Research Article
Response of Soybean to Halosulfuron Herbicide
Table 2
Effect of halosulfuron on yield of soybean varieties with and without sulfonylurea- tolerant trait in the field studies conducted in Stoneville, Miss, USA in 2007a.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bbreviations: AG, Asgrow; DP, DeltaPine; P, ND, not determined; P, Pioneer; RR, Roundup Ready; S, sulfonylurea tolerant. oybean plants were treated postemergence with 0.034 kg halosulfuron. epresents % change in soybean yield in response to halosulfuron application. “”and “”signs indicate yield above and below the nontreated control, respectively, within varieties. ield not determined (ND) due to nonharvestable crop conditions resulting from extreme injury from halosulfuron. ield change not included in analysis to be consistent with data reported for the USDA location. indicates no significant effect of halosulfuron application on soybean yield according to the t statistic () within individual varieties. (USDA) and 18 (MAFES) indicate no significant difference and significant difference, respectively, in % yield change from halosulfuron application among soybean varieties according to Fisher’s protected Least Significant Difference () procedure. |