Table of Contents
Geography Journal
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 927176, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/927176
Research Article

Morphometry Governs the Dynamics of a Drainage Basin: Analysis and Implications

1Department of Geography, University of Calcutta, 35 B. C. Road, Kolkata 700 019, India
2Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Vidyasagar University, Medinipur 721 102, India
3Department of Geology, St. Xavier's College (Autonomous), 5 Mahapalika Marg, Mumbai 400001, India

Received 11 February 2014; Accepted 13 March 2014; Published 7 May 2014

Academic Editor: Biswajeet Pradhan

Copyright © 2014 Atrayee Biswas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. I. Clarke, “Morphometry from maps,” in Essays in Geomorphology, G. H. Dury, Ed., pp. 235–274, Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  2. R. E. Horton, “Drainage basin characteristics,” Transactions of American Geophysics Union, vol. 13, pp. 350–361, 1932. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. R. E. Horton, “Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 56, pp. 275–370, 1945. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. A. N. Strahler, “Hypsometric analysis of erosional topography,” Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, vol. 63, pp. 1117–1142, 1952. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. A. N. Strahler, “Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology,” Transactions of American Geophysics Union, vol. 38, pp. 913–920, 1957. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. N. Strahler, “Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks,” in Handbook of Applied Hydrology, V. T. Chow, Ed., McGraw Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1964. View at Google Scholar
  7. S. A. Schumm, “Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey,” Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, vol. 67, pp. 597–646, 1956. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. R. J. Chorley and M. A. Morgan, “Comparison of morphometric features, Unaka Mountains, Tennessee and North Carolina, and Dartmoor, England,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 17–34, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  9. P. W. Williams, “Morphometric analysis of polygonal karst in New Guinea,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 761–796, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  10. L. M. Mesa, “Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucumán, Argentina),” Environmental Geology, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1235–1242, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. Lyew-Ayee, H. A. Viles, and G. E. Tucker, “The use of GIS-based digital morphometric techniques in the study of cockpit karst,” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 165–179, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. B. Altin and B. N. Altin, “Development and morphometry of drainage network in volcanic terrain, Central Anatolia, Turkey,” Geomorphology, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 485–503, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Buccolini, L. Coco, C. Cappadonia, and E. Rotigliano, “Relationships between a new slope morphometric index and calanchi erosion in northern Sicily, Italy,” Geomorphology, vol. 149-150, pp. 41–48, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. S. Vittala, S. Govindaih, and H. H. Gowda, “Morphometric analysis of sub-watershed in the Pavada area of Tumkur district, South India, using remote sensing and GIS techniques,” Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 351–362, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. R. Chopra, R. D. Dhiman, and P. K. Sharma, “Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in Gurdaspur district, Punjab using remote sensing and GIS techniques,” Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 531–539, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  16. H. Vijith and R. Sateesh, “GIS based morphometric analysis of two major upland sub-watersheds of Meenachil river in Kerala,” Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 181–185, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Rudraiah, S. Govindaiah, and S. S. Vittala, “Morphometry using remote sensing and GIS techniques in the sub-basins of Kagna river basin, Gulburga district, Karnataka, India,” Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 351–360, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Bagyaraj and B. Gurugnanam, “Significance of morphometry studies, soil characteristics, erosion phenomena and landform processes using remote Sensing and GIS for Kodaikanal Hills, a global biodiversity hotpot in Western Ghats, Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu, South India,” Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 221–233, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  19. I. Malik, S. Bhat, and N. A. Kuchay, “Watershed based drainage morphometric analysis of Lidder catchment in Kashmir valley using Geographical Information System,” Recent Research in Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 118–126, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. Thomas, S. Joseph, K. P. Thrivikramji, and G. Abe, “Morphometric analysis of the drainage system and its hydrological implications in the rain shadow regions, Kerala, India,” Journal of Geographical Sciences, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1077–1088, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. S. Magesh, K. V. Jitheshlal, N. Chandrasekar, and K. V. Jini, “GIS based morphometric evaluation of Chimmini and Mupily watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Thrissur District, Kerala, India,” Earth Science Information, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 111–121, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. P. Singh, J. K. Thakur, and U. C. Singh, “Morphometric analysis of Morar River Basin, Madhya Pradesh, India, using remote sensing and GIS techniques,” Environmental Earth Science, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 1967–1977, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  23. K. Pareta and U. Pareta, “Quantitative geomorphological analysis of a watershed of Ravi River Basin, H.P. India,” International Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–56, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  24. S. K. Nag and S. Chakraborty, “Influence of rock types and structures in the development of drainage network in hard rock area,” Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  25. J. D. Das, Y. Shujat, and A. K. Saraf, “Spatial technologies in deriving the morphotectonic characteristics of tectonically active Western Tripura Region, Northeast India,” Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 249–258, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Bali, K. K. Agarwal, S. Nawaz Ali, S. K. Rastogi, and K. Krishna, “Drainage morphometry of Himalayan Glacio-fluvial basin, India: hydrologic and neotectonic implications,” Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1163–1174, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Demoulin, “Basin and river profile morphometry: a new index with a high potential for relative dating of tectonic uplift,” Geomorphology, vol. 126, no. 1-2, pp. 97–107, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. P. D. Sreedevi, K. Subrahmanyam, and S. Ahmed, “The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain,” Environmental Geology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 412–420, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. K. Narendra and