Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Gastroenterology Research and Practice / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 8357025 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8357025

Short-Term Efficacy of Laparoscopic Treatment for Colorectal Cancer in Patients with Schistosomiasis Japonica

Academic Editor: Martin Hubner
Received07 May 2016
Revised10 Aug 2016
Accepted03 Oct 2016
Published24 Oct 2016

Abstract

Introduction. Schistosomiasis is associated with numerous complications such as thrombocytopenia, liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and colitis. To the best of our knowledge, the feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients with schistosomiasis have not yet been studied. Methods. In this study, the data of 280 patients with colorectal carcinoma along with schistosomiasis japonica infection who underwent laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative data, operative data, pathological outcomes, postoperative complications, and recovery were compared between patients in the laparoscopic (LAC) and open (OC) groups. Results. There were no significant differences in the preoperative data between the groups. However, fewer postoperative complications, especially severe hypoproteinemia, early postoperative feeding, and shorter postoperative hospital stay, were observed in patients in the LAC group (). The mean operative time was higher in the LAC group (180 min versus 158 min; ), while the mean blood loss was similar (95 mL versus 108 mL; ) between groups. The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was also similar in both groups (15 versus 16; ). Conclusion. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is safe in patients with schistosomiasis japonica and has better short-term outcomes than open surgery.

1. Introduction

Schistosomiasis is an endemic communicable disease prevalent in tropical and subtropical areas of Asia and Africa [1]. According to data published by WHO, more than 61.6 million people were reported to have been treated for schistosomiasis in 2014 [2]. Despite the availability of effective treatment for more than 50 years, Schistosoma japonicum continues to be a major public health concern in China [3]. Schistosomiasis is associated with numerous complications, including thrombocytopenia, leucopenia, liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension, varicose veins, and splenomegaly [4, 5]. Moreover, it is known to cause colonic disease manifested as acute colitis, chronic colitis, and chronic active colitis and to predispose individuals to the development of colorectal cancer [6, 7]. These factors make the surgical treatment of schistosomiasis more difficult. However, whether this infection affects the feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery has not yet been studied.

This study aimed to evaluate the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma in patients with schistosomiasis.

2. Materials and Methods

This study is a retrospective review of patients with a history of schistosomiasis japonica infection who underwent surgical resection for colorectal cancer in a tertiary care hospital from November 2011 to November 2015. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. The diagnosis of colorectal cancer was based on colonoscopic biopsy examination and histological analysis of resected specimens. S. japonicum infection was detected by fecal or blood tests and/or histopathological examination of resected specimens. Fecal or blood tests to detect S. japonicum infection were performed in patients with suspected S. japonicum infection based on their clinical history or if they had a history of residing in areas where S. japonicum caused epidemics. All patients underwent radiological imaging such as ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to determine the disease stage and to check for any complications of schistosomiasis, such as liver disease and ascites. In patients with underlying liver disease, Child–Pugh grading was performed. Patients with stage I–III cancer were included in this analysis. Seven patients received neoadjuvant therapy for preoperative rectal cancer of stage T3N0M0 or any T, N1-2M0, or T4 and/or locally unresectable M0 stage. The decision regarding the type of operation, that is, open or laparoscopic, was made by the patients after they were explained the benefits and risks of both approaches. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before the operation. The standard surgical procedure was performed in all patients, depending on the location and extent of the disease. The surgeons in this study had more than five years of experience in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Since schistosomiasis is known to cause peritoneal disease, multiple peritoneal biopsy samples were taken when suspicious peritoneal nodules were detected during the operation in order to rule out peritoneal metastases. Patients with multifocal tumors, those with acute intestinal obstruction or perforation due to colorectal cancer, pregnant women, patients with contraindications to laparoscopy, those who had undergone prior abdominal surgery, those who had a malignant disease in the 5 years prior to the study, those with Child–Pugh grade C, and those with massive ascites were excluded from the study (Figure 1).

Preoperative parameters included patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Child–Pugh classification grade, schistosomiasis-related concomitant diseases, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and the volume of ascites. The operative parameters studied were operating time, operative blood loss, operative procedure, additional operations if any, conversion to open surgery, and the reason for conversion. Postoperative data included tumor size, depth of tumor invasion, disease stage, number of dissected lymph nodes, postoperative complications, time to first passage of flatus, days to first oral diet, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and schistosomiasis-related complications. The prothrombin time, serum albumin (ALB), and D-dimer levels on pre- and postoperative day 1 were compared.

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). was considered statistically significant. Continuous data were expressed as means ± standard deviation. Continuous variables were analyzed using the t-test, and qualitative variables were analyzed using the chi-square test.

The primary outcomes analyzed were short-term morbidity, mortality, tumor size, number of dissected lymph nodes, resection margin status, postoperative complications, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and schistosomiasis-related complications. The secondary outcomes studied were complication rates and quality of life measured at least up to 3 months after surgery.

3. Results

During the study period, 280 patients with schistosomiasis underwent colorectal surgery (87 patients, via the laparoscopic [LAC] approach, and 193 patients, via the open [OC] approach). The preoperative clinical data of these patients is summarized in Table 1. There was no statistically significant difference in the age, gender, BMI, ASA score, Child–Pugh classification grade, volume of ascites, and schistosomiasis-related concomitant disease between the groups.


LAC ()OC ()P

Age (y)0.367
 Mean ± SD
 Range(47–83)(45–86)
Gender0.469
 Male46111
 Female4182
Body mass index (kg/m2)0.457
 Mean ± SD
 Range(16.0–36.1)(16.1–35.5)
ASA score
 I611
 II65142
 III1640
 IV00
Child–Pugh classification grade0.406
 A69161
 B1832
Volume of ascites0.367
 None79168
 Minimal825
Schistosomiasis-related concomitant disease
 Liver cirrhosis541210.920
 Esophageal and gastric varices12300.704
 Splenomegaly37610.395
 Perisplenitis26790.077
 Leukopenia or thrombocytopenia25650.412
 Colonic fibrosis020.341

SD: standard deviation, LAC: laparoscopic, OC: open, and ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists.

The perioperative outcomes are summarized in Table 2. No statistically significant difference was observed with regard to the type of operative procedure, requirement of additional operation, and operative blood loss between the groups. One patient (1.1%) in the LAC group required conversion to open surgery owing to severe adhesions. The duration of operation was longer in the LAC group than in the OC group ( min versus  min; ). In the OC group, one patient developed splenic injury because of dense adhesions around the spleen. After 12 days of operation, the patient developed splenic abscess, which was percutaneously drained under ultrasound guidance.


LAC ()OC ()

Operative time (min)
 Mean ± SD180 ± 23158 ± 19<0.001
 Range(150–255)(125–240)
Operative blood loss (mL)
 Mean ± SD95 ± 63108 ± 850.196
 Range(10–300)(20–600)
Procedure
 Right hemicolectomy1858
 Left hemicolectomy414
 Sigmoid resection1622
 Anterior resection3376
 Hartmann procedure214
 Abdominoperineal resection149
Additional operation
 Oophorocystectomy12
 Appendectomy14
 Cholecystectomy29
 Open conversion1

SD: standard deviation, LAC: laparoscopic, and OC: open.

R0 resection was performed in all patients. Histological analysis showed eggs of S. japonicum in the resected specimens of all patients (Figure 2). Table 3 shows the comparison of pathological characteristics such as tumor size, depth of invasion, number of lymph nodes harvested, and disease stage according to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM stage.


LAC ()OC ()

Tumor size (mm)
 Mean ± SD43 ± 1746 ± 200.197
 Range(10–60)(10–70)
Depth of invasion
 T1911
 T21227
 T352110
 T41445
Number of lymph nodes harvested
 Mean ± SD15 ± 816 ± 70.133
 Range(3–38)(2–55)
Pathological stage (TNM)
 11732
 236101
 33460

SD: standard deviation, LAC: laparoscopic, and OC: open.

Data regarding the perioperative outcomes is summarized in Tables 4 and 5. The days to first passage of flatus ( versus ; ), liquid diet ( versus ; ), and postoperative hospital stay ( versus ; ) were shorter in the LAC group than in the OC group. The incidence of postoperative complications was lower in the LAC group than in the OC group (% versus %; ). Compared with patients in the OC group, those in the LAC group had significantly better postoperative albumin levels, which may be related to the minimally invasive surgery in these patients. No death occurred in either group.


LAC ()OC ()

Time to first flatus (d)
 Mean ± SD2 ± 14 ± 2<0.001
 Range(1–4)(3–6)
Time to liquid diet (day)
 Mean ± SD5 ± 16 ± 2<0.001
 Range(2–8)(3–24)
Postoperative hospital stay (d)
 Mean ± SD14 ± 416 ± 7<0.001
 Range(8–27)(10–66)
Postoperative complications1164<0.001
 Anastomotic leakage2100.270
 Anastomotic bleeding350.690
 Abdominal bleeding020.341
 Wound infection3220.031
 Abdominal infection030.242
 Pneumonia290.346
 Urethral infection030.242
 Ileus140.589
 Urinary disturbance040.176
 Chyle fistula020.341
Schistosomiasis-related complications
 Upper gastrointestinal bleeding030.242
 Massive ascites370.941
 Severe hypoproteinemia1160.021

SD: standard deviation, LAC: laparoscopic, and OC: open.

PT (s)ALB (g/L)D-dimer level (ng/mL)
PreoperativePostoperative day 1PreoperativePostoperative day 1PreoperativePostoperative day 1

LAC ()14.5 ± 1.041.4 ± 4.633.2 ± 3.2930 ± 11934600 ± 3319
OC ()13.6 ± 0.814.8 ± 1.038.9 ± 4.731.0 ± 4.2786 ± 8623781 ± 3260
P (preoperative versus postoperative)0.8060.5540.112

4. Discussion

Several epidemiological studies have shown that there may be a causal relationship between schistosomiasis and colorectal cancer [811]. As schistosomiasis is a systemic disease, it also affects other vital organs such as the liver, leading to bleeding diathesis, which is likely to affect the surgical outcomes. Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard of care for treatment of colorectal cancer [12, 13]. However, whether laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and has better outcomes than those observed after open surgery in patients with schistosomiasis is not known.

In the present study, the mean operative blood loss was low and similar between the groups, despite the high incidence of bleeding diathesis in the study population. Moreover, the incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications was similar between the LAC and OC groups. This suggests that laparoscopic surgery is at least as safe as open colorectal surgery in patients with schistosomiasis and its associated morbidities. The duration of surgery was found to be greater in the LAC group than in the OC group, which is consistent with previous findings [1316]. However, the operative time is likely to reduce with increasing surgical experience [17, 18]. Moreover, the lymph node yield was similar in the two groups, which suggests that oncological clearance is not compromised with laparoscopic surgery. Fewer lymph nodes in some of the cases could be attributed to the use of neoadjuvant therapy.

The present study showed that laparoscopic surgery is superior to open surgery in terms of postoperative recovery, as reflected by the shorter time to first passage of flatus and stool, earlier intake of liquid diet, and shorter postoperative hospital stay. Similar findings were noted in previous larger studies [1925]. However, the mean time for resumption of liquid diet was higher in this study, probably secondary to postoperative bowel wall edema, owing to the underlying hypoalbuminemia and portal hypertension.

The authors were concerned about the impact of schistosomiasis-related comorbidities on the perioperative outcomes. However, except for one patient in the OC group who developed splenic trauma due to dense perisplenic adhesions, no specific intraoperative difficulties were encountered. However, in the postoperative period, owing to the presence of liver disease, hypoalbuminemia (ALB < 25.0 g/L) was observed in 17 patients, which was corrected by infusion of human albumin. Variceal bleed was also observed in three patients in the OC group, which was treated using octreotide and endoscopic treatment. No increased incidence of these complications was observed in the LAC group. In order to evaluate the risk of venous thrombosis, the D-dimer values between the two groups were compared, and no significant difference was found. This result was similar to the results of Neudecker et al.’s study [26].

In conclusion, the present study, despite being retrospective in nature, suggests that laparoscopic treatment is safe and effective for colorectal cancer in patients with schistosomiasis japonica. However, only the short-term outcomes were analyzed in this study. Future studies with long-term follow-up are required to assess the oncological risks and benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients with infections caused by S. japonicum.

Disclosure

Zhu Yi is the first author and corresponding author. Jiang Hong-Gang is the co-first author.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the Jiaxing Science and Technology Innovation Team Project (Grant no. 2013-03).

References

  1. B. Gryseels, K. Polman, J. Clerinx, and L. Kestens, “Human schistosomiasis,” The Lancet, vol. 368, no. 9541, pp. 1106–1118, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. WHO, “More than 61.6 million people were reported to have been treated for schistosomiasis in 2014,” 2016, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs115/en View at: Google Scholar
  3. A. G. P. Ross, A. C. Sleigh, Y. Li et al., “Schistosomiasis in the People’s Republic of China: prospects and challenges for the 21st century,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 270–295, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M.-G. Chen, “Assessment of morbidity due to Schistosoma japonicum infection in China,” Infectious Diseases of Poverty, vol. 3, no. 1, article 6, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. Wu, A. Feng, and Y. Huang, “Research and control of advanced schistosomiasis japonica in China,” Parasitology Research, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Cao, W.-J. Liu, X.-Y. Xu, and X.-P. Zou, “Endoscopic findings and clinicopathologic characteristics of colonic schistosomiasis: a report of 46 cases,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 723–727, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. W. Liu, H.-Z. Zeng, Q.-M. Wang et al., “Schistosomiasis combined with colorectal carcinoma diagnosed based on endoscopic findings and clinicopathological characteristics: a report on 32 cases,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 4839–4842, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Z. Xu and D.-L. Su, “Schistosoma japonicum and colorectal cancer: an epidemiological study in the People's Republic of China,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 315–318, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. E. S. Zhao, “Cancer of the colon and schistosomiasis,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 74, no. 9, p. 645, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  10. D.-C. Qiu, A. E. Hubbard, B. Zhong, Y. Zhang, and R. C. Spear, “A matched, case-control study of the association between Schistosoma japonicum and liver and colon cancers, in rural China,” Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Matsuda, T. Masaki, S. Ishii et al., “Possible associations of rectal carcinoma with Schistosoma japonicum infection and membranous nephropathy: a case report with a review,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 576–581, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. F. L. Greene, “Laparoscopic management of colorectal cancer,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 221–228, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group, “A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 350, no. 20, pp. 2050–2059, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Braga, A. Vignali, L. Gianotti et al., “Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 236, no. 6, pp. 759–767, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. P. J. Guillou, P. Quirke, H. Thorpe et al., “Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9472, pp. 1718–1726, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. Heikkinen, S. Msika, G. Desvignes et al., “Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 477–484, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. T. Maeda, K. Y. Tan, F. Konishi et al., “Accelerated learning curve for colorectal resection, open versus laparoscopic approach, can be attained with expert supervision,” Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2850–2854, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. M. Davies and D. W. Larson, “Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: the state of the art,” Surgical Oncology, vol. 13, no. 2-3, pp. 111–118, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. T. C. Wong, K. H. Ng, J. F. Lim, B. S. Ooi, C. L. Tang, and K. W. Eu, “418 Cases of laparoscopic colorectal resections: a single-institution experience and literature review,” Singapore Medical Journal, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 650–654, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  20. A. Biondi, G. Grosso, A. Mistretta et al., “Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer: short- and long-term outcomes comparison,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. Sun, T. Jiang, Z. Qiu et al., “Short-term and medium-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted and open surgery for colorectal cancer: a single center retrospective case-control study,” BMC Gastroenterology, vol. 11, article 85, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Chand, J. Bhoday, G. Brown, B. Moran, and A. Parvaiz, “Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Supplement, vol. 105, no. 10, pp. 429–435, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. G. Jayne, H. C. Thorpe, J. Copeland, P. Quirke, J. M. Brown, and P. J. Guillou, “Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 1638–1645, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Gong, D.-B. Shi, X.-X. Li, S.-J. Cai, Z.-Q. Guan, and Y. Xu, “Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision compared to open surgery,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 18, no. 48, pp. 7308–7313, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. D. McKay, M. J. Morgan, S.-K. C. Wong et al., “Improved short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection for colon and rectal cancer in an area health service: a multicenter study,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 42–50, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. Neudecker, F. Klein, R. Bittner, T. Carus, A. Stroux, and W. Schwenk, “Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 1458–1467, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Zhu Yi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

711 Views | 530 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.