Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Volume 2015, Article ID 698516, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/698516
Research Article

Dynamic versus Adynamic Graciloplasty in Treatment of End-Stage Fecal Incontinence: Is the Implantation of the Pacemaker Really Necessary? 12-Month Follow-Up in a Clinical, Physiological, and Functional Study

1Third Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Pradnicka Street 35-37, 31-202 Krakow, Poland
2Gabriel Narutowicz Memorial Hospital, Pradnicka Street 35-37, 31-202 Krakow, Poland

Received 2 December 2014; Revised 12 February 2015; Accepted 22 February 2015

Academic Editor: Gerassimos Mantzaris

Copyright © 2015 Piotr Walega et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to Cite this Article

Piotr Walega, Michal Romaniszyn, Benita Siarkiewicz, and Dorota Zelazny, “Dynamic versus Adynamic Graciloplasty in Treatment of End-Stage Fecal Incontinence: Is the Implantation of the Pacemaker Really Necessary? 12-Month Follow-Up in a Clinical, Physiological, and Functional Study,” Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2015, Article ID 698516, 5 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/698516.