Clinical Factors of Delayed Perforation after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms

Table 2

Clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes of 5 patients with delayed perforation after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric neoplasms.

Case number	Age	Sex	Tumor location	Tumor size (mm)	Depth of tumor	Time required for ESD (minutes)	Time until diagnosis (hours)	Symptoms	Free air on X-ray	Free air on CT	Size of delayed perforation (mm)	Endoclips	Treatment	Time to oral intake (days)	Hospital stay (days)
1	67	Male	U Pos	22	Submucosa	180	17	None	Negative	Positive	4	Successful	Conservative	8	13
2	79	Female	U Les	23	Mucosa	120	19	None	Negative	Positive	4	Successful	Conservative	6	14
3	80	Female	U Pos	15	Mucosa	55	8	Fever and pain	NE	Positive	3	Successful	Conservative	5	12
4	76	Male	U Les	54	Submucosa	85	21	None	NE	Positive	5	Unsuccessful	Conservative	15	22
5	72	Male	L Gre	20	Mucosa	35	14	Fever and pain	NE	Positive	3	Successful	Conservative	7	15

U: upper third; L: lower third; Les: lesser curvature; Gre: greater curvature; NE: not evaluated; CT: computed tomography.