Research Article

Comparison on the Efficacy between Partially Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent with Funnel-Shaped Enlarged Head versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stent for Palliation of Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the 48 included patients.

CharacteristicsEnlarged-head group ()uSEMS group () value

Age, years70.5 ± 10.473.0 ± 11.90.447
Sex, male11 (45.8)12 (50.0)0.781
Tumor characteristics0.420
 Pancreatic cancer10 (41.6)10 (41.7)
 Cholangiocarcinoma7 (29.2)3 (12.5)
 Duodenal cancer1 (4.2)0 (0.0)
 Gastric cancer2 (8.3)7 (29.2)
 Gallbladder cancer4 (16.7)3 (12.5)
 Ampulla of Vater cancer0 (0.0)1 (4.1)
Site of obstruction0.457
 Pylorus5 (20.8)6 (25.0)
 First part of duodenum13 (54.2)8 (33.3)
 Second part of duodenum5 (20.8)7 (29.2)
 Third part of duodenum1 (4.2)3 (12.5)
Length of stenosis2.38 ± 0.712.91 ± 1.120.06
General condition
 BMI, kg/m220.54 ± 3.4720.13 ± 3.440.686
 ECOG performance status2 (2–4)2 (2-3)0.519
Severity of obstruction
 GOOSS score0.512
  0 no oral intake5 (20.8)5 (20.8)
  1 liquids only12 (50.0)16 (66.7)
  2 soft solid7 (29.2)3 (12.5)
  3 low-residue or normal diet0 (0.0)0 (0.0)

Values are n (%) or mean ± SD or median (range). SEMS: self-expandable metallic stent; BMI: body mass index; GOOSS: gastric outlet obstruction scoring system.