Review Article

A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Prokinetic Agents against Glycemic Control

Table 4

The results of meta-analysis for fasting blood glucose.

StudiesTreatmentControlStandardized mean diff.95% lower CI95% upper CIWeights value
MeanSDMeanSD

Nam, J. S. et al., 20102060.9106.31.1-0.301-1.0650.46225.0%
Ueno, N. et al., 2000199.72.061511.13.1-0.532-1.2230.15825.4%
Ueno, N. et al., 2001308.20.922110.5-3.368-4.549-2.27624.2%
Ueno, N. et al., 2002178.511.4179.61.61-0.705-1.401-0.01025.4%
Total (random effect model)-1.270-2.6130.0740.06
Subgroup 1 (Nam, J. S. et al., 2010; Ueno, N. et al., 2002) (random effect model)-0.522-1.036-0.0100.04
Subgroup 2 (Ueno, N. et al., 2000; Ueno, N. et al., 2001) (random effect model)-2.070-5.1130.9730.18

value of the test of heterogeneity among ; Higgins’ (82.8%, 96.3%).