A Novel Dry Model for Practicable Sphincterotomy and Precut Needle Knife Sphincterotomy
Table 3
Results of a questionnaire survey after hands-on training.
Q1. Realism, scope manipulation
Q2. Realism, ES
Q3 Possibility-improving their own ES skill
Q4. Recommend colleagues, ES
Q5. Realism, NKP
Q6. Possibility-improving their own NKP skills
Q7. Recommend colleagues, NKP
All participants
6 (3–9)
7 (2–9)
8 (0–10)
10 (7–10)
8 (8–10)
10 (8–10)
10 (8–10)
ES experience
Beginners, <10 cases
8 (7–9)
7.5 (6–9)
10 (9-10)
10 (10)
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
Intermediate, 10–100 cases
5 (3–8)
7 (4–8)
8 (5–10)
10 (7–10)
n.a.
10 (8–10)
10 (8–10)
Expert, >100 cases
6 (4–7)
7 (2–9)
7 (0–8)
10 (8–10)
8 (8–10)
10 (10)
10 (10)
Data presented as median, range.
*See Table 1 for details of each question. Only 6 participants performed NKP procedures. Q1 to Q4: there were no significant differences in the scores between beginner versus intermediate and beginner versus expert. Q6, Q7: there were no significant differences in the scores between beginner versus intermediate and beginner versus expert.
