The Outcome of Thoracentesis versus Chest Tube Placement for Hepatic Hydrothorax in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

Ridha, Ali; Al-Abboodi, Yasir; Fasullo, Matthew

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5872068

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

On this page

Abstract Introduction Discussion Conclusion Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 | Article ID 5872068 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5872068

The Outcome of Thoracentesis versus Chest Tube Placement for Hepatic Hydrothorax in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

Ali Ridha,¹Yasir Al-Abboodi,²and Matthew Fasullo³

Academic Editor: Paolo Gionchetti

Received16 Jul 2017

Revised24 Sept 2017

Accepted10 Oct 2017

Published28 Nov 2017

Abstract

There are only a few studies with a small sample size of patients that have compared the risks of using chest tubes versus thoracentesis in hepatic hydrothorax. It has been shown that many complications may arise secondary to chest tube placement and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In this retrospective study, patients with cirrhosis were identified from the 2009 National Inpatient Sample by using ICD-9 codes; we evaluated the risk of chest tube versus thoracentesis in a largest population with hepatic hydrothorax to date to measure the mortality and the length of stay. A total of 140,573 patients with liver cirrhosis were identified. Of this, 1981 patients had a hepatic hydrothorax and ended up with either thoracentesis (1776) or chest tube (205). The mortality in those who received a chest tube was two times higher than that in thoracentesis group with a value of ≤0.001 (CI 1.43–312). In addition, the length of hospital stay of the chest tube group was longer than that of the thoracentesis subset (7.2 days versus 3.8 days, resp.). We concluded that chest tube placement has two times higher mortality rate and longer hospital length of stay when compared to patients who underwent thoracentesis.

1. Introduction

Cirrhosis is the end stage of chronic liver disease, which occurs due to gradual hepatic fibrosis leading to the irreversible destruction of liver anatomy. Liver cirrhosis has a high morbidity and mortality, which is the 14th most common cause of death all over the world and the 4th in central Europe. It leads to more than 1 million deaths per year in the world, and greater than 150,000 deaths per year in Europe [1]. The most common causes of liver cirrhosis are alcohol, chronic viral infection (hepatitis B or C), and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [2]. In early stages, the condition may be reversible by treating the underlying cause, but in later stages, liver transplant will be the ultimate therapy [3].

Shortness of breath and hypoxia are very common in patients with liver cirrhosis for a multitude of reasons [4]. It can be due to the mechanical impingement of the ascetic fluid on the diaphragm, hepatopulmonary syndrome [5], portopulmonary hypertension [6], and cirrhotic cardiomyopathy [7].

Hepatic hydrothorax is one of the complications of liver cirrhosis, which may cause shortness of breath as well, occurring in less than 10% of cirrhotic patients with known portal hypertension [8]. The ascetic fluid will spread into the chest at the pleural cavity via a defect in the diaphragm and usually accumulating in the pleural space of the right lung [9].

Patients are usually advised to limit the salt and fluid intake along with diuretic use [10, 11]. Some patient may need thoracentesis [12], transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement [13], pleurodesis [14], thoracoscopic surgery to repair diaphragmatic defects [15], or liver transplantation [16]. The following article will discuss and review the risk of the complications of chest tubes compared with thoracentesis in cirrhotic patients with hepatic hydrothorax.

2. Method

The 2009 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was used to create a panel of patients diagnosed with cirrhosis. The NIS is one of the largest publicly available database that has more than 7 million admissions from nationally distributed all over the united states including private, academic, nonfederal, and public hospitals. The NIS is part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Data including age, sex, race, length of stay, type of payers, admission types, primary and secondary diagnosis, hospital cost, hospital types and location, and other variables are included in the NIS.

2.1. Case and Outcome Variable Identifications

The ICD-9 (the clinical modification of the International Classification of Diseases) diagnostic codes were used to identify patients with history of liver cirrhosis (ICD-9 = 5718). The following ICD-9 codes were also used: chest tube placement (3404), thoracentesis (3491), hydrothorax (5118), and transudate pleural effusion (5119). Other variables used in this study have already been identified in the NIS data, for instance, race and sex.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

The primary outcome of the study was examining the safety and the mortality difference of chest tube placement versus thoracentesis in people with cirrhosis complicated by hepatic hydrothorax. We also assessed the mortality difference of chest tube placement versus thoracentesis in cirrhotic versus noncirrhotic patients. Data was reviewed and analyzed using the IBM SPSS version 24 statistical software for Mac computer. The target population analyzed was cirrhotic patients with hydrothorax or transudate pleural effusion-related admissions. The target population was further subdivided into people who had chest tube placement for drainage versus those who had thoracentesis. Mean, percentages, and standard deviation of the mean were used to examine the demographic feature of the target population. A multivariate logistic regression statistical test was used to compare the mortality and morbidity difference between these two groups. A confidence interval (CI) of 95% and value less than 0.05 were determined to define the statistical difference between the two groups.

