Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Gastroenterology Research and Practice / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 327872 |

Daniel Reinke, Stamatiki Kritas, Panagiotis Polychronopoulos, Alexios L. Skaltsounis, Nektarios Aligiannis, Cuong D. Tran, "Herbal Substance, Acteoside, Alleviates Intestinal Mucositis in Mice", Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2015, Article ID 327872, 9 pages, 2015.

Herbal Substance, Acteoside, Alleviates Intestinal Mucositis in Mice

Academic Editor: Gianfranco D. Alpini
Received21 Oct 2014
Revised04 Dec 2014
Accepted04 Dec 2014
Published05 Jan 2015


This study investigated the role of acteoside in the amelioration of mucositis. C57BL/6 mice were gavaged daily with acteoside 600 μg for 5 d prior to induction of mucositis and throughout the experimental period. Mucositis was induced by methotrexate (MTX; 12.5 mg/kg; s.c.). Mice were culled on d 5 and d 11 after MTX. The duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were collected for myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, metallothionein (MT) levels, and histology. Acteoside reduced histological severity scores by 75, 78, and 88% in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, respectively, compared to MTX-controls on d 5. Acteoside reduced crypt depth by 49, 51, and 33% and increased villus height by 19, 38, and 10% in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, respectively, compared to MTX-controls on d 5. Acteoside decreased MT by 50% compared to MTX-control mice on d 5. Acteoside decreased MPO by 60% and 30% in the duodenum and jejunum, respectively, compared to MTX-controls on d 5. Acteoside alleviated MTX-induced small intestinal mucositis possibly by preventing inflammation.

1. Introduction

Mucositis is characterised by the degradation and increased ulceration of the protective mucosal layer within the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) [1] and occurs in over 40% of all cancer patients that undergo chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Chemotherapeutic agents, such as methotrexate (MTX), attack rapidly dividing cancer cells by inhibiting folate production in RNA and DNA synthesis [13]. However, these agents are unable to differentiate between all rapidly dividing cells resulting in destruction of the basal cells and damage to connective tissue in the GIT [3].

Damage to the intestinal lining causes debilitating symptoms [4, 5]. These symptoms are divided into two categories, pain and inflammation. Pain symptoms include loss of eating and eventual anorexia [6]. Inflammation symptoms include diarrhoea, vomiting, and reduced nutrient uptake [7].

The current treatments for mucositis are systemic antibiotics [79], anti-inflammatories such as benzydamine and flurbiprofen [7], reducing the immune response and inflammatory markers present in the small intestine [5, 10], and nonspecific pain killers [8] which reduce the amount of damage signalling by nociceptors [11]. Antibiotics decrease levels of bacteria in the small intestine reducing immune mediated inflammation responses [79]. These treatments only mask the symptoms but do not treat the condition.

While there are currently no effective treatments for mucositis, many are in development. Numerous novel compounds which may provide preventative protection are being examined, for example, growth factors such as palifermin [7, 8], free radical scavengers such as amifostine [7, 8], or herbal substance such as iberogast [12] and Rhodiola algida [13].

The herbal substance, acteoside, is a phenylpropanoid glycoside that is derived from plant species in the Scrophularia genus [14, 15]. Plants containing acteoside are often used in traditional medicine to treat a variety of illnesses, such as tumours [16] and inflammation [17]. Hausmann et al. [18] demonstrated that acteoside reduced the intestinal damage caused by experimentally induced inflammatory bowel disease. Acteoside may exert its protective effect through a variety of mechanisms. It is known as an antioxidant [17] that prevents cell apoptosis [19, 20] and sequesters reactive oxygen species (ROS) [21].

It is hypothesised that prophylactic treatment of mice with acteoside will prevent damage caused by MTX to the intestinal mucosa. In the present study, we will be utilising a C57BL/6-mouse model of MTX-induced mucositis to examine the efficacy of acteoside as a potential treatment of mucositis. The mouse model of MTX-induced intestinal mucositis is a well-established model allowing the formation of well-defined, reproducible, clinical, and histological symptoms of mucositis [22].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Diet

All animal studies were performed in compliance with the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes and were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Women’s and Children’s Health Network (WCHN). Male C57BL/6 mice (, 7 weeks of age) were housed at room temperature maintained at 25 degrees Celsius with 12-hour dark and light cycles. Mice were given access to standard chow pellets (Specialty Feeds, WA, Australia) and free access to water.

2.2. Study Design

The experiment was undertaken for 16 d, between d −4 and d 11. The first MTX injection was given on d 1. As maximum damage to the small intestinal lining occurs 5 d after the first injection of MTX, mice were culled to assess prevention of damage. Recovery from MTX-induced gut damage occurs from 11 d after the first MTX injection and so this was selected as a cull day to assess the ability of acteoside to enhance intestinal recovery (Figure 1).

2.3. Disease Activity Index

The animal’s health was recorded using the standard disease activity index (DAI) scoring system and their body weight was recorded daily. DAI is a representative score given for weight loss, general well-being, stool consistency, and blood content in the stool. Categories are rated 1 to 4, with 1 = normal and 4 = severe. Scores from the overall categories are combined for a daily DAI score.

2.4. Acteoside, MTX Preparation and Administration

Acteoside (provided by Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece) powder with purity of >97% was used to prepare a stock solution by suspending 6000 μg dried powder in 1 mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Acteoside (600 μg) was gavage (0.1 mL of 6000 μg/mL) daily throughout the experimental period (Figure 1).

MTX (12.5 mg/kg) was diluted from 50 mg/mL solution (Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd, NSW, Australia) and was injected subcutaneously daily for 3 consecutive days into mice to induce mucositis (Figure 1). Treatments were given to the respective groups by oral gavage. Mice were randomly allocated to 4 groups: PBS + Saline (PS; ), Acteoside + Saline (AS; ), PBS + MTX (PM; ), and Acteoside + MTX (AM; ).

2.5. Tissue Collection

Mice were culled by asphyxiation with CO2 followed by cervical dislocation on d 5 and d 11, after MTX injections (Figure 1). Tissue samples were collected from the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum for histology and biochemical assays (these samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80°C until analysis).

2.6. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Activity

MPO activity in intestinal tissues was determined using a modification of the method by Dahlqvist [23]. Briefly, samples were homogenised (Ultra Turrex homogeniser, Janke and Kunkel, Germany) in 2 mL of saline and centrifuged for 12 min at 15000 rpm (Mikro Benchtop Centrifuge, Hettich GmbH and Co., Tuttlingen, Germany). The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was resuspended in hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide buffer (HTAB), a detergent (Sigma Aldrich, Sydney, Australia). 50 μL of negative and positive control samples as well as 50 ul of each test sample was added to triplicate wells in a microtiter plate. 200 uL of reaction solution, consisting of 8.4 mg of O-dianisidine dihydrochloride, 24 uL of H2O2, 5 mL of potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) and 45 mL of distilled H2O, was added to all wells in the plate and absorbance was read at 450 nm at 1 min intervals for 15 min with a spectrophotometer (Dynatech MR700, Baxter Diagnostics, Adelaide, South Australia). Results were expressed as units/g of tissue.

2.7. Metallothionein (MT) Assay

MT levels in intestinal tissues were determined using a radioactivity 109Cd/haem affinity assay as described previously [24]. Briefly, intestinal tissues were homogenized in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.2) and heated in a boiling water bath for 2 min and then spun at 12,000 g for 2 min. The supernatant was diluted (2 : 1) in 10 mM Tris-HCL and 109Cd (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA) followed by 4% haemoglobin to mop up excess 109Cd. The supernatant was then removed, transferred into a liquid scintillation vial, capped, and analysed using a gamma counter (1282 CompuGamma LRB Wallac, Finland). Results were expressed as nmol of Cd bound/g of wet weight.

2.8. Histological Assessment

Intestinal samples were fixed in 10% formalin, processed, embedded in paraffin wax, and then cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) as described previously [25]. Histological assessments were analysed using light microscopes (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with an attached video camera (Sony Corporation Tokyo Japan). For villus height and crypt depth, 40 measurements were taken using Image Pro Plus 5.1 software (Media Cybernetics, Maryland, USA). Histological scores were analysed using 11 histological parameters consisting of villus height, crypt depth ratio, enterocyte disruption, goblet cell numbers, mitotic figures, crypt disruption, crypt cell disruption, crypt abscess formation, lymphocytic and polymorphonucleocyte infiltration, capillary and lymphatic dilatation, submucosal thickness, and muscularis thickening. Each score was given a value of 0–3 and combined for an overall score.

2.9. Data Analysis

The results were analyzed using SigmaPlot 12.0 (Systat Software, Inc, USA). Two-way ANOVAs with Tukey post hoc tests were used to analyze the results for significance. Statistical significance was considered if . Data was expressed as mean ± SEM, unless otherwise stated.

3. Results

3.1. Disease Activity Index (DAI)

The DAI of the AM group showed no significant difference compared to all other groups throughout the experimental protocol (Table 1). However, the PM group has a significantly () higher DAI compared to the PS group on d 3 and d 5 (Table 1).

Treatmentd −4d 1d 2d 3d 5d 11

PS 1 (1, 1)2 (1, 2)1 (1, 2)1 (1, 2)1 (1, 2)1 (1, 1)
AS1 (1, 1)1 (1, 2)2 (1, 4)1.5 (1, 2)1 (1, 1)1 (1, 1)
PM1 (1, 1)2 (1, 2)2 (1, 4)3 (2, 4)*2 (1, 3)*1 (1, 1)
MA1 (1, 1)1 (1, 2)2 (1, 4)2 (1, 3)1.5 (1, 2)1 (1, 1)

Data was expressed as median and range in parenthesis. *Statistical significance compared to PS within group. PS = PBS + saline, AS = acteoside + saline, PM = PBS + MTX, and MA = MTX + acteoside.
3.2. MPO Activity

The AM group showed reduced MPO levels by 59% compared to mice in the PM group () on d 5 (maximal damage) (Figure 2). The mice in the PM group showed increased MPO levels compared to the AS and PS groups within d 5 in jejunum by 60% and the duodenum by 33% (Figure 2).

3.3. MT Levels

The AM group showed a significant () reduction in MT levels by 64% compared to the mice in the PM group on d 5 (maximal damage) (Figure 3). The PM group showed an increase in MT levels compared to the AS and PS groups within d 5 in all three intestinal segments (Figure 3). The mice in the AM group showed a reduction () in MT levels by 22% compared to the PM group in the duodenum and jejunum only, on d 11 (Figure 3).

3.4. Villus Height and Crypt Depth

The PM group showed a significant increase in crypt depth and decrease in villus height on d 5 compared to all other groups in the duodenum and jejunum (Figures 4 and 5). Crypt depth and villus height were significantly () increased by 49, 51, and 33% and decreased by 19, 38, and 10%, respectively, in the PM group on d 5 compared to d 11 (Figures 4 and 5).

3.5. Histological Severity Scores

PM treated mice had a significantly increased (88%) histological severity score on d 5 compared to all other groups (Table 2; Figure 6). Histological severity scores were significantly () decreased in the PM treated group on d 11 compared to d 5 (Table 2; Figure 6). Mice treated with PM showed a decreased infiltration of inflammatory cells and increased mitotic cells present as well as a reduction in damage to cell structure compared to AM and PB treated mice on d 5 (Figure 6).

d 5d 11d 5d 11d 5d 11

PS2.5 (2, 5)3 (1, 6)2.5 (1, 4)5 (2, 9)3 (1, 5)1 (1, 5)
AS2.5 (1, 3)2 (1, 6)3 (2, 7)3 (2, 4)1.5 (1, 4)2 (0, 2)
PM13 (2, 16)*2 (1, 4)#13 (10, 18)*6 (2, 10)#13 (7, 15)*1 (0, 3)#
MA3 (2, 5)2.5 (1, 6)2.5 (2, 4)3 (1, 8)1 (1, 3)1 (1, 4)

Data was expressed as median and range in parenthesis. *Statistical significance compared to all other groups () on d 5. #Statistical significance () compared to d 5. PS = PBS + saline, AS = acteoside + saline, PM = PBS + MTX, and MA = MTX + acteoside.

4. Discussion

The current study investigated the protective effect of acteoside, a herbal substance, on a mouse model of intestinal mucositis. Acteoside is known for its antioxidative properties as well as its ability to reduce inflammation in multiple tissues [19]. The administration of 3 consecutive doses of MTX (daily) induced a mild mucositis which was observed on d 5 as indicated by increased MPO activity and histological severity scores and this is consistent with previous studies [35, 25].

DAI is indicative of the severity of intestinal damage and mice treated with acteoside showed a trend towards a reduction in the severity of clinical symptoms caused by MTX. The trend represented in the DAI scores was consistent with the results observed from the severity scores suggesting that the DAI may be a good indicator of mucosal damage. Furthermore, we have shown that acteoside may be protective against MTX-induced mucositis as supported by our data of reduced severity scores, crypt depth, MPO activity, and MT levels.

Based on our histological severity score parameters, it was observed that degradation of the cellular structure and shape of the cells present in the mucosal lining was reduced. No noticeable changes were observed in mucosal thickening or vascularisation. The dividing cells in the base of the crypts were protected and the number of inflammatory cells present in the mucosa were reduced, consistent with previous studies [21, 25]. The severity scores suggested that acteoside may have a protective action on the small intestine mucosal lining. Furthermore, crypt depth on d 5 was reduced while villus height was increased in mice given acteoside. This indicated the possibility of a protective action on the cells in the villus and crypts. This may be due to a decrease in the production of TNF-α which, in turn, reduces the inflammation by preventing apoptosis of the stem cells in the crypts [26]. We have also shown that the administration of acteoside reduced MPO activity in mice treated with MTX indicating that acteoside may reduce MTX-induced inflammation.

The administration of acteoside markedly reduced MT levels in mice treated with MTX compared to mice treated with MTX alone. MT, an intracellular heavy metal binding, cystine rich ligand, has the ability to bind ROS [27]. The findings suggest that the endogenous MT may have been used to bind and break down ROS associated with MTX-induced mucositis which has been postulated to be the primary reason for reducing inflammation [28]. However, it is unclear how this is achieved; interestingly, we found that acteoside alone did not induce MT levels and there are no supporting studies indicating that acteoside upregulates MT. Further research into this pathway is warranted.

However, it has been shown that acteoside reduces levels of TNF-α [26], cell mediated apoptosis, and the production of ROS is regulated by TNF-α [2934]. The reduction of TNF-α by acteoside means that local inflammation and cell mediated apoptosis are reduced by the presence of acteoside. This forms a possible mechanism for the function of acteoside in reducing intestinal damage by MTX. Acteoside is known to have antiapoptotic properties [18]. Its ability to inhibit the production of ROS inside cells enables it to prevent the apoptosis of cells [14]. This process suggests that acteoside is able to reduce TNF-α levels within the cell, which is a marker essential for cell mediated death [14, 26]. This implies that the preventative treatment of mice with acteoside may inhibit the initial lysing of basal stem cells in the small intestine in the short term preventing the initial change in tissue response.

The findings from the present study did not show an improvement in recovery rate with respect to MTX-induced damage with the administration of acteoside. This may be expected as acteoside has been shown to partially prevent MTX-induced damage on d 5, and an increased recovery rates may not be observable. It is possible that the protection to the mucosal lining by acteoside was sufficient in the early phase of damage so that recovery rate from damage played a minor role. However, it is possible that acteoside functions in such a way as to prevent increased inflammation but has no direct effect on enhancing the rate of recovery of cells that have already been damaged.

In conclusion, mice treated with MTX to induce mucositis showed reduced levels of damage and inflammation to the mucosal lining when given acteoside prophylactically. Acteoside may be protective against MTX-induced small intestinal damage, by a couple of mechanisms, firstly increasing mitotic cells, thereby increasing cell proliferation, and secondly reducing inflammatory cell numbers as indicated by decreased MPO activity. Acteoside appears to be a promising alternative therapeutic approach for treating chemotherapy-induced mucositis.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Authors’ Contribution

Cuong D. Tran and Stamatiki Kritas designed the experiment and Daniel Reinke conducted the experiments and did the analyses. All authors contributed to the design and review of the paper.


The authors would like to acknowledge Ms. Kerry Lymn for providing technical assistance in the animal trials and histology. This study was supported by the Gastroenterology Departmental Fund at the Women’s and Children’s Health Network.


  1. J.-L. Pico, A. Avila-Garavito, and P. Naccache, “Mucositis: its occurrence, consequences, and treatment in the oncology setting,” Oncologist, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 446–451, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. T. Sonis and K. A. Costello, “A database for mucositis induced by cancer chemotherapy,” European Journal of Cancer—Part B: Oral Oncology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 258–260, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. B. A. E. de Koning, J. M. van Dieren, D. J. Lindenbergh-Kortleve et al., “Contributions of mucosal immune cells to methotrexate-induced mucositis,” International Immunology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 941–949, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. T. Sonis, “Mucositis: the impact, biology and therapeutic opportunities of oral mucositis,” Oral Oncology, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1015–1020, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. M. Logan, A. M. Stringer, J. M. Bowen et al., “The role of pro-inflammatory cytokines in cancer treatment-induced alimentary tract mucositis: pathobiology, animal models and cytotoxic drugs,” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 448–460, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. Boukhettala, J. Leblond, S. Claeyssens et al., “Methotrexate induces intestinal mucositis and alters gut protein metabolism independently of reduced food intake,” The American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 296, no. 1, pp. E182–E190, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. R. Posner and R. I. Haddad, “Novel agents for the treatment of mucositis,” Journal of Supportive Oncology, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 33–39, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  8. E. B. Rubenstein, D. E. Peterson, M. Schubert et al., “Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cancer therapy-induced oral and gastrointestinal mucositis,” Cancer, vol. 100, no. S9, pp. 2026–2046, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. M. Keefe, S. T. Sonis, and J. M. Bowen, “Emerging drugs for chemotherapy-induced mucositis,” Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 511–522, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. M. Keefe, M. M. Schubert, L. S. Elting et al., “Updated clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of mucositis,” Cancer, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 820–831, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. Negri, R. Lattanzi, E. Giannini et al., “Impaired nociception and inflammatory pain sensation in mice lacking the prokineticin receptor PKR1: focus on interaction between PKR1 and the capsaicin receptor TRPV1 in pain behavior,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 25, pp. 6716–6727, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. H. Wright, R. Yazbeck, K. A. Lymn et al., “The herbal extract, Iberogast, improves jejunal integrity in rats with 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)-induced mucositis,” Cancer Biology and Therapy, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 923–929, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W. T. Y. Loo, L. Jin, L. W. C. Chow, M. N. B. Cheung, and M. Wang, “Rhodiola algida improves chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in breast cancer patients,” Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. S91–S100, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. M. Díaz, M. J. Abad, L. Fernández, A. M. Silván, J. de Santos, and P. Bermejo, “Phenylpropanoid glycosides from Scrophularia scorodonia: in vitro anti-inflammatory activity,” Life Sciences, vol. 74, no. 20, pp. 2515–2526, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. B. Konuklugil and Ö. Bahadir, “Phenylpropanoid glycosides from Linum olympicum,” Turkish Journal of Chemistry, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 741–744, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  16. Y. P. Hwang, H. G. Kim, J. H. Choi et al., “Acteoside inhibits PMA-induced matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression via CaMK/ERK- and JNK/NF-κB-dependent signaling,” Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, vol. 55, supplement 1, pp. S103–S116, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Güvenç, Y. Okada, E. K. Akkol, H. Duman, T. Okuyama, and I. Çaliş, “Investigations of anti-inflammatory, antinociceptive, antioxidant and aldose reductase inhibitory activities of phenolic compounds from Sideritis brevibracteata,” Food Chemistry, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 686–692, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Hausmann, F. Obermeier, D. H. Paper et al., “In vivo treatment with the herbal phenylethanoid acteoside ameliorates intestinal inflammation in dextran sulphate sodium-induced colitis,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 373–381, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Q. Xiong, K. Hase, Y. Tezuka, T. Namba, and S. Kadota, “Acteoside inhibits apoptosis in D-Galactosamine and lipopolysaccharide- induced liver injury,” Life Sciences, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 421–430, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. Genovese, I. Paterniti, E. Mazzon et al., “Efficacy of treatment with verbascoside, biotechnologically produced by Syringa vulgaris plant cell cultures in an experimental mice model of spinal cord trauma,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 382, no. 4, pp. 331–345, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. Y. Lee, E.-R. Woo, and K. W. Kang, “Inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-inducible nitric oxide synthase expression by acteoside through blocking of AP-1 activation,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 561–566, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. D. Tran, S. Sundar, and G. S. Howarth, “Dietary zinc supplementation and methotrexate-induced small intestinal mucositis in metallothionein-knockout and wild-type mice,” Cancer Biology and Therapy, vol. 8, no. 17, pp. 1662–1667, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Dahlqvist, “Method for assay of intestinal disaccharidases,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 1964. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. L. Eaton and B. F. Toal, “Evaluation of the Cd/hemoglobin affinity assay for the rapid determination of metallothionein in biologival tissues,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 134–142, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. S. Howarth, G. L. Francis, J. C. Cool, X. Xu, R. W. Byard, and L. C. Read, “Milk growth factors enriched from cheese whey ameliorate intestinal damage by methotrexate when administered orally to rats,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 126, no. 10, pp. 2519–2530, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  26. R. Medeiros, R. D. S. Prediger, G. F. Passos et al., “Connecting TNF-α signaling pathways to iNOS expression in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease: relevance for the behavioral and synaptic deficits induced by amyloid β protein,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 20, pp. 5394–5404, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. D. M. Templeton and M. G. Cherian, “Toxicological significance of metallothionein,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 205, pp. 11–24, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Abel and N. de Ruiter, “Inhibition of hydroxyl-radical-generated DNA degradation by metallothionein,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 191–196, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Fotin-Mleczek, F. Henkler, A. Hausser et al., “Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 1 regulates CD40-induced TRAF2-mediated NF-κB activation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 1, pp. 677–685, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. Hayashi, T. Nagamatsu, M. Ito, H. Yagita, and Y. Suzuki, “Acteoside, a component of Stachys sieboldii MIQ, may be a promising antinephritic agent (3): effect of acteoside on expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in experimental nephritic glomeruli in rats and cultured endothelial cells,” The Japanese Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 157–168, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Q. Xiong, Y. Tezuka, T. Kaneko et al., “Inhibition of nitric oxide by phenylethanoids in activated macrophages,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 400, no. 1, pp. 137–144, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. L. Speranza, S. Franceschelli, M. Pesce et al., “Antiinflammatory effects in THP-1 cells treated with verbascoside,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1398–1404, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Al-Gindan, M. Shawarby, A. Noto, and C. G. Taylor, “Intestinal inflammation in rats induces metallothionein in colonic submucosa,” Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 131–141, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Brüwer, K. W. Schmid, K. A. Metz, C. F. Krieglstein, N. Senninger, and G. Schürmann, “Increased expression of metallothionein in inflammatory bowel disease,” Inflammation Research, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 289–293, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Daniel Reinke et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.