lower Tuscaloosa Formation, Gulf Coast,” AAPG Bulletin, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 1045–1064, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  7. K. Bjorlykke, “Geofluids: Origin, migration and evolution of fluids in sedimentary basins,” in Fluid-flow processes and diagenesis in sedimentary basins, L. Parnell, Ed., vol. 78 of Geological Society Special Publication, pp. 127–140, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  8. F. L. Lynch, “Mineral/water interaction, fluid flow, and Frio sandstone diagenesis: evidence from the rocks,” AAPG Bulletin, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 486–504, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  9. Z. Zhihuan, H. Wenxuan, Z. Jianhui, Y. Bingsong, and L. Xiancai, “Study of fluid-rock interaction in Eogene Formation in Dongying Depression, Bohai Gulf Basin,” Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 560–566, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  10. S. P. Dutton, C. D. White, B. J. Willis, and D. Novakovic, “Calcite cement distribution and its effect on fluid flow in a deltaic sandstone, Frontier Formation, Wyoming,” AAPG Bulletin, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 2007–2021, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  11. K. Al-Ramadan, S. Morad, J. N. Proust, and I. Al-Aasm, “Distribution of diagenetic alterations in siliciclastic shoreface deposits within a sequence stratigraphic framework: evidence from the Upper Jurassic, Boulonnais, NW France,” Journal of Sedimentary Research, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 943–959, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. Jonk, A. Hurst, D. Duranti, J. Parnell, A. Mazzini, and A. E. Fallick, “Origin and timing of sand injection, petroleum migration, and diagenesis in Tertiary reservoirs, south Viking Graben, North Sea,” AAPG Bulletin, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 329–357, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. F. Hao, H. Zou, Y. Fang, and J. Hu, “Kinetics of organic matter maturation and hydrocarbon generation in overpressure environment,” Shiyou Xuebao/Acta Petrolei Sinica, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 9–18, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  14. M. I. Odigi and L. C. Amajor, “Geochemistry of carbonate cements in Cretaceous sandstones, southeast Benue Trough, Nigeria: Implications for geochemical evolution of formation waters,” Journal of African Earth Sciences, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 213–226, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. B. T. T. Nguyen, S. J. Jones, N. R. Goulty et al., “The role of fluid pressure and diagenetic cements for porosity preservation in Triassic fluvial reservoirs of the Central Graben, North Sea,” AAPG Bulletin, vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 1273–1302, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. García-García, R. Marfil, G. A. De Gea et al., “Reworked marine sandstone concretions: A record of high-frequency shallow burial to exhumation cycles,” Facies, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 843–861, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. L. Nyman, R. M. Gani, J. P. Bhattacharya, and K. Lee, “Origin and distribution of calcite concretions in Cretaceous Wall Creek Member, Wyoming: Reservoir-quality implication for shallow-marine deltaic strata,” Cretaceous Research, vol. 48, pp. 139–152, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Z. Ming, Z. Weihai, and Q. Jiangxiu, “The character and origin of overpressure and its explorational significance in Junggar Basin,” Petroleum Exploration and Development, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 31–35, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  19. W.-H. Zhang, M. Zha, and J.-X. Qu, “Overpressure and mechanisms of hydrocarbon accumulation in tertiary of southern Junggar Basin,” Journal of the University of Petroleum, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 10–12, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  20. W. Kongyou, Z. Ming, W. Xulong, Q. Jiangxiu, and X. Chen, “Further researches on the tectonic evolution and dynamic setting of the Junggar Basin,” Acta Geoscientica Sinica, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 217–222, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  21. S. He, Z.-L. He, Z. Yang, H.-Z. Wu, F.-R. Wang, and W.-Z. Shi, “Characteristics, well-log responses and mechanisms of overpressures within the Jurassic formation in the central part of Junggar basin,” Diqiu Kexue - Zhongguo Dizhi Daxue Xuebao/Earth Science - Journal of China University of Geosciences, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 457–470, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. Xi, Y. Cao, Y. Wang et al., “Diagenesis and porosity-permeability evolution of low permeability reservoirs: A case study of Jurassic Sangonghe Formation in Block 1, central Junggar Basin, NW China,” Petroleum Exploration and Development, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 475–485, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Z. Yang, S. He, Q. Li, S. Lin, and S. Pan, “Geochemistry characteristics and significance of two petroleum systems near top overpressured surface in central Junggar Basin, NW China,” Marine and Petroleum Geology, vol. 75, pp. 341–355, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Kuang, Y. Genshun, and Z. Guohua, “The Origin of Favorable Sandstone Reservoirs of Sangonghe Formation, Lower Jurassic in Central Junggar Basin,” Petroleum Exploration and Development, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 34–37, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  25. S. Jianfeng, Z. Xingping, S. Chunsong, Z. Huiliang, and G. Mozhen, “Basic Types of High-quality Clastic Reservoirs Deep-buried in Superimposed Basins in China,” China Petroleum Exploration, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 11–16, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  26. X. Guosheng, L. Jianlin, Z. Ping, L. Feng, and L. Yisha, “Diagenesis and pore formation mechanism of jurassic and cretaceous reservoirs in block 3 in the middle of Junggar Basin,” Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1–7, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  27. S. Epstein, R. Buchsbaum, H. A. Lowenstam, and H. C. Urey, “Revised carbonate-water isotopic temperature scale,” Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 1315–1326, 1953. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. Li, M. Jiang, Y. Wang, L. Zhang, and G. Yu, “Image of crust and upper mantle structure along the array from fuyun to kuerle by P-to-S converted waves,” Acta Geologica Sinica, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 135–141, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  29. K. Yuzhu, “Targets of Paleozoic in Junggar Basin,” Petroleum Prospect and Exploration, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 449–453, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  30. K. Zhihong, “Evolution of paleozoic sedimentation of the junggar basin,” Journal of Geomechanics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 158–174, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  31. S. Jiye, Q. Mingkuan, C. Yuqi, and H. Zhongbo, “Basement charateristics of junggar basin and its effect on sandstone-type uranium metallogenesis,” Geological Review, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 128–138, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  32. X. Wu, D. He, D. Yang, X. Qi, and Y. Tang, “Structural character and hydrocarbon accumulation in the Luliang uplift, Junggar Basin,” Scientia Geologica Sinica, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 73–91, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  33. Z. He, S. Gao, and M. Zheng, “Regional tectonic framework and evolution of superimposed basins in northwestern China,” Earth Science Frontiers, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 227–240, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. P. Changchun, Z. Zhongyi, F. Shanfa, X. Qilai, W. Xulong, and W. Yutao, “Thermal history of Junggar Basin,” Geochimica, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1–7, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  35. W. Xulong, Y. Haibo., and Q. Yongxin, “Basin modeling technique and JunMod basin modeling software,” Computer Application of Petroleum, vol. 2, pp. 18–24, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Q. Nansheng, Z. Ming, and W. Xulong, “Simulation of geothermal evolution history in junggar basin,” Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 38–41, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  37. N. Qiu, H. Yang, and X. Wang, “Tectono-thermal evolution in the Junggar Basin,” Chinese Journal of Geology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 423–429, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  38. W. Yin, B.-W. Bie, and G.-L. Liu, “The characteristics of fluid inclusions and its application to identifying oil accumulating stages in central depression, Junggar Basin,” Bulletin of Mineralogy , Petrology and Geochemistry, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  39. H. Irwin, C. Curtis, and M. Coleman, “Isotopic evidence for source of diagenetic carbonates formed during burial of organic-rich sediments,” Nature, vol. 269, no. 5625, pp. 209–213, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. R. C. Surdam, S. W. Boese, and L. J. Crossey, “The chemistry of secondary porosity,” in Clastic Diagenesis, D. A. McDonald and R. C. Surdam, Eds., pp. 127–149, AAPG Memoir, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  41. S. Morad, “Carbonate cementation in sandstones; distribution patterns and geochemical evolution,” in Carbonate Cementation in Sandstones, S. Morad, Ed., vol. 26 of Special Publication, pp. 1–26, International Association of Sedimentologists, Oxford, UK, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. L.-Q. Zhang, “Distribution and origin of ferrocalcite cements in Paleogene overpressure sandstones on the south margin of Junggar Basin, Xinjiang, China,” Journal of Chengdu University of Technology. Science and Technonogy, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 625–632, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  43. Y.-Z. Wang, Y.-C. Cao, S.-M. Zhang, F.-L. Li, and F.-C. Meng, “Genetic mechanisms of secondary pore development zones of Es 4x in the north zone of the Minfeng Sag in the Dongying Depression, East China,” Petroleum Science, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. H. Sijing, H. Peipei, W. Qingdong, L. Haonian, W. Meng, and Z. Mingliang, “The significance of cementation in porosity preservation in deep-buried sandstones,” Lithologic Reservoirs, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 7–13, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  45. R. M. Siebert, G. K. Moncure, and R. W. Lahann, “A theory of framework grain dissolution in sandstones,” in Clastic Diagenesis, D. A. McDonald and R. C. Surdam, Eds., vol. 37, AAPG Memoir, Tulsa, OK, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. R. H. McNutt, S. K. Frape, P. Fritz, M. G. Jones, and I. M. MacDonald, “The 87Sr 86Sr values of Canadian Shield brines and fracture minerals with applications to groundwater mixing, fracture history, and geochronology,” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 205–215, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. Z. Yang, S. He, F. Wang, Z. He, H. Wu, and X. Meng, “Character istics and genetic mechan ism of carbonate cement in sandstone reservoirs of Yongjin area in central Junggar Basin,” Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 169–178, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. W. Furong and H. Sheng, “The reservoir characteristic ofdeeply-buried sandstone in the Center of Junggar Basin,” Petroleum Geology and Experiment, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 547–552, 2010. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Wang Furong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.