Research Article
Weed Control and Peanut Tolerance with Ethalfluralin-Based Herbicide Systems
Table 1
Weed control in the Texas High Plains with herbicide systems which include ethalfluralin.a
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
aAbbreviations: fb: followed by; PPI: preplant incorporated; PRE: preemergence; EPOST: early postmemergence; MPOST: mid postemergence. bHerbicide rates: ethalfluralin, 0.84 kg/ha; imazethapyr, 0.07 kg/ha; imazapic, 0.07 kg/ha or the split rates of 0.035 kg/ha; bentazon, 1.12 kg/ha; acifluorfen, 0.42 kg/ha; lactofen, 0.22 kg/ha; 2,4-DB, 0.44 kg/ha; paraquat, 0.28 kg/ha; S-metolachlor, 1.1 kg/ha; flumioxazin, 0.11 kg/ha. cPOST treatments of bentazon, acifluorfen, lactofen, 2,4-DB included Agridex at 1% v/v while POST treatments of imazapic, imazethapyr, or paraquat included Induce at 1% v/v. MPOST treatment approximately 3 wk after EPOST treatments. dSplit application of imazapic. Second application followed the initial application by 6 wk in 2008 and 2 wk in 2009. |