Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Volume 2015, Article ID 410150, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/410150
Research Article

Characteristics and Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Assessed Circumferential Margin in Rectal Cancer

1Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
2Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
3Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
4Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
5Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Received 25 February 2015; Revised 20 April 2015; Accepted 11 May 2015

Academic Editor: Greger Lindberg

Copyright © 2015 Xiaoji Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Sauer, H. Becker, W. Hohenberger et al., “Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 17, pp. 1731–1810, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. I. D. Nagtegaal and P. Quirke, “What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer?” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 303–312, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. I. D. Nagtegaal, C. A. M. Marijnen, E. K. Kranenbarg, C. J. H. van de Velde, and J. H. J. M. van Krieken, “Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 350–357, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Caricato, D. Borzomati, F. Ausania, S. Valeri, A. Rosignoli, and R. Coppola, “Prognostic factors after surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer: an overview,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 126–132, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. MERCURY Study Group, “Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 333, no. 7572, pp. 779–782, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. C. Compton, L. P. Fielding, L. J. Burgart et al., “Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer: College of American Pathologists consensus statement 1999,” Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 124, no. 7, pp. 979–994, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. U. Adam, M. O. Mohamdee, I. G. Martin et al., “Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer,” The Lancet, vol. 344, no. 8924, pp. 707–711, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Trakarnsanga, M. Gonen, J. Shia et al., “What is the significance of the circumferential margin in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy?” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1179–1184, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Edge, D. R. Byrd, C. C. Compton, A. G. Fritz, F. L. Greene, and A. Trotti, AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 7th edition, 2010.
  10. T. E. Bernstein, B. H. Endreseth, P. Romundstad, and A. Wibe, “Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 96, no. 11, pp. 1348–1357, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Wibe, P. R. Rendedal, E. Svensson et al., “Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 327–334, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. W. Kim, N. K. Kim, B. S. Min et al., “A prospective comparison study for predicting circumferential resection margin between preoperative MRI and whole mount sections in mid-rectal cancer: significance of different scan planes,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 648–654, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Videhult, K. Smedh, P. Lundin, and W. Kraaz, “Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer in clinical practice: high accuracy in predicting circumferential margin with clinical benefit,” Colorectal Disease, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 412–419, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Brown, A. G. Radcliffe, R. G. Newcombe, N. S. Dallimore, M. W. Bourne, and G. T. Williams, “Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 355–364, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Martling, T. Holm, S. Bremmer, J. Lindholm, B. Cedermark, and L. Blomqvist, “Prognostic value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis in rectal cancer,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 1422–1428, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. A. Wieder, R. Rosenberg, F. Lordick et al., “Rectal cancer: MR imaging before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for prediction of tumor-free circumferential resection margins and long-term survival,” Radiology, vol. 243, no. 3, pp. 744–751, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. G. Tytherleigh, V. V. Ng, A. A. Pittathankal, M. J. Wilson, and R. Farouk, “Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging remains an imprecise tool,” ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 194–198, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. V. Salerno, I. R. Daniels, B. J. Moran, R. J. Heald, K. Thomas, and G. Brown, “Magnetic resonance imaging prediction of an involved surgical resection margin in low rectal cancer,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 632–639, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. G. M. Taylor, P. Quirke, R. J. Heald et al., “Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY Study,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 34–43, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M.-L. Sautter-Bihl, W. Hohenberger, R. Fietkau, C. Roedel, H. Schmidberger, and R. Sauer, “MRI-based treatment of rectal cancer: is prognostication of the recurrence risk solid enough to render radiation redundant?” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 197–204, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. G. M. Taylor, P. Quirke, R. J. Heald et al., “Preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can identify good prognosis stage I, II, and III rectal cancer best managed by surgery alone: a prospective, multicenter, European study,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 253, no. 4, pp. 711–719, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. M. E. Engelen, M. Maas, M. J. Lahaye et al., “Modern multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer based on staging with magnetic resonance imaging leads to excellent local control, but distant control remains a challenge,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2311–2320, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J.-P. Gérard, D. Azria, S. Gourgou-Bourgade et al., “Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial accord 12/0405-Prodige 2,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1638–1644, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus