Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Gastroenterology Research and Practice / 2020 / Article
Special Issue

Carcinoma of Pancreatobiliary Origin

View this Special Issue

Editorial | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 4323687 |

Darina Kohoutová, Jan Bureš, Sameer Zar, Ondřej Urban, "Carcinoma of Pancreatobiliary Origin", Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2020, Article ID 4323687, 2 pages, 2020.

Carcinoma of Pancreatobiliary Origin

Received19 Apr 2020
Accepted20 Apr 2020
Published05 Aug 2020

Cancers of the pancreas and biliary tree remain one of the most dreadful oncological diagnoses with a very poor prognosis. Our special issue focused on the management of precancerous conditions and efforts to find new biomarkers which would enable precise and early diagnosis of these deadly cancers. We also focused on the role of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy, treatment of established carcinomas, and effective palliation.

Pancreatic cysts including mucinous ones and solid-cystic pseudopapillary tumours belong to precancerous lesions of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Despite all the progress in this field, including publishing the recent guidelines [1, 2], our clinical decision-making remains limited and further research, which will stratify the risk, is needed. Precursors to cholangiocarcinoma have been defined; nevertheless, these are rarely diagnosed, and precise characteristics and features of their progression into cancer are yet to be assessed [3, 4]. Management of indeterminate biliary stenoses is difficult in the clinical practice and evaluation of bile acids in the liver bile might help to differentiate between benign and malignant biliary stenoses [5].

Endoscopy plays an important role in the diagnosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic tumours. Endoscopic ultrasound (with fine-needle aspiration or fine-needle biopsy) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are essential methods for obtaining the tissue diagnosis. Cholangioscopy is being used for direct visualization of biliary intraductal processes and to aquire suspicious/malignant tissue when classical methods (including cytology and biopsies) have failed [6, 7].

Tailored surgical and oncological treatment should be available to every patient if this is clinically appropriate. Still, only 20% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma have resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer at diagnosis. Neoadjuvant treatment is being evaluated in this group of patients [8]. Chemotherapy regimens have shown incremental survival gains in those where surgery is not an option, but more progress in this area is needed [9]. The critical situation in the cholangiocarcinoma group of patients remains similar.

Tailored palliation plays a crucial role in pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma, taking into account, that these cancers are usually diagnosed in late stages. Effective biliary drainage belongs to the cornerstones of palliative interventions, yet drainage of especially hilar cholangiocarcinoma can be challenging. Drainage of nonatrophic segments should be planned in an optimal scenario with a magnetic resonance cholangiography, and appropriate stents should be used (plastic or uncovered metal stents) [10].

The guest editors will appreciate if the readers benefit from reading this special issue which provides an overview of the most up-to-date knowledge from the world-leading experts.

Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflict of interest for any of the Guest Editors.

Darina Kohoutová
Jan Bureš
Sameer Zar
Ondřej Urban


  1. The European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas, “European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms,” Gut, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 789–804, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. Tanaka, C. Fernández-Del Castillo, T. Kamisawa et al., “Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas,” Pancreatology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 738–753, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. Klöppel, V. Adsay, B. Konukiewitz, J. Kleeff, A. M. Schlitter, and I. Esposito, “Precancerous lesions of the biliary tree,” Best Practice & Research. Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 285–297, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. Katabi, J. Torres, and D. S. Klimstra, “Intraductal tubular neoplasms of the bile ducts,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1647–1655, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Jusakul, N. Khuntikeo, W. G. Haigh et al., “Identification of biliary bile acids in patients with benign biliary diseases, hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 13, Supplement, pp. 77–82, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  6. T. Nishikawa, T. Tsuyuguchi, Y. Sakai, H. Sugiyama, M. Miyazaki, and O. Yokosuka, “Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of peroral video-cholangioscopic visual findings and cholangioscopy-guided forceps biopsy findings for indeterminate biliary lesions: a prospective study,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 219–226, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Zar, D. Kohoutová, and J. Bureš, “Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: epidemiology, role of EUS in diagnosis, role of ERCP, endoscopic palliation,” Acta Medica (Hradec Králové), vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 131–136, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Q. P. Janssen, E. M. O'Reilly, C. H. J. van Eijck, and B. Groot Koerkamp, “Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients With Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 10, pp. 1–13, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Nakazawa, T. Otsuka, M. Shimokawa et al., “A multicenter retrospective study of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel or FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer: NAPOLEON study,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 30, pp. iv17–iv18, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. M. Dumonceau, A. Tringali, I. S. Papanikolaou et al., “Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline - updated October 2017,” Endoscopy, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 910–930, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Darina Kohoutová et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.