Review Article

Contemporary Tailored Oncology Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancers

Table 1

Completed clinical trials investigating adjuvant therapies following resection of biliary tract cancers.

TrialStudy armsPhaseTumour siteResection marginsNodal statusOverall survival (months)Disease recurrence

Positive trials
BILCAP [20] vs. observation (1 : 1)III
Open-label
ICC: (19%)
PCC: (29%)
DCC: (35%)
GBC: (18%)
R0: (62%)
R1:
(38%)
N0:
(53%)
N1:
(47%)
ITT:
51·1 vs. 36·4
HR 0·81 [95% CI 0·63–1·04];
PPA:
53 vs. 36
HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·58–0·97];
Median RFS (months)
ITT:
24·4 vs. 17·5
HR 0.75 [95% CI 0·58–0·98];
PPA:
25.9 vs. 17.4
HR 0·70 [95% CI 0·54–0·9];

Negative trials
Takada et al. [16]Mitomycin C and 5-flurouracil vs. surgery aloneIII
Open-label
Pancreas: (34%)
Bile duct: (27%)
GBC: (28%)
Ampulla of Vater: (11%)
Curative:
Noncurative:
Not reportedITT (GBC cohort only):
16.4 vs. 14.1 ()
PPA of 5-year survival rate (%) in GBC cohort: 26.0% vs. 14.4%, ()
5-year DFS rate (%) in GBC cohort:
20.3% vs. 11.6%;
PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18 [19] vs. observationIII
Open-label
ICC: (44%)
PCC: (8%)
DCC: (28%)
GBC: (20%)
R0: (87%)
R1:
(13%)
N0: (50%)
N1: (36%)
N2: (1%)
Nx: (13%)
75.8 vs. 50.8
HR 1.08 [95% CI 0.70-1.66];
Median RFS (months):
30.4 vs. 18.5
HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.62-1.25];
BCAT [23] vs. observation (1 : 1)III
Open-label
PCC: (45%)
DCC: (55%)
R0: (91%)
R1: (11%)
N0: (65%)
N1: (35%)
62.3 vs. 63.8
HR 1.01 [95% CI 0.70–1.45];
Median RFS (months):
36.0 vs. 36.9
HR 0.93 [95% CI 0.66–1.32];
ESPAC-3 [84]Fluorouracil/folinic acid vs. gemcitabine vs. observation (1 : 1 : 1)III
Open-label
Ampullary: (69%)
Bile duct: (22%)
Other: (8%)
R0: (84%)
R1: (16%)
N0: (41%)
N1: (59%)
38.9 vs. 45.7 vs. 35.2
HR for FU vs. observation: 0.95 [95% CI 0.71-1.28];
HR for gemcitabine vs. observation: 0.77 [95% CI 0.57-1.05];
Median RFS (months):
23.0 vs. 29.1 vs. 19.5
HR for FU vs. observation: 0.69 [95% CI 0.51-0.95];
HR for gemcitabine vs. observation: 0.68 [95% CI 0.50-0.95];

OS: overall survival; RFS: relapse-free survival; ICC: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; PCC: perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; DCC: distal cholangiocarcinoma; GBC: gallbladder carcinoma; ITT: intention-to-treat; PPA: per protocol analysis; HR: hazard ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; GEMOX: gemcitabine+oxaliplatin. This subgroup analysis was statistically significant, and therefore, there is a positive finding in the study.