Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Volume 2016, Article ID 2548109, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2548109
Clinical Study

The Impact of Colonoscopy Quality Control Table on Adenoma Detection Rates

1Department of Gastroenterology, Yangzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Jiangsu 225001, China
2Department of Emergency, Yangzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Jiangsu 225001, China

Received 5 January 2016; Revised 11 April 2016; Accepted 9 May 2016

Academic Editor: Maida Sewitch

Copyright © 2016 Bin Deng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. G. Zauber, S. J. Winawer, M. J. O'Brien et al., “Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 366, no. 8, pp. 687–696, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Nishihara, K. Wu, P. Lochhead et al., “Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 369, no. 12, pp. 1095–1105, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. C. Chen and D. K. Rex, “Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 856–861, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. A. Corley, C. D. Jensen, A. R. Marks et al., “Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 370, no. 14, pp. 1298–1306, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. J. W. Lee, R. G. Blanks, C. J. Rees et al., “Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: eevidence from the Bowel cancer screening programme in England,” Endoscopy, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Pohl, A. Schneider, H. Vogell, G. Mayer, G. Kaiser, and C. Ell, “Pancolonic chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine versus standard colonoscopy for detection of neoplastic lesions: a randomised two-centre trial,” Gut, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 485–490, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. J. Kahi, J. C. Anderson, I. Waxman et al., “High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 1301–1307, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. F. Madhoun and W. M. Tierney, “The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 127–133, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. J. Kahi, D. Ballard, A. S. Shah, R. Mears, and C. S. Johnson, “Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 925–931, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. J. Winawer, A. G. Zauber, R. H. Fletcher et al., “Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society,” Gastroenterology, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 1872–1885, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. J. Lai, A. H. Calderwood, G. Doros, O. K. Fix, and B. C. Jacobson, “The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 620–625, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. N. Baxter, R. Sutradhar, S. S. Forbes, L. F. Paszat, R. Saskin, and L. Rabeneck, “Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer,” Gastroenterology, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. J. Robertson, D. A. Lieberman, S. J. Winawer et al., “Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis,” Gut, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 949–956, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. J. W. Lee, M. D. Rutter, R. G. Blanks et al., “Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS bowel cancer screening programme,” Gut, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 1050–1057, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. V. Gómez and M. B. Wallace, “Training and teaching innovations in colonoscopy,” Gastroenterology Clinics of North America, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 659–670, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. G. Coe, J. E. Crook, N. N. Diehl, and M. B. Wallace, “An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 219–226, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B. Cai, Z. Liu, X. Yansong, W. Wei, and S. Zhang, “Adenoma detection rate in 41,010 patients from Southwest China,” Oncology Letters, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 2073–2077, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. McCambridge, J. Witton, and D. R. Elbourne, “Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 267–277, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus