Geofluids

Geofluids / 2021 / Article
Special Issue

Multiscale Flow and Optimal Production Control Techniques in Smart Unconventional Reservoirs

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6647647 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6647647

Yongmao Hao, Jikai Liang, Chuixian Kong, Mingwu Fan, Hongzhi Xu, Fan Yang, Shiwei Yang, "Study on the Influence of Sand Production on Seepage Capacity in Natural Gas Hydrate Reservoirs", Geofluids, vol. 2021, Article ID 6647647, 8 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6647647

Study on the Influence of Sand Production on Seepage Capacity in Natural Gas Hydrate Reservoirs

Academic Editor: Guanglong Sheng
Received16 Nov 2020
Revised28 Feb 2021
Accepted08 Apr 2021
Published21 Apr 2021

Abstract

Sand production has become a common phenomenon in the exploitation of unconsolidated natural gas hydrate reservoirs, which will hinder the long-term production of natural gas hydrate reservoirs. However, there are few literatures reported on the influences in reservoir physical properties such as permeability and porosity, and production laws caused by sand production. This paper provides a numerical model, coupled with reservoir sand-gas-water multiphase flow processes, which is capable to simulate the process of sand production in natural gas hydrate reservoirs. The simulation results indicate that sand settlement is mainly concentrated near the wellbore due to the high concentration of migrated sand. The decrease in reservoir porosity and permeability caused by sand settlement has a significant impact on production. The impact of sand production on reservoir fluid fluidity shows that fluid flow is inhibited near the wellbore, while fluid flow performance increases far away from the wellbore. The numerical model and analysis presented here could provide useful insight into changes in reservoir physical properties and production laws caused by sand production in the natural gas hydrate-bearing marine sediments using depressurization method.

1. Introduction

Natural gas hydrate (NGH) is an ice-like solid compound formed by natural gas (the main component methane) and water under high-pressure and low-temperature conditions [1]. Its large reserves and wide distribution are considered as one of the potential alternative energy sources [2]. Many countries with hydrate reservoirs have listed hydrate development as national plans [35].

The northern slope of the South China Sea is a hot area for research on gas hydrate exploration and test production in China [6]. The northern slope of the South China Sea has been explored by the China Geological Survey for rich natural gas hydrate resources [7, 8]. In March 2020, the second round of natural gas hydrate test production in the South China Sea natural gas hydrate reservoir adopted horizontal well depressurization method for continuous production for 30 days, creating a world record for the test production of [9]. However, the natural gas hydrate reservoirs in the South China Sea are argillaceous silt reservoirs, which are characterized by the content of fine grain particles (≤60 μm) in the sediments as high as 88% and gas hydrate as reservoir cement [10, 11]. With the decomposition of hydrate in the reservoir, the large amount of sand migration has greatly increased the difficulty of sand control precision design and the problem of reservoir blockage [12, 13]. There are engineering technical problems such as low productivity and easy sand production in reduced pressure mining. Therefore, it is urgent to carry out research on both gas and sand production law and change of reservoir physical properties to provide basic theoretical support for mine applications.

