Fluorouracil/folinic acid vs. gemcitabine vs. observation (1 : 1 : 1)
III Open-label
Ampullary: (69%) Bile duct: (22%) Other: (8%)
R0: (84%) R1: (16%)
N0: (41%) N1: (59%)
38.9 vs. 45.7 vs. 35.2 HR for FU vs. observation: 0.95 [95% CI 0.71-1.28]; HR for gemcitabine vs. observation: 0.77 [95% CI 0.57-1.05];
Median RFS (months): 23.0 vs. 29.1 vs. 19.5 HR for FU vs. observation: 0.69 [95% CI 0.51-0.95]; HR for gemcitabine vs. observation: 0.68 [95% CI 0.50-0.95];
OS: overall survival; RFS: relapse-free survival; ICC: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; PCC: perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; DCC: distal cholangiocarcinoma; GBC: gallbladder carcinoma; ITT: intention-to-treat; PPA: per protocol analysis; HR: hazard ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; GEMOX: gemcitabine+oxaliplatin. This subgroup analysis was statistically significant, and therefore, there is a positive finding in the study.