International Journal of Agronomy

International Journal of Agronomy / 2010 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 653431 | 7 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/653431

Effects of mti-2 Transgenic Potato Plants on the Aphid Myzus persicae (Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae)

Academic Editor: Robert S. Zemetra
Received08 Jun 2009
Revised07 Oct 2009
Accepted02 Mar 2010
Published13 May 2010

Abstract

Overexpressed in transgenic plants, protease inhibitors showed insecticidal effects against several insect taxa. We transformed potato internodes with the mustard trypsin inhibitor mti-2 gene. Among the 35 independent transgenic potato lines obtained via Agrobacterium tumefasciens transformation, four (DM6, DM7, DM11, and DM19) were selected for their high level of MTI-2 (at least to 30% of trypsin activity inhibition). Feeding assays were carried out to evaluate their effects on the green-peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae). Prereproductive period, nymphal mortality, adult fecundity, and doubling time of M. persicae populations were monitored on nontransformed potato plants (NT) and the four selected DM lines. Compared to NT plants, DM19 did not induce any effect on M. persicae. In contrast, DM7 and DM11 increased nymphal survival by approximately 20%. DM6 and DM11 lines slightly enhanced M. persicae daily fecundity and intrinsic rate of natural increase, leading to a reduction of the doubling time of the populations by 1 day. DM6 did not impact nymphal mortality, whereas with the DM11 almost all the nymphs survived. Potato plants transformed with the mti-2 gene variably affected the life history of M. persicae but did not show any insecticidal effect on the aphid.

1. Introduction

Plant protease inhibitors (PIs) have been found in Brassicaceae, Gramineae, Fabaceae, and Solanaceae and are constitutively produced in storage organs [1] to mobilize protein reserves [2], and in seeds to regulate endogenous proteinases during dormancy [35]. PIs may also be synthesized in plants attacked by insects or pathogens [68]. Among the different classes of PIs described in plants, serine PIs are the most studied, the two best-characterized families belonging to the Kunitz-type and Bowman-Birk inhibitor’s family (BBI) [9]. Several serine PIs from different plant origin (e.g., cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), soybean (Glycine max), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), potato (Solanum tuberosum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) were isolated and tested against insects. In vitro studies showed that chymotrypsin and trypsin inhibitors from Nicotiana alata inhibit gut protease activities of the native budworm Helicoverpa punctigera (Lepidoptera) and the black field cricket Teleogryllus commodus (Orthoptera), and reduce their movement and growth [10]. The cowpea trypsin inhibitor (CpTI) delayed larval growth and development in Lacanobia oleracea (Lepidoptera) [11].

Because of their deleterious effects via in vitro delivery, and owing to possibilities offered by transgenesis, several serine PIs were overexpressed in plant tissues to evaluate their effects on various pests via direct expression. Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), potato, rice (Oryza sativa), cotton (Gossypium sp.), and cereals were genetically modified with serine (trypsin or chymotrypsin) PIs and the transformed plants were reported toxic against lepidopteran [1013] and coleopteran pests [14, 15]. CpTI conferred resistance against many lepidopteran (Heliothis and Spodoptera), coleopteran (Diabrotica and Anthonomus), and orthopteran (Locusta) pests and induced toxic effects in the Lepidoptera Lacanobia oleracea [11]. Tobacco and potato plants expressing a soybean serine PIs caused the death of Spodoptera littoralis larvae [16]. Several studies also described the transformation of Arabidopsis, tobacco, and oilseed rape plants with the mustard trypsin inhibitor (mti-2) encoding gene. Because this inhibitor possesses a specific structure that differs from all the other known serine PIs, it has been considered as a new family [17]. MTI-2 expressing plants were only tested on Lepidoptera and mti-2 levels expressed in these transgenic plants induced variable resistance against larvae of Mamestra brassicae, Spodoptera littoralis, and Plutella xylostella reared on transformed Arabidopsis and oilseed rape [1820].

Although the effects of serine PIs are well described in Lepidoptera and Coleoptera, they remain poorly documented in Homoptera. However, it is known that variable effects of serine PIs on aphids depend on the inhibitor, its delivery mode (in vitro or in planta), and the aphid species targeted. Trypsin inhibitor genes expressed in rice conferred resistance against the planthopper Nilaparvata lugens [21]. Pea (Pisum sativum) and soybean trypsin-chymotrypsin inhibitors (respectively PsTI and SbBBI) from the BBI family were also reported to depress growth and survival when delivered in vitro to the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum, whereas CpTI from cowpea had no effect [22]. Nymphal survival of the aphids Myzus persicae [23], Aphis gossypii [23], and Macrosiphum euphorbiae [24] was unaffected by PsTI and SbBBI. The latter enhanced fecundity of M. euphorbiae when delivered via an artificial diet at 20  𝜇 g/mL, and it decreased fecundity at 500  𝜇 g/mL [24]. CHY8, an MTI-2 variant, was shown as the most aphicidal PI within the BBI family. However, it presented a variable inhibitory activity, the lethal concentration of CHY8 being higher for M. persicae and A. gossypii than for A. pisum [23].

M. persicae can transmit more than 100 viruses on plants, including potatoes, one of the most economically important crops in Northern Europe. Diseases caused by these viruses (e.g., PVY, PLRV, PMTV) incur serious yield losses. No antiviral treatment is available to reduce damage and the primary means to control virus spreading are the management of aphid populations. Owing to the potential of MTI-2 expressed in transgenic plants to manage pests, our objective was to evaluate the effects of mti-2 transgenic potato plants on M. persicae, a key pest of several crops.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Transformation

Genetically modified potato plants of S. tuberosum cultivar Désirée were obtained by transformation with the Agrobacterium tumefasciens strain GV3101 containing the plasmid pKY-MTI-2 [18]. The vector was built with the mustard trypsin inhibitor (mti-2) gene associated with the selection gene coding for kanamycin resistance (nptII), under the control of the 35S CaMV promoter and the pea Rubisco terminator [18]. Plant transformation, selection and regeneration were carried out as described in Saguez et al. [25]. Briefly, potato internode explants were cocultivated for 3 days with A. tumefasciens. Four weeks later, calli were transferred onto a budding medium supplemented with kanamycin to select transformed lines. After bud regeneration, transgenic lines and a nontransformed line (NT) of the cultivar Désirée were micropropagated and acclimatized in a greenhouse at 𝟐 𝟎 ± 𝟏 𝐂 and under a 16-hour light: 8-hour dark photoperiod. One month after acclimatization, plants were used for feeding assays with M. persicae.

2.2. Plant Characterization
2.2.1. Genomic Characterization

Transgene identification was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR amplifications were realized using two mti-2 primers (forward: 5 -ATG-GCC-ATG-GCA-AAA-AAA-TC- 3 and reverse: 5 -AAT-GCC-AAC-TCT-TAG-AAT-CT- 3 ) and two nptII primers (forward: 5 -ATC-GGG-AGG-GGC-GAT-ACC-GTA- 3 and reverse: 5 -GAG-GCT-ATT-CGG-CTA-TGA-CTG- 3 ) as described in Saguez et al. [25]. After PCR, the samples were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis to verify amplification.

2.2.2. MTI-2 and Enzymatic Activity

Protein extracts were prepared with the third and fourth fully expanded leaves from the apex. Transgenic and nontransformed lines were frozen in liquid nitrogen, finely ground and homogenized in a phosphate buffer 0.1 M ( N a H 2 P O 4 / N a 2 H P O 4 pH 6). After 15 minutes of 15 000 g centrifugation at 4 C , the supernatant was collected for further tests.

Inhibitory activity due to MTI-2 expressed in plants was quantified by assaying azocazein hydrolysis, as described in De Leo et al. [18] with slight modifications. Briefly, 5  𝜇 g of crude protein extract of nontransformed and mti-2 expressing potato lines were incubated with trypsin solution (2.5 mg/mL) in the presence of azocasein (0.5%) in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8) containing 10 mM of CaCl2. After 2 hours of incubation at 3 7 C , azocasein hydrolysis was stopped with 20% trichloroacetic acid (TCA). Following 15 minutes of incubation at 4 C , proteins were precipitated by centrifugation. The supernatant was collected and enhanced with 1 M NaOH. Optical density was measured at 450 nm.

Active protease inhibitor detection was monitored by zymography technique, incorporating protease substrate into the gel mixture. The protease inhibitors were detected by the method of Uriel and Berges [26], as modified by Garcia-Carreno et al. [27]. Briefly, crude protein extracts were dissolved in nonreducing Laemmli sample buffer and separated by electrophoresis using continuous 12% polyacrylamide gel containing 0.1% of porcine gelatin. After a sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), the gel was washed twice with 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8) containing 2.5% TritonX-100 (v/v) for 15 minutes to remove SDS, followed by a brief incubation in the same buffer without TritonX-100. The gel was then incubated for 1 hour at 3 7 C in Tris buffer (Tris 50 mM pH 8, C a C l 2 5 mM, NaCl 100 mM) containing 0.1 mg/mL of trypsin. The gel was then stained with Coomassie brilliant blue which allowed the detection of trypsin inhibitors.

Detection of MTI-2 protein in transgenic lines was performed by Western analysis. Five 𝜇 g of total protein were separated by electrophoresis on a 12% polyacrylamide gel. The proteins were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Hybond ECL, Amersham Bioscience, Saclay, France). The membrane was soaked 30 minutes in saturation solution of 50 mM Tris pH 8, containing 100 mM NaCl and 0.5% of BSA. The membrane was hybridized with polyclonal anti-MTI-2 antibodies (1/1000), obtained from rabbit and given by Dr. Jouanin, then washed and incubated with secondary antirabbit antibody (1/25000). Presence of the MTI-2 protein was detected by chemiluminescence on an autoradiography film (Hyperfilm ECL, Amersham Bioscience, Saclay, France).

2.2.3. Ionic Characterization

One month after acclimatization, ion extraction was carried out with sulphuric acid. Ion concentrations in plants were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Instrumentation Laboratories aa-ae spectrophotometer 257) for M g 2 + and C a 2 + and flame spectrophotometry (Corning 400) for N a + and K + assays. Three independent assays were conducted on lyophilized plants.

2.3. Insect and Feeding Bioassays

The M. persicae colony, originated from a single apterous female collected in 1999 in a potato field near Loos-en-Gohelle, France ( 5 0 2 7 2 7 N and 2 4 7 3 0 E ), was maintained on leaves of nontransformed potato plants (S. tuberosum cultivar Désirée) in a ventilated Plexiglass chamber under parthenogenesis-inducing conditions as described in Saguez et al. [25].

In planta experiments where done with the NT and the four DM lines in which recombinant MTI-2 led to at least 30% trypsin activity inhibition compared to the NT plants. Six plants of each selected DM or NT line were used for insect feeding bioassays. Adults taken from the rearing were placed on an artificial diet during 72 hours to synchronize the offspring [25]. Five young nymphs ( < 24 hours) were transferred in a microcage ( 16 × 8 mm) clipped on the abaxial face of a third or fourth fully expanded leaf from the apex. At least 12 replicates were carried out for each line.

For each test, nymphal survival, prereproductive period (i.e., the period of time from birth until onset of reproduction), adult emergence, and offspring were recorded daily. These demographic parameters were used to calculate the daily fecundity, the intrinsic rate of natural increase ( 𝑟 𝑚 ) , and the doubling time of M. persicae populations. The r m value was calculated according to the Lotka equation and its variance using the “Petitr” software and the doubling time was calculated thanks to the equation: DT = l n 2 / 𝑟 𝑚 , as described by Saguez et al. [25].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The effect of MTI-2 transgenic potato lines on nymphal survival was analyzed with the Pearson’s 𝜒 2 test. Oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out with Statistica 5.5 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA) to test the effects of mti-2 expression in potato plants on aphid demographic parameters (i.e., prereproductive period, daily fecundity, 𝑟 𝑚 and population's doubling time). Significant effects were further analyzed with the positive least significant difference test (PLSD) of Fisher at 𝑃 = . 0 5 . Significant variations of C a 2 + rates in plants were statistically analyzed by a Newman-Keuls test at 𝑃 = . 0 5 .