3. Result

A total of 140,573 patients with diagnosis of cirrhosis were identified using ICD-9 code. Only 1981 patients out of 140,573 had transudate pleural effusion or hydrothorax and underwent a thoracentesis or chest tube during their hospitalization. 1776 had a thoracentesis (diagnosis and/or therapeutic) and 205 had a chest tube. 1121 (56.6%) were male and 860 (43.4%) were female (Table 1). 1240 (69.6%) were white, 154 (8.6%) black, 291 (16.3%) Hispanic, 48 (2.7%) Asian, 10 (0.6%) Native American, and 39 (2.2%) others (Table 2). Mean length of stay was 7.2 ± 15.5 for a patient with chest tube and 3.8 ± 10 for a patient with thoracentesis. Mean age was 60.38 ± 15 versus 60 ± 13.4 in people with chest tube versus thoracentesis, respectively (Table 3). The inpatient mortality was two times greater in the chest tube group than in the thoracentesis group (odds ratio = 2.1; value ≤ 0.001, CI 1.43–312). In addition, the length of stay of the chest tube group was longer than that of the thoracentesis group (7.2 days versus 3.8 days, resp.) (Table 3). The mortality was also 2 times higher in cirrhotic patients who had chest tube comparing to noncirrhotic patients who had chest tube (odds ratio = 2, value ≤ 0.001, CI 1.39–2.9). The mortality was 1.3 times higher in cirrhotic patients who had thoracentesis compared to noncirrhotic patients with thoracentesis (odds ratio 1.3, value ≤ 0.01, CI 1.14–159). Comparing male versus female, cirrhotic patients who had a chest tube and or/thoracentesis had no significant mortality difference (value = 0.731, odds ratio = 0.97, and CI 0.71–1.21). Comparing white to black cirrhotic patients who had a chest tube and/or thoracentesis also had no significant mortality difference ( value = 0.127, odds ratio = 1.6, CI 0.8–3.1) (Table 4).

4. Discussion

Hepatic hydrothorax is a rare complication of liver cirrhosis. Less than 10% of patients with severe liver disease may end up with hepatic hydrothorax, which commonly presents as shortness of breath, and low oxygen saturation and can be complicated by underlying infection. The development of a hydrothorax is most likely due to the spread of the ascetic fluid, accumulating from portal hypertension, into the pleural space due to small diaphragmatic defects [17]. Following emergence of symptoms, usually a simple chest X-ray is usually sufficient to point towards the diagnosis. Ultimately, a thoracentesis will be needed for a fluid sample to demonstrate a transudate fluid, like the peritoneal fluid with a greater protein concentration as pleura has a higher capacity for reabsorption for water than in the peritoneum [18].

Rarely, hydrothorax patients may end up with an acute tension hydrothorax, which generally leads to an acute change in respiratory status along with hypotension [19]. Another complication of hepatic hydrothorax is spontaneous bacterial empyema, which can happen around two percent of cirrhotic patients and can be seen in up to 16% when patients develop a hepatic hydrothorax [20].

Once a hydrothorax is diagnosed, the first line of therapy includes salt restriction, fluid restriction, and diuresis [21]. Generally, guidelines following failure of these options are slightly more ambiguous. When shortness of breath progresses to hypoxia due to the accumulation of hydrothorax, a thoracentesis is a fast and useful tool for relieving the symptom [22]. A patient who continues to decompensate following the interventions should be assessed for liver transplantation to reduce the risks of complications. Treatment options for recurrent hepatic hydrothorax that are not candidates for transplant include TIPS, repeated thoracentesis, and pleurodesis [23].

Multiple small-power studies have discussed the complications of chest tube placement for hepatic hydrothorax such as subcutaneous emphysema, organ puncture, haemothorax due to artery laceration, pulmonary edema from rapid removal of fluid (reexpansion pulmonary edema), misplacement of chest tube, protein and electrolyte depletion, infection, bleeding, and death [8, 24–26].

In 2016, Sharaf-Eldin et al. devised a new technique by using a pigtail catheter with a small caliber (22 gauge) for treating recurrent hepatic hydrothorax and, also, concluded that chest tube insertion for hepatic hydrothorax is associated with high complication rate and should be avoided [26].

One major flaw with these prior studies is the small sample used for most them. Our study contains the largest sample size analyzed for complications and mortality of chest tubes in patients with hepatic hydrothorax. We demonstrate a clear increase in mortality as well as hospital length of stay in patients who received a chest tube compared to those who are managed with a thoracentesis (diagnostic or therapeutic). We hope that by presenting this data, we can reiterate the increased morbidity and mortality using chest tubes for hepatic hydrothorax. We advocate for the use of repeated thoracentesis, TIPS, and, if feasible, liver transplant as the only therapeutic options for this condition.

Our study had several limitations that are inherent in the use of an electronic administrative database (NIS), which lacks the details available in standardized clinical trials. Long-term outcomes, complications, indications, severity of cirrhosis (MELD or Child-Pugh Score), and rehospitalization rates could not be assessed using the NIS database. The outcome of the procedure, degree of procedural difficulties, and provider experience could not be assessed.

5. Conclusion

Chest tube placement for hepatic hydrothorax has two times higher mortality and longer length of stay compared to those who underwent thoracentesis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

This is the original work of the named authors. All the named authors have read and approve the matter contained within the final draft of this report.

References

R. J. Wong, M. Aguilar, R. Cheung et al., “Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the second leading etiology of liver disease among adults awaiting liver transplantation in the United States,” Gastroenterology, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 547–555, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W.-C. Zhou, Q.-B. Zhang, and L. Qiao, “Pathogenesis of liver cirrhosis,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 23, pp. 7312–7324, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Heidelbaugh and M. Bruderly, “Cirrhosis and chronic liver failure: part I. Diagnosis and evaluation,” American Family Physician, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 756–762, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Hourani, P. E. Bellamy, D. P. Tashkin, P. Batra, and M. S. Simmons, “Pulmonary dysfunction in advanced liver disease: frequent occurrence of an abnormal diffusing capacity,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 693–700, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Rodríguez-Roisin and M. J. Krowka, “Hepatopulmonary syndrome — a liver-induced lung vascular disorder,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 22, pp. 2378–2387, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Krowka, M. B. Fallon, S. M. Kawut et al., “International liver transplant society practice guidelines: diagnosis and management of hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension,” Transplantation, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 1440–1452, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. M. Zardi, A. Abbate, D. M. Zardi et al., “Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 539–549, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Cardenas, T. Kelleher, and S. Chopra, “Review article: hepatic hydrothorax,” Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 271–279, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. N. Lazaridis, J. W. Frank, M. J. Krowka, and P. S. Kamath, “Hepatic hydrothorax: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 262–267, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Xiol and J. Guardiola, “Hepatic hydrothorax,” Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 239–242, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Fogel, V. K. Sawhney, E. A. Neal, R. G. Miller, C. M. Knauer, and P. B. Gregory, “Diuresis in the ascitic patient: a randomized controlled trial of three regimens,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 3, Supplement 1, pp. 73–80, 1981.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Strauss and T. Boyer, “Hepatic hydrothorax,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 227–232, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Milanez de Campos, L. O. Filho, E. de Campos Werebe et al., “Thoracoscopy and talc poudrage in the management of hepatic hydrothorax,” Chest, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Huang, S. W. Kuo, J. S. Chen, and J. M. Lee, “Thoracoscopic mesh repair of diaphragmatic defects in hepatic hydrothorax: a 10-year experience,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 1921–1927, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Xiol, G. Tremosa, J. Castellote et al., “Liver transplantation in patients with hepatic hydrothorax,” Transplant International, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 672–675, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Norvell and J. R. Spivey, “Hepatic hydrothorax,” Clinics in Liver Disease, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 439–449, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Sukcharoen, S. Dixon, K. Mangat, and A. Stanton, “Hepatic hydrothorax in the absence of ascites,” BML Case Reports, vol. 2013, article bcr2013200568, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. S. Kim, I. Susanto, C. A. Lazar et al., “Pneumothorax ex-vacuo or “trapped lung” in the setting of hepatic hydrothorax,” BMC Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 78, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Garcia Jr and A. A. Mihas, “Hepatic hydrothorax: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 52–58, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Baikati, D. L. Le, I. I. Jabbour, S. Singhal, and S. Anand, “Hepatic hydrothorax,” American Journal of Therapeutics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. S. Morrow, M. Kantor, and R. N. Armen, “Hepatic hydrothorax,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 193–203, 1958.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Milanez de Campos, L. O. Andrade Filho, E. de Campos Werebe, F. L. Pandulo, L. T. Filomeno, and F. B. Jatene, “Hepatic hydrothorax,” Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 665–674, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Borchardt, A. Smirnov, L. Metchnik, and S. Malnick, “Treating hepatic hydrothorax,” BMJ, vol. 326, no. 7392, pp. 751-752, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Runyon, M. Greenblatt, and R. H. Ming, “Hepatic hydrothorax is a relative contraindication to chest tube insertion,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 81, no. 7, pp. 566-567, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Sharaf-Eldin, A. S. Bediwy, A. Kobtan et al., “Pigtail catheter: a less invasive option for pleural drainage in Egyptian patients with recurrent hepatic hydrothorax,” Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2016, Article ID 4013052, 5 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. U. Liu, H. A. Haddadin, C. A. Bodian et al., “Outcome analysis of cirrhotic patients undergoing chest tube placement,” Chest, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 142–148, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2017 Ali Ridha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

4517

Downloads

1344

Citations