Research Article
10 Fr S-Type Plastic Pancreatic Stents in Chronic Pancreatitis Are Effective for the Treatment of Pancreatic Duct Strictures and Pancreatic Stones
Table 2
Short-term outcomes: during EPS placement.
| | Success | Failure | value |
| Results (%) | 41 (69.5) | 18 (30.5) | | Stent placement period, median | 276 | — | | (ranges) | (30–589) | — | | Exchanges, total | 169 | — | | No. of exchange, median (ranges) | 4 (1–16) | | | EPS placement; Santorini duct/Wirsung duct | 3/38 | — | | No. of times of ERCP until the 10 Fr EPS placement, median | 3.5 | — | | 1Pain relief (%) | 37 (90.2) | 15 (83.3) | 0.19 | Additional treatment | None | 11 | 4 | | Surgery | 0 | 4 | | ESWL | 30 | 10 | | Reasons for failure | Lithotripsy failure (ESWL, EHL) | — | 8 | | Deep cannulation failure | — | 10 | | 1Stone location | Single stone/multiple stones | 12/29 | 5/13 | 0.62 | 1Stone extraction results (%) | 37 (90.2) | 4 (0.22) | <0.012 | EPST/precut | 37/4 | 3/15 | | PD dilation procedure device | SSR | 24 (58.5) | 0 | | SBDC | 14 (34.1) | 1 | | EPDBD | 3 (7.3) | 17 | | Complications | Abdominal pain after stent placement | 3 | 0 | | Stent occlusion (complications pancreatitis/pancreatic abscess/colon-fistula/splenic abscess) | 4 (1/1/1/1) | 0 | | Dislocation | EPST hemorrhage | 1 | 0 | | Pancreatitis | 3 | 1 | | (Post-ERCP/post-ESWL/post-EHL) | 2 | 3 | | GW perforation | (0/1/1) | (1/0/2) | | Pseudocyst rupture | 1 | 3 | | 0 | 1 | |
|
|
1 values: chi-square test. 2Statistically significant. SSR: Soehendra stent retriever catheter; SBDC: Soehendra biliary balloon dilator; EPDBD: endoscopic pancreatic duct balloon dilation. |