K. N. Rao, “Morphometry of the Meghadrigedda watershed, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh using GIS and Resourcesat data,” Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 102–110, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  30. K. Avinash, K. S. Jayappa, and B. Deepika, “Prioritization of sub-basins based on geomorphology and morphometricanalysis using remote sensing and geographic informationsystem (GIS) techniques,” Geocarto International, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 569–592, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Mishra, D. P. Dubey, and R. N. Tiwari, “Morphometric analysis of Tons basin, Rewa District, Madhya Pradesh, based on watershed approach,” Earth Science India, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 171–180, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  32. I. Jasmin and P. Mallikarjuna, “Morphometric analysis of Araniar river basin using remote sensing and geographical information system in the assessment of groundwater potential,” Arab Journal of Geosciences, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 3683–3692, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. A. Javed, M. Y. Khanday, and S. Rais, “Watershed prioritization using morphometric and land use/land cover parameters: a remote sensing and GIS based approach,” Journal of the Geological Society of India, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 63–75, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. P. C. Patton and V. R. Baker, “Morphometry and floods in small drainage basins subject to diverse hydrogeomorphic controls,” Water Resources Research, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 941–952, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Diakakis, “A method for flood hazard mapping based on basin morphometry: application in two catchments in Greece,” Natural Hazards, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 803–814, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. H. B. Wakode, D. Dutta, V. R. Desai, K. Baier, and R. Azzam, “Morphometric analysis of the upper catchment of Kosi River using GIS techniques,” Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 395–408, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. A. Romshoo, S. A. Bhat, and I. Rashid, “Geoinformatics for assessing the morphometric control on hydrological response at watershed scale in the Upper Indus basin,” Journal of Earth System Science, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 659–686, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. A. Yin, “Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogen as constrained by along-strike variation of structural geometry, exhumation history, and foreland sedimentation,” Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 76, no. 1-2, pp. 1–131, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. K. S. Valdiya, Geology of the Kumaon Lesser Himalaya, Wadia Institute of Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India, 1980.
  40. P. Srivastava and G. Mitra, “Thrust geometries and deep structure of the outer and lesser Himalaya, Kumaon and Garhwal (India): implications for evolution of the Himalayan fold-and-thrust belt,” Tectonics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 89–109, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. P. G. DeCelles, G. E. Gehrels, J. Quade, and T. P. Ojha, “Eocene-early Miocene foreland basin development and the history of Himalayan thrusting, western and central Nepal,” Tectonics, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 741–765, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. P. G. DeCelles, D. M. Robinson, and G. Zandt, “Implications of shortening in the Himalayan fold-thrust belt for uplift of the Tibetan Plateau,” Tectonics, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1–25, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. O. N. Pearson and P. G. DeCelles, “Structural geology and regional tectonic significance of the Ramgarh thrust, Himalayan fold-thrust belt of Nepal,” Tectonics, vol. 24, no. 4, Article ID TC4008, pp. 1–26, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. N. McQuarrie, D. Robinson, S. Long et al., “Preliminary stratigraphic and structural architecture of Bhutan: implications for the along strike architecture of the Himalayan system,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters, vol. 272, no. 1-2, pp. 105–117, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. C. Vannay and B. Grasemann, “Himalayan inverted metamorphism and syn-convergence extension as a consequence of a general shear extrusion,” Geological Magazine, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 253–276, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. K. S. Valdiya, “Reactivation of terrane-defining boundary thrusts in central sector of the Himalaya: implications,” Current Science, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 1418–1431, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. R. Kumar, S. K. Ghosh, R. K. Mazari, and S. J. Sangode, “Tectonic impact on the fluvial deposits of Plio-Pleistocene Himalayan foreland basin, India,” Sedimentary Geology, vol. 158, no. 3-4, pp. 209–234, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. H. K. Sachan, M. J. Kohn, A. Saxena, and S. L. Corrie, “The Malari leucogranite, Garhwal Himalaya, Northern India: chemistry, age, and tectonic implications,” Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, vol. 122, no. 11-12, pp. 1865–1876, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. E. Mueller, “An introduction to the hydraulic and topographic sinuosity indexes,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 371–385, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. H. Gravelius, Flusskunde, Goschen'sche Verlagshandlung, Berlin, Germany, 1941.
  51. M. A. Melton, An Analysis of the Relations among Elements of Climate, Surface Properties and Geomorphology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA, 1957.
  52. J. S. Smart and A. J. Surkan, “The relation between mainstream length and area in drainage basins,” Water Resources Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 963–974, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  53. P. E. Black, “Hydrograph responses to geomorphic model watershed characteristics and precipitation variables,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 309–329, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. A. Faniran, “The index of drainage intensity -a provisional new drainage factor,” Australian Journal of Science, vol. 31, pp. 328–330, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  55. S. Singh and A. Dubey, Geo-environmental Planning of Watersheds in India, vol. 28, Chugh, Allahabad, India, 1994.
  56. S. Singh and M. C. Singh, “Morphometric analysis of Kanhar river basin,” National Geographical Journal of India, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  57. D. Waugh, Geography, An Integrated Approach, Nelson, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  58. J. M. Harlin, “Statistical moments of the hypsometric curve and its density function,” Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 59–72, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. J. M. Harlin, “The effect of precipitation variability on drainage basin morphometry,” American Journal of Science, vol. 280, no. 8, pp. 812–825, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. W. Luo, “Quantifying groundwater-sapping landforms with a hypsometric technique,” Journal of Geophysical Research E: Planets, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 1685–1694, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus