Review Article
Up-to-Date Tailored Systemic Treatment in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Table 1
Summary of first- and second-line trials in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
| Reference | Treatment arms | | Primary endpoint | Response rate (%) | Median PFS (months) | Median OS (months) |
| First-line therapy | Burris et al. [8] | Gemcitabine vs. | 126 | CBR | 23.8 | 2.1 | 5.65 | 5-FU | 4.8 | 1.2 | 4.41 | | | | | Cunningham et al. [14] | Gemcitabine-capecitabine vs. | 533 | OS | 19.1 | 5.3 | 7.1 | gemcitabine | 12.3 | 3.8 | 6.2 | | | HR 0.78 | HR 0.86 | | | | | PRODIGE4/ACCORD 11 [6] | FOLFIRINOX vs. | 342 | OS | 31.6 | 6.4 | 11.1 | gemcitabine | 9.4 | 3.3 | 6.8 | | | HR 0.47 | HR 0.57 | | | | | MPACT [15] | Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel vs. | 861 | OS | 23 | 5.5 | 8.5 | gemcitabine | 7 | 3.7 | 6.7 | | | HR 0.69 | HR 0.72 | | | | |
| Second-line therapy | CONKO-003 [18] | OFF vs. | 168 | OS | NR | 2.9 | 5.9 | FF | | 2.0 | 3.3 | | | HR 0.68 | HR 0.66 | | | | | PANCREOX [19] | mFOLFOX6 vs. | 108 | PFS | 13.2 | 3.1 | 6.1 | 5-FU+leucovorin | 8.5 | 2.9 | 9.9 | | | HR 1.00 | HR 1.78 | | | | | NAPOLI-1 [21] | Nal-IRI+5-FU/LV vs. | 417 | OS | 17 | 3.1 | 6.2 | 5-FU/LV | 1 | 1.5 | 4.2 | | | HR 0.57 | HR 0.75 | | | | | Nal-IRI vs. | | | 6 | 2.7 | 4.9 | 5-FU/LV | | | 1 | 1.6 | 4.2 | | | | | HR 0.81 | HR 1.07 | | | | | | |
|
|
Abbreviations: CBR: clinical benefit response; FF: leucovorin+fluorouracil; HR: hazard ratio; FOLFIRINOX: 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan+oxaliplatin; mFOLFOX6 (modified FOLFOX6): 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin; OFF: oxaliplatin+leucovorin+fluorouracil; LV: leucovorin; Nal-IRI: nanoliposomal irinotecan; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival; 5-FU: 5-fluorouracil.
|