Research Article | Open Access
Ali Aamar, Zeeshan Butt, Kamraan Madhani, Iqra Hussain, Joel Garsten, Harry Aslanian, "Effect of a Novel Patient Garment on Perceived Privacy during Colonoscopy: A Simple Approach to Minimize Embarrassment", Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2019, Article ID 2467101, 6 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2467101
Effect of a Novel Patient Garment on Perceived Privacy during Colonoscopy: A Simple Approach to Minimize Embarrassment
Background. In the United States, patients wear a one-piece, reusable cloth gown during colonoscopy procedures. Many patients report embarrassment related to bodily exposure during colonoscopy. This may limit participation in colorectal cancer screening programs. Aims. To assess whether the use of a novel, disposable patient garment (Privacy Pants, Jackson, MS), which increases patient coverage, can reduce embarrassment related to bodily exposure and increase colonoscopy acceptance rates. Methods. Patients were offered a novel gown, and they completed questionnaires before and after colonoscopy. Results. A total of 120 patients participated. 54% were female and 82% were Caucasian. The novel gown had high overall satisfaction (8.3) and was associated with a sense of respect during the procedure (9.4). 67% (80) of the patients had a prior colonoscopy, and of these, 76% would request a novel gown over a traditional gown for future procedures. Among all study participants, a high rate of acceptability for repeat colonoscopy if recommended by their doctors was reported (mean of 9.4). Nonwhites were more likely to have a concern for embarrassment addressed by using novel gowns as compared to whites ( value 0.02). Conclusion. All participants, particularly women and nonwhite participants, reported high rates of respect and satisfaction and decrease in embarrassment utilizing the novel gown during colonoscopy. Patients who had prior colonoscopy with a traditional gown preferred the novel garment. A novel procedure gown may enhance colonoscopy acceptance by minimizing embarrassment.
Approximately 15 million colonoscopy procedures are performed annually in the United States, most commonly as an outpatient procedure. The typical current practice in the United States (US) is for patients to wear a one-piece, reusable cloth gown (Figure 1). The gown is typically knee high with a tie in the back that may provide limited coverage of patients’ back. Patients may feel vulnerable and anxious about bodily exposure during colonoscopy [1–5]. Patients typically are placed in the left lateral position for colonoscopy, and their buttocks are exposed. Occasionally, patients need to be turned supine, prone, or right lateral to facilitate scope passage with limited coverage of pelvic anatomy with position changes. Bodily exposure may also be uncomfortable for endoscopy staff.
Currently, colon cancer screening rates in the United States are approximately 65% . Embarrassment is a significant barrier to colonoscopy screening . This is highlighted by the frequent preference of female patients for a female colonoscopist . A large majority of GI endoscopists in the US, however, are male [9, 10]. Members of lower socioeconomic groups are less likely to receive cancer-preventive services . Traditional patient gowns may be associated with a loss of dignity, the reinforcement of the “patient role,” and the assumption of a low-status position in the hospital . In addition, lack of protection for patient privacy could create potential medicolegal issues [13, 14]. A prospective study was performed to evaluate the impact of a novel privacy pant garment on patient’s perception of privacy.
This is a cross-sectional clinical study conducted at an outpatient, hospital-affiliated surgical center (Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center in Waterbury, CT) from November 2016 to January 2017. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Waterbury Hospital. The objectives of this study were to (1) assess the acceptance of a novel patient garment with increased bodily coverage during colonoscopy and (2) determine patients’ perception of embarrassment and physical privacy during colonoscopy.
All patients presenting for an outpatient colonoscopy during the study period were offered to utilize the novel garment during colonoscopy (Figures 2 and 3) (Privacy Pants®, Dignity Garment, Madison, MS, USA). All patients received anesthesia-administered sedation, typically with IV Propofol. A structured questionnaire was prepared to address previously reported factors that impact privacy concerns and anxiety before and during colonoscopy. Before colonoscopy, patients were asked to rate their concerns about physical privacy and embarrassment due to bodily exposure on a numerical scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being the lowest and 10 being the highest. After the colonoscopy, patients were asked to rate their satisfaction and experience with the novel garment and how likely they would choose it for future colonoscopy procedures, with all responses utilizing the same numerical scale. They also rated how respected they felt during the procedure and their sense of physical privacy and embarrassment (Table 1).
2.1. Statistical Analysis
SPSS version 20 was used for data analysis. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical variables, including age and gender. Means were calculated for the variables scored on a scale of 0 to 10. Age was categorized as less than or equal to 50 and more than 50 years. Continuous variables were compared across age and gender groups by using a -test and Mann-Whitney test where appropriate. value <0.05 was considered significant for all comparisons.
A total of 120 patients participated in the study, and 54% were female (Table 2). One-fifth of the study population (19.2%) was less than 50 years of age, and 83% of patients were white. 51 respondents (42.5%) had a high school education and 49 (40.8%) had college education. 67% (80) of the subjects had a prior colonoscopy. The indication for colonoscopy was colon cancer screening or surveillance in 68.8% of patients.
The average score was 6.8 when patients were asked whether they felt that the novel garment provided physical privacy during colonoscopy. The average score for satisfaction with the novel gown was 8.3. “Feeling respected during the procedure,” was associated with a mean score of 9.4. 71% of subjects did not feel embarrassed at all during the procedure (score of zero), with an average score of 2.0. 59% (70) of patients said that they will “definitely” (score of 10/10) choose a novel gown for their next colonoscopy, with a mean of 7.8 for all patients. Participants were very agreeable to have a repeat colonoscopy if recommended by their doctors, with a mean score of 9.4. Among the 80 patients who had a prior colonoscopy, when asked to compare their past experience with the traditional gown to the novel gown, the majority (76%) felt that the novel gown increased privacy (mean score of 7.6) and was associated with increased physical privacy (average score 6.8).
3.1. Impact Based on Gender
Women were more likely to be concerned about physical privacy during colonoscopy than men (mean score 5.1 vs. 2.6, value <0.05) (Table 1), and women were more concerned regarding embarrassment due to bodily exposure (mean score 5.4 vs. 1.9, value <0.05). Although the average score for embarrassment during colonoscopy was only 2, women had a significantly higher average embarrassment score than men (mean score 3.4 vs. 0.5, value <0.05). Men and women equally felt respected during the procedure, and both felt that the novel gown increased their physical privacy during the procedure (6.8).
3.2. Impact Based on Race
83% of participants were Caucasian. Whites were compared with other ethnicities (Table 3). Nonwhites were more likely to be concerned about physical privacy during colonoscopy (mean score 5.4 vs. 3.7, value 0.04). Nonwhites were more likely to have their concern for embarrassment addressed by using a novel gown (mean score 6.7 vs. 4.5, value 0.02). Nonwhites were more likely to report that the novel garment increased physical privacy during colonoscopy (mean score 8.4 vs. 6.1, value <0.05). Nonwhites felt more respected during colonoscopy compared to whites (mean score 9.9 vs. 9.3, value <0.05); however, both groups had high average scores. Nonwhites had higher satisfaction scores for the novel gown (mean score 9.7 vs. 7.8, value <0.05). Nonwhites were more likely to say that they will request the same type of garment for their next colonoscopy (mean score 9.3 vs. 7.5, value <0.05). There was no difference in patients’ experiences regarding the novel gown with respect to age or having their first colonoscopy.
Colonoscopy is proven to reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Due to the limitations of existing hospital gowns, the buttocks and genitals are often exposed during the procedure. Endoscopy teams must take great care to maintain patients’ privacy and dignity and reassure patients that privacy will be maintained [1, 13, 14]. Currently, the colon cancer screening rate in the United States is approximately 65% . Socioeconomic status, access to health care, cultural attitudes, religious beliefs, and communication barriers have been shown to influence screening rates . Embarrassment, cited by 35% of people aged 50 to 79 years, was the second most common reported reason for not having a colonoscopy . Utilization of a procedure garment that increases patients’ sense of privacy and willingness to have repeat procedures has a potential to increase colonoscopy acceptance and improve colon cancer screening rates.
We sought to evaluate patient perceptions of colonoscopy while utilizing a novel gown designed to increase bodily coverage (Privacy Pants, Jackson, MS, USA). (Figures 2 and 3). We estimate the incremental cost of the novel gown relative to a traditional gown to be less than five dollars. Two-thirds of our study subjects (80) had a prior colonoscopy, and of these, 76% would request the novel gown over a traditional gown for future procedures. The novel gown was associated with physical privacy (average score 6.8), a sense of respect during the procedure (9.4), and high overall satisfaction (8.3).
Seeff et al. reported that women are less likely to have colonoscopy for colorectal screening compared to men and embarrassment is a contributing factor [15, 16]. Of 202 women undergoing colonoscopy, 43% preferred a female endoscopist, and of these, 87% would be willing to wait 30 days for a female endoscopist and 14% would be willing to pay more . Embarrassment was the most common reason for this gender preference. In the United States, 87% of the practicing gastroenterologists are male and only 13% are female [9, 10]. We found that women were more concerned about embarrassment due to bodily exposure during their procedure than men (mean score 5.42 vs. 1.91, value <0.01). Women reported a slightly greater sense of privacy protection during colonoscopy than men with the novel procedure garment (mean score 8.07 vs. 7.15, value 0.27). Below-average colon cancer screening rates have been recognized in African Americans and Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders with embarrassment as a significant barrier to screening [17–19]. Nonwhite participants felt the novel gown minimized their embarrassment during colonoscopy to a greater degree than whites (mean score 6.67 vs. 4.47, value <0.05) and reported an increase in physical privacy (mean score 8.45 vs. 6.12, value <0.05). While the novel garment was favored for use for future colonoscopies by all participants (mean score 7.79), nonwhite participants were more likely to request the novel garment (mean score 9.33 vs. 7.45, value <0.05).
The survey questionnaire responses were anonymous; however, responses were self-reported and we recognize the possibility of social desirability bias. Participation in the study was voluntary, thus creating potential selection bias. We estimate that 10% of eligible participants declined participation, although data regarding this group was not recorded. Questions were designed to determine the impact of the novel gown on privacy concerns before and during colonoscopy; however, we recognize that additional factors may potentially influence patient responses. A direct comparison between the novel gown and the traditional gown was not performed, and a comparative study in a larger population with inclusion of groups with low rates of colon cancer screening is warranted.
Embarrassment is a significant colonoscopy screening barrier. The traditional gown offers limited bodily coverage. We found that all participants, and particularly women and nonwhite participants, reported high rates of respect and satisfaction and decrease in embarrassment utilizing the novel gown during colonoscopy. Patients who previously had colonoscopy with a traditional gown preferred the novel procedure garment with increased bodily coverage. A novel procedure gown may enhance colonoscopy acceptance by minimizing embarrassment, and additional comparative studies are warranted.
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
This study was presented as an abstract at the Digestive Disease Week Conference (05/04/2017) Chicago, IL, USA. Dignity Garment LLC was not involved in the preparation of manuscript, including conception, planning, design, conduct, data collection, analysis, writing, editing, or approval of the publication. Figures of the Privacy Pants were reprinted with permission from Dignity Garment LLC.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All authors have directly participated in the execution in a manner substantial enough to take responsibility for it.
- K. A. Mitchell, S. M. Rawl, V. L. Champion, P. R. Jeffries, and J. L. Welch, “Development and psychometric testing of the colonoscopy embarrassment scale,” Western Journal of Nursing Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 548–564, 2012.
- S. A. McLachlan, A. Clements, and J. Austoker, “Patients’ experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context—a systematic review of the literature,” Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 137–146, 2012.
- L. Baillie and L. Ilott, “Promoting the dignity of patients in perioperative practice,” Journal of Perioperative Practice, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 278–282, 2010.
- “Modest during colonoscopy. Concerns about modesty during colonoscopy,” March 2017, http://patientmodesty.org/colonoscopymodesty.aspx.
- Associate Press, Inappropriate Patient Behavior Tough on Nurses, NBC News, 2005, http://www.nbcnews.com/id/10484939/ns/health-health_care/t/inappropriate-patient-behavior-tough-nurses/#.VU_iqumBGzk.
- A. Wang, A. Shaukat, R. D. Acosta et al., “Race and ethnicity considerations in GI endoscopy,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 593–599, 2015.
- N. K. Janz, P. A. Wren, D. Schottenfeld, and K. E. Guire, “Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study,” Preventive Medicine, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 627–634, 2003.
- S. B. Menees, J. M. Inadomi, S. Korsnes, and G. H. Elta, “Women patients’ preference for women physicians is a barrier to colon cancer screening,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 219–223, 2005.
- C. Pallard, Male and Female Active Physicians: 70 Statistics by Specialty, Becker’s GI and Endoscopy, 2015, http://www.beckersasc.com/gastroenterology-and-endoscopy/male-female-active-physicians-70-statistics-by-specialty.html.
- C. Erikson, K. Jones, and C. Tilton, 2012 Physician Specialty Data Book, AAMC, Washington, DC, USA, 2012, https://www.aamc.org/download/313228/data/2012physicianspecialtydatabook.pdf.
- G. S. Cooper, T. D. Kou, A. Dor, S. M. Koroukian, and M. D. Schluchter, “Cancer preventive services, socioeconomic status, and the affordable care act,” Cancer, vol. 123, no. 9, pp. 1585–1589, 2017.
- E. G. McDonald, V. Dounaevskaia, and T. C. Lee, “Inpatient attire: an opportunity to improve the patient experience,” JAMA Internal Medicine, vol. 174, no. 11, pp. 1865–1867, 2014.
- R. Abbott, Unconscious Patient Says Doctors Mocked Him, Courthouse News Service, 2017, http://www.courthousenews.com/unconscious-patient-says-doctors-mocked-him/.
- K. Querry, Recording: Doctor Forced to Pay $500, 000 after Insulting Patient during Procedure, News Channel 4, 2015, http://kfor.com/2015/06/24/recording-doctor-forced-to-pay-500000-after-insulting-patient-during-procedure/.
- L. C. Seeff, M. R. Nadel, C. N. Klabunde et al., “Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population,” Cancer, vol. 100, no. 10, pp. 2093–2103, 2004.
- T. D. Denberg, T. V. Melhado, J. M. Coombes et al., “Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 989–995, 2005.
- C. S. Jackson, M. Oman, A. M. Patel, and K. J. Vega, “Health disparities in colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities in the United States,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, vol. 7, Supplement 1, pp. S32–S43, 2016.
- J. R. Sly, T. Edwards, R. C. Shelton, and L. Jandorf, “Identifying barriers to colonoscopy screening for nonadherent African American participants in a patient navigation intervention,” Health education & behavior, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 449–457, 2013.
- H. Hwang, “Colorectal cancer screening among Asian Americans,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 4025–4032, 2013.
Copyright © 2019 Ali Aamar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.