Research Article

Physician Perceptions on Colonoscopy Quality: Results of a National Survey of Gastroenterologists

Table 3

Impact of quality feedback on colonoscopy practice in multivariable analyses.

VariableNo feedback ( )Yes feedback ( ) value

Discuss risk of missed lesions in consent
 Yes65 (67.0%)52 (86.7%)<0.01
 No32 (33.0%)8 (13.3%)
Attempt to intubate the terminal ileum
 Never2 (2.0%)1 (1.6%)0.65
 Rarely9 (9.2%)10 (16.1%)
 Sometimes40 (40.8%)21 (33.9%)
 Usually33 (33.7%)10 (16.1%)
 Always14 (14.3%)20 (32.3%)
Attempt to retroflex in the right colon
 Never28 (28.6%)8 (12.9%)<0.01
 Rarely47 (48.0%)22 (33.5%)
 Sometimes16 (16.3%)17 (27.4%)
 Usually4 (4.1%)11 (17.7%)
 Always3 (3.1%)4 (6.5%)
Attempt to retroflex in the rectum
 Never2 (2.0%)00.72
 Rarely2 (2.0)1 (1.6%)
 Sometimes3 (3.1%)1 (1.6%)
 Usually9 (9.2%)7 (11.3%)
 Always82 (83.7%)53 (85.5%)
Prolong procedure to meet quality standards for withdrawal time
 Never42 (42.9%)26 (43.3%)0.85
 Rarely16 (16.3%)14 (23.3%)
 Sometimes18 (18.4%)11 (18.3%)
 Usually10 (10.2%)2 (3.3%)
 Always12 (12.2%)7 (11.7%)
Remove polyps solely to increase adenoma detection rate
 Never56 (57.1%)39 (62.9%)0.87
 Rarely13 (13.3%)4 (6.5%)
 Sometimes6 (6.1%)5 (8.1%)
 Usually16 (16.3%)9 (14.5%)
 Always7 (7.1%)5 (8.1%)

value based on multivariable linear regression model that included sex, years in practice, GI board certification, practice setting, productivity bonus, and colonoscopy volume as covariates.