Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Volume 2015, Article ID 609150, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/609150
Clinical Study

Comparison of a 4-Day versus 2-Day Low Fiber Diet Regimen in Barium Tagging CT Colonography in Incomplete Colonoscopy Patients

1Department of Radiology, Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, 34668 Istanbul, Turkey
2Department of Radiology, Zeynep Kamil Training and Research Hospital, 34668 Istanbul, Turkey
3Department of Gastroenterology, Göztepe Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, 34730 Istanbul, Turkey
4Department of Radiology, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, 34752 Istanbul, Turkey
5Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, 34098 Istanbul, Turkey

Received 14 January 2015; Accepted 4 March 2015

Academic Editor: Mohamed Othman

Copyright © 2015 Kaan Meric et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, A. C. von Eschenbach et al., “American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 52, pp. 8–22, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. F. Ransohoff and R. S. Sandler, “Clinical practice: screening for colorectal cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 346, no. 1, pp. 40–44, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. R. Schrock, “Colonoscopy versus barium enema in the diagnosis of colorectal cancers and polyps,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 585–610, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. H. Kim, W. H. Kim, T. I. Kim et al., “Incomplete colonoscopy in patients with occlusive colorectal cancer: usefulness of CT colonography according to tumor location,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 934–941, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. J. Gollub and F. Flaherty, “Barium enema following incomplete colonoscopy,” Clinical Imaging, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 367–374, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. K. Rex and D. Lieberman, “ACG colorectal cancer prevention action plan: update on CT-colonography,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 101, no. 7, pp. 1410–1413, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Macari, P. Berman, M. Dicker, A. Milano, and A. J. Megibow, “Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 173, no. 3, pp. 561–564, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. A. Lefere, S. S. Gryspeerdt, J. Dewyspelaere, M. Baekelandt, and B. G. van Holsbeeck, “Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results—polyp detection and patient acceptance,” Radiology, vol. 224, no. 2, pp. 393–403, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. H. Liedenbaum, M. J. Denters, A. H. de Vries et al., “Low-fiber diet in limited bowel preparation for CT colonography: influence on image quality and patient acceptance,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. W31–W37, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. A. Taylor, A. Slater, D. N. Burling et al., “CT colonography: Optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging,” European Radiology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 32–42, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. A. Lefere, S. Gryspeerdt, J. Marrannes, M. Baekelandt, and B. Van Holsbeeck, “CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 184, no. 6, pp. 1836–1842, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. A. Taylor, S. Halligan, B. P. Saunders, P. Bassett, M. Vance, and C. I. Bartram, “Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 913–921, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. E. van Gelder, E. Birnie, J. Florie et al., “CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study,” Radiology, vol. 233, no. 2, pp. 328–337, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Neerincx, J. S. Terhaar Sive Droste, C. J. J. Mulder et al., “Colonic work-up after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up,” Endoscopy, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 730–735, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Neri, P. Lefere, S. Gryspeerdt, P. Bemi, A. Mantarro, and C. Bartolozzi, “Bowel preparation for CT colonography,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 1137–1143, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. H. Kim, B. I. Choi, J. K. Han et al., “CT colonography in a Korean population with a high residue diet: comparison between wet and dry preparations,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 483–494, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. W. Keedy, J. Yee, R. Aslam et al., “Reduced cathartic bowel preparation for CT colonography: prospective comparison of 2-L polyethylene glycol and magnesium citrate,” Radiology, vol. 261, no. 1, pp. 156–164, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Neri, S. Halligan, M. Hellström et al., “The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography,” European Radiology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 720–729, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. A. Taylor, A. Laghi, P. Lefere, S. Halligan, and J. Stoker, “European society of gastrointestinal and abdominal radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography,” European Radiology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 575–579, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. J. Shinners, P. J. Pickhardt, A. J. Taylor, D. A. Jones, and C. H. Olsen, “Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 186, no. 6, pp. 1491–1496, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus