Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Geofluids
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 5758046, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5758046
Research Article

Experimental Study on Water Sensitivity Difference Based on Oiliness of Porous Medium Rock

Jie Li,1,2,3 Wei Li,4 and Li Li5

1School of Energy Resource, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China
2MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
3University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA
4Institute of CNOOC, Shenzhen Branch, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, China
5Pu Yang Best Oil-Gas Technology Service Co. Ltd., Henan, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Jie Li; ude.aslutu@4740lij

Received 20 June 2017; Accepted 28 September 2017; Published 27 November 2017

Academic Editor: Zhenhua Rui

Copyright © 2017 Jie Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y. Lu, “Damage in reservoir formation induced by fracturing field and relevant protection technology,” Drilling field and Completion field, vol. 12, no. 5, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. Yaoyao, G. Baoshan, X. Yun et al., “Study and application of novel low damage stimulation technology in sulige tight gas field,” in Proceedings of the SPE Oklahoma City Oil and Gas Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. L. Weifeng, L. Zhenpeng, L. Qingjie et al., “Reservoir sensitivity evaluation by monitoring displacement experiment with x-ray Ct imaging,” in Proceedings of the SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil Gas Conference and Exhibition, 2015.
  4. L. L. Guan, Y. Du, and Z. Wang, “Water Injectivity-What We Have Learned in the Past 30 Years,” in Proceedings of the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Petroleum Society of Canada, Calgary, Alberta, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. F. Civan, Reservoir Formation Damage. Gulf Professional Publishing.
  6. Schecther, Robert S. Oil Well Stimulation. 2015.
  7. R. F. Scheuerman and B. M. Bergersen, “Injection-water salinity, formation pretreatment, and well-operations fluid-selection guidelines,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 42, no. 07, pp. 836–845, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  8. P. R. Howard, J. J. Hinkel, and N. C. Moniaga, “Assessing formation damage from migratory clays in moderate permeability formations,” in Proceedings of the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control 2012, pp. 898–908, usa, February 2012. View at Scopus
  9. M. Scholz, “Review of recent trends in Capillary Suction Time (CST) dewaterability testing research,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 44, no. 22, pp. 8157–8163, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Ruan and L.-G. Wang, “Low-permeability oilfield development and pressure-sensitive effect,” Acta Petrolei Sinica, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 73, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. M. Huggett and P. J. R. Uwins, “Observations of water-clay reactions in water-sensitive sandstone and mudrocks using an environmental scanning electron microscope,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 211–222, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Yang, “A New Quantitative Predicting Method for Water-Sensitivity Damage,” in Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. Z. Huang, “Evaluation method research of water sensitivity to oil rock sample,” Oil Drilling and Production Technology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 57–59, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  14. R. Lewis, P. Singer, T. Jiang, E. Rylander, S. Sinclair, and R. H. Mclin, “NMR T2 distributions in the Eagle Ford shale: reflections on pore size,” in SPE Unconventional Resources Conference-USA, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2013.
  15. A. Al Hinai, R. Rezaee, L. Esteban, and M. Labani, “Comparisons of pore size distribution: A case from the Western Australian gas shale formations,” Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, vol. 8, no. C, pp. 1–13, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Industry Standard Of China National Petroleum Corporation SY/T 5358-, Flow Experiment Evaluation Of Reservoir Sensitivity.
  17. Z.-M. Yang, S. Miao, X.-G. Liu, D.-M. Huang, and C.-S. Qi, “Percentage parameter of the movable fluid in ultra-low permeability reservoir and its application,” Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University, Natural Sciences Edition, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 96–99, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Peng and H. Guo, “Experimental study on T2 cutoff in low permeability sandstones,” Well Logging Technology, vol. 34, no. 4, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  19. T. Li and T. Guo, “Experimental research on movable fluid and Nmr T2 cutoff in tight sandstone,” Science Technology and Engineering, vol. 13, no. 5, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  20. Z. Qi, “An application study on water sensitivity damage of tight sandstone reservoir by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR),” Petrochemical Industry Application, vol. 33, no. 5, 2014. View at Google Scholar