The research on sand production in hydrate reservoirs mainly focuses on the prevention of sand production wellbore and the study of overall sand migration in the hydrate reservoir. Experts and scholars have put forward many suggestions based on their own research results. Li et al. and Cao et al. believe that the secondary formation of hydrates and clay accumulation on the sand control medium are the key to clogging [14, 15]. They suggested that a sand-control gravel sizing method called “Holding Coarse Expelling Fine Particles (HCEFP)” and artificial interference of downhole temperature was proposed to tackle the problems caused by possible screen clogging [16, 17]. Uchida et al. establish thermohydromechanically coupled formulation to research the features of sand production in gas hydrate-bearing sediments. It is found that lowering depressurization rate was the most effective in reducing sand production for a given gas production [18]. Ning et al. proposed a thermohydromechanical-coupled natural gas hydrate reservoir bearing particles by coupling of the TOUGH+Hydrate, FLAC3D, and PFC3D. They proposed that how to carry out sand control design should be based on ensuring the gas production of hydrate reservoirs [19]. Yan et al. established a two-dimensional small-scale model by combining TOUGH+ABAQUS to analyze the sand production around the wellbore. They proposed that there is a certain relationship between the speed of natural gas hydrate decomposition and the amount of sand produced [20]. Yu et al. employed the CMG+STARS to qualitatively analyze the laws of sand production in gas production from hydrates. An improper sand control design criteria can induce substantial sand migration and led to clay logging in near well formations, restricting gas production capability [21]. Their research provides inspiration and guidance for subsequent simulation of sand production from natural gas hydrate reservoirs. However, the situation of hindering trial mining caused by sand production in different trial mining sites is different. Further research is needed for the impact of sand blockage on the gas production of unconsolidated natural gas hydrate reservoirs in the South China Sea. This research utilizes a multifield coupling model based on the South China Sea natural gas hydrate reservoir to systemically analyze both the quantitative prediction of gas and sand production and influence of sand process on reservoir physical properties and fluid flow performance.

2. Simulation Preparation

2.1. Model Assumptions

(1)Considering three phases: vapor-liquid-solid, and five components: natural gas hydrate, methane gas, water, solid sand, and migrating sand(2)Sand has the same critical sand detachment speed in the natural gas hydrate layer(3)Migrating sand flows with the fluid without changing the fluid properties(4)Considering the influence of gravity and capillary force on gas and water seepage(5)Solid sand does not occupy absolute porosity, while natural gas hydrates occupy absolute porosity

2.2. Sand Detachment

From the assumptions, it is known that the detachment of sand particles in the sediment depends on the flow rate of water. When the water velocity exceeds the critical sand detachment speed, the solid sand begins to move with the formation water to become mobilized sand.

General formula for sand detachment is expressed as

Concentration equation for sand detachment is expressed as [22] where is solid sand concentration per unit volume, mole/m3; is reaction time, d; is solid sand detachment factor, 1/d; is Heaviside step function; is flow rate of water, m/d; is critical sand detachment speed.

2.3. Sand Migration and Sedimentation

Ensure the rationality of sand migration in fluid through mass conservation equation. The solute transport mass conservation equation is expressed as [23] where is effective porosity; and are migrated and settled sand concentrations, respectively, mole/m3.

General formula for Sand sedimentation is expressed as

Concentration equation for sand sedimentation is expressed as [21] where is the filter coefficient.

2.4. Porosity-Permeability Equation

The permeability changes of natural gas hydrate reservoirs depend on effective porosity. It is calculated as the ratio of volume of water and gas to total matrix volume. With natural gas hydrate decomposition, the volume of solid hydrate gradually decreases. Therefore, the effective porosity is also gradually increased, which is expressed as where is volume of fluid, m3; is initial bulk volume of a grid block, m3; is volume of total matrix, m3; is volume of natural gas hydrate, m3; is volume of sand deposit, m3; is initial sand concentration, mole/m3; is molecular mass of sand, kg/mole; is sand mass density, kg/m3.

The relationship between effective porosity and permeability is represented by the following equation: where is initial natural gas hydrate reservoir permeability, mD; is power-law constant, 3; is initial effective porosity.

2.5. Natural Gas Hydrate Decomposition Equation

According to 1 standard volume of natural gas hydrate decomposition, 164 standard volumes of gas can be released [24]. The natural gas hydrate decomposition process can be simply expressed as the decomposition of natural gas hydrate into gaseous methane and liquid water. General formula for natural gas hydrate decomposition is expressed as where is natural gas hydrate dissociation factor, 5.75; is natural gas hydrate dissociation enthalpy, J/mole;

Natural gas hydrate decomposition equation is expressed as [25] where is natural gas hydrate decomposition rate, gmol/(d·m3); is natural gas hydrate decomposition frequency factor, mole/(d·KPa·m3); is reaction activation energy, J/mole; is natural gas hydrate surface area, m2/m3; is gas constant, J/(mole·K); and are natural gas hydrate equilibrium pressure and gaseous pressure, respectively, kPa.

3. Numerical Simulation

3.1. Model and Parameters

A natural gas hydrate simulator software CMG+STARS was used to simulate sand-containing natural gas hydrate reservoirs, which can be adopted to modeling the processes of natural gas hydrate production, such as natural gas hydrate decomposition, sand detachment, sand migration, sand sedimentation, and mass and heat transfer under complex situation of multiple components.

In this study, the multiphase flow natural gas hydrate model is established using the geological parameters of the natural gas hydrate reservoir in the Shenhu area of the South China Sea. The critical parameters of the model are shown in Table 1. As shown in Figure 1, the model consists of three parts: the over layer, the natural gas hydrate layer, and the under layer. The thickness of the natural gas hydrate layer is 30 m, and the grid step is . Both thickness of the over and under layer is 15 m, and the grid step is . Depressurization production of vertical well is used to develop natural gas hydrate reservoirs, which lasted 60 days.


ParameterValueParameterValue

Initial pressure 10 MPaInitial temperature 13°C
Initial natural gas hydrate saturation of natural gas hydrate sediment [26]0.3Initial permeability [27]3 mD
Initial water saturation of natural gas hydrate sediment 0.65Initial gas saturation of natural gas hydrate sediment 0.05
Natural gas hydrate sediment thickness [28]30 mInitial porosity of natural gas hydrate sediment 0.3
Depth1200 mBottom hole pressure3 MPa
Over layer thickness15 mUnder thickness15 m
Initial porosity of over/under layer0Initial sand concentration of natural gas hydrate sediment921.74 mole/m3

3.2. Model Verification

As a key parameter of the practical production data, cumulative gas production is an important basis for verifying the accuracy of the model. The simulated accumulative gas against measured data of the 2017 South China Sea production test are presented in Figure 2. As shown in Figure 2, the cumulative gas production of the model reaches , which is basically consistent with the practical production data. The article model has a reasonable cumulative gas law.

4. Result Analysis

It can be seen in Figure 3(a) that the gas production rate rises rapidly in the early stage of production and, then, slowly decreases after reached the peak. In the 5th of natural gas hydrate exploitation, the higher peak gas production rate value is . Then, the gas production rate gradually decreases to at the 60th of natural gas hydrate exploitation. The laws of sand production are similar to the gas production curve. Peak sand production rate appeared on the 4th day, which was 36 m3 (Figure 3(b)). It is worth noting that the sand production rate falls more quickly after reaching the peak value. Detailed analyses of the impact of sand production on natural gas hydrate exploitation will be made below.

The influence in the natural gas hydrate reservoir mining process caused by sand production is mainly concluded in three stages, namely, sand detachment, sand migration, and sand sedimentation. Figure 4 presents the evolution of distribution of sand concentration at the natural gas hydrate sediment as depressurization mining process. As shown by the figure, the high sand concentration region caused by sand sedimentation is mainly concentrated in the formation near the wellbore of the natural gas hydrate reservoir. The increase of sand concentration will affect the effective porosity to boost around the wellbore (Figure 5), and the development of the permeability during the depressurization-production process is shown in Figure 6. When the velocity of the pore water reaches the critical sand detachment speed, the formation sand is stripped and moved with the water. Sand migration accumulates near the wellbore and cannot be recovered in time. Then, the sand migration concentration reaches the settlement threshold and settlement occurs in the near-wellbore zone to block the pores. The maximum sand concentration reaches 1476.68 mole/m3, which is 1.6 times the sand concentration of the original formation (Figure 5). As illustrated by Eq. (6), increased solid sand concentration leads to a decrease in effective porosity. Figure 7(a) shows the chance of effective porosity with times. It can be concluded that the lower the effective porosity mainly concentrates on the closer the region to the wellbore. The minimum effective porosity reaches 0.18 around wellbore on the 60th day, which is 0.6 times the initial effective porosity (Figure 7(a)). As mentioned above Eq. (9), the evolution of effective porosity will result to chance permeability of the natural gas hydrate sediment. Figure 7(b) shows the chance of permeability with times. Furthermore, the maximum effective porosity of the formation with only sand detachment and no sand subsidence reaches 0.38 at 20 m from the wellbore on the 60th day (Figure 7(b)). As a result, the sand concentration near the wellbore will increase, resulting in a smaller effective porosity and permeability.

Figure 8 shows the gas phase and water phase mobility performance at different moments. As expected, the decrease of the effective porosity and permeability seriously affect the fluid mobility. As shown in Figures 8(a) and 8(b), conspicuous obstruction occurs near the wellbore after 20 days when the effective porosity and permeability are as low as 0.27 and 0.2 mD, respectively. This could explain why the gas and water production rates of this scheme continued to decline in the stages of the simulation.

5. Conclusion

This paper establishes a numerical simulation model based on the South China Sea first offshore NGH production data to simulate the impact of sand production on reservoir physical parameters and production during natural gas hydrate reservoir exploitation by depressurization. Based on the modeling results, the following conclusions can be obtained: (1)In the process of gas hydrate depressurization production, when the reservoir sand meets the migration conditions, it migrates with the formation fluid to the wellbore. The concentration of migrating sand around the wellbore increases, resulting in sand settlement. Then, the porosity and permeability near the wellbore decrease, which in turn causes blockage of the formation, resulting in low production(2)The simulation result shows that the evolution of spatial distribution of gas hydrate reservoir properties caused by sand settlement with time. The physical properties of the formation outside the range of sand settlement have no effect on the fluid and even increase the fluidity of the fluid. The range of formation blockage of natural gas hydrate reservoir at different times is considered for reservoir reformation, thus contributing to efficient and economical development(3)Different types of natural gas hydrate reservoirs have different periods of formation blockage caused by sand settlement. The simulation results show that the reduced gas production rate is significantly affected by sand settlement near the wellbore about the 20th day of well start up, according to the South China Sea geological model. In view of the natural gas hydrate reservoirs in the South China Sea, stratigraphic reformation should be carried out around the 20th day after mining, so as to improve the formation seepage capacity

Data Availability

All results and data are in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51974347, 51991364) and the Major Scientific and Technological Projects of CNPC under Grant ZD2019-184-002.

References

  1. Z. R. Chong, S. H. B. Yang, P. Babu, P. Linga, and X. S. Li, “Review of natural gas hydrates as an energy resource: prospects and challenges,” Applied Energy, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 1633–1652, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Y. F. Makogon, “Natural gas hydrates–a promising source of energy,” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49–59, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. Boswell, “Japan completes first offshore methane hydrate production test—methane successfully produced from deepwater hydrate layers,” Center for Natural Gas and Oil, vol. 412, no. 1, pp. 386–7614, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  4. T. S. Collett, M. W. Lee, W. F. Agena et al., “Permafrost-associated natural gas hydrate occurrences on the Alaska North Slope,” Marine and Petroleum Geology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 279–294, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Yamamoto and S. Dallimore, “Aurora-JOGMEC-NRCan Mallik 2006-2008 gas hydrate research project progress,” Natural Gas & Oil, vol. 304, no. 1, pp. 285–4541, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  6. N. Wu, G. Zhang, J. Liang et al., “Progress of gas hydrate research in northen South China Sea,” Adwances in New and Renewable Energy, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 80–94, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  7. J.-f. Li, J.-l. Ye, X.-w. Qin et al., “The first offshore natural gas hydrate production test in South China Sea,” China Geology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–16, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Wu, G. Zhang, Y. Huang, H. K. Wong, and J. Liang, “Gas hydrate occurrence on the continental slope of the northern South China Sea,” Marine and Petroleum Geology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 403–412, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. L. Ye, X. W. Qin, W. W. Xie et al., “The second natural gas hydrate production test in the South China Sea,” China Geology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 197–209, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. Wan, N. Wu, G. Hu et al., “Reservoir stability in the process of natural gas hydrate production by depressurization in the Shenhu area of the South China Sea,” Natural Gas Industry B, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 631–643, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. He, Q. Y. Liang, Y. Ma, Y. H. Shi, and Z. Xia, “Geohazards types and their distribution characteristics in the natural gas hydrate area on the northern slope of the South China Sea,” Geology in China, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  12. H. Oyama, J. Nagao, K. Suzuki, and H. Narita, “Experimental analysis of sand production from methane hydrate bearing sediments applying depressurization method,” Journal of MMIJ, vol. 126, no. 8/9, pp. 497–502, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  13. Y. Li, L. Liu, C. Liu, J. Sun, Y. Ye, and Q. Chen, “Sanding prediction and sand-control technology in hydrate exploitation: a review and discussion,” Marine Geology Frontiers, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 36–43, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  14. S. C. Cao, J. Jang, J. Jung, W. F. Waite, T. S. Collett, and P. Kumar, “2D micromodel study of clogging behavior of fine-grained particles associated with gas hydrate production in NGHP-02 gas hydrate reservoir sediments,” Marine and Petroleum Geology, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 714–730, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. Li, N. Wu, F. Ning et al., “Hydrate-induced clogging of sand-control screen and its implication on hydrate production operation,” Energy, vol. 206, no. 1, article 118030, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. Li, F. Ning, N. Wu et al., “Protocol for sand control screen design of production wells for clayey silt hydrate reservoirs: a case study,” Energy Science & Engineering, vol. 8, no. 5, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  17. Y. Li, G. Hu, C. Liu et al., “Gravel sizing method for sand control packing in hydrate production test wells,” Petroleum Exploration and Development, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1016–1021, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Uchida, A. Klar, and K. Yamamoto, “Sand production model in gas hydrate-bearing sediments,” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 303–316, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. F. L. Ning, J. X. Sun, Z. C. Liu, and J. Q. Liang, “Prediction of sand production in gas recovery from the Shenhu hydrate reservoir by depressurization,” in Proceeding of 9th International Conference on Gas Hydrate, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  20. C. Yan, Y. Li, Y. Cheng et al., “Sand production evaluation during gas production from natural gas hydrates,” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 77–88, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. Yu, L. Zhang, R. Zhang, and S. Ren, “Assessment of natural gas production from hydrate-bearing sediments with unconsolidated argillaceous siltstones via a controlled sandout method,” Energy, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 654–667, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. M. Istchenko and I. D. Gates, “Well/wormhole model of cold heavy-oil production with sand,” SPE Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 260–269, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. Bedrikovetsky, F. D. Siqueira, C. A. Furtado, and A. L. S. Souza, “Modified particle detachment model for colloidal transport in porous media,” Transport in Porous Media, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 353–383, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. F. Takeuchi, M. Hiratsuka, R. Ohmura, S. Alavi, A. K. Sum, and K. Yasuoka, “Water proton configurations in structures I, II, and H clathrate hydrate unit cells,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 138, no. 12, article 124504, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. H. Kim, P. R. Bishnoi, R. A. Heidemann, and S. S. H. Rizvi, “Kinetics of methane hydrate decomposition,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1645–1653, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. L. Gang, L. Xiaosen, C. Qi, and C. Zhaoyang, “Numerical simulation of gas production from gas hydrate zone in Shenhu Area, South China Sea,” Acta Chimica Sinica, vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 1083–1092, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  27. X. Qin, Q. Liang, J. Ye et al., “The response of temperature and pressure of hydrate reservoirs in the first gas hydrate production test in South China Sea,” Applied Energy, vol. 278, no. 1, article 115649, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J.-C. Feng, Y. Wang, X.-S. Li, G. Li, Y. Zhang, and Z. Y. Chen, “Production performance of gas hydrate accumulation at the GMGS2-Site 16 of the Pearl River Mouth Basin in the South China Sea,” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 306–320, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Yongmao Hao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views269
Downloads667
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.