Research Article
A Methodology for Assessing the Favourability of Geopressured-Geothermal Systems in Sedimentary Basin Plays: A Case Study in Abruzzo (Italy)
Table 2
Scores (S) of classes and weights (W) for layers of evidence, used in the favourability analysis.
| Layer of evidence | Weight (W) | Unit | Score (S) favourability |
| | | | 5 (very high) | 4 (high) | 3 (medium) | 2 (low) | 1 (very low) | Geopressured effective reservoir | 0.4 | m b.g.l. (depth of the top) | 0–1500 | 1500–2500 | 2500–3500 | 3500–4500 | >4500 | Geochemistry | 0.1 | | Clear indications of CH4-saturated waters | | | | No indications of CH4-saturated waters | Pressure regime | 0.3 | Bar/100 m (pressure gradient) | >18.82 | 15.82–18.82 | 12.52–15.82 | 10.52–12.52 | 0–10.52 | Thermal regime | 0.1 | °C/1000 m (geothermal gradient) | >50 | 40–50 | 30–40 | 15–30 | 0–15 | Deposits thickness | 0.1 | m | >8000 | 6000–8000 | 4000–6000 | 2000–4000 | 0–2000 |
|
|