Table of Contents
Game Theory
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 450208, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/450208
Research Article

The Fairness of Solidarity Bills under the Solidarity Value of Nowak and Radzik

1Department of Mathematics, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Yaoundé, Cameroon
2Department of Mathematics, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Maroua, Cameroon

Received 8 December 2014; Revised 26 March 2015; Accepted 1 April 2015

Academic Editor: Walter Briec

Copyright © 2015 Lawrence Diffo Lambo and Pierre Wambo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. S. Nowak and T. Radzik, “A solidarity value for n-person transferable utility games,” International Journal of Game Theory, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. L. S. Shapley, “A value for n-person games,” in Contributions to the Theory of Games, Volume II, pp. 307–317, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1953. View at Google Scholar
  3. A. C. Pigou, Wealth and Welfare, Macmillan, London, UK, 1912.
  4. H. Dalton, “The measurement of the inequality of incomes,” The Economic Journal, vol. 30, no. 119, pp. 348–361, 1920. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. U. Ebert, “The decomposition of inequality reconsidered: weakly decomposable measures,” Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 94–103, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. C. Chameni Nembua and D. Themoi, “Ordinal equivalence of values and Pigou-Dalton transfers in TU-games,” MPRA Paper 44895, University Library of Munich, Munich, Germany, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. R. Isbell, “A class of simple games,” Duke Mathematical Journal, vol. 25, pp. 423–439, 1958. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. A. Taylor and W. Zwicker, “Weighted voting, multicameral representation, and power,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 170–181, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. A. D. Taylor and W. S. Zwicker, Simple Games: Desirability Relations, Trading, and Pseudoweightings, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1999. View at MathSciNet
  10. L. Diffo Lambo and J. Moulen, “Ordinal equivalence of power notions in voting games,” Theory and Decision, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 313–325, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. J. Friedman, L. McGrath, and C. Parker, “Achievable hierarchies in voting games,” Theory and Decision, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 305–318, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. F. Carreras and J. Freixas, “On ordinal equivalence of power measures given by regular semivalues,” Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 221–234, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. B. Tchantcho, L. Diffo Lambo, R. Pongou, and B. Mbama Engoulou, “Voters' power in voting games with abstention: influence relation and ordinal equivalence of power theories,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 335–350, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Freixas, “On ordinal equivalence of the Shapley and Banzhaf values for cooperative games,” International Journal of Game Theory, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 513–527, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. C. Chameni Nembua and N. Andjiga, “Linear, efficient and symmetric values for TU-games,” Economics Bulletin, vol. 3, no. 71, pp. 1–10, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Chameni Nembua, “Linear efficient and symmetric values for TU-games: sharing the joint gain of cooperation,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 431–433, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus