Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Agronomy
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 257340, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/257340
Research Article

Ethephon Stimulation and Yield Response of Some Hevea Clones in the Humid Forests of South West Cameroon

Ekona Regional Research Centre, Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), PMB 25, Buea, Cameroon

Received 30 March 2011; Revised 10 July 2011; Accepted 11 July 2011

Academic Editor: M. Tejada

Copyright © 2011 J. N. Njukeng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. C. Low, “Distribution and concentration of major soluble carbohydrates in Hevea latex, the effect of ethephon stimulation and the possible role of these carbohydrates in latex flow,” Journal of the Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia, vol. 26, no. 21, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  2. W. A. Southorn, “Physiology of Hevea (latex flow),” Journal of the Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia, vol. 21, pp. 494–512, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. L. Jacob, J. C. Prevot, D. Roussel et al., “Yield-limiting factors, latex physiological parameters, latex diagnosis and clonal typology,” in Physiology of Rubber Tree Latex, J. L. Jacob, J. d'Auzac, and H. Chrétin, Eds., pp. 345–382, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. M. Eschbach and R. Lacrotte, “Factors influencing response to hormonal yield stimulation: limits of this stimulation,” in Physiology of Rubber Tree Latex, J. L. Jacob, J. d'Auzac, and H. Chrétin, Eds., p. 321, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  5. V. H. F. Moraes and L. A. C. Moraes, “Effect of rubber tree (Hevea spp.) budded crowns on the content of magnesium and latex regeneration of the clone Fx 3899,” Agrotropica, vol. 9, pp. 59–66, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  6. J. M. Eschbach and Y. Banchi, “Advantages of Ethrel stimulation in association with reduced tapping intensity in the Ivory Coast,” Planter, vol. 61, pp. 555–567, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  7. X. Wenxian, W. Xiaodi, and P. Yanqing, “A review of studies on exploitation with ethephon: stimulation and proposals for new panel planning in China,” in Proceedings of the IRRDB Rubber Physiology and Exploitation Meeting, pp. 21–32, Hainan, China, December 1986.
  8. S. Sivakumaran, S. W. Pakianathan, and D. Abraham, “Long-term stimulation. Effect of continuous Ethephon stimulation with low frequency tapping systems,” Journal of Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 174–196, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  9. P. d. S. Goncalves, S. R. d. Souza, A. P. Brioschi, A. d. C. V. Filho, A. May, and R. S. C. Alarcon, “Effect of tapping frequency and stimulation on yield and economic peformance of rubber tree clones—efeito da frequencia de sangria e estimulacao no desempenho produtivo e economico de clones de seringueira,” Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1081–1091, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. S. O. Agele, “Response of sunflower to weather variations in a tropical rainforest zone,” in Proceedings of the African Crop Science Society Conference, vol. 6, pp. 1–8, African Crop Science Society, Nairobi, Kenya, 2003.
  11. Y. le Roux, E. E. Ehabe, J. Sainte-Beuve et al., “Seasonal and clonal variations in the latex and raw rubber of Hevea brasiliensis,” Journal of Rubber Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 142–156, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  12. P. J. George and C. K. Jacob, Eds., Natural Rubber Agromanagement and Crop Processing, Rubber Research Institute of India, Rubber board, Kottayam, India, 2000.
  13. Genstat ® Version 7.2 statistical package (Lawes Agricultural Trust), 2007.
  14. J. M. Eschbach, “Clone GT 1: possibilités de réduction de la fréquence de saignée,” Revue Générale des Caoutchoucs et Plastiques, vol. 659, pp. 165–168, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  15. A. O. P Odjugo and C.I. Ikhile, “Impact of climatic conditions and tapping time on the yield of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in mid-western Nigeria,” Tropical Agriculture, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 7–10, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  16. O. O. Awotoye and O. J. Matthew, “Effects of temporal changes in climate variables on crop production in tropical sub-humid South-Western Nigeria,” African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 500–505, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  17. A. S. Devakumar, G. G. Rao, R. Rajagopal et al., “Studies on soil-plant-atmosphere system in Hevea: 2. seasonal effects on water relations and yield,” Indian Journal of Natural Rubber Research, vol. 1, pp. 45–60, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  18. P. S. Rao, C. K. Saraswathyamma, and M. R. Sethuraj, “Studies on the relationship between yield and meteorological parameters of para rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis),” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 235–245, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. M. Priyadarshan, “Contributions of weather variables for specific adaptation of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell.-Arg) clones,” Genetics and Molecular Biology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 435–440, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus