S100A8 and S100A9 Positive Cells in Colorectal Carcinoma: Clinicopathological Analysis

Başsorgun, Cumhur İbrahim; Ünal, Betül; Erin, Nuray; Özlük, Anıl; Uzun, Özlem Ceren; Elpek, Gülsüm Özlem

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/943175

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 943175 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/943175

S100A8 and S100A9 Positive Cells in Colorectal Carcinoma: Clinicopathological Analysis

Cumhur İbrahim Başsorgun,¹Betül Ünal,¹Nuray Erin,²Anıl Özlük,²Özlem Ceren Uzun,¹and Gülsüm Özlem Elpek¹

Academic Editor: Fabio Marra

Received06 May 2014

Accepted20 Sept 2014

Published13 Oct 2014

Abstract

Introduction. In colorectal carcinoma, tumoral tissues infiltrate with various immune/inflammatory cells along their invasive margins and the increased S100A8/A9 expression in these immune cells infiltrating the tumor has recently been demonstrated. We examined S100A8/A9 as a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma. Materials and Methods. The current study included a sample of 80 patients diagnosed with CRC (30 cases with distant metastasis, 30 cases with lymph node metastasis, and 20 cases with no metastasis). Peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8 and S100A9 expressing inflammatory cells were counted in primary tumors and their metastasis and correlated with clinicopathological parameters. Results. The peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8/A9 positive cells showed no correlation with age, gender, or depth of tumor invasion. However higher counts of peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8/A9 positive cells were associated with larger tumor size, higher grade, and the presence of metastasis . Conclusion. Our study also found significantly higher number of S100A8/A9 positive cells in the tumor microenvironment among patients with large tumor size, high grade, and metastatic disease. Moreover, in our study, we observed that the expression in the tumor metastasis appeared similar to that of primary tumor.

1. Introduction

S100A8 (calgranulin A or migration inhibitory factor-related protein-8 (MRP-8)) and its binding partner S100A9 (calgranulin B or MRP-14) are two members of a multigenic family of cytoplasmic Ca2+-binding proteins [1]. These proteins are synthesized by the myeloid cell group mainly composed of neutrophils, monocytes, immature myeloid cells, and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [2, 3]. Both proteins are often coexpressed, composing the heterodimeric complex of S100A8/A9 usually known as “calprotectin” [2]. Increased S100A8/A9 expression has been reported to occur in several chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, cystic fibrosis, tuberculosis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, and transplant rejection [4–6]. In addition to inflammatory conditions, overexpression of S100A8/A9 has also been observed in various types of cancer including stomach, prostate, breast, skin, pancreas, liver, lung, bladder, colon, and esophageal cancers [7–11].

In colorectal carcinoma, tumoral tissues infiltrate with various immune/inflammatory cells along their invasive margins, and the increased S100A8/A9 expression in these immune cells infiltrating the tumor has recently been demonstrated by certain studies. In addition, several studies have suggested that increased S100A8/A9 expression in colorectal carcinoma may play a role in tumor progression and may be associated with metastasis and histological grade. Although a few studies imply a possible relationship with tumor progression and metastasis, there is no clear correlation between increased expression of S100A8/A9 in colorectal cancer and clinicopathological parameters such as tumor progression, tumor stage, lymph node metastases, or distant metastases. The studies conducted on this topic so far have used different counting methods in assessing the S100A8/A9 expression. Research on the subject has been mostly restricted to limited comparisons of peritumoral inflammatory cells in primary tumors or intratumoral inflammatory cells and tumor cells. However, no research has been found to examine the expression in tumor metastasis and severity or its comparison with the primary tumors.

In our study, we investigated increased expression of S100A8/A9 in the tumor microenvironment in colorectal carcinoma as well as previously shown inflammatory process functions of S100A8/A9, which exhibits concentration-dependent function and forms a heterodimeric complex. We also examined S100A8/A9 as a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma by analyzing the relationship between S100A8/A9, secreted by immune cells infiltrating the tumor along its invasive margin, and various clinicopathological parameters including tumor progression and metastasis.

2. Materials and Methods

The current study included a sample of 80 patients diagnosed with CRC (30 cases with distant metastasis, 30 cases with lymph node metastasis, and 20 cases with no metastasis) in the Department of Pathology, Akdeniz University Medical Faculty. The patients were surgically treated at the Department of Surgery between 2007 and 2012. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.

The median age of the 39 men was 69.6 years (range: 49–78 years) at the time of operation and that of the 41 women was 60.4 years (range: 41–84 years).

Four-micrometer-thick haematoxylin and eosin stained tissue sections from the surgical specimens fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin were reviewed and representative tissue blocks were selected. Slides were immunostained with anti-S100A8 and anti-S100A9 (1 : 50 dilution, Santa Cruz, USA) monoclonal antibodies by the avidin-biotin immunoperoxidase technique. Peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8 and S100A9 expressing inflammatory cells were counted in primary tumors and their metastasis. In each case, positive cells were counted at ×400 magnification in 10 systematically selected fields of vision and their mean number was obtained by averaging the number of positive cells per square millimeter of tissue. The research data were analyzed using SPSS 10.0. Continuous variables were compared using the Student’s t-test, and Chi-square test was used for univariate analysis of categorical data. Tests were considered significant when their values were <0.05.

3. Results

Tumors generally contained higher number of peritumoral and intratumoral S100A9 positive cells than peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8 positive cells (Figures 1 and 2). The mean number of peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8/A9 positive cells was significantly higher in tumors with larger size, higher grade, and metastasis () (Table 1). When patients were categorized as having median S100A8/A9 cell counts, for further statistical evaluation, the peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8/A9 positive cells showed no correlation with age, gender, or depth of tumor invasion (Table 2). However higher counts of peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8/A9 positive cells were associated with larger tumor size, higher grade, and the presence of metastasis ().

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

Increased expression of S100A8/A9 in colorectal carcinoma was first shown by Stulík et al. using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis [12]. S100A8/A9 has both intracellular and extracellular functions. In the intracellular space, S100A8/A9 detects calcium, activates NADPH oxidase, and conducts arachidonic acid transport into cells [13, 14], while in the extracellular space it exhibits concentration-dependent functions. At high concentrations (>80 microgram/mL), it displays apoptotic effect on tumor cells, whereas at lower concentrations (<25 microgram/mL) it regulates the viability and migration of tumor cells, endothelial cells, and inflammatory cells and supports tumor cell growth [15–17]. MDSC plays an important part in the suppression of T cell-mediated immune response, increasing in number in inflammation and tumors. As a result of interaction with S100A8/A9 binding sites on MDSC, S100A8/A9 activates MDSC migration [18]. In other words, S100A8/A9 provides MDSC accumulation through an autocrine feedback effect. S100A8/A9 performs these effects through certain cell surface receptors. These are TLR4 and RAGE receptors, known to play a role in infection, autoimmunity, and cancer [19].

Wnt/beta-catenin pathway has a crucial role in the development of colorectal carcinoma [20].

In fact, Duan et al. demonstrated that S100A8/A9 contributed survival and migration of colorectal carcinoma cells through Wnt/beta-catenin pathway, emphasizing that it might be a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma [19].

Our study found that S100A8/A9 positive cell count observed in the tumor microenvironment (peritumoral, intratumoral) was significantly high in the study sample of 80 patients diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma (30 patients with distant metastases, 30 patients with lymph node metastasis, and 20 cases with no metastasis), and comparison with clinicopathological parameters revealed that increased number of S100A8/A9 positive cells was associated with tumor size, high grade, and metastasis. On the other hand, it was found that the number of peritumoral and intratumoral S100A8/A9 positive cells had no correlation with age, gender, and tumor invasion depth. Besides, comparison of positive cell count in the metastatic tumor tissue with positive cell count in the primary tumor did not show a statistically significant difference. This also accords with earlier observations by Duan et al., who found that S100A8/A9 expression in tumor microenvironment of colorectal carcinoma was associated with tumor cell differentiation, Dukes stage, and metastasis [19]. In addition, this study emphasized that this impact of proteins on tumor progression contributed to survival and migration of tumor cells through Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. In fact, some research has reported that Wnt/beta-catenin pathway plays a critical role in the development of colorectal carcinoma [20]. Another study by Ang et al. [21] associated S100A8/A9 expression in stromal cells of colorectal carcinoma with large tumor size. Our findings seem to be consistent with the results of these previous studies investigating the relationship between the expression and clinicopathological parameters. Also, Kim et al., who conducted a study on S100A8/A9, observed increased expression of both proteins in stromal cells in colorectal carcinomas [22] and Sheikh et al. in pancreatic cancer-associated monocytes [23].

There are also several studies that associated the increased expression of S100A8/A9 with poor differentiation in tumors of breast, thyroid, and lung which exhibit glandular differentiation [10, 24, 25]. These members of the S-100 protein family can be identified as potential therapeutic targets for intervention in cancer treatment. However, far too little attention has been paid to the correlation between the expressions of these proteins in the tumor microenvironment in colorectal carcinoma and clinicopathological parameters used to predict tumor progression.

In conclusion, it has been suggested that calcium ions play a significant role in the development of colorectal carcinoma through a direct impact on proliferation and differentiation via calcium receptors [26]. For this reason, increased expression of calcium-binding proteins S100A8 and A9, members of the S-100 protein family, in the peritumoral and intratumoral spaces in colorectal carcinoma becomes important for tumor progression.

Therefore, the analyses conducted on the expression of these proteins and tumor behavior suggest that S100A8/A9 can become potential therapeutic targets in cancer treatment. So far, a limited number of studies have reported correlation between increased expression of S100A8/A9 and parameters such as tumor differentiation, metastasis, tumor size, and Dukes stage. Consistent with this finding, our study also found significantly higher number of S100A8/A9 positive cells in the tumor microenvironment among patients with large tumor size, high grade, and metastatic disease. Moreover, in our study, we observed that the expression in the tumor metastasis appeared similar to that of primary tumor. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to substantiate the results of this study and to better understand the functions of the S100A8/A9 positive immune cells observed in the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer in tumorigenesis and tumor progression.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

E. Lukanidin and J. P. Sleeman, “Building the niche: the role of the S100 proteins in metastatic growth,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 216–225, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Murthy, R. I. Lehrer, S. S. Harwig, and K. T. Miyasaki, “In vitro candidastatic properties of the human neutrophil calprotectin complex,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 151, no. 11, pp. 6291–6301, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Yui, M. Mikami, and M. Yamazaki, “Purification and characterization of the cytotoxic factor in rat peritoneal exudate cells: its identification as the calcium binding protein complex, calprotectin,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 307–316, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Nacken, J. Roth, C. Sorg, and C. Kerkhoff, “S100A9/S100A8: myeloid representatives of the S100 protein family as prominent players in innate immunity,” Microscopy research and technique, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 569–580, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Odink, N. Cerletti, J. Bruggen et al., “Two calcium-binding proteins in infiltrate macrophages of rheumatoid arthritis,” Nature, vol. 330, no. 6143, pp. 80–82, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Roth, M. Goebeler, and C. Sorg, “S100A8 and S100A9 in inflammatory diseases,” The Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9261, article 1041, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
W. El-Rifai, C. A. Moskaluk, M. K. Abdrabbo et al., “Gastric cancers overexpress S100A calcium-binding proteins,” Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 23, pp. 6823–6826, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Minami, Y. Sato, T. Matsumoto et al., “Proteomic study of sera from patients with bladder cancer: usefulness of S100A8 and S100A9 proteins,” Cancer Genomics and Proteomics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 181–190, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
S. S. Cross, F. C. Hamdy, J. C. Deloulme, and I. Rehman, “Expression of S100 proteins in normal human tissues and common cancers using tissue microarrays: S100A6, S100A8, S100A9 and S100A11 are all overexpressed in common cancers,” Histopathology, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 256–269, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Arai, T. Teratani, R. Nozawa, and T. Yamada, “Immunohistochemical investigation of S100A9 expression in pulmonary adenocarcinoma: S100A9 expression is associated with tumor differentiation,” Oncology Reports, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 591–596, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Arai, T. Yamada, and R. Nozawa, “Immunohistochemical investigation of migration inhibitory factor-related protein (MRP)-14 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Medical Oncology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 183–188, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Stulík, J. Osterreicher, and K. Koupilová, “The analysis of S100A9 and S100A8 expression in matched sets of macroscopically normal colon mucosa and colorectal carcinoma: the S100A9 and S100A8 positive cells underlie and invade tumor mass,” Electrophoresis, vol. 20, no. 4-5, pp. 1047–1054, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Donato, “Intracellular and extracellular roles of S100 proteins,” Microscopy Research and Technique, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 540–551, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Kerkhoff, W. Nacken, M. Benedyk, M. C. Dagher, C. Sopalla, and J. Doussiere, “The arachidonic acid-binding protein S100A8/A9 promotes NADPH oxidase activation by interaction with p67phox and Rac-2,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 467–469, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ghavami, I. Rashedi, B. M. Dattilo et al., “S100A8/A9 at low concentration promotes tumor cell growth via RAGE ligation and MAP kinase-dependent pathway,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1484–1492, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Nakatani, M. Yamazaki, W. J. Chazin, and S. Yui, “Regulation of S100A8/A9 (calprotectin) binding to tumor cells by zinc ion and its implication for apoptosis-inducing activity,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2005, no. 5, pp. 280–292, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yui, Y. Nakatani, M. J. Hunter, W. J. Chazin, and M. Yamazaki, “Implication of extracellular zinc exclusion by recombinant human calprotectin (MRP8 and MRP14) from target cells in its apoptosis-inducing activity,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 165–172, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Sinha, C. Okoro, D. Foell, H. H. Freeze, S. Ostrand-Rosenberg, and G. Srikrishna, “Proinflammatory S100 proteins regulate the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 7, pp. 4666–4675, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Duan, R. Wu, L. Ye et al., “S100A8 and S100A9 are associated with colorectal carcinoma progression and contribute to colorectal carcinoma cell survival and migration via Wnt/ $β$ -catenin pathway,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 4, Article ID e62092, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Fodde and T. Brabletz, “Wnt/β-catenin signaling in cancer stemness and malignant behavior,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 150–158, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. W. Ang, T. Nedjadi, A. A. Sheikh et al., “Smad4 loss is associated with fewer S100A8-positive monocytes in colorectal tumors and attenuated response to S100A8 in colorectal and pancreatic cancer cells,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1541–1551, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Kim, S.-H. OH, E.-J. Kim et al., “The role of myofibroblasts in upregulation of S100A8 and S100A9 and the differentiation of myeloid cells in the colorectal cancer microenvironment,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 423, no. 1, pp. 60–66, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Sheikh, D. Vimalachandran, C. C. Thompson et al., “The expression of S100A8 in pancreatic cancer-associated monocytes is associated with the Smad4 status of pancreatic cancer cells,” Proteomics, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1929–1940, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Arai, S. Takano, T. Teratani, Y. Ito, T. Yamada, and R. Nozawa, “S100A8 and S100A9 overexpression is associated with poor pathological parameters in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast,” Current Cancer Drug Targets, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 243–252, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ito, K. Arai, R. Nozawa et al., “S100A8 and S100A9 expression is a crucial factor for dedifferentiation in thyroid carcinoma,” Anticancer Research, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 4157–4161, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
J. F. Whitfield, R. P. Bird, B. R. Chakravarthy, R. J. Isaacs, and P. Morley, “Calcium-cell cycle regulator, differentiator, killer, chemopreventor, and maybe, tumor promoter,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 58, no. 22, pp. 74–91, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Cumhur İbrahim Başsorgun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1506

Downloads

1670

Citations