Gastroenterology Research and Practice / 2016 / Article / Tab 2

Clinical Study

Endoscopic Resection for Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Comparison of Endoscopic Submucosal Resection with Band Ligation and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Table 2

Endoscopic outcomes and follow-up of endoscopic submucosal resection with band ligation (ESMR-L) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) groups.

ESMR-L () number (%)ESD () number (%) value

En bloc resection 53 (100.0)24 (100.0)NS
Histological complete resection53 (100.0)13 (54.2)0.000
Histological margin involvement0 (0)11 (45.8)0.000
 Deep 0 (0)7 (29.2)
 Lateral0 (0)1 (4.2)
 Both 0 (0)3 (12.5)
Lymphatic invasion1 (1.9)2 (8.3)0.228
WHO grade 1/2/352/1/021/3/00.052
Procedure time (min)5.3 ± 2.817.9 ± 9.10.000
Perforation0 (0)0 (0)NS
Bleeding2 (3.8) 0 (0)0.335
Follow-up (month)7.8 ± 11.222.3 ± 16.80.001
Metachronous lesion or recurrence0 (0)1 (4.2)0.312
Distant metastasis 0 (0)0 (0)NS

NS: not significant.
Values are expressed as mean ± SD.