3. Results

3.1. Plant Characterization

Genetic transformation yielded 35 independent transgenic lines, hereafter denoted DM1 to DM35, DM standing for Désirée expressing MTI-2. Electrophoresis of PCR products of the transformed potato lines showed a unique band of approximately 700 bp, confirming that all transgenic lines have been successfully transformed with the npt-II gene. Another band of 500 bp revealed the presence of mti-2 gene insertion in the transformed potato lines. As expected, no mti-2 fragment was observed in the NT line used as control (results not shown).

Total protein content was statistically equivalent across all potato lines (data not shown). The range of trypsin activity in the presence of leaf protein crude extract varied from 48.6 ± 4.1 to 1 0 0 . 2 ± 1 . 6 pmol hydrolyzed azocasein/min/mg of trypsin for the 35 DM lines, compared to 93.0 ± 0.2 pmol hydrolyzed azocasein/min/mg of trypsin for the NT line. The percentage of trypsin activity inhibition due to MTI-2 was evaluated by the ratio of trypsin activity in the presence of crude extract from DM lines and NT (data not shown). For insect bioassays, we selected four lines (i.e., DM6, DM7, DM11, and DM19) whereby the protein crude extract exhibited at least 30% of trypsin activity inhibition, compared to the NT line (Table 1). Gelatin/SDS-PAGE revealed several trypsin inhibitors (Figure 1(a)). A major band of approximately 7 kDa was detected in the four selected DM lines while absent in the NT line. This unique band, which corresponded to MTI-2 molecular weight, was also revealed by Western blot analysis only in the DM lines (Figure 1(b)).


LineAverage trypsin activity  (pmol hydrolysed azocaseine/min/mg of trypsin)

NT (= 100% activity) 9 3 . 0 ± 0 . 2
DM1 8 3 . 7 ± 0 . 0
DM2 7 5 . 1 ± 1 0 . 2
DM3 7 9 . 0 ± 1 . 8
DM4 7 9 . 5 ± 6 . 7
DM5 6 9 . 8 ± 5 . 5
DM 6 6 0 . 2 ± 1 0 . 3
DM 7 4 8 . 6 ± 4 . 1
DM8 8 1 . 8 ± 1 . 4
DM9 6 6 . 6 ± 0 . 3
DM1 1 6 3 . 2 ± 0 . 1
DM12 1 0 0 . 2 ± 1 . 6
DM13 7 7 . 9 ± 4 . 5
DM14 7 3 . 8 ± 3 . 7
DM15 7 4 . 4 ± 4 . 8
DM16 7 5 . 0 ± 9 . 9
DM17 7 3 . 1 ± 3 . 2
DM18 8 2 . 1 ± 3 . 9
DM1 9 6 0 . 7 ± 9 . 4
DM20 6 6 . 9 ± 3 . 2
DM21 8 0 . 2 ± 3 . 5
DM22 7 5 . 8 ± 0 . 8
DM23 7 8 . 8 ± 8 . 1
DM24 8 0 . 3 ± 1 1 . 4
DM26 7 1 . 7 ± 2 . 9
DM28 8 0 . 3 ± 4 . 0
DM29 6 8 . 6 ± 0 . 1
DM30 7 3 . 0 ± 5 . 3
DM31 8 5 . 1 ± 1 1 . 3
DM32 7 6 . 4 ± 1 3 . 2
DM33 8 3 . 1 ± 5 . 7
DM34 6 7 . 7 ± 7 . 0
DM35 8 3 . 2 ± 0 . 1

Selected lines in which at least 30% of trypsin activity were inhibited compared to nontransformed line. Trypsin activity inhibition could not be determined for DM10, DM25, and DM27 lines.

No phenological variation was observed between the NT and the four DM lines. Measurement of ion concentrations did not show significant variation of Mg2+, Na+, and K+ concentrations between the NT and the four DM lines. Compared to the NT line, Ca2+ concentration increased in DM7 and DM19 (7.51 versus 12.31 and 10.89 mg Ca2+/g dry material, resp.).

3.2. Feeding Bioassays

The four mti-2 transgenic potato lines induced variable effects on the demographic parameters of M. persicae, compared to the NT line. There was no significant change on M. persicae nymphal survival on DM6, DM19 ( 𝜒 2 = 14.7, df = 11, 𝑃 < .20;  𝜒 2 = 16.7, df = 15, 𝑃 < . 3 4 , resp.) compared to the NT line. In contrast, nymphal survival significantly increased of approximately 20% which was observed when aphids were reared on DM7 and DM11 ( 𝜒 2 = 65.3, df = 16, 𝑃 < .00; 𝜒 2 = 99.3, df = 16, 𝑃 < . 0 0 , resp.), compared to the NT potato line (Figure 2).

No effect was observed on the mean duration of aphid prereproductive period for all the lines (Table 2). The aphids became adults in an average period of 10 days in both NT and DM lines. Daily fecundity of aphids reared on the foliage of DM7 and DM19 lines was statistically similar to those of aphids fed with the NT line. Subsequently, no variation of r m and doubling time was observed when these two transgenic potato lines were used. Conversely, DM6 and DM11 led to increased daily fecundity and 𝑟 𝑚 value when compared to the NT line. As a consequence, the doubling time was significantly reduced by approximately 1 day when aphids were reared on DM6 and DM11.


 Demographic parametersNontransformedmti-2-expressing potato lines
Line NTDM6DM7DM11DM19 𝐹 𝑃
𝑛 = 2 4 𝑛 = 3 1 𝑛 = 3 3 𝑛 = 3 4 𝑛 = 1 6

Prereproductive period (days) 1 0 . 3 ± 1 . 8 a 9 . 7 ± 1 . 8 a 1 0 . 0 ± 1 . 5 a 9 . 9 ± 1 . 7 a 1 0 . 8 ± 2 . 3 a 1.19 < .31
Daily fecundity (nymphs/female/day) 1 . 2 ± 0 . 3 a 1 . 4 ± 0 . 4 b 1 . 2 ± 0 . 3 a 1 . 4 ± 0 . 5 b 1 . 1 ± 0 . 2 a 3.49 < .01
𝑟 𝑚 (females/female/day) 0 . 1 4 ± 0 . 0 5 a 0 . 1 7 ± 0 . 0 3 b 0 . 1 5 ± 0 . 0 4 a 0 . 1 7 ± 0 . 0 4 b 0 . 1 5 ± 0 . 0 3 a 2.91 < .02
Doubling time (days) 5 . 2 ± 1 . 4 a 4 . 1 ± 0 . 9 b 4 . 7 ± 1 . 1 a 4 . 4 ± 1 . 2 b 5 . 0 ± 1 . 5 a 3.41 < .01

𝑛 : number of aphids tested. 𝐹 : Fisher’s test value of one-way ANOVA analysis. 𝑃 : 𝑃 value of the Fisher’s test. Values in the same row followed by the same letter indicate no significant difference according to the PLSD test of Fisher ( 𝑃 = . 0 5 ) .

4. Discussion

Feeding bioassays showed variability in the effects of mti-2 transgenic potato lines on M. persicae, ranging from non-significant (DM19) to probiotic effects (DM6 and DM11). DM19 did not affect the demographic parameters of M. persicae compared to the NT line. In contrast, DM6 and DM11, that had a similar range of trypsin activity as DM19, induced slightly but significant probiotic effects on the fitness of adults, increased their daily fecundity, and consequently reduced their doubling time. DM7, which exerted the highest inhibition on trypsin activity, increased only nymphal survival of aphids, compared to the NT line. Earlier studies had reported highly variable effects in response to serine PIs ingestion by aphids via in vitro and in planta delivery systems [2224].

The involvement of serine proteases in the digestive processes has been described in Coleoptera [28], Diptera, [29] and Lepidoptera [12] and these gut proteases may be potential targets of serine PIs. However, serine PIs-based strategies to manage aphid populations often failed because aphids have been reported to mainly produce cysteine proteases [3033]. In view of published studies on serine PIs effects in aphids, our study supports the concept that aphids can be considered as nondigestive targets in the context of an MTI-2-based management strategy.

Aphids feed on phloem sap that contains low concentrations of proteins. Although the mti-2 gene was expressed under the control of a constitutive promotor, we hypothesize that MTI-2 concentration is lower in the sieve tubes than in the leaves. It has been reported that PIs must constitute at least 1% of total soluble proteins to exert deleterious effects on insects [34, 35]. Consequently, in contrast to coleopteran and lepidopteran pests that feed on all leaf tissues and ingest high amounts of PIs, aphids only ingest phloem sap and may be less exposed to recombinant PIs. This could also explain the lack of or minimal effects in DM7 and DM19, despite the high inhibitory activity of MTI-2 in these lines.

Several proteins [36, 37], including PIs [22, 24, 32], have been reported to cross the digestive epithelial barrier of aphids. The probiotic effects of DM6 and DM11 lines could be due to the crossing of MTI-2 through mesenteric cells from aphid’s gut to the hemolymph. In the hemolymph, PIs can interact with different developmental processes, such as growth or reproduction, by amino acid food supplements or by MTI-2 activity in the hemolymph.

Localization of transgene insertion in the plant genome carried out by A. tumefasciens is not controlled. Even if no phenological variation was observed between DM and NT lines, gene insertions in the potato genome may have interfered with potato metabolism by inducing pleiotropic effects and modifications of plant physiology that favour the aphids. DM7 and DM19 lines exhibited the highest concentrations of C a 2 + and exerted the least effect on aphid demographic parameters when compared to the NT line. The rise of C a 2 + rate is reported to be one of the most important factors in plant defense response. Callose deposition and phloem sap proteins precipitation that occlude the sieve tubes and prevent sap loss in response to aphid attack are C a 2 + -dependent [38]. Despite the damage caused to cell membranes, aphids are able to overcome plant defenses by reducing calcium influx, preventing callose formation and protein precipitation by chelating C a 2 + [39]. Higher Ca2+ concentrations in DM7 and DM19 may have interfered with aphid food intake, confounding the probiotic effects observed on DM6 and DM11 lines.

Our results showed that MTI-2 transgenic potato plants induced no or slightly positive effects on M. persicae life history and question the efficacy of transgenic serine PIs to manage aphids.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Noubar J. Bostanian for helpful comments on the manuscript, the French “Service Régional de la Protection des Végétaux du Nord Pas-de-Calais” for providing aphids, and the “Comité Nord Plants de Pommes de Terre” for providing potato tubers. This work was supported by the Ministère Français de la Recherche, the Conseil Régional de Picardie and the Fonds Social Européen.

References

  1. H. Watanabe, K. Abe, Y. Emori, H. Hosoyama, and S. Arai, “Molecular cloning and gibberellin-induced expression of multiple cysteine proteinases of rice seeds (oryzains),” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 266, no. 25, pp. 16897–16902, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  2. H. Kondo, K. Abe, I. Nishimura, H. Watanabe, Y. Emori, and S. Arai, “Two distinct cystatin species in rice seeds with different specificities against cysteine proteinases. Molecular cloning, expression, and biochemical studies on oryzacystatin-II,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, no. 26, pp. 15832–15837, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  3. S. K. Haq, S. M. Atif, and R. H. Khan, “Protein proteinase inhibitor genes in combat against insects, pests, and pathogens: natural and engineered phytoprotection,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 431, no. 1, pp. 145–159, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. Koiwa, R. A. Bressan, and P. M. Hasegawa, “Regulation of protease inhibitors and plant defense,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 379–384, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. J. Richardson, “Seed storage proteins: the enzyme inhibitors,” in Methods in Plant Biochemistry, M. J. Richardson, Ed., pp. 259–305, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  6. S.-G. Fan and G.-J. Wu, “Characteristics of plant proteinase inhibitors and their applications in combating phytophagous insects,” Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 273–292, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  7. C. A. Ryan, “Protease inhibitors in plants: genes for improving defenses against insects and pathogens,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, vol. 28, pp. 425–449, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  8. A. Schaller, D. R. Bergey, and C. A. Ryan, “Induction of wound response genes in tomato leaves by bestatin, an inhibitor of aminopeptidases,” Plant Cell, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1893–1898, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Christeller and W. Laing, “Plant serine proteinase inhibitors,” Protein and Peptide Letters, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 439–447, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. L. Heath, G. McDonald, J. T. Christeller et al., “Proteinase inhibitors from Nicotiana alata enhance plant resistance to insect pests,” Journal of Insect Physiology, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 833–842, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H. A. Bell, E. C. Fitches, R. E. Down et al., “Effect of dietary cowpea trypsin inhibitor (CpTI) on the growth and development of the tomato moth Lacanobia oleracea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and on the success of the gregarious ectoparasitoid Eulophus pennicornis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae),” Pest Management Science, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. M. R. Gatehouse, E. Norton, G. M. Davison, S. M. Babbe, C. A. Newell, and J. A. Gatehouse, “Digestive proteolytic activity in larvae of tomato moth, Lacanobia oleracea; effects of plant protease inhibitors in vitro and in vivo,” Journal of Insect Physiology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 545–558, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. K.-W. Yeh, M.-I. Lin, S.-J. Tuan, Y.-M. Chen, C.-Y. Lin, and S.-S. Kao, “Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) trypsin inhibitors expressed in transgenic tobacco plants confer resistance against Spodoptera litura,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 696–699, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. O. L. Franco, R. C. dos Santos, J. A. N. Batista et al., “Effects of black-eyed pea trypsin/chymotrypsin inhibitor on proteolytic activity and on development of Anthonomus grandis,” Phytochemistry, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 343–349, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. O. L. Franco, S. C. Dias, C. P. Magalhaes et al., “Effects of soybean Kunitz trypsin inhibitor on the cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis),” Phytochemistry, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 81–89, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Marchetti, M. Delledonne, C. Fogher et al., “Soybean Kunitz, C-II and PI-IV inhibitor genes confer different levels of insect resistance to tobacco and potato transgenic plants,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 519–526, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  17. M. Volpicella, A. Schipper, M. A. Jongsma, N. Spoto, R. Gallerani, and L. R. Ceci, “Characterization of recombinant mustard trypsin inhibitor 2 (MTI2) expressed in Pichia pastoris,” FEBS Letters, vol. 468, no. 2-3, pp. 137–141, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. De Leo, M. A. Bonadé-Bottino, L. R. Ceci, R. Gallerani, and L. Jouanin, “Opposite effects on Spodoptera littoralis larvae of high expression level of a trypsin proteinase inhibitor in transgenic plants,” Plant Physiology, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 997–1004, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  19. F. De Leo, M. Bonadé-Bottino, L. R. Ceci, R. Gallerani, and L. Jouanin, “Effects of a mustard trypsin inhibitor expressed in different plants on three lepidopteran pests,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 31, no. 6-7, pp. 593–602, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. F. De Leo and R. Gallerani, “The mustard trypsin inhibitor 2 affects the fertility of Spodoptera littoralis larvae fed on transgenic plants,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 489–496, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. I. Lee, S.-H. Lee, J. C. Koo et al., “Soybean Kunitz trypsin inhibitor (SKTI) confers resistance to the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stal) in transgenic rice,” Molecular Breeding, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. Rahbé, E. Ferrasson, H. Rabesona, and L. Quillien, “Toxicity to the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum of anti-chymotrypsin isoforms and fragments of Bowman-Birk protease inhibitors from pea seeds,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 299–306, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L. R. Ceci, M. Volpicella, Y. Rahbé, R. Gallerani, J. Beekwilder, and M. A. Jongsma, “Selection by phage display of a variant mustard trypsin inhibitor toxic against aphids,” Plant Journal, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 557–566, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H. Azzouz, A. Cherqui, E. D. M. Campan et al., “Effects of plant protease inhibitors, oryzacystatin I and soybean Bowman-Birk inhibitor, on the aphid Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Homoptera, Aphididae) and its parasitoid Aphelinus abdominalis (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae),” Journal of Insect Physiology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 75–86, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. Saguez, R. Hainez, A. Cherqui et al., “Unexpected effects of chitinases on the peach-potato aphid (Myzus persicae Sulzer) when delivered via transgenic potato plants (Solanum tuberosum Linné) and in vitro,” Transgenic Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 57–67, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. Uriel and J. Berges, “Characterization of natural inhibitors of trypsin and chymotrypsin by electrophoresis in acrylamide-agarose gels,” Nature, vol. 218, no. 5141, pp. 578–580, 1968. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. F. L. Garcia-Carreno, L. E. Dimes, and N. F. Haard, “Substrate-gel electrophoresis for composition and molecular weight of proteinases or proteinaceous proteinase inhibitors,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 214, no. 1, pp. 65–69, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Y.-C. Zhu and J. E. Baker, “Characterization of midgut trypsin-like enzymes and three trypsinogen cDNAs from the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae),” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1053–1063, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Q. Jiang, M. Hall, F. G. Noriega, and M. Wells, “cDNA cloning and pattern of expression of an adult, female-specific chymotrypsin from Aedes aegypti midgut,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 283–289, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. P. T. Cristofoletti, A. F. Ribeiro, C. Deraison, Y. Rahbé, and W. R. Terra, “Midgut adaptation and digestive enzyme distribution in a phloem feeding insect, the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum,” Journal of Insect Physiology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 11–24, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. C. Deraison, I. Darboux, L. Duportets, T. Gorojankina, Y. Rahbé, and L. Jouanin, “Cloning and characterization of a gut-specific cathepsin L from the aphid Aphis gossypii,” Insect Molecular Biology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 165–177, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y. Rahbé, C. Deraison, M. Bonade-Bottino, C. Girard, C. Nardon, and L. Jouanin, “Effects of the cysteine protease inhibitor oryzacystatin (OC-I) on different aphids and reduced performance of Myzus persicae on OC-I expressing transgenic oilseed rape,” Plant Science, vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 441–450, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. X. Foissac, M. G. Edwards, J. P. Du, A. M. R. Gatehouse, and J. A. Gatehouse, “Putative protein digestion in a sap-sucking homopteran plant pest (rice brown plant hopper; Nilaparvata lugens: Delphacidae). Identification of trypsin-like and cathepsin B-like proteases,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 967–978, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. V. A. Hilder, A. M. R. Gatehouse, S. E. Sheerman, R. F. Barker, and D. Boulter, “A novel mechanism of insect resistance engineered into tobacco,” Nature, vol. 330, no. 6144, pp. 160–163, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  35. J. C. Leplé, M. Bonade-Bottino, S. Augustin et al., “Toxicity to Chrysomela tremulae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of transgenic poplars expressing a cysteine proteinase inhibitor,” Molecular Breeding, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 319–328, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  36. P. G. Allingham, R. L. Kerlin, R. L. Tellam, S. J. Briscoe, and H. A. Standfast, “Passage of host immunoglobulin across the mid-gut epithelium into the haemolymph of blood-fed buffalo flies Haematobia irritans exigua,” Journal of Insect Physiology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 9–13, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  37. A. Cherqui, S. Alla, J. Saguez, G. Doury, B. S. Sangwan-Norreel, and P. Giordanengo, “Probiotic effects of β-glucuronidase on the peach-potato aphid Myzus persicae (Aphididae),” Journal of Insect Physiology, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 1199–1209, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | ß-glucuronidase%20on%20the%20peach-potato%20aphid%20Myzus%20persicae%20(Aphididae)&author=A. Cherqui&author=S. Alla&author=J. Saguez&author=G. Doury&author=B. S. Sangwan-Norreel&author=&author=P. Giordanengo&publication_year=2003" target="_blank">Google Scholar
  38. T. Will, W. F. Tjallingii, A. Thönnessen, and A. J. E. van Bel, “Molecular sabotage of plant defense by aphid saliva,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 25, pp. 10536–10541, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. T. Will and A. J. E. van Bel, “Physical and chemical interactions between aphids and plants,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 729–737, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 Julien Saguez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

869 Views | 530 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder