Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Geofluids
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 7818346, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7818346
Research Article

Analysis of the Influencing Factors on the Well Performance in Shale Gas Reservoir

1State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Sinopec Group, Beijing 100083, China
2Department of Oil-Gas Field Development, College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
3State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
4College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Liang Xue; nc.ude.ukp@gnaileux

Received 13 July 2017; Revised 12 October 2017; Accepted 29 October 2017; Published 26 December 2017

Academic Editor: Stefan Finsterle

Copyright © 2017 Cheng Dai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. B. Curtis, “Fractured shale-gas systems,” AAPG Bulletin, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 1921–1938, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. Sun, A. Chawathe, H. Hoteit, X. Shi, and L. Li, “Understanding shale gas production mechanisms through reservoir simulation,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 36, pp. 317–352, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  3. W. Yu and K. Sepehrnoori, “Simulation of gas desorption and geomechanics effects for unconventional gas reservoirs,” Fuel, vol. 116, pp. 455–464, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Civan, “Effective correlation of apparent gas permeability in tight porous media,” Transport in Porous Media, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 375–384, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Darabi, A. Ettehad, F. Javadpour, and K. Sepehrnoori, “Gas flow in ultra-tight shale strata,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 710, pp. 641–658, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Singh, F. Javadpour, A. Ettehadtavakkol, and H. Darabi, “Nonempirical apparent permeability of shale,” SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 414–424, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. J. Mayerhofer, E. P. Lolon, C. Rightmire, D. Walser, C. L. Cipolla, and N. R. Warplnskl, “What is stimulated reservoir volume?” SPE Production and Operations, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 89–98, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Sun, G. Niu, and D. Schechter, “Numerical simulation of stochastically-generated complex fracture networks by utilizing core and microseismic data for hydraulically fractured horizontal wells in unconventional reservoirs– a field case study,” in Proceedings of the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, vol. 2016, Canton, Ohio, USA, 13–15 September.
  9. R. Hull, H. Bello, PL. Richmond, B. Suliman, D. Portis, and R. Meek, “Variable stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) simulation: eagle ford shale case study,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  10. Y.-L. Zhao, L.-H. Zhang, J.-X. Luo, and B.-N. Zhang, “Performance of fractured horizontal well with stimulated reservoir volume in unconventional gas reservoir,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 512, pp. 447–456, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. E. Warren and P. J. Root, “The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs,” Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, vol. 3, pp. 245–255, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. S. T. Luthy, “Dual-Porosity Reservoir Modeling of the Fractured Hanifa Reservoir, Abqaiq Field, Saudi Arabia,” AAPG Bulletin, vol. 5, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. P. Sarma and K. Aziz, “New transfer functions for simulation of naturally fractured reservoirs with dual-porosity models,” SPE Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 328–340, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Lu, G. Di Donato, and M. J. Blunt, “General transfer functions for multiphase flow in fractured reservoirs,” SPE Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 289–297, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. Gong, M. Karimi-Fard, and L. J. Durlofsky, “Upscaling discrete fracture characterizations to dual-porosity, dual-permeability models for efficient simulations of flow with strong gravitational effects,” SPE Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 58–67, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Geiger, M. Dentz, and I. Neuweiler, “A novel multirate dual-porosity model for improved simulation of fractured and multiporosity reservoirs,” SPE Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 670–684, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Karimi-Fard, L. J. Durlofsky, and K. Aziz, “An efficient discrete-fracture model applicable for general-purpose reservoir simulators,” SPE Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 227–236, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Moinfar, A. Varavei, K. Sepehrnoori, and R. T. Johns, “Development of an efficient embedded discrete fracture model for 3D compositional reservoir simulation in fractured reservoirs,” SPE Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 289–303, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. X. Yan, Z. Huang, J. Yao, Y. Li, and D. Fan, “An efficient embedded discrete fracture model based on mimetic finite difference method,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 145, pp. 11–21, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. H. Lee, C. L. Jensen, and M. F. Lough, “Efficient finite-difference model for flow in a reservoir with multiple length-scale fractures,” SPE Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 268–275, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. H. Lee, M. F. Lough, and C. L. Jensen, “Hierarchical modeling of flow in naturally fractured formations with multiple length scales,” Water Resources Research, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 443–455, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Darishchev, P. Lemouzy, and P. Rouvroy, “On Simulation of Flow in Tight and Shale Gas Reservoirs,” in Proceedings of the SPE Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Muscat, Oman, 2013.
  23. T. Yang, X. Li, and D. Zhang, “Quantitative dynamic analysis of gas desorption contribution to production in shale gas reservoirs,” Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, vol. 9, pp. 18–30, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. X. Li, D. Zhang, and S. Li, “A multi-continuum multiple flow mechanism simulator for unconventional oil and gas recovery,” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 26, pp. 652–669, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. Wang, “What factors control shale-gas production and production-decline trend in fractured systems: a comprehensive analysis and investigation,” Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, vol. 22, no. 02, pp. 562–581, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar