Research Article

Splenectomy versus Partial Splenic Embolization for Massive Splenomegaly Secondary to Hepatitis B-Related Liver Cirrhosis: A Case-Control Study

Table 1

Background characteristics of enrolled patients.

ParametersControl group ()SP group ()PSE group () value

Child-Pugh grade (A : B : C)54 : 11 : 054 : 11 : 054 : 11 : 01.0000
Gender (M : F)43 : 2245 : 2044 : 210.9321
Age (y)45.3 ± 7.146.1 ± 8.746.4 ± 9.40.7771
WBC count (/mm3)3.75 ± 0.882.81 ± 1.023.29 ± 0.95<0.001
PLT count (103/mm3)7.3 ± 2.53.6 ± 2.74.5 ± 2.4<0.001
HBV DNA level (log10)4.27 ± 0.914.16 ± 0.854.34 ± 0.880.5025
Antiviral protocol0.9806
 Lamivudine292828
 Adefovir plus lamivudine655
 Entecavir plus lamivudine221
Spleen weight (g)1376 ± 2411440 ± 2631416 ± 2190.3146
Esophageal varices degree (mild : no) 21 : 4424 : 4126 : 390.6565
ICG R15 (%)19.2 ± 8.418.4 ± 9.120.3 ± 10.70.5167
Comorbidities 111080.7531
 Diabetes 332
 Hypertension 543
 COPD102
 Others231
ASA grade (I : II : III)41 : 16 : 844 : 17 : 438 : 19 : 80.6793

ICG R15, indocyanine green 15 min retention rate.