Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Gastroenterology Research and Practice / 2016 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 2632703 |

Paula Moravkova, Darina Kohoutova, Stanislav Rejchrt, Jiri Cyrany, Jan Bures, "Role of S100 Proteins in Colorectal Carcinogenesis", Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2016, Article ID 2632703, 7 pages, 2016.

Role of S100 Proteins in Colorectal Carcinogenesis

Academic Editor: Bisweswar Nandi
Received20 Aug 2015
Revised22 Nov 2015
Accepted29 Nov 2015
Published06 Jan 2016


The family of S100 proteins represents 25 relatively small (9–13 kD) calcium binding proteins. These proteins possess a broad spectrum of important intracellular and extracellular functions. Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men (after lung and prostate cancer) and the second most frequent cancer in women (after breast cancer) worldwide. S100 proteins are involved in the colorectal carcinogenesis through different mechanisms: they enable proliferation, invasion, and migration of the tumour cells; furthermore, S100 proteins increase angiogenesis and activate NF-κβ signaling pathway, which plays a key role in the molecular pathogenesis especially of colitis-associated carcinoma. The expression of S100 proteins in the cancerous tissue and serum levels of S100 proteins might be used as a precise diagnostic and prognostic marker in patients with suspected or already diagnosed colorectal neoplasia. Possibly, in the future, S100 proteins will be a therapeutic target for tailored anticancer therapy.

1. Introduction

The family of S100 proteins represents a total of at least 25 relatively small (9–13 kD) Ca2+ (calcium) binding proteins. They are expressed exclusively in the vertebrates and their function gets changed in a response to the changing calcium concentration. Their name is derived from the fact that many members are soluble in 100% ammonium sulfate at the neutral pH [1]. S100 proteins have a broad range of functions; they play a role in the regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, energy metabolism, cellular signaling, and Ca2+ homeostasis. Extracellulary, S100 proteins act through activation of surface receptors in autocrine and paracrine manner [2].

2. History

The first mention about “relatively acidic and small in size” proteins appears in the paper written by Moore and McGregor in 1965. Moore and McGregor compared chromatographic patterns of proteins present in the brain and the liver of rabbits and found that brain contained at least two proteins which were in the lower quantity or even absent in the liver [3]. Later on, Rubin and Stenzel described synthesis of the brain protein in vitro, which originates in a ribosomal system from the rabbit cortical grey matter. The specific antigen used was an acidic protein, isolated from brain by Rubin and Stenzel [4].

In 1973, Kretsinger and Nockolds described the structure of calcium binding protein, parvalbumin: the main chain consists of six helices, A–F. The loops CD and EF bind the calcium and AB loop does not; nevertheless, its structure is similar to the CD and EF regions, apparently as a result of a gene triplication [5]. Since then, different S100 proteins have been recognized and their expression in various peripheral tissues has been identified [6].

3. Structure and Function of S100 Proteins

EF-hand (i.e., helix-loop-helix) superfamily consists of at least forty-five distinct subfamilies. Their members contain from two to eight EF-hands that are recognizable by amino acid sequence [7]. The EF-hand motif consists of two alpha helices “E” and “F” joined by an intervening 12-residue calcium binding loop [8]. The EF-hand motifs are typically arranged in pairs held together by a short antiparallel β-strand and numerous hydrophobic interactions between the four helices. S100 family proteins play a specific role among the other members of EF-hand superfamily due to their unique structure and properties [2]:(1)Dimeric structure of S100 proteins: S100 proteins exist in a dimeric structure with the exception of S100G, which is monomeric. S100 proteins can exchange their subunits with other members of S100 family to form homodimers and heterodimers in the cellular compartment.(2)Subunits constitution of S100 proteins: each subunit (each monomer) is composed of two EF-hand motifs. The first monomer, C-terminal one (“canonical”), is formed by 12 residues and ligates calcium with a higher affinity. The 14-residue, N-terminal (also called “pseudocanonical”) EF-hand binds the calcium with a weaker affinity.(3)Expression of S100 proteins: expression of S100 proteins occurs in a tissue- and cell-specific manner [9].

At the low calcium state, S100 proteins present in their calcium-free (apo) state. After the influx of calcium through the voltage-gated or receptor-mediated channels happens, S100 proteins bind calcium and undergo a specific conformational change which leads to a modification of their hydrophobic surface properties [2, 9].

The EF-hand-containing proteins can be functionally divided into two groups. First group consists of calcium sensors, which are characterized by ability to translate the signal of a change in concentration of Ca2+ ions to various responses. The second group includes calcium buffers, which bind free Ca2+ ions in the cytoplasm of the cell and can modulate calcium signals. Nevertheless, the borderline between these two groups is not strict and many EF-hand proteins can be described neither as clear sensors nor as clear buffers [10].

As mentioned above, increase in calcium levels leads to structural changes of S100 proteins and this allows them to interact with hydrophobic regions of the target proteins. For human S100 family members, more than 90 potential intracellular and extracellular target proteins have been reported: other calcium binding proteins (members of the annexin family), enzymes (e.g., aldolase A/C), cytoskeletal components (actin and tubulin), regulator genes of the cell cycle (p53), second messenger-synthesizing enzymes (adenylate and guanylate cyclase), and kinases belong to the interacting partners [11].

4. Gastrointestinal Cancer and S100 Proteins

Carcinogenesis is a multistep process requiring combination of genetic and epigenetic aberrations of normal human cells which lead to their progressive transformation into highly malignant derivatives. In 2000, Hanahan and Weinberg suggested that the malignant growth of nearly all types of cancers is a result of six essential alterations in the cell physiology: self-sufficiency in growth factors, insensitivity to growth-inhibitory signals, evasion of apoptosis, limitless replicative potential, sustained angiogenesis, and the ability to invade and metastasize [12]. In 2011, Hanahan and Weinberg added another two hallmarks of cancer: genomic instability and inflammation. Furthermore, reprogramming of energy metabolism and evading immune destruction have been included as two emerging hallmarks recently [13].

A total of 14.1 million new colorectal cancer cases were diagnosed in 2012 worldwide; there were 32.6 million people surviving with cancer (within 5 years from the diagnosis) and 8.2 million cancer deaths in 2012. According to this colorectal cancer takes prominent place among human malignancies with its third highest incidence in men and second highest incidence in women [14].

A growing interest in S100 proteins has been observed recently, as there is a clear evidence that they are involved in a variety of biological events related to the carcinogenesis. Firstly, majority of S100 genes are found on human chromosome 1q21, which is a region prone to genomic rearrangements. Secondly, altered expression of S100 proteins has been observed in different malignancies. Thirdly, S100 proteins interact with various proteins, which play an important role in carcinogenesis and S100 proteins also exert specific effects on target proteins such as NF-κβ, p53, and β-catenin [15].

Association of S100 proteins with different types of gastrointestinal cancer is shown in Table 1.

Cancer siteType of S100 proteinS100 regulated featuresReferences

Colon S100A8/A9, S100A4, S100A6, S100A11, S100B, S100P[2528, 3133, 4147]

Oesophagus S100A2↓ in ESCC
↑ in adenocarcinoma
[48, 49]
S100A9↑ in adenocarcinoma[50]

Stomach S100A2, S100A14[51, 52]
S100A2, S100A3, S100A4, S100A6–S100A10 [5357]

Pancreas S100A2Dysregulated[58]
S100A4, S100P[59]
S100A11↑ in early stage, ↓ in tumour progression[60]

ESCC, oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma; ↑, upregulated; ↓, downregulated.

5. Colorectal Neoplasia and S100 Proteins

5.1. S100A8/A9: Calprotectin

S100A8 and S100A9 are also known as calgranulins A and B or MRP8 and MRP14. They are expressed in a variety of the cells, being abundant especially in the myeloid cells including granulocytes, monocytes, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, MDSC [16]. Heterodimerization with S100A8 stabilizes S100A9 and causes elongation of its C-terminal α-helix. The tetramers create two high affinity Zn2+-binding sites, which are important for the function of calprotectin including its antimicrobial activity [2, 1618]. Calprotectin, heterocomplex of S100A8/A9, plays a key role in the regulation of different inflammatory processes and immune responses. After the neutrophil activation and/or endothelial adhesion of monocytes, calprotectin starts to be secreted and can serve as a marker of inflammation [17]. On the other hand, calprotectin is chemotactic for neutrophils [2, 19, 20]. At present, calprotectin is used as a biomarker and its faecal levels are routinely measured to confirm activity of inflammatory bowel disease.

Heterocomplex of S100A8/S100A9 can influence migration of MDSC and may induce tumour cell invasion [2123].

Effect of calprotectin towards the tumour cells is dependent on the concentration: at high concentrations, heterocomplex of S100A8/9 exerts an apoptotic effect on colon carcinoma cell lines [24], but at the low concentrations, tumour cell growth is promoted by calprotectin [25]. Low concentrations of S100A8/9 stimulate tumour cell migration [26].

Another important role of calprotectin in the context of increased risk of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases was described by Turovskaya et al.: in human colon tumour tissue, myeloid progenitors infiltrate regions of dysplasia and adenoma and express S100A8 and S100A9. RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end products) is the principal receptor of S100A8/A9 on the surface of tumour cells. Binding of calprotectin to RAGE activates the NF-κβ signaling pathway, which plays a key role in the molecular pathogenesis of colitis-associated carcinoma [27]. Ichikawa et al. confirmed that RAGE and carboxylated glycan-dependent binding of S100A8/9 promotes MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinases) and NF-κβ signaling [26].

Recently Lehmann et al. have shown that majority of colorectal cancer patients had increased levels of faecal calprotectin before the surgical tumour resection, which was followed by a significant decrease 3 months after the operation. Patients with T3 and T4 tumors had significantly higher calprotectin levels compared to those with T1 and T2 cancers [28].

5.2. S100A4: Metastatin-1, Calvasculin

S100A4, a multifunctional protein localized in the nucleus, cytoplasm, and extracellular space, is strongly associated with metastatic tumour progression [29]. Metastatin-1 was firstly described in 1989 by Ebralidze et al. [30] who found it expressed specifically in metastatic cells. Later on, S100A4 was identified to be a precious biomarker for identification of patients who have already developed metastases or who are at high risk to develop metastases metachronously. Therefore, metastatin-1 is a prognostic biomarker, too. Its role in prediction of tumour progression and prognosis of CRC was confirmed in a meta-analysis performed by Liu et al. [31]. Boye et al. emphasized that the nuclear expression (not the cytoplasmic one) of S100A4 is a novel prognostic marker for colorectal cancer. They also found that the prognostic impact was largely confined to TNM stage II, and patients with stage II tumours expressing nuclear S100A4 had similar prognosis when compared to stage III patients [32]. Recent research focused on calvasculin has shown that S100A4 is not only a biomarker, but it also plays a causative role in mediating metastatic processes [33].

Intracellular S100A4 increases cell motility via interactions with the proteins of cytoskeleton, such as actin filaments, nonmuscle tropomyosin, and nonmuscle myosin II [2, 33]. Furthermore, metastatin-1 induces invasiveness of primary tumors through the interaction with liprin beta 1 which leads to modulation of cell adhesion causing a migratory phenotype [34]. S100A4 contributes to the development of more aggressive cell phenotype via binding to p53 which results in a modulation of p53 transcriptional activity [35].

S100A4, when released into the extracellular space, enables angiogenesis through stimulation of endothelial cells motility and through activation of matrix metalloproteinases expression, which cleave proteins of the extracellular matrix and thereby facilitates cell invasion into the adjacent tissues [29, 33]. Extracellular angiogenic effect of S100A4 is also induced through its interaction with annexin II on the surface of endothelial cells [36].

APC gene mutation, which is present in about 90% of colorectal cancers, leads to an increase of cytoplasmic β-catenin, resulting in its nuclear accumulation and expression of genes involved in the tumour growth and invasion [37, 38]. Sack and Stein described that S100A4 is a transcriptional target of β-catenin. Therefore, targeting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway with the subsequent inhibition of S100A4 gene expression will restrict formation of colon cancer metastases [33]. Calcimycin was shown to inhibit Wnt/β-catenin pathway activity and the expression of β-catenin target gene, S100A4 [39]. Stein et al. demonstrated the effect of sulindac on colon cancer cell lines: reduced expression of β-catenin, followed by decrease of its nuclear accumulation, resulted in knockdown of S100A4 expression. In mice, sulindac treatment reduced tumour growth and decreased liver metastases in a human colon cancer xenograft model [40].

5.3. S100A6: Calcyclin

Calcyclin, originally identified in Ehrlich ascites tumour cells, was the first S100 protein described to be related to the cellular proliferation [61, 62]. Indeed, S100A6 is preferentially expressed in proliferating cells when compared to the quiescent ones. Similar to S100A4, calcyclin is associated with the tumour progression and invasion. Komatsu et al. found in their study that expression of S100A6 in human colorectal adenocarcinomas was significantly higher (2.4-fold) when compared to the expression of S100A6 in the normal mucosa. They also demonstrated that positivity of S100A6 antibody was present in 5% of normal mucosa, 46% of adenoma specimens, 55% of adenocarcinomas, and 100% of carcinoma cells that metastasized to the liver. A significant association between Duke’s tumour stage, lymphatic invasion, and S100A6 expression was confirmed [41]. Stulík et al. demonstrated statistically significant correlation between S100A6 expression and colon carcinoma progression, too. They investigated S100A6 in normal colon tissue and in colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. They found out that S100A6 accumulates in the invasive margin of the colorectal cancer [62]. Several mechanisms of calcyclin involvement in colorectal carcinogenesis have been documented: Wnt/β-catenin pathway and β-catenin itself can regulate S100A6 gene expression. Colocalization of calcyclin with β-catenin in colorectal cancer tissues has been identified. S100A6 interacts with a protein called lamin A/C, which is implicated in colon carcinogenesis [42]. Furthermore, S100A6 interacts with the receptor for advanced glycation end products and modulates cell survival [63]. Duan et al. studied the contribution of S100A6 to the colorectal carcinogenesis and demonstrated the effect of calcyclin on cell proliferation and migration via mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in vitro and tumour growth in vivo. S100A6 induced proliferation was partially suppressed by an extracellular receptor kinase inhibitor; migration was attenuated by a p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor [64].

Melle et al. demonstrated that S100A6 was significantly upregulated in colorectal cancer and metastases derived from colorectal cancer when compared to hepatocellular carcinoma. This conclusion seems to be very auspicious for clinical practice when the primary tumour is not known [65].

5.4. S100A11: Calgizzarin, S100C

Calgizzarin is localised in the cytoplasm and, in contrast to the majority of S100 proteins, in the nucleus of the cell, too [66]. Loss of nuclear calgizzarin in HeLa cells was described to lead to loss of inhibition of the cell growth [67]. S100A11 is involved in regulation of cell motility, cell cycle progression, cell differentiation, transcription, apoptosis, and inflammation [43, 66].

Calgizzarin has been identified to be a ligand of receptor for advanced glycation end products [68]. The role of S100A11 is complex and it can act either as a tumour suppressor or as a tumour promoter in different types of tumours [66]. Melle et al. were looking at expression of S100A11 in normal colonic epithelium, adenoma, and colorectal carcinoma and found upregulation of calgizzarin in colorectal cancer when compared to adenoma and to epithelial cells [43]. Stulík et al. also documented possible participation of calgizzarin in the process of colon cancer development [69].

5.5. S100B

S100B was found to be overexpressed in the liver metastases of colorectal cancer patients [70]. Furthermore, Huang et al. tried to detect circulating tumour cells in CRC patients, as the undetected micrometastases play an important role in the early relapse of CRC. They demonstrated that the postoperative relapse was significantly correlated with the gene overexpression including S100B. Based on this finding, S100B might be one of the prognostic markers for CRC patients [44].

5.6. S100P

S100P was discovered in 1992 [45, 71]. Ever since it has been proven that S100P is able to promote tumour invasion and formation of metastases [72, 73]. Upregulation of S100P was described in colorectal adenoma when compared to the normal tissue [46]. S100P is significantly upregulated by prostaglandin E2, which is usually overexpressed in epithelial CRC cells [47]. The first proof that the S100P expression in cancer tissues, as well as the serum S100P levels, might be used as a potential prognostic biomarker for CRC patients was documented by Wang et al. Results of their study confirmed significantly higher expression of S100P protein in cancerous tissues compared to the paired noncancerous regions. Interestingly, expression of S100P protein was associated with the localisation of the primary CRC tumour: the rate of S100P expression increased from the right to the left, being the highest in the rectal carcinomas. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the overall survival time of patients with CRC staged I–III with S100P protein expression was significantly shorter when compared to those without the expression of S100P protein in the tumour tissue. Survival time of CRC patients was also significantly associated with the preoperative S100P serum levels, investigated by ELISA [74].

6. Possible Therapeutical Implications of S100 Proteins

Data show that the inhibition of S100 proteins might play a key role in overcoming resistant forms of different malignancies. Tasquinimod, a novel oral quinoline-3-carboxamide derivative, was shown to have multiple effects on the tumour microenvironment [75] including possible binding to S100A9 protein which leads to the inhibition of interaction between S100A9 and receptors such as RAGE and TLR4. This might have an implication in the therapy of prostate cancer [76].

Dong et al. found that S100P (which is usually overexpressed in the colorectal cancer tissue) decreases chemosensitivity to 5-fluorouracil in vitro [73]. Therefore, S100P protein does not have a role of a prognostic indicator only, but also serves as a therapeutic target.

S100A6 protein became a potential prognostic biomarker and also a precious therapeutic target in the study carried out by Zhang et al. [55]: its inhibition decreased the metastatic potential of gastric cancer cells.

At this point we believe that incorporation of S100 proteins/antibodies aimed at S100 proteins will improve the anticancer therapy: it will make it more tailored, will decrease its side effects, and will help in the fight with resistant forms of cancer.

7. Conclusions

S100 proteins, members of EF-hand family, play an important role in the colorectal carcinogenesis.

According to the available data, S100 proteins could be used for diagnostic, prognostic, and surveillance purposes in patients who are at risk of or have already been diagnosed with colorectal neoplasia.

Possibly, in the very near future, S100 proteins might be a therapeutic target for tailored anticancer therapy.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The study was supported by research grant IGA NT/13413 (from the Czech Ministry of Health) and by research project PRVOUK P37-08 (from Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic).


  1. J. C. Deloulme, G. O. Mbele, and J. Baudier, “S100 proteins. From purification to functions,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 172, pp. 185–198, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  2. R. Donato, B. R. Cannon, G. Sorci et al., “Functions of S100 proteins,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 24–57, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. B. W. Moore and D. McGregor, “Chromatographic and electrophoretic fractionation of soluble proteins of brain and liver,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 240, pp. 1647–1653, 1965. View at: Google Scholar
  4. A. L. Rubin and K. H. Stenzel, “In vitro synthesis of brain protein,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 963–968, 1965. View at: Google Scholar
  5. R. H. Kretsinger and C. E. Nockolds, “Carp muscle calcium-binding protein. II. Structure determination and general description,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 248, no. 9, pp. 3313–3326, 1973. View at: Google Scholar
  6. F. Suzuki, T. Nakajima, and K. Kato, “Peripheral distribution of nervous-system specific S100 protein in rat,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 835–838, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  7. H. Kawasaki, S. Nakayama, and R. H. Kretsinger, “Classification and evolution of EF-hand proteins,” Biometals, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 277–295, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Weinman, “Calcium-binding proteins: an overview,” Journal de Biologie Buccale, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 90–98, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  9. L. Santamaria-Kisiel, A. C. Rintala-Dempsey, and G. S. Shaw, “Calcium-dependent and -independent interactions of the S100 protein family,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 396, no. 2, pp. 201–214, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Denessiouk, S. Permyakov, A. Denesyuk, E. Permyakov, and M. S. Johnson, “Two structural motifs within canonical EF-hand calcium-binding domains identify five different classes of calcium buffers and sensors,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID e109287, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. M. Kraemer, L. R. Saraiva, and S. I. Korsching, “Structural and functional diversification in the teleost S100 family of calcium-binding proteins,” BMC Evolutionary Biology, vol. 8, no. 1, article 48, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. D. Hanahan and R. A. Weinberg, “The hallmarks of cancer,” Cell, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 57–70, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. D. Hanahan and R. A. Weinberg, “Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation,” Cell, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 646–674, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. International Agency for Research on Cancer, GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012, IARC, Lyon, France, 2013.
  15. H. Chen, C. Xu, Q. Jin, and Z. Liu, “S100 protein family in human cancer,” American Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 89–115, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  16. S. Ghavami, C. Kerkhoff, W. J. Chazin et al., “S100A8/9 induces cell death via a novel, RAGE-independent pathway that involves selective release of Smac/DIABLO and Omi/HtrA2,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1783, no. 2, pp. 297–311, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. I. P. Korndörfer, F. Brueckner, and A. Skerra, “The crystal structure of the human (S100A8/S100A9)2 heterotetramer, calprotectin, illustrates how conformational changes of interacting α-helices can determine specific association of two EF-hand proteins,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 370, no. 5, pp. 887–898, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. T. E. Kehl-Fie, S. Chitayat, M. I. Hood et al., “Nutrient metal sequestration by calprotectin inhibits bacterial superoxide defense, enhancing neutrophil killing of Staphylococcus aureus,” Cell Host and Microbe, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 158–164, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. Ryckman, K. Vandal, P. Rouleau, M. Talbot, and P. A. Tessier, “Proinflammatory activities of S100: proteins S100A8, S100A9, and S100A8/A9 induce neutrophil chemotaxis and adhesion,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 170, no. 6, pp. 3233–3242, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. Vogl, K. Tenbrock, S. Ludwig et al., “Mrp8 and Mrp14 are endogenous activators of Toll-like receptor 4, promoting lethal, endotoxin-induced shock,” Nature Medicine, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1042–1049, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Sinha, C. Okoro, D. Foell, H. H. Freeze, S. Ostrand-Rosenberg, and G. Srikrishna, “Proinflammatory S100 proteins regulate the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 7, pp. 4666–4675, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. Hiratsuka, A. Watanabe, H. Aburatani, and Y. Maru, “Tumour-mediated upregulation of chemoattractants and recruitment of myeloid cells predetermines lung metastasis,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1369–1375, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Saha, Y.-C. Lee, Z. Zhang, G. Chandra, S.-B. Su, and A. B. Mukherjee, “Lack of an endogenous anti-inflammatory protein in mice enhances colonization of B16F10 melanoma cells in the lungs,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 14, pp. 10822–10831, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Ghavami, C. Kerkhoff, M. Los, M. Hashemi, C. Sorg, and F. Karami-Tehrani, “Mechanism of apoptosis induced by S100A8/A9 in colon cancer cell lines: the role of ROS and the effect of metal ions,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 169–175, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. Ghavami, I. Rashedi, B. M. Dattilo et al., “S100A8/A9 at low concentration promotes tumor cell growth via RAGE ligation and MAP kinase-dependent pathway,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1484–1492, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Ichikawa, R. Williams, L. Wang, T. Vogl, and G. Srikrishna, “S100A8/A9 activate key genes and pathways in colon tumor progression,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 133–148, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. O. Turovskaya, D. Foell, P. Sinha et al., “RAGE, carboxylated glycans and S100A8/A9 play essential roles in colitis-associated carcinogenesis,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 2035–2043, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. F. S. Lehmann, F. Trapani, I. Fueglistaler et al., “Clinical and histopathological correlations of fecal calprotectin release in colorectal carcinoma,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 17, pp. 4994–4999, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. B. Schmidt-Hansen, D. Örnås, M. Grigorian et al., “Extracellular S100A4(mts1) stimulates invasive growth of mouse endothelial cells and modulates MMP-13 matrix metalloproteinase activity,” Oncogene, vol. 23, no. 32, pp. 5487–5495, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Ebralidze, E. Tulchinsky, M. Grigorian et al., “Isolation and characterization of a gene specifically expressed in different metastatic cells and whose deduced gene product has a high degree of homology to a Ca2+-binding protein family,” Genes & development, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1086–1093, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Y. Liu, W. Tang, J. Wang et al., “Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of S100A4 overexpression in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis,” Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 8, article 181, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. Boye, J. M. Nesland, B. Sandstad, G. M. Mælandsmo, and K. Flatmark, “Nuclear S100A4 is a novel prognostic marker in colorectal cancer,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 46, no. 16, pp. 2919–2925, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. U. Sack and U. Stein, “Wnt up your mind—intervention strategies for S100A4-induced metastasis in colon cancer,” General Physiology and Biophysics, vol. 28, pp. F55–F64, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  34. M. Kriajevska, M. Fischer-Larsen, E. Moertz et al., “Liprin beta 1, a member of the family of LAR transmembrane tyrosine phosphatase-interacting proteins, is a new target for the metastasis-associated protein S100A4 (Mts1),” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 7, pp. 5229–5235, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. Grigorian, S. Andresen, E. Tulchinsky et al., “Tumor suppressor p53 protein is a new target for the metastasis-associated Mts1/S100A4 protein: functional consequences of their interaction,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 25, pp. 22699–22708, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. Semov, M. J. Moreno, A. Onichtchenko et al., “Metastasis-associated protein S100A4 induces angiogenesis through interaction with annexin II and accelerated plasmin formation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 21, pp. 20833–20841, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. B. Rubinfeld, I. Albert, E. Porfiri, C. Fiol, S. Munemitsu, and P. Polakis, “Binding of GSK3beta to the APC-beta-catenin complex and regulation of complex assembly,” Science, vol. 272, no. 5264, pp. 1023–1026, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. B. Mann, M. Gelos, A. Siedow et al., “Target genes of β-catenin-T cell-factor/lymphoid-enhancer-factor signaling in human colorectal carcinomas,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 1603–1608, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. U. Sack, W. Walther, D. Scudiero et al., “S100A4-induced cell motility and metastasis is restricted by the Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitor calcimycin in colon cancer cells,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 22, no. 18, pp. 3344–3354, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. U. Stein, F. Arlt, J. Smith et al., “Intervening in β-catenin signaling by sulindac inhibits S100A4-dependent colon cancer metastasis,” Neoplasia, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 131–144, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. K. Komatsu, A. Andoh, S. Ishiguro et al., “Increased expression of S100A6 (calcyclin), a calcium-binding protein of the S100 family, in human colorectal adenocarcinomas,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 172–177, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  42. E. Kilańczyk, A. Graczyk, H. Ostrowska, I. Kasacka, W. Leśniak, and A. Filipek, “S100A6 is transcriptionally regulated by β-catenin and interacts with a novel target, lamin A/C, in colorectal cancer cells,” Cell Calcium, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 470–477, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. C. Melle, G. Ernst, B. Schimmel et al., “Different expression of calgizzarin (S100A11) in normal colonic epithelium, adenoma and colorectal carcinoma,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 195–200, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  44. M.-Y. Huang, H.-M. Wang, T.-S. Tok et al., “EVI2B, ATP2A2, S100B, TM4SF3, and OLFM4 as potential prognostic markers for postoperative Taiwanese colorectal cancer patients,” DNA and Cell Biology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 625–635, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. Becker, V. Gerke, E. Kube, and K. Weber, “S100P, a novel Ca2+-binding protein from human placenta. cDNA cloning, recombinant protein expression and Ca2+ binding properties,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 207, no. 2, pp. 541–547, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. F. F. Lam, L. Jankova, O. F. Dent et al., “Identification of distinctive protein expression patterns in colorectal adenoma,” Proteomics Clinical Applications, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 60–70, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. Chandramouli, M. E. Mercado-Pimentel, A. Hutchinson et al., “The induction of S100p expression by the Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)/EP4 receptor signaling pathway in colon cancer cells,” Cancer Biology & Therapy, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1056–1066, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. L. Y. Cao, Y. Yin, H. Li, Y. Jiang, and H. F. Zhang, “Expression and clinical significance of S100A2 and p63 in esophageal carcinoma,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 15, no. 33, pp. 4183–4188, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  49. O.-J. Lee, S.-M. Hong, M. H. Razvi et al., “Expression of calcium-binding proteins S100A2 and S100A4 in Barrett's adenocarcinomas,” Neoplasia, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 843–850, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. H. Zaidi, V. Gopalakrishnan, P. M. Kasi et al., “Evaluation of a 4-protein serum biomarker panel-biglycan, annexin-A6, myeloperoxidase, and protein S100-A9 (B-AMP)-for the detection of esophageal adenocarcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 120, no. 24, pp. 3902–3913, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. Y.-F. Liu, Q.-Q. Liu, X. Wang, and C.-H. Luo, “Clinical significance of S100A2 expression in gastric cancer,” Tumor Biology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 3731–3741, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. Q. Zhang, M. Zhu, W. Cheng et al., “Downregulation of 425G>A variant of calcium-binding protein S100A14 associated with poor differentiation and prognosis in gastric cancer,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 141, no. 4, pp. 691–703, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. Z. Ling and R. Li, “Clinicopathological and prognostic value of S100A4 expression in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis,” International Journal of Biological Markers, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. e99–e111, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. Y. Wang, L.-B. Zhou, and X.-H. Li, “S100A4 expression and prognosis of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 10398–10403, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. Zhang, K. Zhang, X. Jiang, and J. Zhang, “S100A6 as a potential serum prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in gastric cancer,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 2136–2144, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. Liu, X. Li, G. L. Dong et al., “In silico analysis and verification of S100 gene expression in gastric cancer,” BMC Cancer, vol. 8, no. 1, article 261, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. L. Wang, E. W. Y. Chang, S. Wong, S.-M. Ong, D. Q. Y. Chong, and K. L. Ling, “Increased myeloid-derived suppressor cells in gastric cancer correlate with cancer stage and plasma S100A8/A9 proinflammatory proteins,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 190, no. 2, pp. 794–804, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. J.-B. Bachet, R. Maréchal, P. Demetter et al., “S100A2 is a predictive biomarker of adjuvant therapy benefit in pancreatic adenocarcinoma,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 2643–2653, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. Y.-F. Ji, H. Huang, F. Jiang, R.-Z. Ni, and M.-B. Xiao, “S100 family signaling network and related proteins in pancreatic cancer (review),” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 769–776, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. K. Ohuchida, K. Mizumoto, S. Ohhashi et al., “S100A11, a putative tumor suppressor gene, is overexpressed in pancreatic carcinogenesis,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 18, pp. 5417–5422, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. J. Kuźnicki and A. Filipek, “Purification and properties of a novel Ca2+-binding protein (10.5 kDa) from Ehrlich-ascites-tumour cells,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 247, no. 3, pp. 663–667, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. J. Stulík, J. Österreicher, K. Koupilová et al., “Differential expression of the Ca2+ binding S100A6 protein in normal, preneoplastic and neoplastic colon mucosa,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1050–1059, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. E. Leclerc, G. Fritz, M. Weibel, C. W. Heizmann, and A. Galichet, “S100B and S100A6 differentially modulate cell survival by interacting with distinct RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end products) immunoglobulin domains,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 43, pp. 31317–31331, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. L. Duan, R. Wu, Z. Zou et al., “S100A6 stimulates proliferation and migration of colorectal carcinoma cells through activation of the MAPK pathways,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 781–790, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. C. Melle, G. Ernst, B. Schimmel, A. Bleul, and F. von Eggeling, “Colon-derived liver metastasis, colorectal carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma can be discriminated by the Ca2+-binding proteins S100A6 and S100A11,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 12, Article ID e3767, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. H. He, J. Li, S. Weng, M. Li, and Y. Yu, “S100A11: diverse function and pathology corresponding to different target proteins,” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 117–126, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. M. Sakaguchi, M. Miyazaki, Y. Inoue et al., “Relationship between contact inhibition and intranuclear S100C of normal human fibroblasts,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 149, no. 6, pp. 1193–1206, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. D. L. Cecil, K. Johnson, J. Rediske, M. Lotz, A. M. Schmidt, and R. Terkeltaub, “Inflammation-induced chondrocyte hypertrophy is driven by receptor for advanced glycation end products,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 175, no. 12, pp. 8296–8302, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. J. Stulík, K. Koupilová, J. Österreicher et al., “Protein abundance alterations in matched sets of macroscopically normal colon mucosa and colorectal carcinoma,” Electrophoresis, vol. 20, no. 18, pp. 3638–3646, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. M.-Y. Huang, H.-M. Wang, H.-J. Chang, C.-P. Hsiao, J.-Y. Wang, and S.-R. Lin, “Overexpression of s100b, tm4sf4, and olfm4 genes is correlated with liver metastasis in taiwanese colorectal cancer patients,” DNA and Cell Biology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 43–49, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. Y. Emoto, R. Kobayashi, H. Akatsuka, and H. Hidaka, “Purification and characterization of a new member of the S-100 protein family from human placenta,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 182, no. 3, pp. 1246–1253, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. S. E. Dowen, T. Crnogorac-Jurcevic, R. Gangeswaran et al., “Expression of S100P and its novel binding partner S100PBPR in early pancreatic cancer,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 81–92, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. L. Dong, F. Wang, X. Yin et al., “Overexpression of S100P promotes colorectal cancer metastasis and decreases chemosensitivity to 5-FU in vitro,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 389, no. 1-2, pp. 257–264, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. Q. Wang, Y.-N. Zhang, G.-L. Lin et al., “S100P, a potential novel prognostic marker in colorectal cancer,” Oncology Reports, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 303–310, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. L. Shen, A. Sundstedt, M. Ciesielski et al., “Tasquinimod modulates suppressive myeloid cells and enhances cancer immunotherapies in murine models,” Cancer Immunology Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 136–148, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. E. Raymond, A. Dalgleish, J.-E. Damber, M. Smith, and R. Pili, “Mechanisms of action of tasquinimod on the tumour microenvironment,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Paula Moravkova et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.